openSUSE Users April 2019

users@lists.opensuse.org

50 participants
50 discussions

[opensuse] libc segfaults attaching an iPad

by Dave Howorth

I just tried to attach an iPad to my openSUSE 15.0 system, via USB. I think I've done it before, but this time it fails. Dmesg has: [9787970.148053] usb 3-9: new high-speed USB device number 96 using xhci_hcd [9787970.302089] usb 3-9: New USB device found, idVendor=05ac, idProduct=12a2 [9787970.302091] usb 3-9: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [9787970.302092] usb 3-9: Product: iPad [9787970.302093] usb 3-9: Manufacturer: Apple Inc. [9787970.302094] usb 3-9: SerialNumber: c4088xxxxxserialxredacted [9787971.044264] ipheth 3-9:4.2: Apple iPhone USB Ethernet device attached [9787991.101146] pool[16789]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f6ada593ef1 sp 00007f6ad6203bd8 error 4 in libc-2.26.so[7f6ada43a000+1b1000] Anybody have any idea what the problem is? Thanks, Dave -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 months

[opensuse] Raid, Raid6, what file system for good fault tolerance?

by cagsm

Hi list, speaking about software raid, not hardware controller based. I am trying to go for some local OpenSuse machine and adding some storage to it. Was considering Raid6, and now reading about a bit and people left and right scaremongering about the larger the disks these days in the double digit terabyte capacities even, the more likely it is that during a reconstruction of a raid subsequent errors would occur. I would absolutely like to keep my data consistent, and I am not thinking about double digit terabytes either, would stick to 2TB or 4TB disks, with Raid6 thats at least 4 physical drives. Now I am wondering if it possible to use a good robust file system that can add some more parity or check blocks or redundancy on top of the hardware disks, to absolutely be able to always read my data. I can't add multiple machines or like those high availability stuff like clusters and what not I read about DRBD (Distributed Replicated Block Device), or maybe I am just too scared by those technical terms or consider myself to be just a simpleton and wanting to keep it rather simple. My use case here is also not constant availablity, when a disk needs to be replaced, so be it, but I don't want to lose my data that I can not ever read certain parts of it again or such stuff. The thing that came to my mind was, if there is some file systems that would add redundancy and robustness onto the mdraid system of the linux kernel? Anyone with some useful insights? Roughly speaking, I was considering some simple pcie esata interfaced controller card and an external case enclosure with esata port and portmulitplier stuff inside, that can present at least 4 physical disks as JBOD, just a bunch of disks, so that the Linux can seem them all separately. Speed and rebuild times are not my concern, but data persistence and data integrity. Not even number of physical disks, I could live with even one of those 8 bay device enclosures and cases that are out there on the market. Thanks for any help and hints. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 months

