November 2004 - openSUSE Users - openSUSE Mailing Lists

postfix and php on suse 9.1
by Chris W 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

I recently installed SUSE 9.1 and my php script that sent mail no longer works. It works fine on an suse 9.0 box. I was wondering if anyone can give me a hint as to what to look for to fix this. I understand there is some error in the PHP config that needs to be fixed. Can someone tell me where that config error is? Below is some of my error log from a send attempt. Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/pickup[30613]: 1EF48D587: uid=30 from=<wwwrun> Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/cleanup[31469]: 1EF48D587: message-id=<20041113175034.1EF48D587(a)aopro.com> Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/cleanup[31469]: 1EF48D587: to=<unknown>, relay=none, delay=0, status=bounced (No recipients specified) Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/cleanup[31473]: 2CA3DD5AF: message-id=<20041113175034.2CA3DD5AF(a)aopro.com> Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/qmgr[3547]: 2CA3DD5AF: from=<>, size=1833, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/local[31474]: 2CA3DD5AF: to=<root(a)aopro.com>, orig_to=<wwwrun(a)aopro.com>, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox) Nov 13 11:50:34 WebServer postfix/qmgr[3547]: 2CA3DD5AF: removed Here is the simple mail script that I am using to test <?php $message = "This is a Test Message "; mail('1qazse4(a)cox.net', "test message", $message); ?> <HTML><BODY> Message sent. </BODY></HTML> Thanks for the help. -- Chris W Not getting the gifts you want? The Wish Zone can help. http://thewishzone.com

2 1

Replacementsfor Windows Applications
by Russ 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

I am looking to replace Turbo Tax and Quicken. Does anyone know of any Linux based programs I can use to replace them? -- Russ

12 26

Re: [SLE] Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [SLE] Re: Samba HOWTO
by James Knott 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

Don Parris wrote: > I don't see anything unusual. Just out of curiosity, did you delete the > ***SPAM*** bit from your subject header when sending to me? Also, I don't > see that in any thread on the list but this one. > > Don I didn't change the subject. When it left here, it still had ***SPAM*** in it. It got into the thread subject, because someone else was getting messages marked that way, and he then replied with it still in the subject. Apparently the problem was caused by spamassassin, at his ISP. It has since been corrected.

2 1

RE: [SLE] network interface not found
by Ricci Graham 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

Sid, Thanks for the help, but that didn't fix it. Do you know where I can go in and manually change the interface? It is still picking up the Compaq Netelligent Card Interface and I need to change it to the Intel EE Pro 100. What config file is that housed in? It isn't changing it when I change it in Yast. Thanks, Ricci -----Original Message----- From: Sid Boyce [mailto:sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:28 AM Cc: suse-linux-e(a)suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] network interface not found Ricci Graham wrote: > I am having the same problem with a Compaq 1850R with an integrated NIC. I > had originally installed > Compaq interface for the NIC and that one wasn't working. A co-worker said > he has Linux working on another machine > with the same NIC using an Intel EE Pro 100 so I am trying to install that > interface, but no matter what I do, it still > sees the old interface and then gives the same message as below. > > So I guess my question would be how do I get it to recognize a new NIC > interface??? > > Ricci > > -----Original Message----- > From: Taavi Dovnar [mailto:taavid@luunja.edu.ee] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 3:06 AM > To: suse-linux-e(a)suse.com > Subject: [SLE] network interface not found > > > Suse 9.1 Pro. While booting, very often network card (integrated) is not > found. Usually "few" restarts helps. Messages from log file are below. > There is another computer with same configuration, usually no problems > there. And same problem occur sometimes with other computers also... > What could be reason & solution? > > MB: Epox 4PLAI 848P > > > > <notice>start services (network) > Setting up network interfaces: > lo > lo IP address: 127.0.0.1/8 > doneWaiting for mandatory devices: eth-id-00:04:61:4e:bb:5b > 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 > eth-id-00:04:61:4e:bb:5b No interface found > failedSetting up service network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > . .failed > <notice>exit status of (network) is (7) > Try "modprobe eepro100" lsmod|grep eepro ###to check it's in. rcnetwork restart If all is fine, then /etc/modprobe.conf may need modification. I'm not using an eepro100, so this line is commented out, it may need to be differnt on your box. # options eepro io=0x260 irq=10 mem=0x6000 Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer =====LINUX ONLY USED HERE===== -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help(a)suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq(a)suse.com IMPORTANT NOTICE - The information (both of the message and any attachments) contained in this message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient or has received this message in error, you are hereby notified that we do not consent to any reading, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any such actions are strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the transmitted information.

