On Wednesday 03 July 2002 03:38, Michael wrote:
> I tried to visit this site.
> http://www.bet365.com
> The result upset me so much i sent them this.
I sent the letter below, and I encourage everyone on the list to send a
similar letter.
-----------------------------------------
Subject: Create a Real Web Site Please
From: Bryan S. Tyson <bryantyson(a)earthlink.net>
To: webmaster(a)bet365.com
When attempting to view your site using Konqueror 2.2.1 and Mozilla
0.9.4, both Linux web browsers, I was curtly informed that my browser
is "incompatible." Your site, sir, is what is "incompatible." Stick
with established standards and real html, not Microsoft proprietary
"features."
***************************************************
Powered by SuSE Linux 7.3 Professional
KDE 2.2.1 KMail 1.3.1
This is a Microsoft-free computer
Bryan S. Tyson
bryantyson(a)earthlink.net
***************************************************
We have an winNT server and need to auto mount a shared folder as if it were a
windose mapped drive Z: on SuSE8
Could someone please explain how to do this and how to make sure it is set-up
for every user everytime the system is booted.
Thanks
Regards
Keith Jacobs
New to Linux
Hi all,
Reading some mails on the GIMP mail list, I ran across the procedure
to install some more fonts for not only Gimp, but the system and
StarOffice to use also. Well, I installed the fonts, went to the
shell and issued the command xset fp+ <font directory> and then the
rehash command and all fonts are there! Ok, that went well, but each
time I restart the system, I have to do it all over again? Is there
a way to make it permanent and read the new fonts like it does the
ones the system installs or is that a no-no?
end of line
Tracer
Shell commands:
xset fp+ <new font directory>
xset fp rehash
--
---KMail 1.2--- SuSE Linux v7.2---
Registered Linux User #225206
/tracerb(a)sprintmail.com/ *Magic Page Products*
*Team Amiga* http://home.sprintmail.com/~tracerb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm having a problem with some mails handled by one particular rule in
procmail - all the rest are being handled ok. The .procmailrc goes like
this:
VERBOSE=on
LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail.log
... cut
:0
* ^Received: from correo.foo.es
{
:0
* ^Received: from (ruebert.ieee.org|engine.ieee.org|hormel3.ieee.org|boldfish.ieee.org|aries3.…)
$HOME/Mail/in_ieee
:0
* ^FROM_DAEMON
$HOME/Mail/in_daemon
:0
$HOME/Mail/in_foo
}
The problem is that mail matching the "^Received" clause above goes to the
"/var/spool/mail/cer" folder instead of the "$HOME/Mail/in_foo" that
corresponds. The log is this, showing a write error:
procmail: No match on "^List-Id: <husky-discuss.lists.sourceforge.net>"
procmail: Executing "/usr/bin/spamc"
procmail: No match on "^X-Spam-Status: Yes"
procmail: No match on "^^rom[ ]"
procmail: No match on "^From.*FETCHMAIL-DAEMON(a)nimrodel.valinor"
procmail: No match on "^To.*virusalert(a)nimrodel.valinor"
procmail: No match on "^From.*(MAILER-DAEMON|postmaster)(a)nimrodel.valinor"
...
procmail: Match on "^Received: from correo.foo.es"
procmail: No match on "^Received: from (ruebert.ieee.org|engine.ieee.org|hormel3.ieee.org|boldfish.ieee.org|aries3.…)"
procmail: No match on "(^(Mailing-List:|Precedence:.*(junk|bulk|list)|To: Multiple recipients of |(((Resent-)?(From|Sender)|X-Envelope-From):|>?From )([^>]*[^(.%@a-z0-9])?(Post(ma?(st(e?r)?|n)|office)|(send)?Mail(er)?|daemon|m(mdf|ajordomo)|n?uucp|LIST(SERV|proc)|NETSERV|o(wner|ps)|r(e(quest|sponse)|oot)|b(ounce|bs\.smtp)|echo|mirror|s(erv(ices?|er)|mtp(error)?|ystem)|A(dmin(istrator)?|MMGR|utoanswer))(([^).!:a-z0-9][-_a-z0-9]*)?[%@> ][^<)]*(\(.*\).*)?)?$([^>]|$)))"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/home/cer/Mail/in_foo"
procmail: Opening "/home/cer/Mail/in_foo"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
So far, normal.
procmail: Error while writing to "/home/cer/Mail/in_foo"
procmail: Truncated file to former size
A write error. What write error?
procmail: No match on "^Received: from pop.tiscali.es"
procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored
....
procmail: Bypassed locking "/var/spool/mail/cer.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/cer"
procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/cer"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Notified comsat: "cer@0:/var/spool/mail/cer"
>From sombody(a)somewhere.com Wed Aug 31 20:17:13 2005
Subject: Final....
Folder: /var/spool/mail/cer 952289
I have copied over the emails in /home/cer/Mail/in_foo to another folder,
then deleted, recreated in_foo, and finally copied back all the emails.
