November 2011 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] acpid requires systemd?
by Felix Miata 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

Can this be true? If so, why? Zypper won't let me upgrade acpid without breakage unless systemd is installed too. I have systemd locked out, as I'd rather test things I can understand in Factory, not major overhaul stuff. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 3

[opensuse-factory] Export broken for KinfoCenter
by Roger Luedecke 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Export button is greyed out no matter what. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] KDE menus and gitorious
by Cristian Morales Vega 06 Nov '12

06 Nov '12

I created a merge request for desktop-data three weeks ago. It's just a minor patch that doesn't really fix anything but a warning from kbuildsycoca4. I'm not sure about how Gitorious works, maintainers are supposed to notice the "1" in the merge requests section or they receive an email notifying it? And since I'm on it. Since I updated my 11.3 system to KDE to 4.5 the "inline" part of the menu is not honored... Expected behavior? Known problem? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 6

[opensuse-factory] Lilypond won't work with guile 2.0, What can I do to prevent it being dropped? Do we really want guile 2.0 yet?
by Dave Plater 31 Jan '12

31 Jan '12

OpenSUSE has jumped way ahead of all the other major distributions by pushing guile-2.0 to factory, this may cause problems for packages such as gnucash if it uses guile to the extent that lilypond does. Lilypond uses guile extensively and are working on porting lily to guile 2.0 but this is their timeline quoted from one of my emails from Graham Percival to the devel list please note that lilypond 2.16.0 may not be released before openSUSE 12.1 and I'm working on 2.14.2 atm the current release : There is absolutely zero chance of lilypond 2.16 using guile 2.0. There is maybe a 10% chance that any version of lilypond will support guile 2.0 in 2011. Total guesswork for future predictions: 50% chance of supporting guile 2.0 before July 2012, 80% chance of support guile 2.0 before the end of 2012. What that means for opensuse is up to you. If you particularly want guile 2.0, then by all means jump in; the more people working on it, the higher the chances are that it'll get done sooner. But based on the amount of work that currently goes into guile 2.0, those are my estimates. Cheers, - Graham and I think this is also relevant, another lily developers reply from the same message: Given that the upcoming ubuntu oneiric apparently does not include guile 2.0, I also don't see a switch to guile 2.0 in the near future. I suppose that we should ask the ubuntu people when they'll finally package guile 2.0. Cheers, Reinhold I've looked at parallel installation of guile 1.8.8 (we jumped from 1.8.7 to 2.0.1) and it doesn't look easy otherwise I would have submitted guile1 but I'm still working on it although I'm not that familiar with the autoconf/automake build system at this level. What this means for openSUSE, lilypond is a very popular musical notation type setting program, the developers pride themselves in the accuracy of the notation positions, it is also used, for musical notation by rosegarden, a popular music and midi composition program. Both of these applications have no substitutes in the open source world and only have costly equivalents in the ms windows world, neither being available for ms windows although there are requests to port for both this won't happen in the immediate future. Rosegarden can work without lilypond as it is only bound to lilyponds notation fonts but the sheet music it exports will be useless so it will lose major functionality. Lilypond won't even be able to be installed via tarball on openSUSE 12.1 without the user removing guile 2.0 completely and installing guile 1.8 via tarball, as a result these users of lilypond and rosegarden will drop openSUSE. I started as a community maintainer by saving both lilypond and rosegarden from being dropped, I'm now very active in maintaining multimedia apps and libs and losing these programs will mean losing a large section of professionals in music related professions that have migrated from the windows world including the people that I've converted from ms windows just by showing them rosegarden although ms's change from xp to vista also helped. For the other packages that directly depend on guile : guile aisleriot gnucash autogen and slib, the change back to guile-1.8.8 won't AFAICS have any negative effects, all of these packages simply have patches for guile 2.0 and after looking at the patches, will most probably build with the patches still in place. I don't know what the situation is with guile users but it is an app for use by apps and not a direct users app. Guile-1.8.7 builds for factory, guile-1.8.7 doesn't build for 11.4. What are we going to do? Drop lilypond, I will keep it alive in home:plater:lilypond with guile-1.8.8 to replace guile-2.0.2 or revert to guile-1.8.8 in line with the other linux distributions? Thanks Dave Plater -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

5 5

[opensuse-factory] proper way to link packages in openSUSE:Tumbleweed
by Greg KH 12 Jan '12

