David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I want a quick and dirty want to get the svn revision of a local svn module.
> What I'm currently doing is:
>
> It works fine, but is there a standard way (no not svnversion) to read the
> local version other than the backwards way I'm doing it?
Ahem ... svnversion *is* the standard way.
You would have to explain first why you can't use it; i.e., what
are your constraints concerning your personal definition of `SVN
standard'.
Joachim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod Email: jschrod(a)acm.org
Roedermark, Germany
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Guys,
I want a quick and dirty want to get the svn revision of a local svn module.
What I'm currently doing is:
#!/bin/bash
getsvnrev() {
msg "Determining SVN revision for $pkgname..."
[[ -d .svn ]] && echo $(sed -n '4p' .svn/entries) || echo 9999
}
pkgver=$(getsvnrev)
It works fine, but is there a standard way (no not svnversion) to read the
local version other than the backwards way I'm doing it?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello:
My system clock tends to stray (1-2 minutes within a week, or so)
So far I adjusted the time manually using the command:
# sntp -r ntp1.ptb.de
then setting hwclock
# hwclcok --systohc
I would like the system automatically set/keep the time.
I also discovered that there is no /etc/adjtime on my system.
Is that normal?
Where could I find a decent description on how to use
1) adjtime method for keeping time, or
2) sntp in case when the system is turned off and on
frequently and is connected to the net occasionally only.
Thanks,
Istvan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello all, my first mail so hope i'm doing this right.
My problem is that I like to boot into rl3 by default, then start Xorg
with startx. It doesn't work though, i get errors saying "no xauthority.
xxx", "can't find screen.." etc, and that I should set the setuid bit. I
can't find log files anywhere to give detail on the errors sorry. xinit
gives a slightly different error, but still something about
authority/permissions.
The only way I can start X from console is either via logging in as the
root user, by using sudo, or by switching on the setuid bit on the Xorg
binary (which is suggested in the startx error message). So the only
sensible way I can get X as a normal user is to set default boot to rl5 in
inittab.
I'm new to SUSE but not new to gnu/linux, and this doesn't seem like
'normal' gnu/linux bahaviour to me. So is this a problem with my
installation (11.4 RC1) or is this the intended behaviour? Guys on IRC
seemed to think it was a bug, but if so why the 'informative' error message
suggesting I set the setuid bit?
Thanks in advance
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi all,
I noticed that we didn't have any public openSUSE 11.3 AMIs for Amazon
EC2, so I made some.
Please refer to my blog post on the SUSE Studio blog for details:
http://blog.susestudio.com/2011/02/public-opensuse-113-amis.html
Cheers,
James T.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello Listmates.
Is the uninstaller script available in
ati-driver-installer-11-1-x86.x86_64.run package?
Because I can not find it:
rpm -ql fglrx64_7_5_0_SUSE113-8.812-1 | grep fglrx-uninstall.sh
So I think it is safe to remove the proprietary driver only by running
through rpm command, right?
rpm -e $(rpm -qa | grep fglrx)
If so, we should update the tutorial describe in the wiki*. We should
not necessarily "run any uninstall scripts that ATI provides" anymore,
we just can remove it (safely) through: rpm -e $(rpm -qa | grep fglrx)
, and the user will happier for that sorter steps required.. =)
Thanks in advance.
*) http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Radeon#Remove_the_proprietary_driver
Best regards,
--
Andi Sugandi. Bandung, Indonesia.
openSUSE-id Team, openSUSE Community Member.
http://en.opensuse.org/User:Andisugandi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
How does one disable/enable KDE4 from controlling my CD/DVD drives? I
have some scripts that I run that fail all over the place in run-level-5
running KDE4. Something as simple as the following
eject /dev/sr0
eject -t /dev/sr0
mount /dev/sr0
will show no errors but the device will not be mounted when I go to look
at the files. My fstab entry is "/dev/sr0 /mnt iso9660
ro,noauto,user 0 0". If I mount it enough times it eventually mounts.
Sometimes when I "eject /dev/sr0" it even closes before I can get my
media out.
All the problems I'm having are gone if running in run-level-3.
Thanks and Regards
Mark
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello,
when I built my new kernel I have forgotten to check that my DVB-T drivers
were selected.... How can I now just compile these drivers without compiling
the whole kernel or all modules? I just select those I need and then? How do I
compile single modules afterwards?
Thanx
Malte
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello,
to get my DVB-T stick running i had to upgrade to kernel 2.6.38-rc5 from the
Kernel:Head repo.
Now, when I open my LUKS encrypted /home partition I always get these
messages:
Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 5
What does that mean? I still can open the encrypted partition without any
problems. Does this message mean there is something going on that might harm
the LUKS partition?
Thanx
Malte
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org
Watson, the impressive system from IBM that made all the fuss this week is
running SUSE Linux Enterprise Server.
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/newss/7294/1/
I welcome our new SUSE Linux supercomputer overlords!
--
“What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.”
- Christopher Hitchens
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help(a)opensuse.org