openSUSE Project June 2015

project@lists.opensuse.org

75 participants
37 discussions

[opensuse-project] test
by Kostas Koudaras 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

test -- --- \m/ --- If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing anything very innovative. --- \m/ --- me I am not I --- \m/ --- Time travel is possible, you just need to know the right aliens -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-project] 1. Is openSUSE a community without a community manager ?
by Françoise Wybrecht 12 Jun '15

12 Jun '15

(I wrote a few mails about openSUSE. You are free to trash them or to "not read", but of course, I secretely ;-) hope not.) So "is openSUSE a community without a community manager?" is my first "key project question", as Joss was hired for that a few years ago, did a lot of articles, marketing, noise for and around openSUSE, he "did the job" (2011 was a good marketing year, no?) then Augustin was hired too did try to "reorganize openSUSE community with less success, he left ? we guess (even if he is still managing openSUSE group on linkedin) then ??? no information on the project list ? no formal information (on what was decided) And now ? Some of us have met Doug ... he was not introduced, wasn't he. as far as I heard, he was not hired as a community manager, did he ? in fact, we (member/contributors ... non SUSE employees) don't know who is "responsible" for what ? (about "SUSE ppl working for openSUSE" - since the openSUSE booster team is no more ... ?) is there a wiki page somewhere ? explaining who (from SUSE) is working for openSUSE distribution or collaborating to openSUSE project with openSUSE "non-SUSE contributors" ? who do what ? Comment : it's a difficult mission (challenge?) to manage a community as openSUSE but it's very pretentious to believe that a community can grow and go over challenges without a "community manager" (boosting, listening, communicating, helping, animating) it should be an important question for the present and future : is openSUSE definitely a community without a community manager ? (who can answer ? who decide ? who choose ?) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 17

[opensuse-project] Please could we (you?) increase TSP to 100 % ...
by Françoise Wybrecht 12 Jun '15

12 Jun '15

(I wrote a few mails about openSUSE. You are free to trash them or to "not read", but of course, I secretely ;-) hope not.) At OSC14, I heard Ancor and Izabel saying that we have to thank the TSP when we get some- which is of course ABSOLUTELY LOGICAL ! "Thanks to SUSE to help openSUSE contributors." so what ? For sure many of you have done some openSUSE booth somewhere. We do that for freedom, for the distribution, to share our values and for all the reasons given in another thread (snip snip) - of course we do not do it to be thanked But ... travelling, hotel, staying 3-4-5 or more on a booth, answering, showing, sharing ... it's very interesting but exhausting too + days given to openSUSE (and not family, vacation, work) so : For the next "TSP talk", would it be possible to hear : (OK it's one of my dreams) "Thanks to SUSE to help openSUSE contributors AND thanks to contributors/geekos who give time and energy to do booth everywhere since 2009." AND ... Please could we (you? who?) increase TSP to 100 % ( I'm not talking about OSC, nor about myself of course, but about all future contributions as booths, openSUSE-talks, mini-summit etc) if we (as an openSUSE community) wish to go on having volonteers in the future - doing booths and talks, it would be great to increase TSP to 100 % for volonteers giving already a lot (as 5 working days for example-which is not NOTHING). (and the day we'll have so much booth that TSP dont have enought money to support travel and hotel, then we'll see how to crowdfund the "TSP system") OpenSUSE community need more & more booth/talks all around the world. (This is basic marketing ... sharing openSUSE passion all over) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-project] 3. Distribution or project, not easy to do write "AND" ?
by Françoise Wybrecht 11 Jun '15

11 Jun '15

Time is money, most of us have less time (after work), only a few can "work + write on this list" so, when having to choose (fixing bugs or talking about community) in 98 % of the cases in a geeks population, programming will win and project will be delayed. to resume : - openSUSE distribution is technically almost GREAT !! - is openSUSE project & community great too ? if answer is not YEAHHHHHHHHH, then : - how to adjust the balance ? - what would we (each of us) suggest (small change for a big impact) ? - what could simply (*) be done / adopted / changed ? (**) (*) simply is not rewrite the wiki or change the website or change the world (but why not ...) (**) of course when nobody is motivated to change anything, things just stay as they are. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-project] Slides for openSUSE 13.2
by Chuck Payne 11 Jun '15