12 Jan '12

Hi Adrian, We talked at brainshare about the "correct" way to link packages in Tumbleweed, and unfortunatly, I forgot one of the steps as I can't get it to work now. Here's what I remember: - look up the xsrcmd5 from the "root" package. For example, in the X11:xfce midori package I would do something like: osc api /source/X11:xfce/midori | grep linkinfo | pick out xsrcmd5 (where 'pick out' is a regex) - then run 'osc setlinkrev' with that md5 in the Tumbleweed repo. It's that last step that I can't seem to get correct, what is the exact command for it? I tried something like: $ osc setlinkrev -r bc383278250a5673d3799c2b31c9e6ef openSUSE:Tumbleweed filesystem setting revision to bc383278250a5673d3799c2b31c9e6ef for package filesystem Server returned an error: HTTP Error 400: Base System/filesystem/bc383278250a5673d3799c2b31c9e6ef not in repository. Either not existing or misconfigured server setting for '$nosharedtrees' setting in BSConfig.pm Base:System/filesystem/bc383278250a5673d3799c2b31c9e6ef: not in repository. Either not existing or misconfigured server setting for '$nosharedtrees' setting in BSConfig.pm Any hints would be appreciated. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 7

[opensuse-factory] [12.1] massive data loss in /var/tmp/
by Melchior FRANZ 09 Jan '12

09 Jan '12

Apparently, 12.1 has added /var/tmp/ to TMP_DIRS_TO_CLEAR in /etc/sysconfig/cron. I was quite surprised when I found out today that I've lost a few GB of data, which used to be safe there. Needless to say that I'm not pleased. No backups, because it wasn't *that* important, but I find such changes without warning suboptimal, to put it politely. m. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

44 244

[opensuse-factory] Planned submission of glib 2.31 and resulting package failures
by Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger 05 Jan '12

05 Jan '12

Hello everybody! This is as a heads up for all of you having packages depending (directly or indirectly) on glib. We're like to start pushing parts of GNOME 3.3.2 to Factory in the not too distant future. A 'critical' part will be glib, which gets updated to version 2.31, and, in turn, get's very strict on its header inclusion. With the exception of very few headers (see end), only glib.h can be #include'd now; all the others trigger an error: error: "Only <glib.h> can be included directly." Generally, the code needs fixing and changing the includes to only contain #include <glib.h> Most of the other glib headers are indirectly implicit included. So far I know of those that still need to be manually included: glib/gstdio.h glib/gi18n.h glib/i18n-lib.h I'll be trying to setup a repo like coolo does for the various fallouts he produces (libtool/automake) and try to get a bunch of packages fixed beforehand (I fixed most of GNOME:Factory/GNOME:Apps by now), but of course I'll gladly accept any help of other volunteers checking their packages. Best regards, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Proposal for 12.2, move all binaries under /usr
by Greg KH 04 Jan '12

04 Jan '12

Hi all, As a proposal for 12.2, I would like to implement the move of all binaries to /usr/ like is being done at the moment in Fedora. Here's the details as to why this is a good thing to do, and what is involved in it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove The first packages implementing this have already started to land in Fedora's version of Factory. Before you get worried, there will be symlinks back to /bin and /sbin for those scripts expecting things to be in those locations. We can use the Fedora patches for almost all of this, they are all published at: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/usrmove/ and a number of upstream projects are already moving their releases over to this as well, which will make things easier. If there are no major objections, I'll start working on Base:system in December. thanks, greg k-h p.s. Please, before you respond, read the link above and all of the discussion about it and don't repeat the same questions that the link already answers. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

27 57

[opensuse-factory] Still openSUSE 12.1 - NetworkManager does it worst....
by Kim D. Leyendecker 19 Dec '11

19 Dec '11

Howdy all, *Before* reading my mail, please note: openSUSE 11.4 ran perfect on my machine, after the upgrade to 12.1, networkmanager doesn't run at all.I can't connect to my router anymore (which worked yesterday, even with 12.1). The result is a completely angry user, who just wants his sane and working 11.4-like system back. Please excuse my offending mail, but I'm boiling totally. My problem: After the upgrade, NetworkManager doesn't ran anymore. I did some searching and fixed the problem. Now, today, I started my machine but NM can't connect anymore. It just says something like: Wait for authorization On 11.4 it used to be KWallet which asked my a password for NM. With 12.1 it's a KDE-su like one. Does anyone else has the problem? I'm writing from my notebook because my workstation isn't connected anymore. Please, can you help me? thanks, --kdl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

