If you are interested in using the suse 6 rpms off of the www.gnome.org
site, a few notes about compiling programs from scratch. I wanted to
compile xchat, guitar, and a few other selections. I read the gnome
and balsa lists quite a bit recently but ended up downloading and
rpm'ing all the devel libs also to get things to compile. I dont know
why this is but now I have a working system to build gnome aware
applications under SuSE 6. This took me awhile. I am using the
windowmaker which comes with the suse gnome stuff and its pretty cool
and fast.
If you are looking for something fun to try, visit the gnome website
and download all the 99.8 rpms. Be sure to follow the directions on
the web page as when I first did gnome 99.8 some things were seriously
broken such as png image loading.
I dont have a subjective or objective impression regarding gnome other
than I thinks its really cool and the applications seem well thought
out. Its nice to have suse 6 rpm files and I would like to thank
whoever made this possible. I also use kde 1.1 on occasion.
I believe that gnome 1 level should be released in a few so hopefully
we will see 1.0 level rpms soon.
The recent rpm farm for gnome is nice; thanks SuSE and everyone who had
a hand in contributing.
--
Michael Perry
mperry(a)basin.com
-------------------
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo(a)suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>
Kaare(a)webline.dk, UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS@.SYNTAX-ERROR wrote:
---snip---
> > you get a nice front end for the office suite, though it took me a while to
> > actually get it to work properly.
>
> Hm. What did you do? For me, the New button doesn't work and the Open
> button just finds some .kdelink (complaining about not being able to
> find some names) and then bombs out with an QPixmap: Invalid pixmap
> parameters.
>
When you open up koshell, you should notice one of those dockable
toolbars in the viewing area. On my system it is positioned
horizontally with nothing on it. By clicking on it you should be able
to move it to reposition itself vertically it seems like you also might
need to resize the window (make it bigger). Hopefully then you'll see
an icon bar containing icons for KWord, Killustrator and several other
programs. When you choose one of these programs it looks like it
actually gets opened up in the same window that koshell uses and just
inserts all the new toolbars. The nice thing is that it keeps the icon
menu (for KWord, KIllustrator et al) up so yo can also call up any of
these programs as you need them.
The new and open options don't work for me either in just a freshly
opened koshell, but of course when you open up one of the new programs
they should all work as expected. There definitely needs to be some
work done on this (KOffice is still only alpha), but I really think it
looks promising.
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo(a)suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>
I've installed vnc-3.3.2r3 from source on my S.u.S.E. 5.3 linux 2.0.35
machine and vnc-3.3.2r6_x86-win32 on a Win95 box. Unfortunately the
vnc-client running on my linux box will segmentation fault anytime
an attempt is made to access a menu item from the taskbar of the
server W95 system. Also, when viewed from linux the W95 icons are
often mostly obscured by black rectangular sections.
The W95 box runs 256 colors while the linux box is 24bit on a 4mb
Matrox Millennium card. On the linux side I've tried both the binary
vnc distribution and have built the lot from source, with the same
result in both cases.
Any help or suggestions you may have will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Lance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lance Heller email: lheller(a)unidial.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo(a)suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>
Hi all,
I just installed SuSE 6.0 on my workstation at my job :-).
Works great, no problems, but....
The box has an STB Nitro 3D graphics card, 2MB RAM on board,
and I've noticed that manipulating windows is about 1/4 as fast as
my putzy old 486, running 5.2, with a Diamond Stealth VLB 2000
graphics card (S3 Trio 64+, 2MB RAM). My workstation is a no-
name clone PII 200, 96 MB RAM. Is this just the nature of this
card, or is something screwed up? Please consider that my 486
has a pretty tight 2.0.36 kernel, while I haven't had time to rebuild
the Pentium II kernel yet.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Dennis
"Custard pies are a sort of esperanto: a universal language."
--Noel Godin
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo(a)suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>
[SuSE Linux] pppd unexpectably fails SYNDROME
Who expects pppd to fail, anyway?
I do!
I know about removing "lock" from /etc/ppp/options
but NOTHING is that simple.
There is YAST options, options, rc config, hosts, hosts allow, pppd to
chmod, YAST networking--->ppp setup lines to fill out and those you mustn't
fill out, and chat scripts hidden places I don't even wash with a rag on a
stick!
...and kppp gives me a pppd failed notice about 3 seconds after the click I
hear 5 seconds after the login and password are exchanged.
I am running S.u.S.E. 6.0 on a Gateway 2500 "SOLO" laptop with a pcmcia
card modem.
It worked for awhile under 5.3, then I did a reinstall and could never get
it working again...
I LOVE 6.0. My screen is 16 bit colors, everything works, but I desprately
need to get ppp going.
Any help will be totally appreciated.
Yours,
"I'm sorry to still keep bugging you"
Hal
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo(a)suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the
archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>