September 2021 - openSUSE Users - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details
by L A Walsh 13 Sep '21

13 Sep '21

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:51:33 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON(at)Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org> To: <suse(at)tlinx.org> The original message was received at Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:51:25 -0700 from Athenae [192.168.3.12] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <factory(at)lists.opensuse.org> (reason: 550 5.7.1 Spam identified (10.1/5.0)) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx1.opensuse.org.: >>> DATA <<< 550 5.7.1 Spam identified (10.1/5.0) 454 4.0.0 Service unavailable Reporting-MTA: dns; Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org Received-From-MTA: DNS; Athenae Arrival-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:51:25 -0700 Final-Recipient: RFC822; factory(at)lists.opensuse.org Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.opensuse.org Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.7.1 Spam identified (10.1/5.0) Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:51:33 -0700 Final-Recipient: RFC822; opensuse(at)opensuse.org Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx1.opensuse.org Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.7.1 Spam identified (10.1/5.0) Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:51:33 -0700 Subject: Re: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20210908 released!, and first try spammy bounce? From: L A Walsh <suse(at)tlinx.org> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:51:06 -0700 To: oS-fctry <factory(at)lists.opensuse.org> Well, gave me a chance to add a bit to the message: On 2021/09/10 03:00, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: Why are there 4 dates associated with the release(s) that go out? internal date: 0907 title date (in message) 0908 file date: 0909 actual message date 0910. Shouldn't any of those agree? ----Also, why did the first copy of this get bounced as *s*p*a*m*???? Haven't seen that before... Will have to try some other addresses to see if this one gets through or bounces... I mean what is possibly spammy about the below? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:22:46 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON=Ishtar-sc-tlinx-org> To: Postmaster-Ishtar-sc-tlinx-org The original message was received at Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:22:38 -0700 from Athenae [192.168.3.12] with id 18AJMagZ020964 ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <factory(at)lists.opensuse.org> (reason: 550 5.7.1 Spam identified (10.4/5.0)) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mx2.opensuse.org.: >>> DATA <<< 550 5.7.1 Spam identified (10.4/5.0) 454 4.0.0 Service unavailable =============================== -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: New Tumbleweed snapshot 20210908 released! Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:22:21 -0700 From: L A Walsh <suse-tlinx-org> To: factory-lists-opensuse-org References: <163126805338.15681.9955158119170188019(at)go-agent-stagingbot-7> I have a question about the date listed in the subject. If I look at the repomd.xml file in oss/repodata, on dl.os.org, I see a timestamp of 09-Sep-2021 13:48 (i.e. 20210909 , not 0908). Looking inside that file I see the cpeid having a value of 20210907! Thats 3 different values: the 7th in the file, the 8th on the announce, and the 9th on the file date. So why don't any of them agree? UmVwb3J0aW5nLU1UQTogZG5zOyBJc2h0YXIuc2MudGxpbngub3JnDQpSZWNlaXZlZC1Gcm9t LU1UQTogRE5TOyBBdGhlbmFlDQpBcnJpdmFsLURhdGU6IEZyaSwgMTAgU2VwIDIwMjEgMTI6 NTE6MjUgLTA3MDANCg0KRmluYWwtUmVjaXBpZW50OiBSRkM4MjI7IGZhY3RvcnlAbGlzdHMu b3BlbnN1c2Uub3JnDQpBY3Rpb246IGZhaWxlZA0KU3RhdHVzOiA1LjcuMQ0KUmVtb3RlLU1U QTogRE5TOyBteDEub3BlbnN1c2Uub3JnDQpEaWFnbm9zdGljLUNvZGU6IFNNVFA7IDU1MCA1 LjcuMSBTcGFtIGlkZW50aWZpZWQgKDEwLjEvNS4wKQ0KTGFzdC1BdHRlbXB0LURhdGU6IEZy aSwgMTAgU2VwIDIwMjEgMTI6NTE6MzMgLTA3MDANCg0KRmluYWwtUmVjaXBpZW50OiBSRkM4 MjI7IG9wZW5zdXNlQG9wZW5zdXNlLm9yZw0KQWN0aW9uOiBmYWlsZWQNClN0YXR1czogNS43 LjENClJlbW90ZS1NVEE6IEROUzsgbXgxLm9wZW5zdXNlLm9yZw0KRGlhZ25vc3RpYy1Db2Rl OiBTTVRQOyA1NTAgNS43LjEgU3BhbSBpZGVudGlmaWVkICgxMC4xLzUuMCkNCkxhc3QtQXR0 ZW1wdC1EYXRlOiBGcmksIDEwIFNlcCAyMDIxIDEyOjUxOjMzIC0wNzAwDQoNCg==

4 5

Re: no ip address
by James Knott 13 Sep '21

13 Sep '21

On 2021-09-12 4:27 p.m., Douglas McGarrett wrote: > >> OK, zypper installed it, in spite of the Firefox entry. But I don't >> know how to use it! I entered the MAC address, but then what? I assume you only have 1 interface. If not, select the appropriate one. Then, in the long box "using this filter" enter ether host <MAC address>. Here's an example "ether host e0:37:17:cf:b7:52". Then, with the cursor in that long box, press Enter. You should now see the captures if printing is occurring. It will list both source and destination IP addresses. This is assuming there is no router between the computer and printer. What's this about Firefox? It has nothing to do with Wireshark.

