May 2011

[opensuse-factory] KDE menus and gitorious
by Cristian Morales Vega 06 Nov '12

06 Nov '12

I created a merge request for desktop-data three weeks ago. It's just a minor patch that doesn't really fix anything but a warning from kbuildsycoca4. I'm not sure about how Gitorious works, maintainers are supposed to notice the "1" in the merge requests section or they receive an email notifying it? And since I'm on it. Since I updated my 11.3 system to KDE to 4.5 the "inline" part of the menu is not honored... Expected behavior? Known problem? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+… [View More]

4 6

[opensuse-factory] Kernel for 11.4?
by Jeff Mahoney 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all - Since technically we're in feature freeze for 11.4, I thought I'd put this out for discussion. Factory is currently using 2.6.36 which was released 3 weeks ago. Upstream versions tend to take about 10-11 weeks, on average, to release. The scheduled release for the first openSUSE RC is Jan 20. The scheduled release for the first RC is Jan 20. The typical development time for a kernel release, on average, is about 10-11 weeks. That puts … [View More]the release of 2.6.37 around Dec 29 to Jan 12. That sounds like kind of a tight window, but the reality is that the differences in the later kernel RCs tend to be small and fix bugs. The "real" development happens in -rc1, which was released about two weeks ago. Later -rcs serve to stabilize the development that went into -rc1. So, the the feature freeze aspect of it will be a one-shot, when I update to -rc1. (Actually, I hardly ever update to -rc1 and instead use - -rc2 which tends to be more stable). I've already done the merge work for 2.6.37-rc1 since the master kernel always tracks the latest upstream. Xen is the lone exception, as it usually is, but Jan Beulich has been great about getting that completed shortly after I do the update. This time might be a little more difficult because much of the Xen code has been merged into the mainline kernel so there's some sorting out to be done. As far as testing goes, we're still early enough that we won't lose a lot of effort. I'd update Factory to 2.6.37-rc2 as soon as it is released upstream, which should be this week. Our usual corps of dedicated testers can dig in quickly. In my experience, though, the number of testers drastically increases around the RC1 release. I wish it weren't so, but it is. So revving the kernel now isn't likely to toss out a lot of testing. The biggest "feature" I'm going for is not having to backport fixes from 2.6.37. The BKL removal patches and the VFS scalability patches are going to improve performance on multicore systems. The removal of I/O barriers should also be pretty noticeable but I haven't had time to verify that yet. So, opinions? - -Jeff Features that are going into 2.6.37: - - The inode portion of the VFS scalability patches - - More BKL removal, including parts of the core kernel - - Block I/O can be throttled via cgroups - - Simple pNFS support - - In-kernel PPTP (tunneling) acceleration - - "Lazy" inode table creation for ext4 to allow faster fs creation - - Batched discard support, which allows the file system to advise the block layer to use the TRIM command. This allows online TRIMs, but is only implemented in ext4 so far. - - Xen dom0 support (mostly) - - The usual round of bug fixes. - - fanotify - - Block barriers have been removed[1] Drivers: - - Systems and processors: - Flexibility Connect boards - Telechips TCC ARM926-based systems - Telechips TCC8000-SDK development kits - Vista Silicon Visstrim_m10 i.MX27-based boards - LaCie d2 Network v2 NAS boards - Qualcomm MSM8x60 RUMI3 emulators - Qualcomm MSM8x60 SURF eval boards - Eukrea CPUIMX51SD modules - Freescale MPC8308 P1M boards - APM APM821xx evaluation boards - Ito SH-2007 reference boards - IBM "SMI-free" realtime BIOS's - MityDSP-L138 and MityDSP-1808 systems - OMAP3 Logic 3530 LV SOM boards - OMAP3 IGEP modules - taskit Stamp9G20 CPU modules - aESOP Samsung S5PV210-based Torbreck boards - - Block: - Chelsio T4 iSCSI offload engines - Cypress Astoria USB SD host controllers - Marvell PXA168/PXA910/MMP2 SD host controllers - ST Microelectronics Flexible Static Memory Controllers - - Input: - Roccat Pyra gaming mice - UC-Logic WP4030U, WP5540U and WP8060U tablets - several varieties of Waltop tablets - OMAP4 keyboard controllers - NXP Semiconductor LPC32XX touchscreen controllers - Hanwang Art Master III tablets - ST-Ericsson Nomadik SKE keyboards - ROHM BU21013 touch panel controllers - TI TNETV107X touchscreens - - Miscellaneous: - Freescale eSPI controllers - Topcliff platform controllher hub devices - OMAP AES crypto accelerators - NXP PCA9541 I2C master selectors - Intel Clarksboro memory controller hubs - OMAP 2-4 onboard serial ports - GPIO-controlled fans - Linear Technology LTC4261 Negative Voltage Hot Swap Controller I2C interfaces - TI BQ20Z75 gas gauge ICs - OMAP TWL4030 BCI chargers - ROHM ROHM BH1770GLC and OSRAM SFH7770 combined ALS and proximity sensors - Avago APDS990X combined ALS and proximity sensors - Intersil ISL29020 ambient light sensors - Medfield Avago APDS9802 ALS sensor modules - Basic, memory-mapped GPIO controllers - Intel Topcliff GPIO controllers - Intel Moorestown/Medfield i2c controllers - IDT CPS Gen.2 SRIO RapidIO switches - Freescale i.MX DMA engines - ARM PrimeCell PL080 or PL081 DMA engines - Cypress West Bridge Astoria controllers - USB ENE card readers - Asahi Kasei AK8975 3-axis magnetometers - OLPC XO display controller devices - Analog Devices AD799x analog/digital converters - Winbond/Nuvoton W83795G/ADG hardware monitoring chips - Flarion OFDM usb and pcmcia modems - Maxim MAX8952 and MAX8998 Power Management ICs - National Semiconductors LP3972 PMIC regulators - Broadcom BCM63xx hardware watchdogs - - Network: - Brocade 1010/1020 10Gb Ethernet cards - Conexant CX82310 USB ethernet ports - Atheros AR9170 "otus" 802.11n USB devices - Topcliff PCH Gigabit Ethernet controllers - Intel Topcliff platform controller hub CAN interfaces - Technologic Systems TS-CAN1 PC104 peripheral boards - SBE wanPMC-2T3E3 interfaces - RealTek RTL8712U (RTL8192SU) Wireless LAN NICs (replaces older rtl8712 driver) - Atheros AR6003 wireless interface controllers - Beeceem USB Wimax adapters - Broadcom bcm43xx wireless chipsets - - Sound: - Marvell 88pm860x codecs - TI WL1273 FM radio codecs - HP iPAQ RX1950 audio devices - Native Instruments Traktor Kontrol S4 audio devices - Aztech Sound Galaxy AZT1605 and AZT2316 ISA sound cards - Wolfson Micro WM8985 and WM8962 codecs - Wolfson Micro WM8804 S/PDIF transceivers - Samsung S/PDIF controllers - Cirrus Logic EP93xx AC97 controllers - Intel MID SST DSP devices - - USB: Intel Langwell USB OTG transceivers - YUREX "leg shake" sensors - USB-attached SCSI devices - - Video4Linux2: remotes using the RC-5 (streamzap) protocol - Konica chipset-based cameras - Sharp IX2505V silicon tuners - LME2510 DM04/QQBOX USB DVB-S boxes - Samsung s5h1432 demodulators - Several new Conexant cx23417-based boards - Nuvoton w836x7hg consumer infrared transceivers - OmniVision OV6650 sensors - OMAP1 camera interfaces - Siliconfile SR030PC30 VGA cameras - Sony imx074 sensors - VIA integrated chipset camera controllers - -Jeff [1] This is because they were a very big hammer that had a reputation for killing performance. They're necessary for safely using journals on devices with write caching enabled, but were implemented by flushing the entire I/O queue to physical media -- not just "to disk" which includes the disk's write cache. The new implementation will still use the flush-to-media feature but will not stall the i/o queue. - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzhW0YACgkQLPWxlyuTD7JgBACbBfR+uJwfKKnEcBZIg/KeIj/S hikAnRiL9nG50QoKZkrn1AsmGljnGvYn =T/Hp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

