openSUSE Users May 2003

users@lists.opensuse.org

566 participants
1368 discussions

DialIN Server on Suse 8.1
by Vishal Khanna 08 Jul '03

08 Jul '03

Hi, Can any one give me some pointers on how to configure a dial-in server on Suse 8.1 Vishal -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disparate Needs ------ One Solution --- INETBOX Ampersand Info-Tech Pvt.Ltd phone +91 (0)11 / 2693 3118 New Delhi -- Munich fax +91 (0)11 / 2632 2980 http://www.aitpl.com Linux - Solaris - Windows - Software Application Partners ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message (including any attachments)is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it from your system immediately - any disclosure, copying or distribution thereof or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance thereon is prohibited and may be unlawful. AITPL makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this message and hereby excludes any liability of any kind for the information contained herein or for the transmission, reception, storage or use of such information in any way whatsoever. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of AITPL. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6 8

gftp broken in 8.2
by fsanta 05 Jul '03

05 Jul '03

Here is the command line message. I've uninstalled and reinstalled gftp from the 8.2 cd's but no luck. Can anyone help me? Thanks, Steve. gftp gFTP Warning: Skipping line 130 in config file: use_default_dl_types No fonts found; this probably means that the fontconfig library is not correctly configured. You may need to edit the fonts.conf configuration file. More information about fontconfig can be found in the fontconfig(3) manual page and on http://fontconfig.org

4 8

Re: [SLE] Why does loopback encryption only work when loopback is compiled as a module
by Bo Jacobsen 25 Jun '03

25 Jun '03

> >> >When "loopback device support" and "Twofish encryption for loopback device" is compiled > >> >INTO the kernel, the "losetup -e twofish /dev/loop0 /encrypted-file" command fails with the > >> >error: "ioctl: LOOP_SET_STATUS: invalid argument" > >> > > >> >If they are compiled as modules, everything works OK. > >> > > >> >I have tred it with many versions of the SuSE kernels, and the result is always > >> >the same !. > >> > > >> >Any suggestions on how to get it to work. > >> > >> Yeah, I have my own kernel compiled with the various different algorithms > >> built-in. > >> There were 2 patches which I had to apply to the vanilla kernel. > >> One was the patch-int-2.4.20.0 > >> and the other was > >> loop-jari-2.4.20.0.patch > >> > >> So I will hazard a guess that you don't have the patched loop built > >> into the kernel. > >> > >> The files are at: > >> http://ftp.linux.hr/pub/linux/kernel/crypto/v2.4/testing/ > > > >Yes but the strange thing is that it works when "Twofish encryption for > >loopback device" is compiled as a module, so it must be included in the source. > >I use SuSE kernels, the latest I have testet is 2.4.20-13. > > Well SuSE is heavily patched and they do everything with modules, so > maybe the loop module isn't getting loaded right when you build twofish > into the kernel. Have you tried to manually load the loop module first, > before any attempt to use the encryption? I don't understand. What do you meen by "manually load the loop module" ?. No matter if "loopback device support" is compiled into the kernel or not, as long as "Twofish encryption for loopback device" is compiles as a module everything works OK. I have not tried compiling the "loopback device support" as a module and the "Twofish encryption for loopback device" INTO the kernel, if that's what you meen.

