June 2005 - openSUSE Users - openSUSE Mailing Lists

SuSE9.3 ftp install?
by Clayton 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

Maybe a really dumb question... is it actually released now? I noticed a huge number of files appear on the ftp site in the last couple days... I've also found this... ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/9.3/iso/ which has a DVD eval iso, and a 5 disk CD set. Is the CD set the full iso's of the 9.3 release? There's no handy dandy readme laying about to make it clear what's up with those files. C.

3 3

Fwd: Automount pen drive.
by Surya Kiran Gullapalli 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Surya Kiran Gullapalli <suryakiran.gullapalli(a)gmail.com> Date: Jun 7, 2005 10:21 AM Subject: Automount pen drive. To: SuSE linux list <suse-linux-e(a)suse.com> Hi, I've this Suse 9.1 (default kernel) which was working fine with usb mass storage devices (pen drive). When ever i plug it in the USB port, konqueror opens up and shows up the contents of pen drive. I've upgraded the kernel to kernel 2.6.11.10 <http://2.6.11.10>. and while compiling i've compiled USB support as a module, instead of built in. kernel compiled well, and working with no issues except for pen drive. When ever i plug in the pen drive in the USB port, SuSE is not automounting the device. whats more, i'm not able to mount it manually.. the entry for usb looks like this in my /etc/fstab file ============== proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs noauto 0 0 ============= and the entry for usb in /etc/mtab file is usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0 I've given the command mount /proc/bus/usb but i got the error saying the device is already mounted. I've umount that and mounted the device again. This time it did not show any error, but did not mount the device. Now i want to mount the device to /media/usbkey. automatically. what should i do. Please find the text below, which is taken from /var/log/messages ================================================== Jun 3 16:32:47 Matrix kernel: Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... Jun 3 16:32:47 Matrix kernel: usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage Jun 3 16:32:47 Matrix kernel: USB Mass Storage support registered. Jun 3 16:33:26 Matrix kernel: usb 5-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 Jun 3 16:33:26 Matrix kernel: scsi2 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices Jun 3 16:33:26 Matrix kernel: usb-storage: device found at 2 Jun 3 16:33:26 Matrix kernel: usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning Jun 3 16:33:26 Matrix /etc/hotplug/usb.agent[9405]: need a device for this command Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: Vendor: JetFlash Model: TS1GJF2B Rev: 2.00 Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb: Unit Not Ready, sense: Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: : Current: sense key: Unit Attention Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb : READ CAPACITY failed. Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb : status=1, message=00, host=0, driver=08 Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sd: Current: sense key: Unit Attention Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming Write Enabled Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming drive cache: write through Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9483]: grep: /sys/class/scsi_host/target2:0:0/proc_name: No such file or directory Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9483]: grep: /sys/class/scsi_host/target2:0:0/proc_name: No such file or directory Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9483]: try 1 while waiting for /block/sdb's bus_id 2:0:0:0 Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb: Unit Not Ready, sense: Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: : Current: sense key: Unit Attention Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb : READ CAPACITY failed. Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb : status=1, message=00, host=0, driver=08 Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sd: Current: sense key: Unit Attention Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming Write Enabled Jun 3 16:33:31 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming drive cache: write through Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sdb: Unit Not Ready, sense: Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: : Current: sense key: Unit Attention Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sdb : READ CAPACITY failed. Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sdb : status=1, message=00, host=0, driver=08 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sd: Current: sense key: Unit Attention Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming Write Enabled Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming drive cache: write through Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: sdb:end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 0 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 0 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix last message repeated 2 times Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: ldm_validate_partition_table(): Disk read failed. Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical block 0 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: unable to read partition table Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Attached scsi removable disk sdb at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: usb-storage: device scan complete Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type 0 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix kernel: Attached scsi generic sg1 at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type 0 Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix /etc/hotplug/scsi_generic.agent[9528]: /sbin/udev.get_unique_hardware_path.sh: cannot open /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/../../../idVendor: no such file Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix /etc/hotplug/scsi_generic.agent[9528]: /sbin/udev.get_unique_hardware_path.sh: cannot open /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/../../../idProduct: no such file Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix /etc/hotplug/scsi_generic.agent[9526]: [: [0-9]*: bad number Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9483]: /sbin/udev.get_unique_hardware_path.sh: cannot open /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/../../../idVendor: no such file Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9483]: /sbin/udev.get_unique_hardware_path.sh: cannot open /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/../../../idProduct: no such file Jun 3 16:33:32 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9483]: new block device /block/sdb Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: SCSI device sdb: 2045184 512-byte hdwr sectors (1047 MB) Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming Write Enabled Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming drive cache: write through Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: SCSI device sdb: 2045184 512-byte hdwr sectors (1047 MB) Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming Write Enabled Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: sdb: assuming drive cache: write through Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: sdb: sdb1 Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix kernel: program hwscan is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9653]: grep: /sys/class/scsi_host/target2:0:0/proc_name: No such file or directory Jun 3 16:33:34 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9653]: grep: /sys/class/scsi_host/target2:0:0/proc_name: No such file or directory Jun 3 16:33:35 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9653]: /sbin/udev.get_unique_hardware_path.sh: cannot open /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/../../../idVendor: no such file Jun 3 16:33:35 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9653]: /sbin/udev.get_unique_hardware_path.sh: cannot open /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host2/target2:0:0/2:0:0:0/../../../idProduct: no such file Jun 3 16:33:35 Matrix /etc/hotplug/block.agent[9653]: new block device /block/sdb/sdb1 ================================================ Thanks in advance, Surya