2 1

Problem with amavis-new
by Hans du Plooy 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

Hi all, I'm having a weird problem on a mailserver. The setup is postfix-2.1.5-3 and amavisd-new-2.1.2-5 with clamav-0.80-2.1, BitDefender-Console-Antivirus-7.0.1-3, and antivir-2.1.1-4. OS is SUSE 9.2 with all updates applied. All users can receive mail, except one person who's mail gets sent to root. For each mail a "message undelivered mail gets set to root too, with Command died with status 99: "/usr/sbin/amavis" as the only hint. From the amavis logs I see: Nov 29 09:41:22 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) AM.CL /var/spool/amavis/amavis-client-XXr5Y7VL: <root(a)company.com> -> <amanda(a)company.com> Nov 29 09:41:22 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) body hash: d8e8fca2dc0f896fd7cb4cb0031ba249 Nov 29 09:41:22 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Checking: <root(a)company.com> -> <amanda(a)company.com> Nov 29 09:41:22 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Cached virus check expired, TTL = 180 s Nov 29 09:41:22 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) cached d8e8fca2dc0f896fd7cb4cb0031ba249 from <root(a)company.com> (1,0,0) Nov 29 09:41:22 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Using (Clam Antivirus - clamscan): /usr/bin/clamscan --stdout --no-summary -r /var/spool/amavis/amavis-client-XXr5Y7VL/parts Nov 29 09:41:24 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) run_av: /usr/bin/clamscan exit 0, /var/spool/amavis/amavis-client-XXr5Y7VL/parts/p001: OK Nov 29 09:41:24 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Using (H+BEDV AntiVir or CentralCommand Vexira Antivirus): /usr/bin/antivir --allfiles -noboot -nombr -rs -s -z /var/spool/amavis/amavis-client-XXr5Y7VL/parts Nov 29 09:41:25 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) run_av: /usr/bin/antivir exit 0, AntiVir / Linux Version 2.1.2-15 +gui\nCopyright (c) 1994-2004 by H+BEDV Datentechnik GmbH.\nAll rights reserved.\n\nLoading /usr/lib/AntiVir/antivir.vdf ...\n\nVDF version: 6.28.0.94 created 28 Nov 2004\n\nAntiVir license: 149999 for Evaluation License for SuSE Linux\n\nchecking drive/path (list): /var/spool/amavis/amavis-client-XXr5Y7VL/parts\n\n------ scan results ------\n directories: ...1\n scanned files: ...1\n...alerts: ...0\n...suspicious: ...0\n...scan time: 00:00:01\n--------------------------\nThank you for using AntiVir. Nov 29 09:41:25 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Using (BitDefender): /usr/bin/bdc --all --arc --mail /var/spool/amavis/amavis-client-XXr5Y7VL/parts Nov 29 09:41:27 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) run_av: /usr/bin/bdc exit 0, BDC/Linux-Console v7.0 (build 2490) (i386) (Dec 10 2003 16:11:35)\nCopyright (C) 1996-2003 SOFTWIN SRL. All rights reserved. \n\n\n\nResults: \nFolders ...:1\nFiles ...:1\nPacked ...:0\nArchives ...:0\nInfected files :0\nSuspect files ...:0\nWarnings ...:0\nI/O errors ...:0\n Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) spam_scan: hits=-2.574 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) SPAM-TAG, <root(a)company.com> -> <amanda(a)company.com>, No, hits=-2.574 tagged_above=-2200 required=9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) FWD via SMTP: [127.0.0.1]:10025 <root(a)company.com> -> <amanda(a)company.com> Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) AUTH not needed, user='', MTA offers '' Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) mail_via_smtp: 250 2.6.0 Ok, id=client-XXr5Y7VL, from MTA: 250 Ok: queuedas 1603F11E98 Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Passed, <root(a)company.com> -> <amanda(a)company.com>, Message-ID: <41AAD2A2.mailK7K1UA1PW(a)mpost.company.com>, Hits: -2.574 Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) Passed CLEAN, <root(a)company.com> -> <amanda(a)company.com>, Hits: -2.574, tag=-2200, tag2=9, kill=9, L/Y/0/0 Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) WARN: no recips left (forgot to set $forward_method=undef using milter?),250 2.6.0 Ok, id=client-XXr5Y7VL, from MTA: 250 Ok: queued as 1603F11E98 Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) mail checking ended: setreply=250 2.6.0 Ok,%20id=client-XXr5Y7VL,%20from%20MTA: %20250%20Ok:%20queued%20as%201603F11E98\nreturn_value=discard\nexit_code=99 Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) TIMING [total 6841 ms] - got data: 8 (0%), body_hash: 6 (0%), mkdir parts: 3 (0%), mime_decode: 38 (1%), get-file-type1: 27 (0%), decompose_part: 1 (0%), parts_decode: 0 (0%), AV-scan-1: 2120 (31%), AV-scan-2: 1036 (15%), AV-scan-3: 2030 (30%), spam-wb-list: 7 (0%), SA msg read: 3 (0%), SA parse: 7 (0%), SA check: 1359 (20%), update_cache: 4 (0%), fwd-connect: 30 (0%), fwd-mail-from: 5 (0%), fwd-rcpt-to: 10 (0%), write-header: 11 (0%), fwd-data: 1 (0%), fwd-data-end: 76 (1%), fwd-rundown:9 (0%), main_log_entry: 43 (1%), update_snmp: 0 (0%), unlink-1-files: 2 (0%), rmdir: 0 (0%), unlink-1-files: 1 (0%), rmdir: 0 (0%), rundown: 3 (0%) Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost /usr/sbin/amavisd[26107]: (client-XXr5Y7VL) load: 5 %, total idle 449.889 s, busy 23.596 s Postfix logs give me: Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/qmgr[25477]: 1603F11E98: from=<root(a)company.com>, size=895, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/pipe[26195]: 43D1B11E96: to=<amanda(a)company.com>, orig_to=<amanda>, relay=vscan, delay=7, status=bounced (Command died with status 99: "/usr/sbin/amavis") Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/local[26187]: 1603F11E98: to=<hansdp(a)company.com>, orig_to=<amanda(a)company.com>, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/qmgr[25477]: 1603F11E98: removed Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/cleanup[26167]: AB45111E97: message-id=<20041129074129.AB45111E97(a)mpost.company.com> Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/qmgr[25477]: AB45111E97: from=<>, size=2128, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/qmgr[25477]: 43D1B11E96: removed Nov 29 09:41:29 mpost postfix/local[26187]: AB45111E97: to=<hansdp(a)company.com>, orig_to=<root(a)company.com>, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) I thought I'd make a temporary user and alias her mail to that user, but the new user had the same problem. Now I'm baffled. Anybody know what causes this? Even a simple test mail sent with mailx from command line causes this to happen. Thanks -- Kind regards Hans du Plooy Newington Consulting Services hansdp at newingtoncs dot co dot za

