July 2011 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: [opensuse-factory] mobilebroadband and other daemons
by Alin Marin Elena 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

2 4

[opensuse-factory] Kcalc not working correctly
by Freigeist 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

Hello all, since the last Tumbleweed update Kcalc does not accept entering numbers by keyboard or numpad anymore. It is only possible to enter numbers by mouse. kcalc --version gives the following result: Qt: 4.7.3 KDE: 4.6.5 (4.6.5) "release 5" KCalc: 2.8 Can anybody confirm this? Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

5 9

[opensuse-factory] ofed/infiniband support on Opensuse 11.4 ?
by Mora, Joshua 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

Hello, Is ofed/infiniband supported on OpenSuse 11.4 ? Thanks, Joshua -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] mobilebroadband and other daemons
by Alin Marin Elena 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

Hi, I am using, or better said try to use, an usb dongle to connect to internet... Until begining of July it seemed to work perfectly on factory and kde-trunk... but suddenly decided that is holiday season and stopped working. I have the network manager from 07/07/2011 installed... at least this is what it claims... and with both nm-gnome and the plasmoid I have the same results... the modem is not accessible at all... I checked nm-tool and the device is not listed... I checked /var/log./NetworkManager log and rien... nobody heard about my modem their... dmesg is at least nicer (all the log from the time I dissconet to the time I connect it back) [ 661.374836] usb 2-4: USB disconnect, device number 8 [ 661.374950] option: option_instat_callback: error -108 [ 661.375075] option1 ttyUSB0: GSM modem (1-port) converter now disconnected from ttyUSB0 [ 661.375092] option 2-4:1.0: device disconnected [ 661.375128] cdc_ether 2-4:1.1: wwan0: unregister 'cdc_ether' usb-0000:00:06.1-4, Mobile Broadband Network Device [ 661.380250] option1 ttyUSB1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now disconnected from ttyUSB1 [ 661.380265] option 2-4:1.3: device disconnected [ 661.380334] option1 ttyUSB2: GSM modem (1-port) converter now disconnected from ttyUSB2 [ 661.380346] option 2-4:1.4: device disconnected [ 668.618034] usb 2-4: new high speed USB device number 9 using ehci_hcd [ 668.734307] usb 2-4: New USB device found, idVendor=12d1, idProduct=1446 [ 668.734311] usb 2-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 668.734313] usb 2-4: Product: HUAWEI Mobile [ 668.734315] usb 2-4: Manufacturer: HUAWEI Technology [ 668.738351] scsi18 : usb-storage 2-4:1.0 [ 668.738539] scsi19 : usb-storage 2-4:1.1 [ 669.382088] usb 2-4: USB disconnect, device number 9 [ 674.477033] usb 2-4: new high speed USB device number 10 using ehci_hcd [ 674.592931] usb 2-4: New USB device found, idVendor=12d1, idProduct=1436 [ 674.592935] usb 2-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=4, Product=3, SerialNumber=0 [ 674.592937] usb 2-4: Product: HUAWEI Mobile [ 674.592939] usb 2-4: Manufacturer: HUAWEI Technology [ 674.595848] option 2-4:1.0: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected [ 674.595960] usb 2-4: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB0 [ 674.703514] cdc_ether 2-4:1.1: wwan0: register 'cdc_ether' at usb-0000:00:06.1-4, Mobile Broadband Network Device, 02:50:f3:00:00:00 [ 674.704021] option 2-4:1.3: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected [ 674.704132] usb 2-4: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB1 [ 674.704283] option 2-4:1.4: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected [ 674.704342] usb 2-4: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB2 [ 674.705285] scsi24 : usb-storage 2-4:1.5 [ 674.706156] scsi25 : usb-storage 2-4:1.6 [ 675.710434] scsi 24:0:0:0: CD-ROM HUAWEI Mass Storage 2.31 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 675.710571] scsi 25:0:0:0: Direct-Access HUAWEI SD Storage 2.31 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 675.710731] sd 25:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg3 type 0 [ 675.714195] sr1: scsi-1 drive [ 675.714328] sr 24:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr1 [ 675.714407] sr 24:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg4 type 5 [ 675.718532] sd 25:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI removable disk I am a little bit puzzled on why the device is seen as a high speed usb crap... Any advice much appreciated! regards, Alin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] locking its deps no longer prevents replacement of FF3.6 with FF5
by Felix Miata 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

One might think this belongs in some other list because AFAICT FF3.6 is no longer available in 12.1. Nevertheless, those with the knowledge and the power to do anything should more likely see this than some post elsewhere. How is subject possible? I strongly object to UI changes that came about in FF4, and so enable the Mozilla repo and 'zypper al mozilla-xulrunner20 mozilla-js20' in 11.3, 11.4 & Tumbleweeds to prevent installation of FF post-3.6. This worked until about yesterday. Now FF5 installs anyway. How is one supposed to keep getting automatic upgrades from the 3.6 branch if locking out dep 20s doesn't work? Are required js and xulrunner now built into FF5 instead of it using support packages, like a static build? Also, shouldn't dup be required instead of up to get 3.6 branch replaced by 5.0 branch? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed - Packman package conflict - kopete, linphone, libmediastreamer - Need To Update Factory Packages?
by Rob OpenSuSE 08 Jul '11

