April 2006 - openSUSE Users - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: [SLE] Stopping spam to postmaster@ account?
by david rankin 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

>From: "Per Jessen" <per(a)computer.org> > david rankin wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> How are you handling all of the spam that is being sent to >> postmaster@ >> addresses. In order to be RFC compliant, you are supposed to have >> postmaster active, but since the spammers have now made this a >> favorite address, how do you handle it? I'm considering blocking it >> temporarily to generate rejects to see if that helps. Any other >> thoughts? > > Hi David, > > rejecting would be a waste of time. Why don't you filter the > postmaster@ mail using whatever means you use for "regular" users? > > <blatant plug> > > Or, try our service - http://www.spamchek.com/ - up 2 months for free. > Setup takes less than 30mins. > > </blatant plug> > > > You're obviously quite knowledgeable and I guess you like and have got > the time to fiddle, but otherwise a law firm is quite a typical > customer of ours. Pricewise we charge USD5/user/month. > > Sorry about "hijacking" your question. > No problem, it is good information. Right now I just blocked it with recepient_check.pcre for the time being. I'll see how many rejects I get in 24 hours and see if they don't dwindle away. -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. RANKIN LAW FIRM, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 (936) 715-9333 (936) 715-9339 fax www.rankinlawfirm.com --

1 0

PDF viewing in firefox
by Josef Wolf 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

Hi! For some reason, viewing pdf from firefox don't work anymore on my suse-10.0 box. When I download them to HD and start acroread or xpdf from the shell, it works fine. Any ideas what could be screwed here?

1 0

[SLE] HELP - 536EP modem driver?
by Bruce Duncan 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

Hi. Third time I've posted this. I've installed Open Source SuSe 10, and it doesn't seem to come with a driver for my Intel 536EP modem, which WAS working fine before I upgraded from SuSe 9.2, & all I can find online are drivers for earlier versions. Will any of those work? Is there a current one? Thanks, Bruce Duncan hatter(a)calweb.com

2 1

RE: [SLE] GRUB problems
by Cleary_Mike＠emc.com 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

-----Original Message----- From: Greg Wallace [mailto:gregwallace@fastmail.fm] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:25 PM To: suse-linux-e(a)suse.com Subject: RE: [SLE] GRUB problems On Monday, April 03, 2006 @ 8:34 AM, Mike Cleary wrote: >I have a machine at home which has SuSE and Windows on separate drives. A >while back windows died and had to be reinstalled, which of course blew away >the MBR. This weekend I booted linux from the dvd and proceeded to perform >an update (9.2 to 10). During the upgrade, the GRUB install failed >(couldn't find stage 1). I tried every combo offered in the way of where to >install GRUB, but it failed every time. I usually install it in the MBR of >/dev/hda1 (windows drive), which may or may not be the best place to put it. >Even so, I tried installing it in the boot sector of the root partition, but >still no joy. Unfortunately, windows needs to be the default OS to boot on >this machine, and before having to reinstall windows I had no problem using >GRUB. Any assistance w/ resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated! >TIA, >Mike >------------------------------- >Cleary_Mike(a)emc.com >------------------------------- >A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse. Stage 1 has to be written to the MBR. Try the following. 1) Boot Linux from the CD. 2) In a shell, enter grub 3) at the prompt, enter -- find /boot/grub/stage1 This should tell you where stage 1 is targeted to be installed (something like (hd0,1). Your /boot/grub/device.map will tell you what hd the hdn in this message is referring to; i. e., hda, hdb, etc.). If nothing has changed since you upgraded to 10, it should still be the hard drive of the Windows machine (that's the boot drive on your computer, based on what you have said). 4) Then do root (hdn1,n2) <- n1 and n2 are the numbers that came out of the above find command; i. e., just enter that same string in the root command 5) Finally, do setup (hdn1) <- n1 being the number following the hd in the above statetments. This setup command causes the stage1 located in /boot/grub on your machine to be written to the mbr. For My system, the above process looks like this -- grub find /boot/grub/stage1 -> It comes back (hd0,1) root (hd0,1) setup (hd0) I'm sure all of this can be accomplished from the graphical interface, but I never made the switch, as I have gotten used to using this method over the years. I have had to go through this every time I upgrade my system since about 9.1 (I wish to hell I knew why!). For some reason, I never get a clean MBR written when I upgrade. Every time, after I upgrade, I try to do some more tweaking in the grub files hoping it will work right for the next upgrade (it never does). I did some more tweaking since installing 10.0, so I'm hoping I won't have that problem this next time (but I'd bet money I will!). Good luck. Greg Wallace Thanks! I've never had a problem during upgrades before, but perhaps because the MBR was blown away... Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- cleary_mike(a)emc.com -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help(a)suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq(a)suse.com