3 4

XP/Suse network
by Scott Eschner 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

Hi, Wanted some/any recommendations for the following network: 25 or so XP and 2000 Clients. 3 or 4 wireless clients running XP. Want to configure Suse Linux Enterprise 9 running Samba w/ LDAP backend. 1. What kind of Anti-virus software is recommended? 2. what email service should be used? Postfix or Sendmail? Any other recommendations/suggestions, configuration ideas, are welcome. Scott <http://www.sadasystems.com/marketing/EmailSigOffers/> *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is directly addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure. Any retransmission, dissemination or other use of the information by persons other than the intended recipient or entity is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete this message, along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank you. ***

3 2

9.2 KDE updates via YAST?
by Peter B Van Campen 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

Hi Folks, There are a bunch of updated pkgs for KDE-base at: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_9.2/base Is there a way to use YAST to get and install these, as we do w/ YOU? How about if I d/l them into a local directory; can YAST then use them to update the KDE installed sys? PeterB

8 13

New kernel at YOU today and a Quest.
by Peter B Van Campen 01 Dec '04

01 Dec '04

Hi ALL, Just saw a new batch of 'red' patches on YOU for 9.2 There is a new kernel 2.6.8-24.5 PeterB

2 1

Odd issues with screen saver/power save
by Eric Wagar 30 Nov '04

30 Nov '04

To be able to leave my system on at night, I need to use the power save mode on my flatscreen. That way, it will blank, then turn itself off after 30 minutes. Recently, I have noticed that it doesn't turn itself off anymore. Instead it only does the screen saver. Where should I start looking to see why it is not doing power save? (I don't remember any patches that may have affected this.) thanks eric

3 2

Is there a DEFINATIVE way to know if nvidia 3D is ON?
by Peter B Van Campen 30 Nov '04

30 Nov '04

Hi Folks, Since doing updates to, and fresh installs to 9.2 on systems w/ nvidia cards, I have started to doubt whether 3D Accl is really on, after d/l'ing the nvidia drivers via YOU. Is there a really difinative way to know if the nvidia drivers are really installed?? Whenever I let YOU get, and install them, and after a re-boot, YOU >YAST >Hardware >Graphics card & monitor gives "3D Disables" and when I ask it to enable it, a box pops open that says that "you must use YOU to get and install the nvidia drivers" and then it gives details how to RE-install them since last time. But when I do this, and then check the 3D capabilities via YOU it shows the same negative results. Loops like that forever? I have seen many times here that "Never mind, 3D is REALLY ON, but the system lies, trust me". So, is there a sure-fire way to verify that nvidia 3D is really ON? PeterB

4 14