3 10

no ip address
by Douglas McGarrett 12 Sep '21

12 Sep '21

Epson WP4530 once had a static IP. Perhaps now damaged by lightning in July. At any rate, nmap shows NO ip address for the printer, yet Windows 10 and Mint can write to it. How does that work? --doug

8 22

OT? best basic IMAP server
by David T-G 12 Sep '21

12 Sep '21

Hi, all -- Now that I've moved out of my datacenter server, I have much less online mail space :-) I'd like to set up an IMAP server at home (15.2) so that we can get to the local archive copy. Can anyone (probably Carlos?) suggest an easy-to-manage simple server? TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/email/ See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/tofu.txt

5 6

[oS-en] repair an ntfs disk?
by Carlos E. R. 12 Sep '21

12 Sep '21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 How can I fsck in Linux an ntfs partition? It is used by a TV set, no windows available here and now. fsck appears to do nothing, there is no fsck.ntfs that I can see. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE Leap 15.2 x86_64 (Minas Tirith)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iJIEAREIADoWIQQt/vKEw5659AgM/X2NrxRtxRYzXAUCYTixbRwccm9iaW4ubGlz dGFzQHRlbGVmb25pY2EubmV0AAoJEI2vFG3FFjNcw2kBAJSmJWoGUrciaKLjqhqz zR5iWfv8/rKqnJCugvAusvlmAP4k2tA+MFLm1iWOOsxggp8/n8QYxaPyR+3sCzqL GQDdFA== =JfRl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

14 82

Thunderbird message dating
by Michael Spartana 11 Sep '21

11 Sep '21

Hi, I updated to the new Thunderbird 91 and now all messages are in 2400 mode. I looked online and everything says it uses system time and my system time is 12 hour mode. I see there is a time setting prefs for app or regional settings, but this had no effect. Any ideas?? mike

5 22

printer--again
by Douglas McGarrett 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

Weird: after the lightning strike in July, I replaced an HP printer with a duplicate. The original was never installed in Leap, so I figured it's HP, it ought to be easy. No such luck. It even gave me its IP address. Leap can't see it. But it can ping it. BUT! Windows can see it but can''t install it! Windows can ping it also. Two machines, same problem. BUT! I installed Mint on a laptop, and it automatically found the HP and prints to it happily. Same lan, same router, etc. What could be going on? Ideas? --doug

8 28

for dup from 15.2, adding even those special 15.3 repos before? backports and SLE15updates repo?
by cagsm 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

Hello list, for a dup from 15.2 to 15.3, would it make sense or is it possible to even add those special 15.3 repos before? backports and SLE15updates repo? wondered when I dup an online connected 15.2 to 15.3, it misses all those many update/packages coming from those two special repos. when I look into what comes from via those repos, I notice such stuff as openssh, openssl and many more. meaning: an updated 15.2 to 15.3, initial reboot, such a system is highly attackable and insecure as it initially is missing all those many updates from those two very important repos. only from the then online 15.3 system can one use those two additional repos (which have then been added by the dup process) and show up in the rebooted online 15.3 system. then another round of zypper up is needed to make the system safe. am I missing something important here or is this an accepted situation and by design? ty.

7 16

Status of SuSE for Raspberry Pi
by Andrei Verovski 08 Sep '21

08 Sep '21

Hi ! What is current status of SuSE for Raspberry Pi? Is it actively maintained and tested? SuSE section on Raspberry Pi site forum is quiet for a while, last post dated March 9, 2021. https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=87 Thanks in advance. Andrei

3 2

problems with update repo for 15.2/OSS?
by Carlos F. Lange 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

I am getting this error from the update repo OSS for Leap 15.2: File './repodata/7ea45c97ce169211ef944d6a0ff15f92049a2cbe6044f4d7b79874eff8915eaf-primary.xml.gz' not found on medium 'http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.2/oss/' Are there alternative repositories? -- Carlos F Lange Gaúcho nas Pradarias https://sites.google.com/site/carlosflange/

4 8