15 33

[opensuse-factory] IPV6 privacy in openSUSE
by Andreas Jaeger 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

I wonder whether our IPv6 settings are the right ones after reading the following article (sorry, German only): http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/IPv6-Smartphones-gefaehrden-Privatsp… which references: http://www.heise.de/netze/hotline/IPv6-anonym-1100727.html We set use_tempaddr to 0 by default (disabling privacy extensions) and set it to 1 if enabled. The article advises to use 2. Background: By default (value 0) my IPv6 address will be derived from my hardware (macaddr) and therefore … [View More]

7 6

[opensuse-factory] Cronie as default cron in Factory
by Michal Seben 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Hi all! Next week I will move cronie[1] package to Factory, so it will replace old cron. If someone is against this step, please just write what's wrong. As I announced earlier, you could find Cronie in Base:System repo [2] there is also prepared wiki about known changes after switch to cronie [3] [1]https://fedorahosted.org/cronie/ [2]https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=cronie&project=Base%3ASys… [3]http://en.opensuse.org/Cron_replace#Differences_between_old_openSUSE.… [View More]

12 28

[opensuse-factory] Systemd by default
by Tim 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Hi, to my knowledge systemd supposed to be the default init daemon in 12.1. Doesn't it make sense to activate it now (or as early as possible) to get at least some feedback from the people running factory? Tim -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

21 57

[opensuse-factory] libqt-* package links in tumbleweed
by Jiri Slaby 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Hi Greg, libqt4-doc-devel and libqt4-sql-plugins should point to libqt4 sources in Tumbleweed, not in KDE:Qt. Otherwise they can get out of sync (the fixed libqt4-doc-devel/sql-plugins links from TW to KDE:Qt still point to the latest liqt4 sources in KDE:Qt, not fixed ones). I've fixed it for now. However could you modify your scripts to not update these packages the same as for kernel-<non-source>? thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)… [View More]