11 Jun '15

Guys, I am still working the Southeast Linux Fest. I am doing dual roles this year, CM and running a table for openSUSE. I was wondering if anyone have slides for openSUSE 13.2. I will be running three stations, one running slides one, one running 13.2, and a RB2 B+ running openSUSE with XFCE4. -- Terror PUP a.k.a Chuck "PUP" Payne ----------------------------------------- Discover it! Enjoy it! Share it! openSUSE Linux. ----------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Terrorpup openSUSE Ambassador/openSUSE Member skype,twiiter,identica,friendfeed -- terrorpup freenode(irc) --terrorpup/lupinstein Register Linux Userid: 155363 Have you tried SUSE Studio? Need to create a Live CD, an app you want to package and distribute , or create your own linux distro. Give SUSE Studio a try. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-project] openSUSE Members retirement
by Michal Hrusecky 11 Jun '15

11 Jun '15

Hi, I sent following mail on Monday, but something is broken in my setup so it never arrived. As discussions are still ongoing, resending. > Hi everybody, > > as you all know, we have a group of contributors that are eligible to > participate in elections, have @opensuse.org mail and other perks - yes I'm > talking about openSUSE Members. We have now about 600 of them, but as you can > see[1] in last openSUSE Board elections only 150 of them voted. > > This could mean two things - either most of the members are not interested in > elections or plenty of them are simply no longer around. I guess the truth is > somewhere in middle. But it would be nice to know. At some point we might need > to take some project wide decisions and it would be great to know at that point > how many of the still active members voted. > > We discussed this topic at not so recent openSUSE Board Face to Face meeting > and touched it on oSC 15 during project meeting. Also taking under > consideration the responses that were provided to a similar topic approximately > 2 years ago, we (in the board) think it would be a good idea to > implement something to help with that. Automatically monitor openSUSE > Members activity on mailing lists, OBS, bugzilla, maybe more. Remember > when we last saw openSUSE Member on any of those channels and if he > doesn't show for for example one year, we can send him e-mail asking > whether he still wants to be a member with a link to click to create > artificial activity for the automat. And if he doesn't click on it in > let's say month, we will retire him - he will be moved to openSUSE > retired geekos group. If he comes back and want to be member again or if > he was retired by accident, he can be made member again by just clicking > on the link from the mail or by asking membership committee and they > will approve him without any additional questions. > > What do you think? As it will affect whole project some feedback would be > appreciated. If it goes well, I would put it for project wide vote to let the > project members decide. > > To answer some of the obvious questions: > > Q: Shouldn't we retire inactive members anyway and measure their activity? > > A: No, it's too hard, too subjective and it could bother people that we cannot > measure automatically. Automatic measurement is just an indicator that those > people are no longer interested, but they might be just working on project > aspects we cannot measure. > > Q: Wouldn't it offend active contributors if they will be falsely accused of > not being interested? > > A: I hope not. If period will be long enough (1 year) and if we monitor even > mailing lists, people will usually show up somewhere... > > Q: Doesn't it change the meaning of the openSUSE Member? > > A: Kind of yes. So far once you got a membership status, it was forever. Now > it would be forever as long as you are interested. No big change, but still > a little difference. > > Q: What if mail with warning gets lost? > > A: If you loose your membership by accident by loosing an e-mail, you can still > contact membership committee and as a retired member you will be reinstated > immediately without voting/verification that takes time. And you should fix > your e-mail in connect in that case ;-) > > [1] https://connect.opensuse.org/pg/polls/read/RBrownSUSE/46342/opensuse-board-… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