The folder has 57Mb (392 emails) and Pine seems happy with it, no
complaints.
Ideas?
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFDFflQtTMYHG2NR9URAuBbAJ96DTk33WG7nb+BfwkIB40MTql0qgCffUW8
i7c5FLtIHFDl86hb4moJhu8=
=k4MY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I don't remember seeing this problem on the list.
KMail print on screen is clear and most letters are
separated. When I print out a mail, some letters,
particularly the "t", the "si" and the "sk" combinations
are scrunched together with adjoining letters.
I am printing to an HP 2200D laserjet. The
typeface on screen (and on paper) is a
sans-serif font. Even on screen, it is slightly
scrunched in spots. "ri" and "ti" and "tt" and "th" are
too close together.
Suggestions?
TNX--doug
Hi Folks,
I have been trying to get a tarball of transcode to compile on my SUSE
9.2 system. Every pkg I have d/l'd from the sites listed on the
Transcode Wiki page:
http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode
are unopenable. Every one, including the beta versions. Have I made one
of those embarrassing newby errors? Konqi Filemgr says :
"The file does not exist" even tho it lists it.
Is there a location for a transcode I can open and compile?
PeterB
p.s. The pkgs are unopenable on my SUSE 8.2 sys also
--
--
Proud SUSE user since 5.2
Loving SUSE 9.2
My BLOG == http://vancampen.org/blog
--
While attempting to stop a video playing on Macro Media Flash Player 7,
I managed to lock out everything. I could not move the mouse cursor,
the arrow keys and the rest of the kb didn't work, ctl-alt-del did nothing.
None of the function keys did anything. (The video was something downloaded
from the 'net via Firefox.) I wound up pulling the big switch, as us hams
like to say. Is there anything else I could have done?
I'm trying to put Linux to practical use, and this is the first time I've seen
10.0 crash, so it's good, but not fool-proof. (If something can be broken,
this fool will break it!)
good idea - please see here:
http://www.susewiki.org/index.php?title=HowTo:_PHP4_ODBC
Hope this is detailed enough...
BTW, thats my first wiki entry ever...
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2005 22:36 schrieb Richard Bos:
> Op zondag 24 april 2005 23:36, schreef Sven Haberer:
> > If desired, I could post a short description how I did this...
>
> If you can put it own the wiki (http://www.susewiki.org): than we can all
> maintain it.
>
> --
> Richard Bos
> Without a home the journey is endless
Dear everyone,
I wonder if anyone has any experience of getting the wireless eth-card in
a Dell Latitude D600 to work for SuSE 9.2? The card is an Intel
PRO/Wireless 2200BG. It is recognised by the system as such, and I am able
to configure it in Yast without any obvious problems. However, it doesn't
get an IP-address. This is in contrast with the same laptop in the same
location booting the XP partition, in which case it finds the network,
gets an IP and chats away happily. The setup is the same for SuSE and XP:
DHCP, named ssid, WEP-ASCII-5char encryption.
The following may be relevant version numbers
Kernel 2.6.8-24
wireless-tools 27pre26-10
ipw-firmware 3.3
During boot I get the following messages (some of which sound a bit
omnious, but I am not certain how serious they are) that I interpret as
related to the problem
<4>ieee80211_crypt: unsupported module, tainting kernel. ("tainting is
bad, right?")
<7>ieee80211_crypt: registered algorithm 'NULL'
<4>ieee80211: unsupported module, tainting kernel.
.
.
<4>ipw2200: unsupported module, tainting kernel.
<6>ipw2200: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2200 Network Driver, 0.8
<6>ipw2200: Copyright(c) 2003-2004 Intel Corporation
.
.
<6>eth1: Setting MAC to 00:0e:35:ad:e3:81
<3>ipw2200: Calibration
and the later on when trying to connect
eth1 device: Intel Corp. PRO/Wireless 2200BG (rev 05)
eth1 configuration: wlan-id-00:0e:35:ad:e3:81
ERROR: command 'iwconfig eth1 mode Managed' returned
Error for wireless request "Set Mode" (8B06) :
SET failed on device eth1 ; Operation not supported.
eth1 (DHCP) . . . . . no IP address yet... backgrounding.
waiting
If anyone recognise the problem and has a solution to it I would be for
ever grateful.
Please also be gentle with me if/when replying. I am a bit of a beginner
and don't handle jargon very well.
Puss Jesper
Hi,
I'm not sure, that its easily possible, but running few comps in a
network, I would like them to pass my root e-mails to my own machine.
I setup already the alias, so my "normal" user can read everything
already, but only locally. This I would like to change by the
following scheme:
- if my computer is available, then the messages should be transfered,
- if my computer is not online, messages should wait in a queue, until
it appears again. This should happen with no error-messages, no
expiring, etc.
I don't ask for complete solution for this problem, but please let me
know, what I would need to get the above system up and running. At
present I have postfix installed and running on all the comps;
UIDs/GIDs are identical on all of them; all SUSE, but various
versions.
Thank you,
Pelibali