4 7

[opensuse-factory] Can packages in the 11.4 standard or update repos build against tumbleweed?
by Dave Plater 03 Jun '11

03 Jun '11

Can packages in 11.4 standard or update repositories build against packages provided in the tumbleweed update repository.? I've filed bnc#696826 about 11.4's lv2core-devel's lv2config being unable to function due to a lack of package python-redland. The LV2 plugin system cannot be used at all if the package can't build against lv2core and slv2, I submitted new packages lv2core, slv2 and an updated redland package that included the python bindings before 11.4's release, lv2core is in the 11.4 … [View More]distribution but slv2 is still in review, here is it's history : 62079 State:declined By:autobuild When:2011-02-18T16:30:51 submit: multimedia:libs/slv2 -> openSUSE:Factory note: obsoleted by submitreq 62078 From: plater(new) Descr: Removed conflict for libslv2-8 62078 State:review By:coolo When:2011-03-28T16:14:46 submit: multimedia:libs/slv2 -> openSUSE:Factory From: plater(new) -> saschpe(review) Descr: Removed conflict for libslv2-8 60049 State:declined By:autobuild When:2011-02-18T16:30:43 submit: multimedia:libs/slv2 -> openSUSE:Factory From: plater(new) Descr: Add slv2-0.6.6-licencefix.patch to remove file with conflicting GPLv2 statement in the header. See bnc#669117 and slv upstream drobillad #630 59638 State:declined By:autobuild When:2011-02-04T17:25:01 submit: multimedia:libs/slv2 -> openSUSE:Factory From: plater(new) Descr: New package slv2 is a library to make the use of LV2 plugins as simple as possible for applications.slv2 is free software (GPL v2 or later) written in C99 using the Redland RDF toolkit, and is known to work on GNU/Linux and Mac OS X. This package is the other part of the slv2 lv2core needed for openSUSE packages to use the LV2 plugin system and compliments submit request sr#59624 the home url for this package is http://drobilla.net/software/slv2/ apart from the url and licence all of the other relevant information is contained in submit request id 59624 and this is sr#62078 the last request which is still open : Request #62078: submit: multimedia:libs/slv2(r5) -> openSUSE:Factory/slv2 Message: Removed conflict for libslv2-8 State: review 2011-03-28T16:14:46 coolo Comment: run checker Review: new darix None None None Please decide accepted None factory-auto 2011-03-29T16:16:48 coolo Builds for all Factory repos found Output of check script (non-fatal): History: review 2011-03-18T10:39:07 saschpe new 2011-02-18T16:18:50 plater This last request effectively blocks slv from even going into factory. There was a comment made in a reply during one of my many emails pleading for slv2 to be accepted that it was a duplicate of a Packman package and I replied that it's purpose was to enable multimedia applications to build with support for LV2 plugins and openSUSE packages cannot build against Packman packages. I'm busy updating qtractor from 0.7.8 to 0.7.9 the earlier version would have been in 11.4 had slv2 been present and now it seems that version 0.7.9 is also going to be blocked. Reference threads : http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2011-02/msg00678.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2011-02/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2011-01/msg00377.html I originally created the lv2core and slv2 packages when a user requested LV2 plugin support for ardour which isn't in the main distribution but he was happy with the result and this verifies that there isn't anything wrong with the package. Maybe I violated an openSUSE rule inadvertently but if nobody explains what it was I may do it again. I'm passionate about openSUSE multimedia and I feel that it presents an important face of openSUSE. Regards Dave Plater -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

2 4

[opensuse-factory] new openSUSE:* source processing method. PLEASE TEST !
by Adrian Schröter 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

