February 2015 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] acpid requires systemd?
by Felix Miata 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

Can this be true? If so, why? Zypper won't let me upgrade acpid without breakage unless systemd is installed too. I have systemd locked out, as I'd rather test things I can understand in Factory, not major overhaul stuff. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 3

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE maintainer finder tool
by Bernhard M. Wiedemann 14 Jan '16

14 Jan '16

Hi, during our Hackweek at SUSE I spent a day or two to improve my tool to help finding the maintainer for software in Factory, which comes in handy for bugzilla-screening (getting bugs to the right people). You can use the tool at http://maintainer.zq1.de/ You can give it command names, full filepath, or package names (exact matches (including case) only) If you want to run or extend it, the code is all open on https://github.com/bmwiedemann/susepkginfo and the databases can be fetched from http://aw.zq1.de/db.suse/ The actual maintainer information comes from OBS, so is always current. Ciao Bernhard M. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 14

[opensuse-factory] xgettext aborts [Fwd: Build failure of Base:System/coreutils-testsuite openSUSE_Factory/x86_64]
by Bernhard Voelker 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

What happened to xgettext? [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext --default-domain=coreutils --directory=.. \ [ 198s] --add-comments=TRANSLATORS: --keyword=_ --keyword=N_ --flag=_:1:pass-c-format --flag=N_:1:pass-c-format --flag=error:3:c-format --flag=error_at_line:5:c-format --flag=asnprintf:3:c-f ormat --flag=asprintf:2:c-format --flag=error:3:c-format --flag=error_at_line:5:c-format --flag=vasnprintf:3:c-format --flag=vasprintf:2:c-format --flag=verror:3:c-format --flag=verror_at_line:5:c- format --flag=wrapf:1:c-format --flag=xasprintf:1:c-format --flag=xfprintf:2:c-format --flag=xprintf:1:c-format --from-code=UTF-8 --keyword=proper_name:1,'"This is a proper name. See the gettext ma nual, section Names."' --keyword=proper_name_utf8:1,'"This is a proper name. See the gettext manual, section Names."' ${end_of_xgettext_options+} --flag=error:3:c-format --flag=error_at_line:5:c-f ormat --keyword='proper_name:1,"This is a proper name. See the gettext manual, section Names."' --keyword='proper_name_utf8:1,"This is a proper name. See the gettext manual, section Names."' --flag =asprintf:2:c-format --flag=vasprintf:2:c-format --flag=verror:3:c-format --flag=verror_at_line:5:c-format --flag=xprintf:1:c-format --flag=xvprintf:1:c-format --flag=xfprintf:2:c-format --flag=xvf printf:2:c-format --flag=xasprintf:1:c-format \ [ 198s] --files-from=./POTFILES.in \ [ 198s] --copyright-holder='Free Software Foundation, Inc.' \ [ 198s] --package-name="${package_gnu}coreutils" \ [ 198s] --package-version='8.22' \ [ 198s] --msgid-bugs-address="$msgid_bugs_address" \ [ 198s] ;; \ [ 198s] esac [ 198s] *** Error in `/usr/bin/xgettext': realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x00000000018ff590 *** [ 198s] ======= Backtrace: ========= [ 198s] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7343f)[0x7fa6640e043f] [ 198s] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x78cae)[0x7fa6640e5cae] [ 198s] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7bde5)[0x7fa6640e8de5] [ 198s] /usr/lib64/libgettextlib-0.19.1.so(xrealloc+0xe)[0x7fa66445b56e] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x40b301] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x40b38d] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x40b4e1] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x40b98e] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x40ba93] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x40c340] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x406953] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x4052cc] [ 198s] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7fa66408eb05] [ 198s] /usr/bin/xgettext[0x405ba3] Have a nice day, Berny -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Build failure of Base:System/coreutils-testsuite openSUSE_Factory/x86_64 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:15:31 +0000 From: hermes(a)opensuse.org Reply-To: hermes(a)opensuse.org To: mail(a)bernhard-voelker.de Package coreutils-testsuite (version 8.22-248.68) of project Base:System failed to build for openSUSE_Factory / x86_64. Review the build log: osc remotebuildlog Base:System coreutils-testsuite openSUSE_Factory x86_64 | less Check out the package for editing: osc checkout Base:System coreutils-testsuite -- Hermes messaging (http://hermes.opensuse.org) openSUSE Build Service (https://build.opensuse.org/) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 5

Re: [opensuse-factory] repository priorities with Tumbleweed
by Thomas Langkamp 16 Jul '15