[opensuse] Issue with smartd

by Carlos E. R.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have one disk that is giving me problems with the smartd daemon. I get this in the log: <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:23.829155+02:00 Isengard smartd 1173 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], state written to /var/lib/smartmontools/smartd.WDC_WD80EZAZ_11TDBA0-2TKST2SD.ata.state <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.483719+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], opened <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.484570+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], WDC WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0, S/N:2TKST2SD, WWN:5-000cca-26af51579, FW:83.H0A83, 8.00 TB <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.503334+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], not found in smartd database. <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.525071+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], enabled SMART Attribute Autosave. <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.530486+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], enabled SMART Automatic Offline Testing. <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.535003+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], is SMART capable. Adding to "monitor" list. <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.535627+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], state read from /var/lib/smartmontools/smartd.WDC_WD80EZAZ_11TDBA0-2TKST2SD.ata.state <3.6> 2018-10-21T13:45:24.880219+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], state written to /var/lib/smartmontools/smartd.WDC_WD80EZAZ_11TDBA0-2TKST2SD.ata.state <3.6> 2018-10-21T14:15:25.233525+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], SMART Usage Attribute: 194 Temperature_Celsius changed from 147 to 144 <3.6> 2018-10-21T15:45:31.681938+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], not capable of SMART self-check <3.2> 2018-10-21T15:45:33.632399+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], failed to read SMART Attribute Data <3.6> 2018-10-21T16:15:24.678100+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], read SMART Attribute Data worked again, warning condition reset after 1 email <3.6> 2018-10-21T18:15:31.767150+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], not capable of SMART self-check <3.2> 2018-10-21T18:15:33.717688+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], failed to read SMART Attribute Data <3.6> 2018-10-21T18:45:24.587304+02:00 Isengard smartd 11255 - - Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], read SMART Attribute Data worked again, warning condition reset after 1 email It intermitently but periodically fail to read atributes, triggering hundreds of emails sent to me to warn of the problem: +++------------ Subject: SMART error (FailedReadSmartData) detected on host: Isengard This message was generated by the smartd daemon running on: host name: Isengard DNS domain: valinor The following warning/error was logged by the smartd daemon: Device: /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 [SAT], failed to read SMART Attribute Data Device info: WDC WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0, S/N:2TKST2SD, WWN:5-000cca-26af51579, FW:83.H0A83, 8.00 TB For details see host's SYSLOG. You can also use the smartctl utility for further investigation. Another message will be sent in 24 hours if the problem persists. - ------------++- The disk is indeed smart capable and it works fine, as long as I call smartctl with "-d sat,16", which I do: Isengard:~ # smartctl --test=short -d sat,16 /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0\:0 smartctl 6.6 2017-11-05 r4594 [x86_64-linux-4.4.155-68-default] (SUSE RPM) Copyright (C) 2002-17, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF OFFLINE IMMEDIATE AND SELF-TEST SECTION === Sending command: "Execute SMART Short self-test routine immediately in off-line mode". Drive command "Execute SMART Short self-test routine immediately in off-line mode" successful. Testing has begun. Please wait 2 minutes for test to complete. Test will complete after Sun Oct 21 13:50:18 2018 Use smartctl -X to abort test. Isengard:~ # Isengard:~ # smartctl --health -d sat,16 /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0\:0 smartctl 6.6 2017-11-05 r4594 [x86_64-linux-4.4.155-68-default] (SUSE RPM) Copyright (C) 2002-17, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED Isengard:~ # It is crucial to use "-d sat,16" or it fails: Isengard:~ # smartctl --health /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0\:0 smartctl 6.6 2017-11-05 r4594 [x86_64-linux-4.4.155-68-default] (SUSE RPM) Copyright (C) 2002-17, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0: Unknown USB bridge [0x1058:0x25ee (0x4004)] Please specify device type with the -d option. Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary Isengard:~ # Of course I use that option on the config: Isengard:~ # cat /etc/smartd.conf | egrep -v "^[[:space:]]*$|^#" /dev/sda -a -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -m root(a)telcontar.valinor /dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x5000000000000001 -a -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -m root(a)telcontar.valinor /dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x5000c5009399305f -a -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -m root(a)telcontar.valinor /dev/disk/by-id/usb-WD_My_Book_25EE_32544B5354325344-0:0 -d sat,16 -a -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -m root(a)telcontar.valinor Isengard:~ # What else am I missing? Is smartd not using "-d sat,16" somewhere else? Is it some other problem? Isengard:~ # rpm -q smartmontools smartmontools-6.6-135.1.x86_64 Isengard:~ # - -- Cheers Carlos E. R. (from 42.3 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlvM5UMACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WCwQCePjOt8PSMKsx6DwSe9bZJRhHf 2lQAn02eBTrtfAqmEg5ydZVagvMfW2r6 =eIzR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 months

[opensuse] oS 13.1 : "gnome keyring socket is not owned with the same credentials as the user"

by ellanios82

Hello List am using Xfce : - in /var/log/warn : i see warning " The gnome keyring socket is not owned with the same credentials as the user login: /run/user/1000/keyring-4i77r7/control 2013-11-27T13:27:17.434100+02:00 su: gkr-pam: couldn't unlock the login keyring " ............... - any ideas how to fix ? thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 year, 10 months

[opensuse] 3D printing software?

by Markus Egg

Hello, in the SuSE repositories for Leap 15 I only find cura1-lulzbot as software for 3D printing. Slic3r ( https://slic3r.org/ ) or repetier-host (https://www.repetier.com/download-now/ ) are not there. Can I find these packages in another repo? (I already had both running on an older SuSE machine by installing them from scratch). Thanks in advance -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 1 month