Hello, I look for some more people who want to try our hopefully soon to be applied new source processing method for openSUSE:Factory and the maintenance updates to :Update projects. It should work good already, so you do not need to be brave ;) You may know that currently all package source submissions to Factory and friends get SUSE in-house be reviewed, re-validated and reformated. You can see this in the additional "autobuild" commits in the openSUSE:Factory commits. We plan to do … [View More]following changes in future: * We would like to do these steps out there and as soon as possible in future. This means in best case before any packager is commiting his changes the validating and reformating is done already. This avoids any possible merge problems, unnecessary commits and extra turn around times. * these services can be code stream specific (unlike current osc_source_validator). That means we will be able to do better checks in future for Factory then for maintenance updates (where we need to stay compatible). And we do not need to take care about non-SUSE code streams, eg. Fedora or MeeGo people can still work and submit their changes to their projects or write their own services. * In addition to existing checks, we want to track where upstream sources (tar balls) are comming from. So far we had the download_url source service, which downloaded files and stored them with _service: prefix what not everybody liked. The new and project wide working "download_files" service is just validate the URL's from the spec file. The new osc will commit these files as usual files and the server is just validating this. (People with low upstream bandwidth can still decide to skip the commit, the server will store it with prefix again.) So, if everybody is using this current osc & source service stack, the source services will be used to do these steps, but there will be no _service* file(s) in your package sources. And the last really SUSE in-house part of Factory development would be the legal review db, really everything else would be out there in build.o.o... How to test this ? ================== First of all you need the new services and a new osc installed. Please add the proper openSUSE:Tools project repo and install zypper in obs-service-download_files obs-service-format_spec_file obs-service-source_validator In addition to that please install "osc" from openSUSE:Tools:Unstable project. If you do not like to add the repo, just run osc getbinaries openSUSE:Tools:Unstable osc $YOUR_REPO $YOUR_ARCH and install the osc package manually. To activate this for your entire devel project (it would work also per package) do # osc co $YOUR_DEVEL_PROJECT _project # cd $YOUR_DEVEL_PROJECT/_project # cat > _service <<EOF <services> <service name="format_spec_file" mode="trylocal"/> <service name="download_files" mode="trylocal"/> <service name="source_validator" mode="trylocal"/> </services> EOF # osc addremove # osc ci -m "activate factory default source services" Afterwards these services running on "osc build" and "osc commit" actions, if not disabled via CLI switch. Reformated spec files will be uploaded directly and in case of validation errors, osc will abort before commit/build'ing. What happens to people with old osc version (0.130 and before) or just using the webui after activating these services ? Nothing. The services will run on the server only. => The source state will turn into "broken" if a validation error exists. => if tar ball is missing/different or spec file is different formated they will be visible with _service:* prefix again. How to get rid of them again ? Just anyone with a current osc stack will merge these changes automatically on next commit and the server side generated files will disappear again. If this testing phase works out fine, we will of course make a maintenance update for all these packages, so everybody should have a current stack. I have activated this already for the openSUSE:Tools* projects and everything seems to work. And I found out that 3 out of 3 random packages from openSUSE:Factory contain broken Source: $URL lines ;) Feel free to branch any openSUSE:Tools package into your branch and try to edit it. With the new osc you will use these local services automatically. -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH email: adrian(a)suse.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

2 10

[opensuse-factory] Banshee update to 2.0.1
by Nelson Marques 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

I've submitted the updated version of Banshee (2.0.1) to Factory today and also banshee-community-extensions (which wasn't a part of Factory). If the community extensions package isn't attractive to factory, then feel free to decline it, though it would be somehow interesting to be available also on Factory. banshee-1 : SR 71891 banshee-community-extensions: SR 71890 NM -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Recursive login - 12.1 M1
by Steven Sroka 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

I just downloaded the Factory KDE LiveCD (which contains 12.1 M1), and I can't log in. I haven't even installed it yet, but when I press enter to login, the screen flashes and I get the login screen again. I also *did* do a seperate install from the NET iso and I get the same issue. I'll check for existing bug reports, but I don't think the coming M1 is testable :( Steve -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

6 11

[opensuse-factory] Releasing Milestone 1
by Stephan Kulow 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

Hi, Whatever is now in Factory will be Milestone 1 even though the final images are still building. There are quite some ugly bugs in it, but it's testable software and we have a complete set of ISOs. There is quite a lot of difference against 11.4, I tried to produce the diff out of the wiki and I found 819 version updates - including packages with so small names like rpm, perl or gcc, but also with long names like kernel-source and gnome-shell. I hope you can make use out of it, be … [View More]

4 3

[opensuse-factory] Web page shows wrong title Download openSUSE 11.4 Milestone 1
by Roman Bysh 31 May '11

31 May '11

Hello all, The web page shows Download openSUSE 11.4 Milestone 1 -- Cheers! Roman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] (none)
by Donn Washburn 31 May '11

31 May '11

Well Group; That is what is showing at Login. Note no HOSTNAME and no mention using uname -a. Where is the tie missing? /etc/HOSTAME, /etc/defaultdomain, and via YAST2 has been set and my homepage works ->/home/me/public_html -- 73 de Donn Washburn 307 Savoy Street Email:" n5xwb(a)comcast.net " Sugar Land, TX 77478 LL# 1.281.242.3256 Ham Callsign N5XWB HAMs : " n5xwb(a)arrl.net " VoIP via Skype:n5xwbg BMWMOA #:4146 Ambassador " http://counter.li.org " #279316 -- To … [View More]

2 1

[opensuse-factory] ipod-sharp
by Nelson Marques 30 May '11

30 May '11

Dear all, I have submitted a request to remove ipod-sharp from openSUSE Factory. This package has been replaced by libgpod and it was used mainly for Banshee for < 1120. Current supported platforms should use libgpod. Ipod-sharp is no longer maintained and I believe it's superfluous for Factory. I've disabled all builds for this package in Banshee repository. Request: 72135. NM -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] glibc update in Base:System - Call for testing
by Andreas Jaeger 30 May '11