19 47

[opensuse-project] oSC looking past 2016
by Robert Schweikert 10 Jun '15

10 Jun '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Somehow, and I am certain I had my fingers in it, discussion about oSC has somewhat high jacked the thread about the wording of a form letter for membership applicants. As we have lots of discussions going on, rather than continue to high jack the other thread lets just add another log to the fire. Let me start out with a proclamation about oSC: The intent of the openSUSE Conference (oSC) is/was to be an inward looking conference. Focused on the openSUSE community and project the idea is/was that a significant number of contributors gather once a year to discuss the current state of the project, make plans for future direction, innovate, start new initiatives, socialize face to face, and bond. Everyone is welcome to contribute and attend the event, but it is not targeted to be an outreach conference with a focus on "finding" new contributors. The conference should have ample of time to mentor those that attend that are new or relatively new to openSUSE and want to be more involved. We can of course argue over this proclamation/charter but I will consider it as basis for what is to come. Lets look at the facts: - - While in the end we had a good turn out at oSC15, it took a herculean effort to get there and I would say we did not meet the goal of having "..a significant number of contributors gather..". - - The most recent oSCs required an unbelievable effort by a very small group of people. Each year we got lucky and found someone who was willing to take on the organization. But effectively we are in "burn mode", i.e. once someone organized the event they are completely and utterly burned out. This is simply not sustainable. + Arguments about this point will probably range anywhere from personality issues to "I am too far away to help" - - Not having "a significant number of contributors gather" at oSC makes it impossible to achieve the other goals: + discuss the current state of the project + make plans for future direction + start new initiatives The glaring example here is that the "Booth box" session at oSC15 was attended by 2 people, both of whom were already familiar with the current state and how we got there etc. Making it impossible to have a discussion about what works and what doesn't and how we can do better going forward. So what's next? - From my perspective we are failing at "fulfilling the charter of oSC". Yes there are a million reasons why contributors cannot come, Travel is expensive, it is too far away, it is over a weekend, one needs to take vacation, bad timing, ..... Given that everyone can probably give at least 5 reasons why oSC attendance is at the bottom of their list, we have no sustainable way of organizing oSC, and we are failing the charter (as defined above) I think it is fair to ask a few questions: Staring with the most provocative one on purpose: - - Should the effort be made to continue oSC past oSC16? + Consider that no proposals were received for the call for location of oSC16 + Everyone that says "yes we should", be prepared to help - - Should we strive to change the charter/nature of oSC and brand it more as a "FOSS conference organized by the openSUSE project" + Even this will require us to figure out how we get more people involved in the organization. Burning people out year after year to organize oSC is not really a good approach - - How can we come up with a model that provides a more sustainable organizational effort? - - What would it take to raise oSC attendance closer to the top of your list, given the other reasons listed above plus your own are still present? + Do we need a rock star act for the party? + More beer, less beer, .....? - - What prevents people from contributing to the organization of oSC? Obviously a rather incomplete list of questions, but it is a start. Anyway, as it stands at this point (business as usual) a call for location would go out towards the end of this year for oSC17. This will probably go unanswered adn thus a few of us will be left sending out direct e-mail to someone who might be willing to take on the task. Unless we do something about it oSC might die all by itself without having this discussion. Thus, rather than having a death by apathy, lets figure out if we are all comfortable with this, i.e. oSC dying, or if collectively we have the energy to save the event and we can come up with a plan to do so. Later, Robert P.S. If I inadvertently steeped on your tows or pointed the finger at you, or was offensive in any way, I apologize. I believe it is necessary that we have an honest and open discussion about oSC, attendance and organization. - -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Public Cloud Architect LINUX rjschwei(a)suse.com IRC: robjo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVbyxiAAoJEE4FgL32d2Uk458H/0uoc8y3YL++vL8p+fBzBzRW qoMIKCnLTlccY5ZLa52rXfh3ZESIeh2Wml1dr1mZmI1tyfqRiMS43wMQvWfXyF2U n+Go58ei10oRHkOXupL8aXd+EyvnQmX9idYhV/S7hWNg5858Oax0VbMJ9hiddTfw t0e81/SEg4wIKmVJ8lrtRStRoLR4ofpzTkor7uthQbfDl/SltS/3JH4hVh++I7Ie 9qbqBBr12UQtfeP59W+A0FHddxasyQcp6EIwiMtl8h0tgUg5JO95lfYXy0sNvUGp MP5mANfrSsbaD3d97jX8/WU87k7ae3Byh9wEpgMDqwGbxlddN6h6qJMlaiD3Lgo= =Opm1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

14 28

Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Members retirement
by Robert Schweikert 10 Jun '15