16 Jul '15

> No, please don't confuse people, if you add more repos than just > Tumbleweed you really had better know what you are doing or bad things > can, and will, happen :) I understand. I just would like to add the following to http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Tumbleweed - between ## is the new stuff: "The only supported method of repo use for Tumbleweed is to have only the main repos (Oss, Non-oss, and Update) and the Tumbleweed repo active. ## If you use more repositorys you have to know how repo-priorities work, but even then Tumblweed does NOT support this ## " It would also be good to move this information to "Special concerns" and to move the whole "Special concerns"-section up. For example "Special Concerns Virtual Machines ... Third Party Drivers ... ## Non-Standard Repos: Only use Oss, Non-oss, and Update combined with the Tumbleweed-Standard repo. Everything else is not supported and might break the system ## " >You do know the legal reasons behind why packman is there, right? Yes. Then I do not whish you personaly to support Packman with TW - I understand now that this is not possible from your perspectivg. But...as the OS community discusses right now if/how to strengthen Tumbleweed... one way would be, that Packman+TW would be supported BY Packman. So I will ask the Packman-guys to do that... I hope this is possible for them. Without Packman Tumbleweed is so ... "anti-multimedia" ;) thanks anyway :D -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 18

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE:Factory:NonFree repository
by Kyrill Detinov 03 Jul '15

03 Jul '15

Hello. /factory/repo/non-oss/ isn't updated since September 23. -- WBR Kyrill

4 9

[opensuse-factory] Mandos in openSUSE
by mots 01 May '15

01 May '15

Hello, I was told on the opensuse(a)opensuse.org list to post this here. Debian GNU/Linux has a program called Mandos, which allows computers with encrypted root filesystem to boot unattended as long as they are in the same LAN segment as the mandos server. If someone steals the computer or copies the storage of an ecrypted VM then they'll still have to enter the password on boot. It needs to install its client in the initrd of the encrypted machine, which is why it only works on Debian GNU/Linux for now. I feel like it would be a great addition to openSUSE GNU/Linux, but it needs a lot of changes in the boot process in order to work. More info about Mandos: https://wiki.recompile.se/wiki/Mandos Regards, mots

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Upcoming transition to GCC 5
by Richard Biener 09 Apr '15

09 Apr '15

Hi, we are currently trying to get openSUSE:Factory:Rings:0-Bootstrap and openSUSE:Factory:Rings:1-MinimalX clean to build with GCC 5 in the openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc49 project. Once that works reasonably I will push GCC 5 to Factory without enabling it as a default - that will be done when it works fully (help appreciated at that point). There is a porting-to document that explains some issues you may run into (also consider the 4.9 variant as we didn't transition to that): https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html You may also find the analysis of Fedora interesting which explains why some packages now fail to build: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/207549.html GCC 5 packages can be installed from devel:gcc where they are regularly updated. Those sources also feed openSUSE:Factory:Staging:Gcc49. Richard. -- Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.de> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

10 27

[opensuse-factory] Monospace font issue
by Kyrill Detinov 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

Hello. Recently updated my Factory running workstation (x86_64, Xfce). Monospace font interval is increased badly. I'm sure, I use DejaVu Sans Mono as a monospace font. I choose 'monospace 9' in programs settings. There is a screenshot: http://susepaste.org/view/simple/38919191 Changing to 'DejaVu Sans Mono 9': http://susepaste.org/view/simple/70371539 It looks like it was before. % fc-match Monospace Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/56-user.conf", line 14: reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated. please move it to /home/kent/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf manually Monospace: "Monospace" "Regular" -- WBR Kyrill

9 23

[opensuse-factory] Java:* repo cleanup
by Tomáš Chvátal 07 Mar '15

07 Mar '15

Hello people, I am going to clean up the mess we have in Java namespace by removing all the experimental subprojects which were not updated. As most of this will just delete packages that fail to build or are broken one way or other it should be no biggie, but still scream now if you think it will ruin your mojo :-) The current setup: base Base Java platform for SUSE base:maven2 base:scratch Scratch esmska Packages for esmska Factory Devel project of Java packages for openSUSE:Factory jpackage-1.7 JPackage 1.7 packages jpackage-5.0 Jpackage 5.0 jpackage-5.0:bootstrap jpackage-5.0 bootstrap jpackage-6.0 Jpackage 6.0 development jpackage-6.0:bootstrap jpackage-6.0 bootstrap packages Factory Java packages packages:maven Maven testing playground After cleanup: esmska Packages for esmska Factory Devel project of Java packages for openSUSE:Factory packages Factory Java packages packages:maven Maven testing playground I will do this removal next monday unless I get decent reason why I should not as I already announced this once beforehand. Cheers Tom

4 13

[opensuse-factory] Staging report: PIE for everyone
by Marcus Meissner 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hi, The "build all binaries with PIE" has been proceeding slowly. - gcc-PIE package is in Tumbleweed, after installing it PIE is default. - making it default will be done via Requires in the "rpm-build" subpackage of rpm. https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:PIE is tracking build. - kmod: bug was exposed by PIE building, fix submitted and upstream. - cmake: the newer "file" in Factory broke "PIE binary" detection in cmake. SRed to devel project and mailed upstream - various package using assembler that uses %EBX (PIC register for x86). Common pattern seems to be inline "cpuid" assembler, as CPUID reports some flags in %EBX. I fixed one or two, for others building without PIE is probably better (syslinux and memtest86+) - kernel does not build (just does not like PIC building) - gcc48 does not build (not debugged yet) Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4