20 93

[opensuse-factory] Pull down menu platform in bugzilla is missing openSUSE 12.1 and openSUSE 12.2
by Freek de Kruijf 15 Dec '11

15 Dec '11

The pull down menu in a bugzilla bug report page for the platform does not have an entry for openSUSE 12.1 and with factory around also not for openSUSE 12.2 or if you prefer openSUSE Factory. -- fr.gr. Freek de Kruijf -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 5

[opensuse-factory] libgadu and kdenetwork
by todd rme 05 Dec '11

05 Dec '11

I have been trying to get kdenetwork to detect libgadu for gadu protocol support without success. libgadu is available, and it is in the buildrequires. Here is the cmake message: -- checking for module 'libgadu' -- found libgadu, version 1.11.0 -- Found LIBGADU: /usr/lib64/libgadu.so grep: /usr/local/include/libgadu.h: No such file or directory -- libgadu must be compiled with pthreads support Note that libgadu IS being built with pthreads support enabled. Also note that cmake appears to be searching /usr/local/include/. Include files are not installed there, they are installed in /usr/include/, and kdenetwork is told to search in /usr/include, it searches in /usr/include for every other package it needs, and libgadu.pc says to look in /usr/include. I looked at the cmakelists.txt files and couldn't find anything obviously wrong. Does anyone have any ideas what might be going on here? -Todd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 6

Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Apper disaster - Can´t get my beloved 11.4 KpackageKit back
by jdd 03 Dec '11

03 Dec '11

Le 19/11/2011 00:24, Greg Freemyer a écrit : > what I see (via zypper patch). I see that zypper up do *not* update flash, but zypper patch give the option to do (changing repo) is zypper patch a prefered way to make an update, I didn't use it before thanks jdd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed 12.1 Postfix and network don't start at boot
by Vahis 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

I'm not sure if 12.1 is on topic here anymore, but Tumbleweed should be :) This issue of course occurs in both: First there's no system mail. Then I see via YaST runlevels that Postfix is not running. I start it and he wants to start also network. (Which obviously was not running either but I had no idea. There's nothing wrong there, in networking) Now system mail works, fine. But the settings disappear after reboot, no mail again. No difference whether I boot with systemd or sysvinit. I wonder what is causing this. Vahis -- http://waxborg.servepics.com openSUSE 11.4 (x86_64) 2.6.37.6-0.9-default main host openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64) 3.1.0-1.2-desktop Tumbleweed in VirtualBox openSUSE 12.1 (i586) 3.1.0-1.2-desktop in EeePC 900 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] obsolete init scripts: cpufreq
by Cristian Rodríguez 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

Hi: I have been looking at all sorts of init scripts, the first that caught my attention is /etc/init.d/cpufreq it essentially only load kernel modules that as far as I undestand is a work for udev, is there a reason why it is still done this way or I should fill a bug report ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Python 2 and 3 packaging without conflicts
by todd rme 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

For many python packages, packages are installed in directories that are named after the python version. This works well with installing python 2 and python 3 versions of packages in parallel. Some packages, however, install files in common directories, such as %{_bindir}. In these cases the python 2 and python 3 version of the packages may conflict, potentially causing errors. Obviously changing all the python 2 version of packages would be prohibitive. The solution would be to change something in the python 3 packages. It would be possible to create new directories for the python 3 versions, like %{_bindr}/python%{py3_ver} (/usr/bin/python3.2, for example). These would needed to be added to PATH, but that shouldn't be a problem. However, creating a new directory in /usr/bin should probably not be done trivially. I was wondering if this was a good idea, or if anyone has any other ideas. I cannot find a way to selectively rename the script files, although if there was that might be better. -Todd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] changing distro freeze limit
by jdd 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