30 May '11

I've updated glibc from 2.11 to 2.13 for Base:System and like to see some testing: * Whether it runs fine on your system * Whether it breaks any package builds Please tell me about any problems you encounter. Here're the release notes: Version 2.13 * The following bugs are resolved with this release: 3268, 6812, 7066, 10085, 10484, 10563, 10851, 11149, 11155, 11611, 11640, 11655, 11701, 11840, 11856, 11883, 11903, 11904, 11968, 11979, 12005, 12037, 12067, 12077, 12078, 12092, 12093, … [View More]12107, 12108, 12113, 12140, 12159, 12167, 12191, 12194, 12201, 12204, 12205, 12207, 12348, 12378, 12394, 12397 * New Linux interfaces: prlimit, prlimit64, fanotify_init, fanotify_mark * POWER7 optimizations: memset, memcmp, strncmp * New optimized string functions for x86-64: strnlen (SSE2), strcasecmp (SSE2, SSSE3, SSE4.2), strncasecmp (SSE2, SSSE3, SSE4.2) Implemented by Ulrich Drepper. * The following bugs are resolved with this release: 3662, 4457, 5553, 10162, 10401, 10414, 10554, 10824, 10864, 10915, 10918, 10936, 10939, 10958, 10968, 10969, 10972, 10992, 11000, 11001, 11007, 11010, 11027, 11039, 11040, 11041, 11043, 11046, 11056, 11070, 11093, 11115, 11120, 11125, 11126, 11127, 11134, 11141, 11149, 11183, 11184, 11185, 11186, 11187, 11188, 11189, 11190, 11191, 11192, 11193, 11194, 11200, 11230, 11235, 11242, 11254, 11258, 11271, 11272, 11276, 11279, 11287, 11292, 11319, 11332, 11333, 11387, 11389, 11390, 11394, 11397, 11410, 11438, 11449, 11470, 11471, 11520, 11537, 11538, 11571 * New interfaces: pthread_getname_np, pthread_setname_np * New Linux interface: recvmmsg * STT_GNU_IFUNC implemented for Sparc by David Miller. * The dynamic linker now recognizes supported ABI versions from the EI_ABIVERSION field in the ELF header. Implemented by Ulrich Drepper. * New NIS mode selector ADJUNCT_AS_SHADOW. The passwd.adjunct.byname table will not be used to fill in password fields in the passwd.byname replies. Instead it is used to synthesize the shadow.byname table, should it be missing. This is a useful mode in some installations involving Solaris. Implemented by Ulrich Drepper. * New locales: kok_IN, sq_MK, cv_RU Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj(a){novell.com,suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

5 13

[opensuse-factory] rpmlint demands rename of a package as library though it is not library
by Ilya Chernykh 30 May '11

30 May '11

Hi! I faced the following problem with Factory: rpmlint demands to rename kxmleditor into libkxmleditorpart1 even though the package is not a library but a full-featured application with .desktop entry in the menu. Maybe the rpmlint policy should be changed so it at least not to attack packages which have .desktop file inside? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-factory] Rekonq out of date
by Roger Luedecke 30 May '11

30 May '11

Current version in repos is 0.6.1. Rekonq is now available at 0.7.0. Can the maintainer upgrade? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-factory] EOL feature
by Carlos E. R. 30 May '11

30 May '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm seeing several people asking (forums) why their 11.2 is now complaining about problems connecting to repos, or not being able to update their machines. I know the reason, but couldn't somebody design a feature that tells the user of their system that support is about to finish, or finished already? Add it to package kit or zypper or YaST. Or all. Perhaps there is time enough to add the feature to factory, for this release? - -- … [View More]

11 17

[opensuse-factory] libdjvulibre21 and GCC 4.6
by Kyrill Detinov 29 May '11

29 May '11

Friday 27 May 2011 Hello. It seems a problem in libdjvulibre21 compiled with gcc46. pdf2djvu failed build for Factory i586: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=pdf2djvu&project=openSUSE%3… https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=pdf2djvu&project=Publishing https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=pdf2djvu&project=home%3ALaz… Report to pdf2djvu upstream: http://code.google.com/p/pdf2djvu/issues/detail?id=58 -- WBR Kyrill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:… [View More]

1 1

[opensuse-factory] Milestone 1 Xorg crashing
by Sid Boyce 29 May '11

29 May '11

I did a zypper dup to Milestone 1, always Xorg crashes leaving kdm running. A string of messages like below for mouse, keyboard and other stuff. The usbhid module is loaded and I also have a PS/2 mouse attached as well as the USB one. [ 1840.432] (II) config/udev: Adding input device Logitech Trackball (/dev/input/mouse0) [ 1840.432] (II) No input driver/identifier specified (ignoring) Bug #696813 submitted. Regards Sid. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)… [View More]

1 0

[opensuse-factory] milestone 1
by Dale Ritchey 28 May '11

28 May '11

dale@linux-eu11:~> cat /etc/SuSE-release openSUSE 12.1 Milestone 1 (i586) VERSION = 12.1 CODENAME = Asparagus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] gobi_loader should be included in official repos.
by Roger Luedecke 28 May '11

28 May '11

Gobi_loader is a crucial component for people using gobi chipsets for mobile broadband. It seems like an odd oversight to not have it included on the .iso much less in official repos. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