08 Jul '11

Have searched for some discussion of this on list, but didn't turn anything up recent (only things imply linphone version in distro, tends to be stale). The scoop as I see it is : OS 11.4 / Factory kopete 4.6 rpm - requires linphone 3.3, because of bundled lib libmediastreamer.so.0 Packman provides linphone 3.4, libmediastramer unbundled libmediastreamer (Mediastreamer 2?) provides libmediastreamer.so.1 (not sure if the .so.1 version reflects lib API change) This means zypper objects to having both Packman linphone & kopete on system, in general Packman Multi-media is desired to avoid necessary distro codec restrictions. Tumbleweed & Factory, offer kopete 4.6.5 & linphone 3.3 but no unbundled lib libmediastramer In general unbundling libraries seems like a good idea to avoid unwanted application dependency cycles, and Packman has built upgraded linphone & libmediastreamer packages, so that part ought not to be problematic. Fedora have a "No Bundling" policy, presumably it's discouraged in openSUSE for technical software engineering reasons (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Why_no_Bundled… explains). May be there's problems porting kopete to new version of libmediastreamer, or is it simply that some labour is required to update the linphone & libmediastramer packages? Anyone looked at this? It seems like an issue that ought to be sorted for 12.1. Whilst I'd be happy to try and build the package updates, I'm not the best person as currently I have NEVER used kopete or linphone nor submitted packages to Factory. Suggestions? Does it help to look into building kopete against updated linphone & libmediastreamer? Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

Re: [opensuse] Re: [opensuse-factory] using suse build service -- supposedly easy -- doesn't work at all (can't even checkout a package or see avail distros)
by Linda Walsh 08 Jul '11

08 Jul '11

Per Jessen wrote: > Linda Walsh wrote: > >> Per Jessen wrote: >>> could you summarize what it is you're trying to do, please? It's not >>> really very clear from the above. >> Any of the examples from the wiki... >> >> When someone earlier suggested I build a product using osc, that >> wouldn't work either. > > I asked a similar question at some point - this page was really helpful: > > http://lizards.opensuse.org/2009/06/20/opensuse-factory-fixing-packages/ ---- That's where I started .... and the process doesn't work... I got past the zipper d/l install of osc, Then with the next command: osc branch openSUSE:Factory knock Server returned an error: HTTP Error 404: Not Found (after it brought up vim to have me write my 'purpose'...) The rest is dependent on on that step.... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-factory] Request to change MS6 to Beta
by Larry Finger 07 Jul '11

07 Jul '11

This is a request for changing the name of the MS6 release to Beta. The Testing Core Team (TCT) discussed the general problem of testing of new releases. With openQA, the probability that Factory iso's will boot and install is greatly increased; however, with the current system, many users do not start testing until RC1 is ready. As a result, there is very little time for detecting and fixing the bugs that will only be seen with a workload that is diverse. Such early testing will be particularly important for 12.1. Not only have we regularized the release schedule and naming scheme and need to follow through with a high-quality product, but we are behind due to the early build problems. The TCT considered several possible changes to entice earlier and broader testing. The schedule does not have much flexibility to increase the time between the RC1 and GM releases, thus we probably need to indulge in some 'social engineering' to get earlier testing. We could change from 6 Milestone and 2 RC releases to 5 and 3, respectively, without tampering with the total time. Alternatively, we could rename from MS6 to Beta. The TCT favors the latter option. It might mislead the users/testers a little regarding the quality of the offering, but we don't think calling MS6 "Beta" is misleading. By most definitions, Beta means feature-complete and free of huge bugs - we should be able to get that with MS6. A beta release should attract more users. In addition, many of us start full-time usage with MS5 or MS6, thus we know it to be usable for many people. Thanks for considering this proposal to further enhance the user experience and the quality of the final 12.1 release. This proposal is supported (in no particular order) by Larry Finger, Bernhard M. Wiedemann, Refilwe Seete, Holger Sickenberg, Jürgen Radzuweit, Bruno Friedmann, Ismail Doenmez, and Peter Czanik. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

10 16

Re: [opensuse-factory] any users of "opie" one time passwords?
by Andreas Jaeger 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 11:30:16 Marcus Meissner wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any users of opie driven OneTimePasswords left? It's used by some packages at luest: - cyrus-imapd - cyrus-sasl - cyrus-sasl-saslauthd - fetchmail > The code quality of opie is bad and I would like to drop it, if there are > no users. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] any users of "opie" one time passwords?
by Marcus Meissner 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

Hi, Are there any users of opie driven OneTimePasswords left? The code quality of opie is bad and I would like to drop it, if there are no users. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0