August 2012 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] acpid requires systemd?
by Felix Miata 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

Can this be true? If so, why? Zypper won't let me upgrade acpid without breakage unless systemd is installed too. I have systemd locked out, as I'd rather test things I can understand in Factory, not major overhaul stuff. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 3

Re: [opensuse-factory] repository priorities with Tumbleweed
by Thomas Langkamp 16 Jul '15

16 Jul '15

> No, please don't confuse people, if you add more repos than just > Tumbleweed you really had better know what you are doing or bad things > can, and will, happen :) I understand. I just would like to add the following to http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Tumbleweed - between ## is the new stuff: "The only supported method of repo use for Tumbleweed is to have only the main repos (Oss, Non-oss, and Update) and the Tumbleweed repo active. ## If you use more repositorys you have to know how repo-priorities work, but even then Tumblweed does NOT support this ## " It would also be good to move this information to "Special concerns" and to move the whole "Special concerns"-section up. For example "Special Concerns Virtual Machines ... Third Party Drivers ... ## Non-Standard Repos: Only use Oss, Non-oss, and Update combined with the Tumbleweed-Standard repo. Everything else is not supported and might break the system ## " >You do know the legal reasons behind why packman is there, right? Yes. Then I do not whish you personaly to support Packman with TW - I understand now that this is not possible from your perspectivg. But...as the OS community discusses right now if/how to strengthen Tumbleweed... one way would be, that Packman+TW would be supported BY Packman. So I will ask the Packman-guys to do that... I hope this is possible for them. Without Packman Tumbleweed is so ... "anti-multimedia" ;) thanks anyway :D -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 18

[opensuse-factory] Export broken for KinfoCenter
by Roger Luedecke 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Export button is greyed out no matter what. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

Re: [opensuse-factory] Nothing provides /usr/bin/php5
by Sascha Peilicke 11 Jan '14

11 Jan '14

On 12/01/2011 11:44 AM, Kyrill Detinov wrote: > > Hello. > > We have one package affected in standard repo: leechcraft-eiskaltdcpp. > The program itself doesn't require php5. But the package includes > example scripts with shebang '!/usr/bin/php5'. So the package isn't > installable. > > Also I see the same problem with pgfouine from Contrib (written in > PHP) and eiskaltdcpp from filesharing repo. Maybe more in third-party > repositories. > > Can we have symlink /usr/bin/php -> php5 in php5 package? Or affected > packages should be fixed? > Please file a bug against php5 and assign to Cristian Rodríguez. -- Viele Grüße, Sascha -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-factory] rpmlint: warn if -ansi is used to build packages
by Cristian Rodríguez 19 Mar '13

19 Mar '13

Hi: Will be cool if rpmlint could warn when upstream packages attempt to use the -ansi gcc option because it inhibits usage of gcc builtin functions while optimizing (list here --> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#Other-Builtins) most recently it caught my attention that it also disables the new "optimize-strlen" pass in gcc 4.7, in particular this: "for hosted compilations where stpcpy is available in the runtime and headers provide its prototype, e.g. void foo (char *a, const char *b, const char *c, const char *d) { strcpy (a, b); strcat (a, c); strcat (a, d); } can be optimized into: void foo (char *a, const char *b, const char *c, const char *d) { strcpy (stpcpy (stpcpy (a, b), c), d); } " when -ansi is used and (defined(_GNU_SOURCE) || (_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 700 || _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L)) is false, there is no stpcpy prototype and hence no optimization. Thoughts ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 28

[opensuse-factory] Re: Fontconfig fonts priority
by Lars Müller 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Mariusz Fik wrote: > Dnia środa, 1 lutego 2012 01:03:13 Sven Burmeister pisze: > > Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, 22:43:11 schrieb Mariusz Fik: > > > > > > current fontconfig configuration[1] sets the highest priority for > > > Microsoft font. If user install them (i.e. Times New Roman, Arial, > > > Consolas) they will be set as _default_ for respectively families > > > (sans-serif, sans, monospace). Why do we promote Microsoft fonts > > > instead support open fonts, shipped with system? > > > > > > I propose[2] to downgrade those fonts. Thanks to this, we keep our > > > default font settings but those MS fonts will be still available for > > > use. > > > > > > Whats Your point of view in this case? > > > > Are you sure that the free fonts have the same quality – even if > > anti-aliasing is disabled? I remember ugly characters with free fonts > > unless I would use bitmap fonts and that's a no-go IMHO. My suggestion is: > > Set the best quality fonts as default. Those that do not want to use MS > > fonts simply do not install them. There was a reason to prefer those fonts > > and AFAIR it was quality or lack thereof regarding the free fonts. > > The goal is: to not set those fonts as _default_ and not to get them rid off . > Why Joe when install i.e. Consolas font should get it set as default monospace > font? Maybe he want's only to use it in a single program? Please continue this thread at opensuse-factory as it was already suggested as part of this thread. Therefore the Reply-To got set. The begin of this thread was here: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2012-01/msg02101.html Why? Cause it's more likely that you'll get the required attention. Thanks, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany

8 18

[opensuse-factory] gtkglext missing from factory
by Josef Reidinger 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

Hi, some project in games repository start failing as opensuse:Factory doesn't have gtkglext. Is it intention? I found that it is in 12.2 and cannot find in in opensuse:DROPPED. It is accident or intention? Thanks for answer Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-factory] KDE menus and gitorious
by Cristian Morales Vega 06 Nov '12

06 Nov '12

I created a merge request for desktop-data three weeks ago. It's just a minor patch that doesn't really fix anything but a warning from kbuildsycoca4. I'm not sure about how Gitorious works, maintainers are supposed to notice the "1" in the merge requests section or they receive an email notifying it? And since I'm on it. Since I updated my 11.3 system to KDE to 4.5 the "inline" part of the menu is not honored... Expected behavior? Known problem? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 6

[opensuse-factory] Splitting deb?
by Frank Lichtenheld 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Hi. I saw that Marguerite has added another two Debian packages to the "deb" openSUSE package. As a user of and contributor to that package, may I suggest that we stop that (and instead do the opposite, split the package)? I don't know what the historic reasons were for collecting multiple independent source packages in one RPM. But by now this is a very big and complicated spec file which makes maintenance somewhat hard, especially when multiple people are working on it. It also makes it hard to use parts of the packaging for other purposes (e.g. Fedora already has a dpkg package, but no debhelper or devscripts package. The current deb package doesn't work for Fedora and adapting it would make the spec file even bigger [it needs overrides for the automatic perl dependencies and other changes]) If there is no opposition I would volunteer to do all the work of splitting the deb package in its components and submit them to Factory (Probably something that would be targeted for 12.3, not 12.2?). Opinions? Would it make sense to file a bug about this? Or a fate entry? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <frank(a)lichtenheld.de> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 11

[opensuse-factory] Classifying a bug under installation or kernel in Bugzilla
by Roman Bysh 01 Oct '12

01 Oct '12

Hello all, I have been having a problem in which the installer with default kernel freezes when "Searching for Linux Partitions" during the probing. This has been happening since 12.2 M1 - M3. To resolve this I add "acpi=off" to the boot options. This should not happen with the default kernel. Should I add this as a bug under "Installation" or "Kernel" in Bugzilla? -- Cheers! Roman -------------------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE Linux -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! -------------------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-factory] Printing KDE-Help-Center: Too large font size?
by Dominik Baumann 28 Sep '12

28 Sep '12

Hi, printing help:/kcontrol/windowbehaviour/index.html from KDE help center prints with too large fonts. Even when decreased to minimal font size it still looks so: http://wstaw.org/m/2012/08/31/plasma-desktopDM1411.jpg I don't remember wether i still have the original KDE font settings or wether i changed them after installation (because of NX issues) So, before i will do a bug report: Can someone confirm this bug? db PS: Printing the above mentioned URL from konqueror is much better. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-factory] python2 or python3
by Alin M Elena 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

Hi, I see that the factory has both python2 and python3. Are there any plans about switching to python3 as default? I will also appreciate if the python maintainers can push=20 home:HighwayStar:branches:devel:languages:python python3-matplotlib Alin PS can we also, cripple kmail by default, or update the settings of our mailing list to accept html emails... It is bloody annoying to get your messages bounced back because of the default settings of the mail client. -- Without Questions there are no Answers! ______________________________________________________________________ Alin Marin ELENA Advanced Molecular Simulation Research Laboratory School of Physics, University College Dublin ---- Ardionsamblú Móilíneach Saotharlann Taighde Scoil na Fisice, An Coláiste Ollscoile, Baile Átha Cliath ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://alin.elenaworld.net ______________________________________________________________________ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 4

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed kernel changes to help upstream development
by Greg KH 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

Hi all, As part of one of the Linux kernel Summit discussions today, it was brought up that after a kernel is released (for example 3.5), it's a bit too late to be doing testing to see how well it is working out. The .0 release is usually a bit rough, and it takes until the .1 or .2 release to get most major issues out of the way. So, the kernel developers would like to get a wider range of testing, and one thing proposed would be to have rolling distros switch their kernel over a bit earlier to the new release than they had been doing. Specifically, around the -rc5 point in time would be great. That way, any reported regressions could be fixed sooner and get into the final .0 release for everyone to use. Now this does place a bit of a larger burden on the users of those distros to be diligent in reporting problems, and the distro engineers to report the issues upstream as well, but it sounds like a reasonable thing to try out. So, for the next kernel release, I'm thinking of switching the kernel in Tumbleweed over to 3.6 at the -rc5 timeframe. Does anyone strongly object to this happening? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