7 13

[opensuse-factory] Kernel 3.0 for openSUSE 12.1 ?
by Roman Bysh 28 May '11

28 May '11

Hello friends, Can we expect to see the kernel 3.0 for openSUSE 12.1? -- Cheers! Roman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-factory] 0install?
by Larry Stotler 27 May '11

27 May '11

Slashdot is running an article on how 0install is now at 1.0 release. Here's their website: http://0install.net/ I've looked at it before but didn't realize they were already close to being out with a stable release. The website correctly shows I'm running opensuse. While zypper is a very powerful and useful tool, I've always found package management on linux to be a huge duplication of effort and storage(ie multiple versions of a program for not only each distro but also for each version … [View More]

6 6

[opensuse-factory] Taglib
by Ilya Chernykh 27 May '11

27 May '11

It seems taglib has been removed from Factory. Is there any compatible replacement? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-factory] We're nearing Milestone 1
by Stephan Kulow 27 May '11

27 May '11

Hi, I just changed the release from Milestone 0 to Milestone 1, so one of the next builds could be released as Milestone 1. For a month we didn't have live cds because too much was broken, but last night we saw working DVDs (openqa sees tons of problems in installation, but my own tests worked) and live cds. The GNOME one "fails to load GNOME3", but I played (and won of course :) a round of freecell solitaire as Live-CD User, so I'd say it's good enough for a Milestone 1 ;-) It would be … [View More]

16 32

[opensuse-factory] What prevents this SR from being accepted?
by Ilya Chernykh 26 May '11

26 May '11

Hi! I want to know what prevents this submit request from being accepted? https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/66899 It has been submitted to 11.4:Uptade:Test already 6 weeks ago and still no response. It fixes this issue: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=686786 which is very critical for all KDE3 users. It is even more strange that the sr has been accepted to Factory but still is not accepted to 11.4:Update:Testing. As a temporary measure we included the fixed package in our … [View More]

4 3

[opensuse-factory] Updating your package to support swig 2.0.3 and later
by Ismail Dönmez 26 May '11

26 May '11

Heya; Looks like some packages are still using old swig m4 macro which fails to detect swig 2.x properly. I sent SRs for the packages in the Factory but if your own package fails because of this you can use the attached swig.m4 file which will properly detect swig 1.x and 2.x. Regards. -- Ismail Dönmez - openSUSE Booster SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Factory versus Tumbleweed : kernel versions
by Bruno Friedmann 26 May '11

26 May '11

Why in Tumbleweed we have 2.6.39x and in Factory we have 2.6.38x ? Shouldn't factory have the same or a bit in advance ? -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Ambassador GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

9 16

[opensuse-factory] syslog-ng 3.3 beta1 and a new dependency
by Peter Czanik 25 May '11

25 May '11

Hello, I just prepared a new syslog-ng package for version 3.3 beta1 in my home at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=syslog-ng&project=home%3Acz… This version added json support and an additional dependency: libjson-glib Question: should I break it into a separate package, or it could stay in the main syslog-ng package, as libjson-glib is installed on most systems anyway? syslog-ng 3.3 beta1 brings many interesting new features: it is fully multi-threaded, mongodb and json … [View More]

2 2

[opensuse-factory] update url from community windo
by jdd 25 May '11

25 May '11

Hello, before adding this to feature, I want to know if it's feasible, unusefull or even stupid :-( I have to upgrade several 11.3 installs to 11.4 (or 12.1) and I find that going to the wiki to find help is boring. I know it works because I did several times already. So I wonder why is shouldn't be possible to add to the "community" windows in the repos management section an "upgrade to 11.4 and upgrade to 12.1" part. I think of this part of YaST because this menu is dynamically … [View More]

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Clementine for Factory
by Mariusz Fik 24 May '11

24 May '11

Hi, Since 0.6, Clementine [1] is really good competitor for amarok, but it is built only with Qt. It's lightweight and powerful audio player. First version of package has been prepared over one year ago and was available in KDE:Extra repository. Now in devel project [2] we have current version, 0.7.1. Clementine is licensed under GPLv3. [1] - http://www.clementine-player.org/ [2] - http://goo.gl/QZnIQ It would be great to have clementine in oss repository. I'm not c++ coder but I can … [View More]

5 5

[opensuse-factory] Preferred VirtualBox repository for Tumbleweed users
by R. Tyler Croy 24 May '11

24 May '11

When I first started using Tumbleweed, I dropped all my VirtualBox packages to make sure there wasn't any issues between the newer Tumbleweed kernels and VirtualBox. Are any of you Tumbleweed users using VirtualBox successfully while keeping up to date? If so, which repo? - R. Tyler Croy -------------------------------------- Code: http://github.com/rtyler Chatter: http://identi.ca/agentdero http://twitter.com/agentdero

6 5

[opensuse-factory] snapshot repo
by Stephan Kulow 24 May '11

24 May '11

Hi, I made snapshot repo now a link to standard repo to see if this works better. With the changed rebuild flags in openSUSE:Factory, it's really only an annoyance to me - but please keep an eye on how well it works for the devel projects. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

Re: [opensuse-factory] Fwd: [obs submit-request 70847] openSUSE:Factory/curl: declined by coolo
by Stephan Kulow 24 May '11

