Hello all,
I am wondering about whether or not a mailing list or a group could be
established or already exist, to
talk about current use of and further implementation of the NCL. A
friend and I have been working with PAM_SCRIPT and
integrated contextless login. It works really well but I would like to
have some help with converting it to use PAM_EXEC.
so that an "open" possibly GPL add on to the client could be built.
Any Suggestions?
James
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
Katarina Machalkova wrote:
>> > We're doing a massive redesign of the partitioner for 11.1 and I'm
>> > not sure whether we can add ext4 support.
>
> At this point of time, I'm sorry to tell we can't :( Neither we will
> support ext4, nor, for example nfs4. ENOTIME ...
> However, we accept patches :)) Actually, we'd be quite happy if the
> community contributed.
>
Hello Katarina,
this is one thing I've been thinking about on and off - how exactly
does the community contribute to openSUSE?
Not openSUSE the distro, but openSUSE the packaging, framework,
concept - whatever it is that sets openSUSE apart. After all, the
software distributed is the same.
I understand that areas such as translation are easy to open to
community support, but your comments were made in the context of the
partitioner and ext4, i.e. YaST, a very key element to openSUSE.
Personally (and partially speaking on behalf of my company too), I'd
like to contribute in the areas of JFS and LILO support. Both have
been or are being deprecated support-wise, which I am or have been
quite vocal about.
So, as we are talking about the YaST/partitioner, the key question is:
who decides what goes into it?
Is this true open source, or is it a Novell product management decision?
Who is the project lead on YaST? How does one submit patches? Who
decides what is accepted and what is rejected?
For instance - why might ext4 get accepted/supported whilst JFS got
kicked out earlier? I dare say their level of support/testing is about
the same ATM.
If you can answer those questions in a satisfactory manner, you might
just be getting some community support.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:58 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Felix-Nicolai Müller wrote:
>
> > Well, http://www.libsrs2.org/download.html states "testing" which
> > gives hope it might actually work. I guess we just have to try it.
> >
>
> Yeah - the patch is for postfix 2.1.4 though, and I feel pretty certain
> I looked into using it at least 18 months ago. I don't think there's
> _any_ testing going on.
>
> Anyway, why is this really a problem for opensuse.org
> addresses? "opensuse.org" does not have an SPF record/entry, so no
> provider should refuse reception of emails from @opensuse.org.
>
I think (assume) the problem is more on reception @opensuse.org:
user(a)domain1.com sends a mail to user2(a)opensuse.org
user2(a)opensuse.org is configured to forward a the mail to
user2(a)domain2.com
domain1.com is exporting SPF records, domain2.com is verifying on SPF
records.
thus:
MX of domain2.com gets a mail from user(a)domain1.com, transmitted from
the smtp server opensuse.org
if domain1.com is strict (so no -All in the SPF), domain2.com will deny
reception of that mail.
Dominique
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
emails _to_ your opensuse.org address will bounce if sender and receiver
use SPF. I opened a bug report about it (
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414666 ) and explain the
details in my blog (
http://fnmueller.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/opensuseorg-email-address-will-bo…
~ ).
Marcus said it would be a good idea to bring it up on the ML. So I do. I
think it would be a good idea if all of you would vote for the bug as
this problem hits almost everybody I believe.
Have fun
Felix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFImGESaQ44ga2xxAoRAhm3AKCpk07wqauiKd7HQkrtGIjV1kEgngCeNzkq
1p+xMnxb4Fl+LySPe3yBIpI=
=v+DG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
If at all possible would someone be able to advise on who to attribute
the videos on tube.o.o to? I would like to use the screen casts
initially, and would like to comply fully with the license.
Thanks,
Andy
--
Andrew Wafaa, openSUSE Member: GNOME & Marketing Teams.
http://opensuse.org/GNOME | http://en.opensuse.org/Marketing_Team
openSUSE: Get It, Discover It, Create It at http://www.opensuse.org
awafaa(a)opensuse.org
http://www.wafaa.eu | http://www.forcev.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org