Hey folks,
recently someone asked me if I can point out particular examples of sexist
blogposts in the context of openSUSE community. So be it - here's the fresh
one: http://rauhmaru.blogspot.com/2010/08/parabens-opensuse-5-anos-de-
vida.html
It's not that I would be a close-minded prude - I wouldn't say a word if
someone posted pics of nude or scantily clad chicks to his personal blog, not
aggregated on a community Planet - but associating Playboy-like pics with 5th
anniversary of openSUSE? How unproffesional (to put it mildly).
Unless, of course, the author of the post wanted to imply that we're the best
and the stablest distro for pr0n server. Now everyone can answer a question if
this is the kind of publicity we want for themselves.
Please drop this gentleman some nice comments :)
B.
--
\\\\\ Katarina Machalkova
\\\\\\\__o OOo developer
__\\\\\\\'/_ & hedgehog painter
Hye,
The only way I finally got to have that list is to install the package
"kiwi-config-openSUSE" and then you go to /usr/share/openSUSE-kiwi/,
there you've got the different media as folders in the one you need,
the file config.xml has the list under that way:
<package name="yast2-live-installer"/>
<package name="pam"/>
<package name="pam-config"/>
<package name="pam-modules"/>
<package name="udev"/>
<package name="aaa_base"/>
<package name="tar"/>
<package name="patch"/>
<package name="zypper"/>
Regards,
Jean
2010/8/19 Jean Cayron <jean.cayron(a)gmail.com>:
> Hye Rémy,
>
> 2010/8/19 Rémy Marquis <remy.marquis(a)gmail.com>:
>
>> Have a look at http://en.opensuse.org/Package_list
>> The link is available from the main Portal:11.3 page ("Resources").
>>
>>
>
> Thanks, I know this list. It's the list of the packages on the repo
> OSS. What I'm looking for is the list of the packages on the media's
> (KDE live CD especially).
>
> Regards,
>
> Jean
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello everyone,
I can't find a list similar to this:
http://old-en.opensuse.org/Package_List/11.2/KDE4-LiveCD-i686 for
openSUSE 11.3.
Is it available on the new wiki or somewhere else?
Thanks in advance,
Jean
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
Dear owner of http://en.opensuse.org,
Hi,whats up??
i have visited yoour site and i would like to buy a link on it.
please get back to me so we can start working together.
Best regards,
Benjamin Coloto
bencoloto(a)mercado-hq.com
This is NOT SPAM -- this is a one-time reciprocal link request. We
have NO INTENTION to email you again. You can also reply to this email
with REMOVE in the subject line to make sure we'll NEVER send you any
more e-mails in the future.
Powers that be.
I've started to use SpiderOak with 11.3 and just bought a couple
hundred GB of space.
Much to my surprise when I went to install it on a couple 11.2
fileservers I could not find it in OBS.
I really think SpiderOak is the kind of package that should be
available in OBS for all supported versions of openSUSE. ie.
Especially for servers, people like myself will make one decision for
multiple machines, so having it available for multiple versions of
openSUSE is important.
I wasn't sure whether to post here, bugzilla, or openfate.
Regardless, I hope it gets addressed.
Thanks
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
Atri wrote:
> Hi! I am a subscriber to the openFATE mailing list. Of late there
> seems to be one person identified by the name jpxviii jpxviii who
> has been going around changing the status of all feature reports
> [even the done ones] to open for openSUSE 11.4 and HackWeek V, as
> well as changing the titles of features without any knowledge of what
> it is supposed to mean. For example, about this feature
> https://features.opensuse.org/301038 he changes the title from
>
> "Improved performance in main menu, app browser and control center"
>
> to
>
> "Improved performance in main menu, app, browsers and control
> center"
>
> which is ridiculous.
>
> I understand that this might not be right m-l to complain abt
> features.o.o but could somebody please look into this, or at least
> point me to where I ought to report this so that some action is
> taken against this sort of blatant spamming?