Hello, Please, redirect me to feature, bugzilla or an other list if necessary. * I notice an unexpected number of severe bugs on 12.1 (at least on my HW) * I notice most of these bugs come late in the process. Several things worked in beta (or where not possible to test) and do not work in GM * I do not blame anybody. I know the extraordinary effort done. But we can't find testers from the wild. Also we now have tumbleweed for people liking the next extra step right now. So I think we should take feature/distro freeze (I'm not sure of what is what) a month earlier, to get a month more to test and debug. In the same time we have to give somemore attention to packman, because many very important packages are held there and many do not work at all (just tested pitivi, openshot, avidemux and I couldn't even install kdenlive) Of course, if somebody have a better idea to have the same result, I take it! Just to give an idea, I planned to work for the marketting team after OSC and was stuck in debugging weird bugs since (sure, my knowledge and time are very limited, so this effort may not have changed most of the things :-() thanks jdd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

16 41

[opensuse-factory] systemd: What open questions do you have?
by Andreas Jaeger 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

I've seen a couple of bugs and quite some confusion about systemd. systemd comes with great man pages, there are upstream blog post and we have our own wiki. But still there are open questions. So, let's try to collect the open questions - like Wolfgang's - and then answer them in a second step. I'll go through the questions and will try to answer some and I hope others (Frederic, please!) help as well. Here's the wiki page and as a start I added the questions by Wolfgang. http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Systemd_status#Open_Questions_that_should_b… Please update the page, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj(a){novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-factory] packagekit still in 12.1?
by Greg Freemyer 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

All, I thought packagekit was removed from 12.1? I have run zypper dup twice in the last 2 days. Both times it claimed packagekit had locks in place and I needed to wait. With 11.4 I certainly had similar things happen on rare occasion, but 2 out of 2 seems excessive. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

20 32

Re: [opensuse-factory] Hello, regarding gcc plugin support
by Bombshellz Administrator 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

On 11/29/2011 8:18 AM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Bombshellz Administrator wrote: > >>>>>> I would like to make a correction, it's not implicitly dependent >>>>>> on GCC plugin headers being available but without it, the >>>>>> drawback is a less secure kernel >>>>> So, which plugin do you use to increase security of your kernel? >>>> I personally didn't write the patch but here is the snippet of the >>>> actual code in the Makefile that introduces the GCC plugins in the >>>> build: >>> Thank you. So it's the PaX kernel patch that meanwhile also >>> distributes GCC plugins. Okay, I'm considering a new sub package >>> containing the headers. >> I'm sending this E-Mail to inquire about the latest updates about the propose >> packages? Is there a time table so I can schedule my service for a Kernel >> Update? > Nope. openSUSE work has low priority. If you want something earlier I > happily accept package submissions against devel:gcc. > > > Ciao, > Michael. Hello, It's very unfortunate... My only grievance is that whilst other distributions like Debain have GCC plugin headers available, yet openSuSE does not because openSuSE is reluctant because the possibility of additional bug reports. Although I empathize with openSuSE developers, it would be very unfortunate and disheartening to drop openSuSE as a production server altogether because of missing package. The real issue here is that there maybe some unforeseen issues in the future in reference to additional packages that maybe required that are already available in other distributions that could be missing as well. To make matters worst, while I'm focusing on resolving technical issues such as this, I'm spending less time on my organization and growth. If I or a staff member on my team (which is 3, me included) had the time and the know how. We could have help contribute. :( -- Best Regards, The Admin Team Intended for the recipent eyes only -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] package systemd migration
by Wolfgang Rosenauer 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

Hi, I might have missed important systemd information during the 12.1 development phase but haven't had to deal with it for my packages up to now. A recent package update now introduced systemd services and I found it's not obvious to me what to do. It already starts with trivial questions where I have an my own understanding but not absolutely sure. The package provides an init script currently and now added systemd service files. So the following questions came to my mind: Do I still package the sysvinit files? I guess that's a yes because we still offer the sysvinit boot process. The package has a sysconfig file which only takes a variable to modify the daemon options. Can I use that for systemd as well? How to do that? The daemon is currently started by default when installed. What happens after the update to the new version which includes systemd files? Will it be enabled by default? (I've actually tried the update and the service was running afterwards so I guess it will be enabled in update case but not for a fresh installation?) For the service it makes a lot of sense to use systemd's socket activation feature. So what do I need to do exactly to have the service disabled but have the socket enabled to start the service automatically (in terms of system configuration)? Is the only way to have services/sockets enabled by default to modify some certain systemd package and not from within a package installation? This sounds strange and rather unfortunate so it's for example not possible to install/update a package which then starts a service by default w/o updating an official central distribution package? I've tried to find answers to those questions in the wiki but had no luck. Any hints? Thanks, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 10

