openSUSE Factory August 2010

factory@lists.opensuse.org

83 participants
41 discussions

[opensuse-factory] Cronie as default cron in Factory
by Michal Seben 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Hi all! Next week I will move cronie[1] package to Factory, so it will replace old cron. If someone is against this step, please just write what's wrong. As I announced earlier, you could find Cronie in Base:System repo [2] there is also prepared wiki about known changes after switch to cronie [3] [1]https://fedorahosted.org/cronie/ [2]https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=cronie&project=Base%3ASys… [3]http://en.opensuse.org/Cron_replace#Differences_between_old_openSUSE.27s_… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

12 28

[opensuse-factory] syslog-ng update
by Peter Czanik 11 Dec '10

11 Dec '10

Hello, I prepared updated syslog-ng packages with the close supervision of Marius Tomaschewski, the maintainer of the syslog-ng package. They are available in home:czanik in the openSUSE BS. I would like to see these packages included in Factory, to replace the ancient 2.0 syslog-ng, but MT seems to have disappeared (no response to e-mails in the past two weeks). Questions: - it works fine on my machines, but could anybody else test it? - what is the proper way to get syslog-ng updated in factory, if the maintainer seems to be unavailable? - I have now both 3.0 and 3.1 packages there, called syslog-ng and syslog-ng31. The ultimate goal is to include 3.1. Should I drop the current syslog-ng package and rename syslog-ng31 to syslog-ng? Bye, CzP -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-factory] Fwd: observed significant performance improvement in XFS a real-world application
by Linda Walsh 21 Nov '10

21 Nov '10

Forward this from the linux-xfs list, in hoping that decision-makers will consider XFS as the default suse OS install choice. It continually bests other file systems in optimized configuration performance tests and these new improvements sound like they only add more speed to the equation. For nearly all systems, disk speed is the bottle neck, so using the best solution possible should be strongly considered the default choice for all users -- regardless of 'political' concerns (which seem to often over-rule practicality, unfortunately). Linda p.s. I am not part of the xfs project. I've just used it with open suse (or previously, Suse) since ~ 2002 and have never regretted it. Current filesystem read rates using XFS are about 1GB/second on sustained multi-gigabyte reads. Using 1Gbit ethernet, Samba gets 97MB/s read from disk to 115 MB/s read from memory and 125MB/s writes to memory or disk. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:01:33 +0200 From: Peter Niemayer <niemayer(a)isg.de> To: linux-xfs(a)oss.sgi.com Hi all, we use XFS for a very I/O-intensive, in-house developed real-time database application, and whenever we see new or significantly changed file-systems becoming available, we run a benchmark using this application on a conserved, fixed real-world data set. I'm pleased to state that using the experimental "delaylog" mount option (in vanilla linux-2.6.35) we measured a 17% performance increase for our benchmark scenario. (Other mount-options in use both before and after the "delaylog" option: noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier) That's a lot given that XFS was the fastest performing file-system for this application already. It's also a promising result regarding stability, as several other tests (using e.g. reiser4 or ceph) in the past led to crashes in the same benchmark scenario. So thanks to all contributing developers for this significant optimization! Regards, Peter Niemayer _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs(a)oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

17 42

[opensuse-factory] Is the upgrade from 32 bits to 64 bit supported? Question for devs O:-)
by Carlos E. R. 07 Oct '10

07 Oct '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm asking here a question not related to factory directly, because I want to reach the devs. You can reply on opensuse list instead if you prefer. To keep it short (longer post in the opensuse list), I'm attempting to upgrade from 11.0 to 11.2 (32 bits) using the retail DVD, wich turns out it has only the x64 version. It offers to upgrade to 64 bit the 32 bit install: The architecture of the system installed in the selected partition is different from the one of this product" [continue] [cancel] I said "continue", then I checked the package list. As far as I could see, it intended to replace all packages with those corresponding to the 64 bits version. If this works, fine... but I was afraid, and I cancelled. Not because risking data (it is a copy), but because of possible waste of time. I thought I'd better RFC. Has anybody done this, an upgrade from 32 to 64 bits? Does it work? Is it "supported"? - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.2 x86_64 "Emerald" GM (Elessar)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktvNHIACgkQU92UU+smfQVsTwCfSYFG8N7Owo/PWNu0ylYKGqmr fuQAoJQSLDrMlTDMYeRihU5SfBa0fVz8 =zvu9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

9 22

[opensuse-factory] comparing png files for build-compare
by Andreas Jaeger 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

