> No, please don't confuse people, if you add more repos than just
> Tumbleweed you really had better know what you are doing or bad things
> can, and will, happen :)
I understand.
I just would like to add the following to http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Tumbleweed -
between ## is the new stuff:
"The only supported method of repo use for Tumbleweed is to have only the main repos
(Oss, Non-oss, and Update) and the Tumbleweed repo active. ## If you use more
repositorys you have to know how repo-priorities work, but even then Tumblweed does NOT
support this ## "
It would also be good to move this information to "Special concerns" and to move the
whole "Special concerns"-section up. For example
"Special Concerns
Virtual Machines ...
Third Party Drivers ...
## Non-Standard Repos: Only use Oss, Non-oss, and Update combined with the
Tumbleweed-Standard repo. Everything else is not supported and might break the system ## "
>You do know the legal reasons behind why packman is
there, right?
Yes. Then I do not whish you personaly to support Packman with TW - I understand now
that this is not possible from your perspectivg. But...as the OS community discusses
right now if/how to strengthen Tumbleweed... one way would be, that Packman+TW would be
supported BY Packman. So I will ask the Packman-guys to do that... I hope this is
possible for them. Without Packman Tumbleweed is so ... "anti-multimedia" ;)
thanks anyway :D
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
Export button is greyed out no matter what.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
On 12/01/2011 11:44 AM, Kyrill Detinov wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> We have one package affected in standard repo: leechcraft-eiskaltdcpp.
> The program itself doesn't require php5. But the package includes
> example scripts with shebang '!/usr/bin/php5'. So the package isn't
> installable.
>
> Also I see the same problem with pgfouine from Contrib (written in
> PHP) and eiskaltdcpp from filesharing repo. Maybe more in third-party
> repositories.
>
> Can we have symlink /usr/bin/php -> php5 in php5 package? Or affected
> packages should be fixed?
>
Please file a bug against php5 and assign to Cristian Rodríguez.
--
Viele Grüße,
Sascha
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi:
Will be cool if rpmlint could warn when upstream packages attempt to use
the -ansi gcc option because it inhibits usage of gcc builtin functions
while optimizing (list here -->
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#Other-Builtins)
most recently it caught my attention that it also disables the new
"optimize-strlen" pass in gcc 4.7, in particular this:
"for hosted compilations where stpcpy is available in the runtime and
headers provide its prototype, e.g.
void foo (char *a, const char *b, const char *c, const char *d)
{
strcpy (a, b); strcat (a, c); strcat (a, d);
}
can be optimized into:
void foo (char *a, const char *b, const char *c, const char *d)
{
strcpy (stpcpy (stpcpy (a, b), c), d);
}
"
when -ansi is used and (defined(_GNU_SOURCE) || (_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 700 ||
_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L)) is false, there is no stpcpy prototype and
hence no optimization.
Thoughts ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Mariusz Fik wrote:
> Dnia środa, 1 lutego 2012 01:03:13 Sven Burmeister pisze:
> > Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, 22:43:11 schrieb Mariusz Fik:
> > >
> > > current fontconfig configuration[1] sets the highest priority for
> > > Microsoft font. If user install them (i.e. Times New Roman, Arial,
> > > Consolas) they will be set as _default_ for respectively families
> > > (sans-serif, sans, monospace). Why do we promote Microsoft fonts
> > > instead support open fonts, shipped with system?
> > >
> > > I propose[2] to downgrade those fonts. Thanks to this, we keep our
> > > default font settings but those MS fonts will be still available for
> > > use.
> > >
> > > Whats Your point of view in this case?
> >
> > Are you sure that the free fonts have the same quality – even if
> > anti-aliasing is disabled? I remember ugly characters with free fonts
> > unless I would use bitmap fonts and that's a no-go IMHO. My suggestion is:
> > Set the best quality fonts as default. Those that do not want to use MS
> > fonts simply do not install them. There was a reason to prefer those fonts
> > and AFAIR it was quality or lack thereof regarding the free fonts.
>
> The goal is: to not set those fonts as _default_ and not to get them rid off .
> Why Joe when install i.e. Consolas font should get it set as default monospace
> font? Maybe he want's only to use it in a single program?
Please continue this thread at opensuse-factory as it was already
suggested as part of this thread. Therefore the Reply-To got set.
The begin of this thread was here:
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2012-01/msg02101.html
Why?
Cause it's more likely that you'll get the required attention.
Thanks,
Lars
--
Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team
SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
I created a merge request for desktop-data three weeks ago. It's just
a minor patch that doesn't really fix anything but a warning from
kbuildsycoca4. I'm not sure about how Gitorious works, maintainers are
supposed to notice the "1" in the merge requests section or they
receive an email notifying it?
And since I'm on it. Since I updated my 11.3 system to KDE to 4.5 the
"inline" part of the menu is not honored... Expected behavior? Known
problem?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi.
I saw that Marguerite has added another two Debian packages to the
"deb" openSUSE package. As a user of and contributor to that package,
may I suggest that we stop that (and instead do the opposite, split
the package)?
I don't know what the historic reasons were for collecting multiple
independent source packages in one RPM. But by now this is a very big
and complicated spec file which makes maintenance somewhat hard,
especially when multiple people are working on it. It also makes it
hard to use parts of the packaging for other purposes (e.g. Fedora
already has a dpkg package, but no debhelper or devscripts package.
The current deb package doesn't work for Fedora and adapting it would
make the spec file even bigger [it needs overrides for the automatic
perl dependencies and other changes])
If there is no opposition I would volunteer to do all the work of
splitting the deb package in its components and submit them to Factory
(Probably something that would be targeted for 12.3, not 12.2?).
Opinions? Would it make sense to file a bug about this? Or a fate entry?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <frank(a)lichtenheld.de>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hello all,
I have been having a problem in which the installer with default kernel
freezes when "Searching for Linux Partitions" during the probing.
This has been happening since 12.2 M1 - M3.
To resolve this I add "acpi=off" to the boot options.
This should not happen with the default kernel. Should I add this as a
bug under "Installation" or "Kernel" in Bugzilla?
--
Cheers!
Roman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
openSUSE Linux -- Get it! Discover it! Share it!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
12.2 beta2 updated with Yast Online Update yesterday
Hi everyone
I have a problem with 12.2 on VirtualBox.
The 4.1.16 that came with 12.2 gave a very large virtual text screen
(the ones that have to have scrollbars) which is really annoying when
working in a console in text mode.
I removed 4.1.16 and installed 4.1.18. Same problem. The graphics modes
are fine, it's just the cli.
I have tried with and without the guest additions.
Both versions of vbox work as expected on 12.1
Any ideas how to fix this?
Thanks,
L x
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
In 12.1 I just type 3 at the prompt. In 12.2 I don't seem to have the
opportunity to type 3 anywhere.
Thanks,
L x
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org