[opensuse-factory] Kmail 4.7 is not shippable in 12.1
by Tim 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

Hi, I have upgrade my system yesterday from 11.4 to 12.1 after some testing and most seem to work fine but I haven't tested KMail. I thought after it was delayed for so long it should work. But after starting it the migration failed and the program crashed. I thought this might have something to do that I had a newer version of Kmail for some time (from Tumbleweed) so I removed all akonadi, kmail, kontact and so on settings and directories in my home directory and only restored the kmail folder and the kmailrc. After that the automatic kmail import still failed so I used the kmail-migrator which seems to work fine but if you start Kmail you have your folders but in them are only a few mails which can't really be accessed. Kmail seems to load forever. And even the imap folders shown only some mails. After running kmail-migrator Akonadi and Mysql had a high cpu usage which seems to have something to do with an error posted in console during running kmail-migrator. So do you seriously want people to upgrade or reinstall with a home directory from 11.4 and get all their mails messed up? Not everyone does a backup even if they should. I mean even if there are not so many Kmail users it worked most of the time for me in the past. Not to mention that it is not so easy to import all your data from this Akonadi mix. So isn't it possible to ship the "old" Kmail from 4.6 instead, like it was done in the past by the KDE team? Some bugs are not a problem imho but it really seems to be utterly broken and according to forum entries and the IRC other people seem to have the same problem. Tim -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

14 26

[opensuse-factory] One-click-installs
by Jos Poortvliet 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Heya all, Going back to the discussion we had a while ago about moving to Tumbleweed in openSUSE 12.1. After a little bit of thinking* I concluded that of course all (new) tumbleweed users need to move over to this setup of using the 'current' instead of the 12.1 repositories. So I changed the Tumbleweed page to reflect this: http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Tumbleweed And also: http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Change_from_12.1_to_Tumbleweed It makes the text a bit complicated. And I suck at un-complicating it, I suppose, help is welcome. But there is another matter I'm sure some of you object to much more strongly: I use a self-made one-click-install file for adding Tumbleweed**. I dunno if OCI can remove repo's but at least I can add the right ones... However. I have no idea where to host the file. So for now I put it on my *anathema* public dropbox... /me hides Yes, horrible, I know. I'm however sure our sysadmins can find a much better spot for this one-click install. And maybe also for the one-click-install for ownCloud, if we have one that works better?!? http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Tumbleweed I just decided to go ahead, make the OCI and put it somewhere to have at least an improvement over the current situation ;-) Cheers, Jos * yes, I do it sometimes and yes, it usually hurts and leads to bad stuff, I'll try not to do it again ** Credit to Greg KH who made it, I just added the 'current' repo's to it too -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-factory] Custom zsh completion files
by Ismail Dönmez 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Hi; zsh package in Factory now provides /etc/zsh_completion.d directory where you can ship custom zsh completion files as part of your package. Regards. -- İsmail Dönmez - openSUSE Booster SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Third-party repos
by Ilya Chernykh 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Hi! What do you think about an idea to add some third-party repos (Nvidia, Adobe, Google) to the proposed repositories in Yast the same way as Education and other community repos are included? For a user it may be difficult to find the location of such repositories and I suppose some even do not know that they exist. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 8

Re: [opensuse-factory] Tumblweed has switched to 12.1 and is now empty
by Juergen Orschiedt 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

which - in fact means (at least for my installation): > 2 Pakete werden aktualisiert, 203 werden zurück gestuft, 8 neue, 5 erneut zu installieren, 4 zu entfernen, 210 > Herstellerwechsel . > Gesamtgröße des Downloads: 327,9 MiB. Nach der Operation werden zusätzlich 540,3 MiB belegt. That means I'm back on 11.4 w/o Tumbleweed... Not really the behaviour I expected when switching to Tumbleweed... -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: "Greg KH" <gregkh(a)suse.de> Gesendet: 16.11.2011 22:52:20 An: opensuse-factory(a)opensuse.org Betreff: [opensuse-factory] Tumblweed has switched to 12.1 and is now empty >Just a short note saying that openSUSE:Tumbleweed has switched over to >be based on 12.1, and because of that, it is now "empty". > >Have fun, > >greg k-h >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org >To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

12 38