3 2

Moveing SuSE 9.2 from IDE to SCSI
by Eduardo J. Vega A 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

Hello guys... I got already SuSE 9.3 installed at /dev/hda but I need to move it to /dev/scd I know that I can move them by using dd, but, what else do I may need to change ? 1) Grub ? Which config files ? Should I do any other stuff rather than modify the new path at the Config files ? 2) FSTAB ? 3) Others ? Thanks --ed He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you .Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, Aphorism 146

5 7

Problem with list?
by Robert A. Rawlinson 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

I have been sending the following message and it is blocked as spam. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>: ezmlm-reject: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <rarawlinson(a)siscom.net> Received: (qmail 26524 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2005 13:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2005 13:04:38 -0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228409FA3 for <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:04:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1]) by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 10641-08 for <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E41661B for <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from siscom.net (mail.siscom.net [209.251.2.10]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04C41CAC2 for <suse-linux-e(a)suse.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:04:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (unverified [209.251.6.147]) by siscom.net (Mail) with ESMTP id 114145392 for <suse-linux-e(a)suse.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:08:49 -0400 Message-ID: <42BFF95C.4060601(a)siscom.net> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:04:28 -0400 From: "Robert A. Rawlinson" <rarawlinson(a)siscom.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: suse-linux-e(a)suse.com Subject: *****SPAM***** Strange USB memory stick problem in Suse 9.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: rarawlinson(a)siscom.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.2 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, RCVD_IN_XBL X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Spam-Flag: YES I have two pc's and on each I installed Suse 9.1. When I put the memory stick in the usb port on one, within a few seconds it recognizes the memory stick and I can use it. This is an older pc running a 233meg intel cpu. When I put the memory stick in the other, it may have to keep trying all night to access it. The light in the memory stick keeps blinking showing it is trying to access it. Then again the next time the light in the memory stick may turn right off and the pc never recognize it. This pc is a late model abit running a 2.4 gig cpu. Does anyone know of a work-around to make it be recognized? Bob Rawlinson -- Robert A. Rawlinson -- Robert A. Rawlinson

6 6

opera
by Hans Krueger 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

did opera update get fixed yet? -- Hans hanskrueger(a)adelphia.net

4 5

Cups users who need to get .ps file from .dvi?
by Paul Elliott 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

The dvi2ps (which converts TeX .dvi files to postscript .ps files) is in the package lpdfilter for SuSE 9.3: http://www.novell.com/products/linuxpackages/professional/lpdfilter.html But if you have cups, you can not install lpdfilter because it conficts with cups, cups-SUSE-ppds-dat, and cups-drivers-stp. According to yast2. So what is a cups user to do if he wants to send a .ps file to some one with a postscript printer (via email perhaps), if he has a .dvi file? -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelliott(a)io.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.io.com/~pelliott/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117

5 6

setting multiple user id to 0 (zero) is bad ! Why?
by Chadley Wilson 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