>
> CC: suserocks [openFATE screening team member].
>
> Bye
Thank you for letting us know about it, Atri.
I've confirmed that at least 50 features are senselessly modified by
'jpxviii jpxviii'.
https://users.opensuse.org/show/jpxviii
Can anyone contact him and warn him not to change the features unless he
takes a real understanding of what it means ?
And, as Klaas wrote recently, members of the openFATE screening team
don't have privilege to change or rollback the status of each features ATM.
http://lizards.opensuse.org/2010/08/06/status-openfate-milestone/
Is there any good method to undo such changes based on misunderstanding ?
Best,
--
_/_/ Satoru Matsumoto - openSUSE Member - Japan _/_/
_/_/ Marketing/Weekly News/openFATE Screening Team _/_/
_/_/ mail: helios_reds_at_gmx.net / irc: HeliosReds _/_/
_/_/ http://blog.zaq.ne.jp/opensuse/ _/_/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
As said in my previous mail, I have a strong feeling that the discussions are
often pointless and lead nowhere. It seems to me that this is partly also
because the strategies, as currently formulated, do not offer a good way to
lead somewhere. Specifically, their either poorly or completely fail to
address fundamental practical issues, such as the following questions:
- who will do the work?
- what will openSUSE actually gain from it?
- what may openSUSE lose because of it?
I hope we can all agree that these are very important questions related to
the strategies. Also, to actually better understand the strategies, I think
it would be very good if they gave examples and answered the question
- what will openSUSE look like in 2 years?
For example, looking at the mobile/cloud strategy, let me try to give answers
for that strategy, as I see it:
In 2 years:
With the mobile/cloud strategy, openSUSE will include as much software as
possible that connects to web-based services, and those are the preferred
solutions. Other solutions are included, if possible, but they are secondary.
The distribution makes it very easy to connect to these services and work
with them. [This should be longer, but since it's not an area I understand
well, I will stop. The 'focus on' and intro sections provide some information
for this].
The gains:
As a result, openSUSE will attract users who use the web and mobile devices
extensivelly, web developers, professionals who work in areas related to
cloud/mobile. Number of packages that are necessary for the primary focus
will be considerably smaller, because a lot of functionality will be provided
by something on the web and not by openSUSE itself, thus reducing the
required effort.
The loses:
Users who prefer solutions that are not heavily web-based may leave openSUSE
for another distribution with a focus that suits them better. These people
may be developers who focus on other areas than web development, desktop
users (i.e. those that prefer local mail client and so on).
Who will do the work:
I don't know. People focused on the web are more likely to work on something
web-based and will be presumably not very good at maintaining a distribution,
nor interested very much in it. People who already are contributors or who
may become ones are more likely to be driven away by this strategy, possibly
eventually leading to existing contributors not being able to handle even the
reduced work.
=> FAIL.
So the strategy, as I understand it, is in practice unsustainable and as such
a complete failure, even though in theory it may look nice. This may be just
because I don't understand the mobile/cloud area well, but that's how I see
it. If I'm wrong, create better answers to the questions in the wiki.
I suggest that every strategy proposal is extended to provide answers to
these important questions. Without it, the discussions are just fluff talk
and there is no good base for actually judging the strategy proposals.
PS: Just in case it's not clear, there's no point in discussing my analysis of
the mobile/cloud strategy itself.
--
Lubos Lunak
openSUSE Boosters team, KDE developer
l.lunak(a)suse.cz , l.lunak(a)kde.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello All,
I am trying to stimulate a serious discussion about the installation of
"restricted formats" on OpenSUSE.
I would like to see the process by which "restricted formats" are
installed become easier, more reliable, and less susceptible to error.
Please join me in a community conversation:
http://forums.opensuse.org/english/community/soapbox/444044-opensuse-multim…
Please invite others to the conversation!
I look forward to reading your ideas.
and as my favorite motd of all times says .... "Have a lot of fun...",
Charles Wight
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org