10 Jun '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/09/2015 03:08 PM, Chuck Payne wrote: > I can't reply to the email because it bonuses all my e-mail, what > sucks is it only openSUSE mailing, I am on 40 linux/user group > mailing list, but I wanted to input this Please to we really have to regurgitate this: http://email.about.com/od/gmailtips/qt/How-To-Send-A-Message-In-Plain-Te xt-From-Gmail.htm Set gmail to send text messages instead of html and voila all is well. > > Everyone, > > I am still active, Thanks > and I didn't vote because of time. Fair enough, but I'd like to understand the time factor in more detail. Let me make some rough estimates and assumptions to start the conversation and then people can elaborate where my estimations are off the wall. Hopefully we can learn from this process how we can make the voting and campaigning process more time friendly. On average we have lets maybe 3 or 4 people running for positions on the board. However to tend more towards the higher end lets assume we have 10 candidates for this rough estimation. Given that one wants to make an educated decision it is probably fair to say that a voter wants to read the information candidates make available about themselves, e-mail and platform page. For the most part this is usually relatively short, thus lets estimate that it will take about 15 minutes to read through the information. With 10 candidates that would be a time investment of 2.5 hours. For arguments sake one could say that it takes 1/2 hour to read about each candidate which then amount to a 5 hour time investment. From beginning to end our campaigning plus voting time period is probably on the order of 4 weeks or more. With the basic assumptions above it is reasonably straight forward to calculate that the time investment is roughly 5 to 6 minutes a day over the voting/campaigning period, or double that if we assume it takes 30 minutes to read about each candidate. The voting process itself is also no more than a 5 minute affair. Thus my question is, is it too much for members to spend 5 or 10 minutes a day over a period of 4 weeks to figure out who the member thinks should be on the board? So, lets see how this estimation holds up. Maybe I am way off and trying to decide turns out to be a big time sink for people. That would possibly warrant a change in approach. Maybe candidates need to have a podcast as their platform so people can listen to it in the cars or whenever reading and typing is not an option. > I don't like this What do you mean with "this"? You do not like - - the idea of monitoring general activity - - checking who votes - - sending automated e-mails to perceived inactive members > because I think you are going to remove some people that are > working but not vocal like me. Well the original proposal from Michal has a very simple "we made a mistake" reinstatement option, thus getting back into the pool of voters is a short e-mail away. > > I take care of the Facebook pages and I go around Atlanta, GA > talking about openSUSE. Thanks you for your efforts. Later, Robert - -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Public Cloud Architect LINUX rjschwei(a)suse.com IRC: robjo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVd370AAoJEE4FgL32d2Uk+rgH/342Tp4zwRjsHAYYFQxo6gQR fvlm4Q6nw3xa9q3adDuR/A5BZKaUDjuIbd1i9xZcVDrV8BOv6Vw7oR+h1gkNveH1 C8mOojfB3A33JpHiv7biZCEVnpYddhmOEOP09XJX+3YtKfXOXACWXcynDv1TYt7f F88AxVwtSLXxsj5wxJ2thqzbkzJg+vC38lt2WuFQOmfbHM5YfFtlZaJ3kMr0q9Pb fOHn6FSzNmgRt2qRVJ86gzSdQEbelA2oTjcbdLBSbEtY1pTBM6qJ8a1EXy2mEb3Q rPpXc6QRWrqCpmcWXU3Mr5odOpyZFYYYfhDnJLhERTPDJwfHAo6mL/oIQw4fqCA= =J0YC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 9

[opensuse-project] Why are we here
by Bernhard M. Wiedemann 10 Jun '15

10 Jun '15

The actual question to be discussed below is slightly different then the "Why are we here" in the title, but as philosophical and possibly even more important to us. In this talk https://events.opensuse.org/conference/osc15/proposal/650 it was discussed, that communication is important and that more important than _what_ we are doing and _how_ we are doing it, is _why_ we are doing it. And it is important to put this "why" answer first. All the other stuff is just minor details which follows. Which brings us back to the important question: Why are we here, or more precisely _Why are we contributing to free/libre/open source software_ (the openSUSE project and upstream software in our case) I already asked a few people and got several good reasons: 1) Because I want to help FLOSS to make the world a better place. (related: Because it makes me proud, knowing that many people using it for all kinds of tasks) 2) Because software should be free (since I have already written it, distributing it is free, it is useful to other people and they are even contibuting (ideas and some patches) back) 3) Because I want to use the best (in some of the dimensions of best) software (related: because I do not want to use proprietary software crap) 4) Because I can make it to do what I want. 5) Because there is a Challenge (while doing something that is useful and cool) 6) Because it is Fun Note: The numbering above is meant to help reference the items and not as a ranking. Feel free to add other good reasons or tell which ones you like best or add other thoughts on the topic (If you dont feel comfortable discussing this in public, just mail me and I might add it to a later summary) Ciao Bernhard M. -- SUSE LINUX GmbH Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 11

[opensuse-project] Possible addition to the posting rules for openSUSE mail lists?
by Basil Chupin 10 Jun '15

10 Jun '15

An article which deals with etiquette of internet usage has some useful suggestions about how to post messages. The article is- Don't be vague, check before you send and NEVER start with 'hey': Etiquette expert William Hanson explains why you are writing emails all wrong http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3115242/Don-t-vague-check-send-NE… Perhaps these suggestions could be included in the "Rules" for posting messages in the openSUSE's mail lists? BC -- Using openSUSE 13.2, KDE 4.14.6 & kernel 4.0.5-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX660 GPU -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Project June 2015