[opensuse] Unwanted DNS Queries

by Dutch Ingraham

Hi all: I have a question about some DNS querys/responses that continue after the application that originally requested them is closed. I am running Tumbleweed (20190426 snapshot)on x86_64, Firefox version 66.0.3. The Setup: run Firefox and browse multiple sites. Close Firefox. Open Wireshark. Note multiple DNS querys/responses are still being made from/to some process (Firefox does not appear in a ps query) related to the sites just visited. In a recent test, I surfed to seven different websites in three minutes, closed Firefox, opened Wireshark, and noticed 32 DNS queries and 32 responses, all related to sites I just visited (and their "partners"). Letting Wireshark run, this same sequence was repeated every few seconds for 10 minutes, when I closed Wireshark. I have no idea how long this process will continue. I have also tried this same test on Fedora and OpenBSD, with the same version of Firefox, with the same configuration, and the issue does not present. I don't happen to prefer this behaviour, so I have two questions: 1. Why is this happening on OpenSuSE? 2. How do I disable it? All constructive replies are greatly appreciated! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 1 month

[opensuse] Libreoffice unusable on Leap 15.1

by Carlos E. R.

It has no menu, I can do nothing. How do I restore the menu? Right click on the icons area does nothing. There is a cog wheel on the right hand panel: no restore menu thing. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE, Leap 15.1 x86_64 (ssd-test)) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 1 month

[opensuse] password managers

by George from the tribe

Just wondering if anyone has thoughts and experience in using password managers that are cross-platform and cross-device? I have 3 computers and an android phone, and mostly use google Chrome for a browser. The Chrome password manager has somehow completely messed up my entire password database so that nothing matches now. So I was thinking of looking at some other application to use. I read a little about LastPass, Universal Password Manager, Password Gorilla, KeePass, and KeePassX. All look ok, but I would be interested to know what other folks' experiences have been. Thanks :) -- George Box: TW | Plasma 5 | AMD Phenom IIX4 | 64 | 32GB Laptop #1: 15.0 | Plasma 5 | AMD FX 7TH GEN | 64 | 32GB Laptop #2: 15.0 | Plasma 5 | Core i5 | 64 | 8GB -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 1 month