19 27

[opensuse-factory] segfault on zypper dup completion
by Felix Miata 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

I just did a dup to a 32 bit Beta 2 P4/Celeron system last dup'd about 6 weeks ago (host t2240). It appeared to complete normally, but after the zypper ps warning there was a segmentation fault line. Tail of dmesg: [ 37.342287] Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir(a)monad.swb.de). [ 38.104167] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory [ 38.113952] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period [ 44.610044] eth0: no IPv6 routers present [ 475.004020] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 475.004041] WARNING: at /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-desktop-3.4.2/linux-3.4/net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0x1e8/0x200() [ 475.004046] Hardware name: [ 475.004049] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (e100): transmit queue 0 timed out [ 475.004052] Modules linked in: snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device nfsd nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl sunrpc dm_mod sr_mod snd_intel8x0 cdrom snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support microcode pcspkr e100 i2c_i801 shpchp pci_hotplug floppy i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video button scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh fan processor thermal thermal_sys ata_generic ata_piix sata_sil [ 475.004113] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.4.2-1-desktop #1 [ 475.004117] Call Trace: [ 475.004138] [<c02054b9>] try_stack_unwind+0x199/0x1b0 [ 475.004149] [<c02041d7>] dump_trace+0x47/0xf0 [ 475.004155] [<c020551b>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x4b/0x60 [ 475.004161] [<c0205548>] show_trace+0x18/0x20 [ 475.004169] [<c06f02fe>] dump_stack+0x6d/0x72 [ 475.004178] [<c0233188>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb0 [ 475.004185] [<c0233253>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40 [ 475.004194] [<c0636ef8>] dev_watchdog+0x1e8/0x200 [ 475.004204] [<c0240808>] run_timer_softirq+0xf8/0x300 [ 475.004211] [<c02398a1>] __do_softirq+0x81/0x1b0 [ 475.004217] [<c02040b6>] do_softirq+0x76/0xb0 [ 475.004224] ---[ end trace e91e2e809858261d ]--- [ 475.021328] e100 0000:01:02.0: eth0: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex [ 2774.999044] end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0 [ 3268.406459] udevd[12045]: starting version 182 [ 4264.313985] nfsd: last server has exited, flushing export cache [ 4269.974101] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory [ 4269.974153] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period [ 4875.923898] zypper[2291]: segfault at 0 ip 08140fd8 sp bfcdcd80 error 4 in zypper[8048000+151000] -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 9

[opensuse-factory] Erasing the 1st VT at boot or not (systemd question)
by Carlos E. R. 15 Sep '12

15 Sep '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I boot 12.2 in text mode, with this line: title Desktop -- openSUSE 12.2 - verbose II root (hd0,2) kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/disk/by-label/Main resume=/dev/disk/by-label/Swap showopts splash=verbose console=tty1 loglevel=3 vga=0x333 3 initrd /boot/initrd This produces a detailed log during boot showing the services as they start or fail, which I find nice and productive. The problem is that when the virtual terminals are created, the previous text is erased. How can I avoid that? With system V this was controlled in inittab: 1:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty --noclear tty1 2:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty2 3:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty3 4:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty4 5:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty5 6:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty6 See the first terminal? It is different. Where is the equivalent for systemd? - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAaWO8ACgkQtTMYHG2NR9XIEgCdEqLfs0FFzWcceKr2p8n+i1bY kAgAn37XmEhBHa4tYwmMgy9jDaBXgb66 =3UB0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 8

[opensuse-factory] Packaging Guideline enforcement
by Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Dear Factory contributors and packagers, As openSUSE 12.2 is frozen and Factory is 'open to go wild' again, I would like to announce that the packaging guidelines have some extensions (not really new) that will be stricter enforced than they used to be. Currently a common rule to be 'ignored' or packagers are not aware is around the topics of: - .Changes entries - Patches First, the .changes entry (rpm changelog) surves two purposes: - News for the user - History tracking of packaging changes (often referenced in bugs to verify if a user has the latest packaging bugfixeS). A simple "Update to version x.y.z" is, as before, not accepted. There should be some buzz around the update for the user; some major reasons to the upgrade should be listed Changes on the package itself should be mentioned in a way that any other contributor to the same package can follow traces of why something is the way it is. Commonly, Added (build)dependencies are interesting to be seen, special hacks to make something work in a particular way [..]: Always consider that package maintenance is a distributed task and various contributors need to be able to step up at will. Patches: The rules about patches are listed at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines . Most prominent is likely the mentioning of the patches life cycle, which forces you to mention additions and removals of patches in the changelog. As history shows, this can be helpful if a patch got removed, and later a regression is reported; finding out when a patch was removed can be crucial in reconstructing feature sets (including contacting the contributor that dropped it.. which is easily extracted from the .changes if listed) The main appeal is to the devel project maintainers / reviewers, to keep out for those rules, to live according to them, as it is frustrating for everybody if a package needs to be declined by the Factory Review team: - The dev prj maintainer is the one getting the 'decline' (as it was usually a forwarded request), which often leaves the 'fixing' to the devel project maintainers, where the 'originator' of the fix would have been willing to actually do that... And the Factory Review team also prefers to see complying submissions to having to reject SRs... reject is not fun for anybody! Looking forward to many more SRs to accept! Dominique / DimStar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