1 0

Need to know how to mount subfs defined floppy as reg user
by Greg Wallace 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

I know this has been discussed on this list before, but I didn't realize it applied to me, but it does. If I try to mount a floppy as a regular user I get the message -- "only root can mount /dev/fd0 on /media/floppy" I hadn't tried accessing a floppy as a regular user before and didn't realize this limitation was there. /dev/fd0 is set up as type subfs in fstab. I assume that if I made that auto instead I could get this to work, but I'd like to try to leave it subfs and work within that framework, if possible. Can someone tell me how to accomplish this? I would hope there would be an option I could simply put on that fstab line to allow regular users to mount a floppy, but fear I will have to go into some subfs XML file and make code changes to accomplish this (hope I'm wrong). Any help greatly appreciated. Greg Wallace

2 2

Repository metadata for projects/*
by Pascal Bleser 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Would it be possible to create yast2 or rpm-md metadata in the projects subdirectories (e.g. for projects/OpenOffice) ? At least running a createrepo for 10.0 ? Please ? ;) (@emoenke: I know there is apt-rpm metadata for it on gwdg.de ;)) BTW, current alternative is to use apt or smart: yast2 --install smart smart channel --add openoffice type=apt-rpm \ baseurl=ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/SuSE/10.0-i386 \ components=openoffice smart update openoffice && smart upgrade OpenOffice_org thanks - -- -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ /\\ <pascal.bleser(a)skynet.be> <guru(a)unixtech.be> _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEKyApr3NMWliFcXcRAhN5AJ9S+JOU9rQeaEkGjg4s4cSQoqg3awCfZpoy /r1ePsck4LhRtuZtmgKhBNc= =SFxu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Re: [opensuse] Where is the Source Code?
by Mark Gray 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

Peter Czanik writes: > Hello, > > Mark Gray wrote: >> This is probably a FAQ, but I just did a search for the source code >> for opensuse 10.1 Beta 8. The link on the opensuse website led me to >> ftp.ale.org which had only about a dozen src rpms on it. Similar >> searches of higher quality mirrors led to no source directory at all. > I can speak only about my situation: lack of space and bandwidth. And > forgot to mention, that /src/ generated less than 1/10000th of the > download traffic, while it takes a lot of resources to keep in sync. Bye, Understandable -- but it would be nice if download.opensuse.org's mirrored link to the source code only pointed to mirrors which actually had the source. (Just a minor irritation on such a beautiful spring day.)

3 2

how to log off from smb?
by Daniel Bauer 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

Hello Does anybody know, how I can log off a smb-connection between Suse 10 and Win98? I have an old Win98 PC and I use some of it's disk space for backups. I installed the samba client here on the SUSE 10.0 machine and everything works fine, except that it seems that Windows sees a new user each time I do something with a Windows-drive in konqueror with smb:// ??? When I shutdown Win it says "there are X users connected...". And Win get's so sloooooow with time, even when I do nothing with its drives. I thought, the samba-connection would be closed when I close konqueror, but oviously this is not the case.... Any help, please? Daniel -- Daniel Bauer photographer Basel Switzerland professional photography: http://www.daniel-bauer.com special interest site: http://www.bauer-nudes.com

1 0

GRUB problems
by Cleary_Mike＠emc.com 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

I have a machine at home which has SuSE and Windows on separate drives. A while back windows died and had to be reinstalled, which of course blew away the MBR. This weekend I booted linux from the dvd and proceeded to perform an update (9.2 to 10). During the upgrade, the GRUB install failed (couldn't find stage 1). I tried every combo offered in the way of where to install GRUB, but it failed every time. I usually install it in the MBR of /dev/hda1 (windows drive), which may or may not be the best place to put it. Even so, I tried installing it in the boot sector of the root partition, but still no joy. Unfortunately, windows needs to be the default OS to boot on this machine, and before having to reinstall windows I had no problem using GRUB. Any assistance w/ resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated! TIA, Mike ------------------------------- Cleary_Mike(a)emc.com ------------------------------- A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse.

2 1

10.1 Beta 9 uses too high refresh for 1280x1024 LCD
by Mark Gray 03 Apr '06

03 Apr '06

This is the same thing that happened when I installed SUSE-10.0 boxed set on this machine -- when starting the install using the default 1280x1024 resolution, the installer uses too high a refresh rate for my brand new HP vs17e LCD monitor H: 46.4 kHz V: 87Hz. The best resolution for this device is 1280x1024 at 60 Hz (any higher refresh leaves the screen blank). Selecting 1024x768 resolution allows the installation to continue. Oddly enough the refresh it uses for 1024x768 is 60Hz. Is there any additional information I should gather that can help sort this out before 10.1 goes gold?

3 2