[opensuse] Mails from openSUSE conferences failing to spam

by Vojtěch Zeisek

Hi, I have problems with some mails from opensuse-factory(a)opensuse.org and opensuse(a)opensuse.org failing into spam. For example from yesterday from Michael Ströder (13:13) Re: [opensuse- factory] Friendly warning: Python 2 is going to be removed from Factory on 2020-01-02 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Rspamd-Server: kikimora.laddobar.cz X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.85 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.85 / 9.00]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(0.00)[0.593,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: mx1.suse.de]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[michael(a)stroeder.com,opensuse- factory(a)opensuse.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00) [15.220.135.195.list.dnswl.org:query refused]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29298, ipnet:195.135.220.0/22, country:DE]; BAYES_HAM(-1.81)[93.89%]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[bounces-89961- vojtech.zeisek=opensuse.org]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[opensuse- factory@opensuse.org,vojta@trapa.cz]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00) [michael@stroeder.com,opensuse-factory@opensuse.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_SMIME(-2.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[stroeder.com]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~,3:+]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00) []; BROKEN_HEADERS(10.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; IP_SCORE(-1.93)[ip: (-5.16), ipnet: 195.135.220.0/22(-2.53), asn: 29298(-2.03), country: DE(0.07)] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C3F1660988FB X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam: Yes This mails also has invalid signature. Or from today from Mathias Homann (7:49) *** SPAM *** Re: [opensuse] How do I interpret this router advert? X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ X-Spam-Level: ******* X-Rspamd-Server: kikimora.laddobar.cz X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.20 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.20 / 9.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(0.00)[0.883,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: mx1.suse.de]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30) [Mathias.Homann@opensuse.org,opensuse@opensuse.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00) [2.220.135.195.list.dnswl.org:query refused]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~,3: +]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00) [opensuse@opensuse.org,vojta@trapa.cz]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00) [Mathias.Homann@opensuse.org,opensuse@opensuse.org]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29298, ipnet:195.135.220.0/22, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[bounces-216650- vojtech.zeisek=opensuse.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opensuse.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) [1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; BROKEN_HEADERS(10.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; IP_SCORE(-1.89)[ip: (-4.94), ipnet: 195.135.220.0/22(-2.53), asn: 29298(-2.03), country: DE(0.07)] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5D3626959202 X-Spam-Flag: YES Very often, mails with signatures are affected. Common case in past few days were mails by Carlos, e.g. from Friday 22:04 *** SPAM *** Re: [opensuse] Permission problem - I need another pair of eyes. X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Rspamd-Server: kikimora.laddobar.cz X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.79 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.79 / 9.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[gmx.net:s=badeba3b8450]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.50) [cached: mx1.suse.de]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.net:-]; CTYPE_MIXED_BOGUS(1.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[robin.listas@gmx.es,opensuse@opensuse.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2.220.135.195.list.dnswl.org:query refused]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29298, ipnet:195.135.220.0/22, country:DE]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[bounces-216572-vojtech.zeisek=opensuse.org]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[opensuse@opensuse.org,vojta@trapa.cz]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[robin.listas@gmx.es,opensuse@opensuse.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/ mixed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.es]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-1.90)[ip: (-4.97), ipnet: 195.135.220.0/22(-2.55), asn: 29298(-2.04), country: DE(0.07)]; R_SPF_NA(0.00) []; BROKEN_HEADERS(10.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; GREYLIST(0.00) [pass,body] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D3FF1602E33B X-Spam-Flag: YES But even from Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar (Monday, 14:34) *** SPAM *** Re: [opensuse-factory] Friendly warning: Python 2 is going to be removed from Factory on 2020-01-02 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Rspamd-Server: kikimora.laddobar.cz X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.29 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.29 / 9.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(0.00)[0.758,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: mx1.suse.de]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30) [dimstar@opensuse.org,opensuse-factory@opensuse.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00) [2.220.135.195.list.dnswl.org:query refused]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[opensuse- factory@opensuse.org,vojta@trapa.cz]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29298, ipnet: 195.135.220.0/22, country:DE]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[bounces-89935- vojtech.zeisek=opensuse.org]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[dimstar@opensuse.org,opensuse-factory@opensuse.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opensuse.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~,3:+]; BAYES_HAM(-0.41)[77.88%]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; BROKEN_HEADERS(10.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; IP_SCORE(-1.89)[ip: (-4.95), ipnet: 195.135.220.0/22(-2.54), asn: 29298(-2.03), country: DE(0.07)] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 86BBA6959205 X-Spam-Flag: YES or from Matěj Cepl (yesterday, 8:42) *** SPAM *** Re: [opensuse-factory] Friendly warning: Python 2 is going to be removed from Factory on 2020-01-02 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++ X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Rspamd-Server: kikimora.laddobar.cz X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.68 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [8.68 / 9.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM(0.00)[0.646,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: mx1.suse.de]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30) [mcepl@cepl.eu,opensuse-factory@opensuse.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00) [2.220.135.195.list.dnswl.org:query refused]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29298, ipnet:195.135.220.0/22, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[bounces-89957- vojtech.zeisek=opensuse.org]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(2.00)[opensuse- factory@opensuse.org,vojta@trapa.cz]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00) [mcepl@cepl.eu,opensuse-factory@opensuse.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~,3:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cepl.eu]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.89)[ip: (-4.94), ipnet: 195.135.220.0/22(-2.53), asn: 29298(-2.03), country: DE(0.07)]; BAYES_HAM(-0.03)[55.15%]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; BROKEN_HEADERS(10.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BB4706959185 X-Spam-Flag: YES And more... As You can see, mails are forwarded to my inbox vojta at trapa dot cz hosted on kikimora.laddobar.cz. I'm not sure where the problem starts. When composing mail by senders? On the conference mail server? On my mail server? In my KMail? How to fix it? -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/

2 years, 1 month

[opensuse] zypper + snapper + rollback

by Roger Oberholtzer

I was doing an update of a Tumbleweed system yesterday and at some point the computer restarted. I did not see how far it had gotten in installing the updates. Now the system no longer has a GUI. X can be started. But kdeinit5 seems unhappy. Instead of fighting with whatever may have been borked in kde, I thought I would just undo the update. When running snapper, I only see the pre snapshot. Usually there is a post. My question is, how can I revert to what I had before the troublesome zypper update? In the description here (https://doc.opensuse.org/documentation/leap/reference/html/book.opensuse.re…), all the examples are when there is a pre and a post. What if I only have the pre? Before the pre made when the update failed, I only have the original snapshot. This is on a disk with limited space, so when things look good, I have to remove snapshots. Any help is greatly appreciated! -- Roger Oberholtzer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 1 month

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

openSUSE Users April 2019