For build-compare, we compare that the files are the same of the current build and the last build - and thus throw away the new build if they are the same. For this we can ignore all timestamps. I now have a problem with png files, they contain timestamps, e.g.: /usr/share/icons/Tango/24x24/actions/address-book-new.png differs ( PNG image data, 24 x 24, 8-bit/color R GBA, non-interlaced) --- /tmp/tmp.DxFiypOYVS 2010-08-25 07:07:40.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.wG7ZYsxIU5 2010-08-25 07:07:40.000000000 +0000 @@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ 00000390 39 6f 0f 3e 20 81 16 a3 9e 85 ff 1a ff 00 67 f8 |9o.> .........g.| 000003a0 31 7c 0c 93 b4 fd 00 00 00 25 74 45 58 74 64 61 |1|.......%tEXtda| 000003b0 74 65 3a 63 72 65 61 74 65 00 32 30 31 30 2d 30 |te:create.2010-0| -000003c0 38 2d 31 34 54 31 37 3a 34 32 3a 35 39 2b 30 30 |8-14T17:42:59+00| -000003d0 3a 30 30 a9 67 ca a8 00 00 00 25 74 45 58 74 64 |:00.g.....%tEXtd| +000003c0 38 2d 32 35 54 30 37 3a 30 33 3a 33 31 2b 30 30 |8-25T07:03:31+00| +000003d0 3a 30 30 63 01 be 97 00 00 00 25 74 45 58 74 64 |:00c......%tEXtd| 000003e0 61 74 65 3a 6d 6f 64 69 66 79 00 32 30 31 30 2d |ate:modify.2010-| -000003f0 30 38 2d 31 34 54 31 37 3a 34 32 3a 35 39 2b 30 |08-14T17:42:59+0| -00000400 30 3a 30 30 d8 3a 72 14 00 00 00 00 49 45 4e 44 |0:00.:r.....IEND| +000003f0 30 38 2d 32 35 54 30 37 3a 30 33 3a 33 31 2b 30 |08-25T07:03:31+0| +00000400 30 3a 30 30 12 5c 06 2b 00 00 00 00 49 45 4e 44 |0:00.\.+....IEND| 00000410 ae 42 60 82 |.B`.| 00000414 How can I compare two png files with ignoring the timestamp? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj(a){novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

9 17

[opensuse-factory] Python 2.7 coming to Factory
by Jan Matejek 03 Sep '10

03 Sep '10

Fellow developers and users, just a heads-up: moments ago I have submitted a new Python version 2.7. This version contains many new and interesting features, and only a small chance of breaking existing code: no backwards-incompatible changes, and no big changes worth mentioning. For more details see [1]. There is one thing notable for people who write or maintain software that embeds Python: the new function PySys_SetArgvEx [2] does the job originally done by PySys_SetArgv, but closes a nasty security problem with the latter [3][4]. Most software should be fixed by now, but please review your packages anyway. have fun m. [1] http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html#porting-to-python-2-7 [2] http://docs.python.org/dev/c-api/init.html#PySys_SetArgvEx - the link points to python 3 docs, but applies to 2.7 as well [3] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-5983 [4] http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/26/2 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-factory] [Request] Add google-tallkplugin to openSUSE:Factory:NonFree
by Malcolm 02 Sep '10

02 Sep '10

Hi List I have created a bug requesting adding the google-talkplugin to openSUSE Non free, please review and add your support :) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635607 -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 11.3 (x86_64) Kernel 2.6.34-12-default up 9 days 20:14, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.15, 0.06 GPU GeForce 8600 GTS Silent - Driver Version: 256.52 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

11 20

[opensuse-factory] iscan-proprietary-drivers
by Terje J. Hanssen 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

I am aware of the OSS iscan-free, but yet, the non-OSS iscan-proprietary-drivers has so far been a simple and reliable application for my Epson scanner with ADF or Photo adapter options. The previous iscan-proprietary-drivers-2.10.0 for openSUSE 11.2 was available here http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/11.2/repo/non-oss/suse/i586/ Why is it left out on openSUSE 11.3 ? Rgds, Terje J. Hanssen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] make-3.82 testcases fail *sometimes* (fwd)
by Matthias Hopf 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

FYI regarding make 3.82, which will soon hit factory. Matthias -- Matthias Hopf <mhopf(a)suse.de> __ __ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat(a)mshopf.de Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Status: distribution
by Stephan Kulow 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

Hi, I plan to publish the first 11.4 milestone this week. The changes aren't that big (for once we still have 2.6.34 kernel), but we have a new libzypp media backend and new gnome and kde major versions, that should suffice for a new milestone. We have still > 60 failing packages, but nothing I would consider out of control - still it would be good if more would look around and fix left and right and/or do version updates of packages they care for. Feel free to bookmark the build service URL behind http://preview.tinyurl.com/2wzh836 The polished roadmap I will push into the wiki this week, I decided against any change in the milestone counting, but michl and me agreed to always talk about "Milestone X of 6" when we talk about milestones in writing. I hope this will be enough to make people aware that Milestone 5 is about the end. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

openSUSE Factory August 2010