2 9

Strange raid init sequence
by Carlos E. R. 24 Jun '03

24 Jun '03

During the boot up sequence (suse 8.1), the kernel autodetects and tries to mount a software raid partition I have with data, and fails: <6>md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. <6> [events: 0000032b] <6> [events: 0000032b] <6>md: autorun ... <6>md: considering hdb14 ... <6>md: adding hdb14 ... <6>md: adding hda11 ... <6>md: created md0 <6>md: bind<hda11,1> <6>md: bind<hdb14,2> <6>md: running: <hdb14><hda11> <6>md: hdb14's event counter: 0000032b <6>md: hda11's event counter: 0000032b <6>md: RAID level 1 does not need chunksize! Continuing anyway. <3>kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k md-personality-3, errno = 2 <3>md: personality 3 is not loaded! <4>md :do_md_run() returned -22 <6>md: md0 stopped. <6>md: unbind<hdb14,1> <6>md: export_rdev(hdb14) <6>md: unbind<hda11,0> <6>md: export_rdev(hda11) <6>md: ... autorun DONE. I suppose I should add that "md-personality-3" module to the initrd, but there is no such module. In fact, the ramdisk is read later than this phase: <5>RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 <6>Freeing initrd memory: 247k freed <4>VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). and a bit latter, raid is mounted successfully: <5>Trying to free ramdisk memory ... okay <6>Freeing unused kernel memory: 164k freed <6>md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. <6> [events: 0000032b] <6> [events: 0000032b] <6>md: autorun ... <6>md: considering hda11 ... <6>md: adding hda11 ... <6>md: adding hdb14 ... <6>md: created md0 <6>md: bind<hdb14,1> <6>md: bind<hda11,2> <6>md: running: <hda11><hdb14> <6>md: hda11's event counter: 0000032b <6>md: hdb14's event counter: 0000032b <6>md: RAID level 1 does not need chunksize! Continuing anyway. <6>md: raid1 personality registered as nr 3 <6>md0: max total readahead window set to 508k <6>md0: 1 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 508k <6>raid1: device hda11 operational as mirror 0 <6>raid1: device hdb14 operational as mirror 1 <6>raid1: raid set md0 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors <6>md: updating md0 RAID superblock on device <6>md: hda11 [events: 0000032c]<6>(write) hda11's sb offset: 3124544 <6>md: hdb14 [events: 0000032c]<6>(write) hdb14's sb offset: 3124544 <6>md: ... autorun DONE. So... Why does it fail at first, and how how could I make it succeed? Or, how could it be told not to try the mounting so early? -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson

3 17

Patched SuSE kernel still incompatible with aic7xxx or fixed?
by Patriiiiiiiiiick 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

Hello! I have an Adaptec Utra160 SCSI card and I wonder if the following problem is solved with the SuSE version of the kernel. http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2002-Oct/3179.html http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2002-Oct/3600.html To summarize the issue, when using this kernel, the system totally hangs when loading both new or old version of the aic7xxx module. This forces you to use the manual install on an IDE drive. The only solution found by then to access the SCSI drives was to compile my own kernel. I wonder if this has been somehow solved since October of last year and if the 8.2 version doesn't have that issue anymore. Thank you for the info! Patrick

4 8

apm for laptop
by Michael Sacco 19 Jun '03

19 Jun '03

Hello all, I have a brand new laptop, yet the battery monitor and some other things are not working. I have acpi turned on, and klaptop complains of an incomplete acpi setup for the kernel. Also, I have a radeon mobility u1 card...SaX doesn't detect it, and when I try to use the radeon driver and test the setup, I get this error: (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device) (EE) No devices detected. I'm using the updated 2.4.19 kernel from SuSE, and when I try booting with the options "apm=on acpi=off" and then type "rcapmd status", it says unused. So I try "rcapmd start" it says "apmd not supported by kernel". Is this going to require a kernel compilation? And if so, how do I compile a kernel so that it still uses the SuSE bootscreen and bootsplash and all those pretty bouncing icons? :) BTW: SuSE 8.1 Thanks in advance! Mike S.