24 May '11

Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2011, 18:44:16 schrieb Cristian Rodríguez: > <https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/8534295> > > Are This rejection messages automated in any way ? Yes, they are. They are the decline reasons for "factory-auto", the auto implies the automation. > > It is the third or forth time the submission is rejected for totally > bogus reasons. > > > Comment: > > please make sure to wait before these depencencies are in > > openSUSE:… [View More]

4 5

[opensuse-factory] Feature request: add "Support: pbzip2" to factory prjconf
by Cristian Rodríguez 23 May '11

23 May '11

Hi: Will be cool if someone can add "Support: pbzip2" to factory build config, this version of bzip2 is capable of decompressing tarballs using multiple CPU and usually does the job twice as fast as the regular version. The package already contains rpm macros that redefine bzip2 macro so the build system can automatically use it. Cheers. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed: a libreoffice a day keeps the doctor away?
by richard -rw- weinberger 23 May '11

23 May '11

Hi, Nearly every day I get new libreoffice packages from Tumbleweed. My zypper history log: 2011-05-05 15:20:19|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.12 2011-05-09 15:20:35|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.13 2011-05-10 23:40:35|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.15 2011-05-15 16:30:15|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.16 2011-05-16 15:41:48|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.17 2011-05-17 18:18:29|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.18 2011-05-19 11:29:28|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.19 2011-05-20 21:56:30|libreoffice|3.3.2.2-1.20 Why are there so much rebuilds? Downloading ~… [View More]

10 18

[opensuse-factory] New things in 12.1
by Sascha Manns 23 May '11

23 May '11

Hello Mates, some Bloggers asked, which new things are planned for 12.1. Maybe we have a Site for this topic? Have a nice day Sascha -- Sincerely Yours Sascha Manns open-slx Community & Support Agent openSUSE Membership Comitee openSUSE Marketing Team Web: http://saigkill.homelinux.net German Community Portal: http://community.open-slx.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 3

[opensuse-factory] mysql-devel
by Ilya Chernykh 23 May '11

23 May '11

Hi! I have several packages which depend on mysql-devel. But it seems that this package is not available any more in Factory. So my question is was it made intentionally? Is there a compatible replacement? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-factory] zypper dup confusion
by Sid Boyce 23 May '11

23 May '11

Can someone explain what appear to be inconsistencies here? # zypper dup Warning: You are about to do a distribution upgrade with all enabled repositories. Make sure these repositories are compatible before you continue. See 'man zypper' for more information about this command. Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Computing distribution upgrade... 27 Problems: Problem: nothing provides libstdc++46-devel = 4.6.0_20110505 needed by libgcj46-devel-4.6.0_20110505-2.3.i586 … [View More]Problem: nothing provides gcc46 = 4.6.0_20110505 needed by gcc46-java-4.6.0_20110505-2.3.i586 Problem: libsemanage1-32bit-2.0.43-12.3.x86_64 requires libustr-1.0.so.1, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: perl-Cyrus-SIEVE-managesieve-2.3.16-17.2.x86_64 requires perl = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libzypp-8.12.2-2.4.x86_64 requires satsolver-tools = 0.16.4, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: nothing provides libstdc++46-devel = 4.6.0_20110505 needed by libgcj46-devel-4.6.0_20110505-2.3.x86_64 Problem: perl-5.12.3-14.12.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: satsolver-tools-0.16.4-4.1.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit), but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: satsolver-tools-0.16.4-4.1.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit), but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: satsolver-tools-0.16.4-4.1.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit), but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: satsolver-tools-0.16.4-4.1.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit), but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: satsolver-tools-0.16.4-4.1.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit), but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: rpm-devel-4.9.0-8.1.x86_64 requires rpm = 4.9.0, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libzypp-8.12.2-2.4.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit), but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libzypp-8.12.2-2.4.x86_64 requires satsolver-tools = 0.16.4, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: apache2-mod_perl-2.0.4-54.3.x86_64 requires perl = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: perl-Cyrus-SIEVE-managesieve-2.3.16-17.2.x86_64 requires perl = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: libsnmp25-5.6.1-9.1.x86_64 requires perl-base = 5.12.3, but this requirement cannot be provided Problem: nothing provides libstdc++46-devel = 4.6.0_20110505 needed by libgcj46-devel-4.6.0_20110505-2.3.i586 Solution 1: keep obsolete libgcj46-devel-4.6.0_20110328-2.2.x86_64 Solution 2: break libgcj46-devel by ignoring some of its dependencies # rpm -q libstdc++46-devel libstdc++46-devel-4.6.0_20110328-2.8.x86_64 # rpm -q perl-base perl-base-5.12.3-14.12.x86_64 # rpm -q libzypp libzypp-8.12.2-2.4.x86_64 # rpm -q satsolver-tools satsolver-tools-0.16.4-4.1.x86_64 # rpm -q libgcj46-devel libgcj46-devel-4.6.0_20110328-2.2.x86_64 # zypper up -t package gcc46 Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... No update candidate for 'gcc46-4.6.0_20110328-2.8.x86_64'. The highest available version is already installed. Resolving package dependencies... Nothing to do. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org [View Less]