Greetings, Friends, I am in a situation with my one clients who use - (Yes that one again!!), uucp. Now their previous techies set all the user id's for the system to 0 (zero) Oh! and all the GID's as well. Now I have come in and had to fix this, but I get resistance. I have only one good reason why not to right now, with uucp on one site all the files are transfered but not removed from the queue, only when I set the user id to 14 (IIRC) and the GID to 512, and of course changed all the on the relevant configs and files, would it clean the remote queue. This reason however has been flawed as we have other sites that work properly with all the UID's and GID's set to 0 (zero). I need more reasons, explaining how this affects the system integrity, and functionality, the trick here is they don't give two hoots about the security aspect. So to win my case professionally and cleverly, I ask for real opinions and reasons. Could you please assist. -- -- Chadley Wilson Production Line Superintendant Pinnacle Micro Manufacturers of Proline Computers ==================================== Exercise freedom, Use LINUX =====================================

3 2

rejected email to list
by Art Fore 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

Can anyone tell me why my email is being rejected as spam from the suse mail list? <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>: ezmlm-reject: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <art.fore(a)comcast.net> Received: (qmail 26996 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 15:18:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 15:18:38 -0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B43451E for <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1]) by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 06960-09 for <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150234509 for <suse-linux-e(a)lists.suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6951D29B for <suse-linux-e(a)suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.121.33] (adsl-71-129-145-33.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net[71.129.145.33]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20050629151826014003p666e>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:18:32 +0000 Message-ID: <42C2BBBB.5080804(a)comcast.net> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:18:19 -0700 From: Art Fore <art.fore(a)comcast.net> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: suse-linux-e(a)suse.com Subject: SPAM: Evolution-Thunderbird Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Flag: YES

10 23

Azureus UDP port 6881
by Paul Cartwright 01 Jul '05

01 Jul '05

I am trying to run Azureus, and I got a new message saying I need to open UDP port 6881 for this to work correctly. Is this a good idea ? If so, how do I enable port 6881 ? Under YaST firewall, I can't find any config area to add ports. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux user # 367800 X-Request-PGP: http://home.comcast.net/~p.cartwright/wsb/key.asc

7 12

Re: [SLE] 3D/GL Nvidia Problem (weird)
by Andrei Verovski (aka MacGuru) 30 Jun '05

30 Jun '05

Hi, Thanks everyone who have replied. Of course, I have ¨nvidia¨ driver listed (and not ¨nv¨), in my X.conf. The dri module was not listed here (a bug in sax2? ), but I have added it, although it did not changed anything. And of course, I have checked ¨3D support enabled¨ in sax2 when configured X. Now the most interesting part. ---------------------------------------------------- 3Ddiag 0.724 ouputs this: Verifying driver installation: nvidia ... done. Tests for X.Org configuration: Config File /etc/X11/xorg.conf ... done. Driver ... done. Extensions ... done. Options ... done. Checking GL/GLU/glut runtime configuration: GL/GLU ... done (package xorg-x11-Mesa) glut ... done (package freeglut) ---------------------------------------------------- glxinfo outputs this (output was rather long, so I cut it to most important parts): direct rendering: Yes server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation server glx version string: 1.3 server glx extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control client glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation client glx version string: 1.3 GLX extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_ARB_get_proc_address OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation ---------------------------------------------------- So, the question is: which one is correct? What OpenGL acceleration is running? MESA or nVidia GLX? Basically I am just trying to run Command and Conquer Generals Zero Hour under cedega 4.3.2-1 on SuSE 9.3, Athlon XP 1600+, 512 MB RAM, nVidia GeForce. On SuSE 9.2 I did run Warcraft III and StarCraft, and everything seem to be fine. Launching CC Generals loads CPU to 100%, there is a sound (sometimes distorted), but graphic redraw is hell slow, what made me think that hardware 3D acceleration do not work. Or may be it is just culprit of Cedega and CC Generals? Transgaming site lists them as compatible... > >I have SuSE 9.3 with nVidia driver 7167 succesfully installed with >SuSE fetchnvidia script. I have, of course, reconfigured X with SAX >to enable 3D support. > >However, 3DDiag gives the following: > >Verifying driver installation: > nvidia ... done. > >Tests for X.Org configuration: > Config File /etc/X11/xorg.conf ... done. > Driver ... done. > Extensions ... done. > Options ... done. > >Checking GL/GLU/glut runtime configuration: > GL/GLU ... done (package xorg-x11-Mesa) > glut ... done (package freeglut) > >It seems like my system uses MESA instead of nVidia GLX. I have tried >to reinstall kernel, nvidia driver again, but it did not helped. I am >trying to run Command&Conquer Generals Zero Hour, and it is hell slow >(absolutely non-usable, to say precisely) without real hardware 3D >support.

2 3