7 15

Kernel Panic
by Ron Joffe 13 Jun '03

13 Jun '03

Was wondering if someone with a bit more kernel knowledge could take a look at this output from /var/log/messages. This is an SLES-8 machine one a dell 2600 with dual Pentium Zeon's (Hyperthreading is on as you can see by the CPU#3). Here is the interesting part, after this occured the machine was still usable, but had the performace equivelant of an 8086 :(. (it took about 5 minutes just to log in from the console. Thanks, Ron May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 79726173 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: printing eip: May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: c029ce60 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: *pde = 00000000 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Oops: 0000 2.4.19-64GB-SMP #1 SMP Wed Apr 16 12:42:15 UTC 2003 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: CPU: 3 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: EIP: 0010:[tcp_v4_rcv+400/1392] Not tainted May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: EIP: 0010:[<c029ce60>] Not tainted May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: eax: 79726173 ebx: 9c1000c2 ecx: 9c1001c6 edx: c2ebb300 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: esi: 071000c2 edi: ce159300 ebp: ec14a044 esp: c281fdb8 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c281f000) May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Stack: 00000000 c281fe34 c0282b90 c0490248 00000000 13ed0104 00000002 000013ed May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: 00000000 00000006 ce159300 ec14a030 c0282cde ce159300 c281fe54 c382c000 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: 00000000 00000006 00000000 00000001 00000000 c0282b90 c0272307 ce159300 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Call Trace: [ip_local_deliver_finish+0/368] [ip_local_deliver_finish+334/368] [ip_local_deliver_finish+0/368] [nf_hook_slow+263/480] [ip_local_deliver_finish+0/368] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Call Trace: [<c0282b90>] [<c0282cde>] [<c0282b90>] [<c0272307>] [<c0282b90>] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: [ip_local_deliver+83/128] [ip_local_deliver_finish+0/368] [ip_rcv_finish+537/642] [ip_rcv_finish+0/642] [ip_rcv_finish+0/642] [nf_hook_slow+263/480] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: [<c0282913>] [<c0282b90>] [<c0282f19>] [<c0282d00>] [<c0282d00>] [<c0272307>] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: [ip_rcv_finish+0/642] [ip_rcv+416/592] [ip_rcv_finish+0/642] [net_rx_action+542/880] [do_softirq+217/224] [do_IRQ+251/304] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: [<c0282d00>] [<c0282ae0>] [<c0282d00>] [<c026a64e>] [<c012d459>] [<c010b66b>] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: [default_idle+0/80] [call_do_IRQ+5/13] [default_idle+0/80] [default_idle+44/80] [cpu_idle+50/80] [printk+23/32] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: [<c0107110>] [<c010e2e8>] [<c0107110>] [<c010713c>] [<c01071b2>] [<c0127ff7>] May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Code: 39 18 0f 84 30 03 00 00 8b 40 10 85 c0 75 f1 f0 ff 02 31 c0 May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: <0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: In interrupt handler - not syncing May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: klogd 1.4.1, ---------- state change ---------- May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.4.19-64GB-SMP May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Loaded 21658 symbols from /boot/System.map-2.4.19-64GB-SMP. May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Symbols match kernel version 2.4.19. May 19 14:28:56 sciremc-CADOPS kernel: Loaded 867 symbols from 27 modules.

2 1

LINUX GETTING MORE VIABLE ON THE DESKTOP
by Fred A. Miller 11 Jun '03

11 Jun '03

LINUX GETTING MORE VIABLE ON THE DESKTOP (Source: InfoWorld.com) Features such as virtual desktops and solid e-mail clients help to make Linux desktops viable for business. http://www.linuxworld.com/go.cgi?id=742196 -- Fred A. Miller Systems Administrator Cornell Univ. Press Services fm(a)cupserv.org, www.cupserv.org

4 5

Hosts file "corrected" by something
by Michael D Green 10 Jun '03

10 Jun '03

Hi! When I add lines like the following to my hosts file on the machine puddleglum: 198.162.0.201 fred.puddleglum.mylocaldomain.com fred.puddleglum 198.162.0.201 lili.puddleglum.mylocaldomain.com lili.puddleglum 198.162.0.201 lulu.puddleglum.mylocaldomain.com lulu.puddleglum something (!?!) comes along behind me and "corrects" these lines (it leaves the other lines alone) to simply: 198.162.0.201 puddleglum.mylocaldomain.com puddleglum (The reason I am putting these lines in my hosts file is to be able to access virtual hosts on my Apache web server on puddleglum from puddleglum.) BTW I'm using SuSE 8.2. Ideas? TIA! Mike Green

3 4

Problems with low resolution modelines in X
by Pieter Hulshoff 08 Jun '03

08 Jun '03

Hello all, I've been adding some modelines for low resolution setups for xmame a few days ago but some are not accepted. An example: Modeline "320x224" 16.55 320 328 376 416 224 225 228 234 doublescan The XFree86 logfile states: (II) RADEON(0): Clock range: 20.00 to 400.00 MHz (II) RADEON(0): Not using mode "320x224" (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan) My assumption (the mother of all f**kups) is that the modeline is not accepted due to the clock range starting at 20 MHz. Any idea on how I can decrease that 20 MHz? My old computer using a TNT chipset had no problems running these modelines, so I think they're correct in themselves. Regards, Pieter Hulshoff

1 1

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

openSUSE Users May 2003