2 1

[opensuse-factory] rpm 4.9.0 failure, can somebody please give me a clue?
by Dave Plater 23 May '11

23 May '11

I asked for help with this problem on the packaging list but was met with silence most probably because nobody knows. Rosegarden fails to build with debug packages on factory standard in my home:plater and multimedia:apps when debug package is enabled. This is the failure on the two different versions of rosegarden. : + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rosegarden-11.02 extracting debug info from /usr/src/packages/BUILDROOT/rosegarden-11.02-15.44.i386/usr/bin/rosegarden /… [View More]

3 4

[opensuse-factory] About 80 PHP packages to push to factory - when
by Ralf Lang 23 May '11

23 May '11

Hi folks, I have about 80-100 packages in server:php:applications which belong more or less to the new horde 4 groupware and framework. I want them in 12.1 but there are almost weekly minor updates and I don't want to generate too much overhead with sr supersedes. Apart from that, some of them could really use some more polishing but last-minute commits to factory aren't that good a decision either. When is the best time to sr them to factory? -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer … [View More]

2 1

[opensuse-factory] libevent in opensuse 11.4 is behind the times
by Linda Walsh 23 May '11

23 May '11

I'm not sure when the cutoff for opensuse 11.4 was, but looking at the history for libevent, (http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent/) release candidates for 2.0 started 2010-08-08 with 2.0.6 and , with a stable released on 2010-12-16. It's now up to 2.0.11-stable, but OpenSuse 11.4 only has version 1.l4.14, from 11 months ago (released 2010-06-07). Is the cutoff window that long, or did it slip into a crack or what? Is libevent-2.0 scheduled for inclusion in OS 11.5? With an 18-month release … [View More]

7 13

[opensuse-factory] Why this package dies so early?
by Ilya Chernykh 23 May '11

23 May '11

Why this package dies so early when building for Factory? https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=piklab&project=KDE%3AKDE3 It builds well for other releases including openSUSE 11.4 but when building for factory it dies just after spec file parsing starts without any error message: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I have the following modifications for piklab.spec: 12c12 < Release: 5 --- > Release: 10.1 84a85 > %changelog --… [View More]

1 0

[opensuse-factory] factory and gcc46 mess up
by Bruno Friedmann 22 May '11

22 May '11

Actually on factory I get several errors, ( I'm pretty sure the working guys know about but ... ) I'm in the process to clean up all gcc45 related things. zypper in gcc-java lead to error nothing provides gcc46 = 4.6.0_20110505 needed by gcc46-java-4.6.0_20110505-2.2.x86_64 and same for other related things I've those installed S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+-----------------------------------+---------+--------------------+---… [View More]

2 2

[opensuse-factory] Fwd: [obs submit-request 70847] openSUSE:Factory/curl: declined by coolo
by Cristian Rodríguez 21 May '11

21 May '11

<https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/8534295> Are This rejection messages automated in any way ? It is the third or forth time the submission is rejected for totally bogus reasons. > Comment: > please make sure to wait before these depencencies are in openSUSE:Factory: stunnel It has never been required, it is an optional build dependency !! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed possible intel driver bug
by Yaşar Arabacı 21 May '11

21 May '11

Hi, I am using Tumbleweed with opensuse 11.4. I sometimes experience screen tearing. Mostly when I scrool or move things. Next time it happens I will try to get a screen shot of it. I am adding my lspci,lsmod output and repository list as an attachment.

2 2

[opensuse-factory] What about Firefox 5.0 beta2?
by Kim Leyendecker 21 May '11

21 May '11

Dear all! Anyone knows about Firefox 5.0 beta 2 in factory? I´m on trying to create a RPM-package of it today (after sleeping) and wanted to know, if it´s in factory yet, so that I don´t have to create one on my own. thanks in advance Kim -- Kim-Dennis Leyendecker openSUSE Ambassador / openSUSE Wiki Team DE HAVE A LOT OF FUN! http://www.opensuse.org | http://www.suse.de Have you tried SUSE Studio? Need to create a Live CD, an app you want to package and distribute , or create your own … [View More]

2 2

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed repo structure question
by barton`ello 21 May '11

21 May '11

Hello guys. I have a simple question, but can not find an answer. Manual recommends to use only one repo -- Tumbleweed. But we have not enought software there. And because of this we need to have 11.4-oss, 11.4-non-oss and updates repo enabled. As result we have repo hell: packages conflicts and so on. For example, first update with "zypper dup --from Tumbleweed" was completed great. But later, when new packages appeared in Tumbleweed repo, "zypper dup" (as Greg K-H recommends) instead "… [View More]

3 4

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed package request
by Greg T 20 May '11

20 May '11

Would it be possible to add lyx 2 into TW? It's already in /KDE:/Unstable:/Playground/openSUSE_Factory/ -- Greetings, GregT -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

Main

Development

Information

Community

Social Media

Other

openSUSE Factory