19 44

[opensuse-factory] CDE goes Open Source
by Ilya Chernykh 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

Does anybody mean to package it? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

13 21

[opensuse-factory] Checking Release Notes
by Karl Eichwalder 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

Approaching the release date it would be good if more eyes would take a look at the release notes and provide feedback. Find the sources of the release notes in the berlios SVN: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/opensuse/trunk/documentation/release-n… I'd prefer patches against the XML file, but general feedback based on the HTML or YaST output format is also fine. We especially must make sure to eliminate all CHECKIT remarks ;) I added most of these CHECKIT remarks to old systemd related entries that I took over from the 12.1 document. aTdHvAaNnKcSe! -- Karl Eichwalder SUSE LINUX Products GmbH R&D / Documentation Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 4

[opensuse-factory] RC2 zypper dup What are the new packages?
by lynn 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

12.2 RC2 I ran zypper DUP yesterday and it updated around 190 packages. I did it again just now and there are another 174 today including having to accept a 12.2 licence agreement that includes a typo. Today's stuff includes new packages such as samba 3.6.7 and a new kernel 3.4.6-1.10.1 Is this the GM? Thanks, L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 14

[opensuse-factory] the latest nss-pam-ldapd package for 12.2?
by lynn 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi Is it too late to ask for the latest nss-pam-ldapd package to be included in 12.2? The latest stable version is 0.8.10 whilst 12.1 and 12.2 are stuck with the older 0.7.x series. Thanks L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 15

[opensuse-factory] 68 new mostly 32 bit packages on 64 bit 12.2
by Felix Miata 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Last zypper dup on this 64 bit system belonging to Bob Stia was less than a week ago. None of my own systems have anything 64 bit. Today I tried again, after 'zypper dup -r KDE49'. Now it wants to downgrade 23 packages including Firefox and SeaMonkey, and install 68 new packages, most of which are lib*32bit. There are only 5 to upgrade, 4 of which are qt3/kde3. Should I try again some other time? Something else? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 6

[opensuse-factory] basedonopensuse
by Wolfgang Rosenauer 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi, I just had a case where someone had issues with Firefox because he was using MozillaFirefox-branding-basedonopensuse Could someone give me some pointers what the purpose of these -basedonopensuse packages is and who is responsible for them? I'm only maintaining -branding-openSUSE at the moment and we just released an update for that for compatibility with Firefox 14 but I guess nobody touches basedonopensuse and therefore people are a bit stuck with bugs probably. Thanks, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 9

[opensuse-factory] 12.2 beta VirtualBox problem
by lynn 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

12.2 beta2 updated with Yast Online Update yesterday Hi everyone I have a problem with 12.2 on VirtualBox. The 4.1.16 that came with 12.2 gave a very large virtual text screen (the ones that have to have scrollbars) which is really annoying when working in a console in text mode. I removed 4.1.16 and installed 4.1.18. Same problem. The graphics modes are fine, it's just the cli. I have tried with and without the guest additions. Both versions of vbox work as expected on 12.1 Any ideas how to fix this? Thanks, L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 6

[opensuse-factory] RC2 very slow to boot after upgrade from RC1
by lynn 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

Hi I did an upgrade from RC1 which was on vbox, to RC2. The upgrade went OK but the system now takes 4 minutes to boot: I see the Welcome to GRUB message and then a fleeting glimpse of an error message. Then a black screen for a long time before the splash appears, then everything is back to normal Any ideas for 1. Where I could get to see the error message (in a log somewhere? I can't find anything like it under /var/log) 2. How to get the boot time down. Thanks L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 16

[opensuse-factory] What the devs miss for not reading the forums ;-)
by Carlos E. R. 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Praises like this: <http://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php?t=477123> - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAbETYACgkQtTMYHG2NR9XfDwCgh1SzXqFJYJ81i2ScHhd4RZa0 SQkAn0DJcpm/ccIaP4gZxLi32cKSYj5b =7MJX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 13