April 2013 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] Question about the Intel Linux Graphics Installer
by Roman Bysh 12 Apr '13

12 Apr '13

Hello List mates, Is the xf86-video-intel - Intel video driver for the Xorg X server the same as what Intel provides on their website here: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2013/intel-linux-graphics-installer Cheers! Roman ------------------------------------------------------- openSUSE -- Get it! Discover it! Share it! ------------------------------------------------------- http://linuxcounter.net/ #179293 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 5

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed is back!
by Greg KH 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Hi all, Now that 12.3 is all settled down and working well, it's time for those of you wanting newer packages to rejoice, Tumbleweed is back up and rolling along. I've populated the openSUSE:Tumbleweed repo with a few packages to start with, (editors, git, kernel) to whet your appetite, and once you are done installing them, the big GNOME 3.8 update will be landing in a few days after the build system catches up. Once you are finally getting used to it (and cursing the fact that your favorite GNOME extension isn't updated for 3.8), the Libreoffice 4.0.2 update should hopefully be built, so you will have that goodness as well. >From there, it's just more of the same, package updates that people request to be added, and maybe the next KDE update, whenever that happens. If anyone has any questions, please be sure to let me know on the openSUSE-factory mailing list. thanks, greg k-h p.s. If someone could forward this to opensuse-announce@, and anywhere else that openSUSE news happens, that would be great. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 4

[opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed, future directions
by Greg KH 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

Hi all. So Tumbleweed is, I think, almost 2 years old now. It seems to be working fairly well, or at least well enough for my daily use, and I haven't heard any complaints about it in a long time which means that either no one is using it, or it's working for others :) Anyway, with the advent of 12.3 soon, I have been thinking if Tumbleweed needed to change any to make things work better. My original set of complaints a year or so ago about OBS issues that keep us having a "proper" rolling distribution, still pretty much are the same: - the build-number issue - build speed - dependancy rebuild problems. Build speed of OBS has increased recently, I don't know if it's just my imagination, or if I have a higher priority for my repos now, or if new hardware really was added to the build system, but I'm happy things seem to be working better in that area at the moment. But the other two issues are still big ones, as the recent GNOME update in Tumbleweed proved quite well. So, I was thinking about maybe, when 12.3 changing Tumbleweed from being an "add-on" repo on top of the 12.3 repos, to being a "full" distro snapshot. That would resolve the build number problems we have had, but the dependancy rebuild issue would increase. The rebuild problem can be manually handled, much like FACTORY currently is, but odds are, I would lean toward the conservative side, having more rebuilds than are probably necessary just to ensure that systems work well. That means that libreoffice would be updated on a weekly basis for users, which might get annoying over time :) Any thoughts by anyone about this? Or should I just do it and see how well it works out? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

15 24

[opensuse-factory] Math code runs half as slow in 12.3 compared to previous versions.
by Carlos E. R. 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, In here <http://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php?t=484988> it has been found that the "libm" library is faulty, makes code run half as slow, in several distros, compared to previous version. Brute force replacing the libm library in 12.3 with that of 12.2 solves the issue. Sample code: // Version 1.0 // // Compilation command: // g++ -Wall -Wextra -O2 check_speed.C # include <cstdlib> # include <iostream> # include <cmath> using namespace std; //---------------------------------------------- int main() // Purpose: measure execution speed. { const int NX=1000000, NY=8; double x=-3.3, y=0.0, z=9.4; int j = 99; for(int i=0; i<NX; i++) { x = i + cos(i+z-j); for(j=0; j<NY; j++) { y = exp(-fabs(sin(x-i+y))); z = x+y+z - cos(y+i-j); z += x - rand(); if(x+i-j < j+20) z += y + fabs(cos(x-i)); else z = sin(z+x) - sin(i-j+z); x = cos(x-y+z-i+j/20); } } cout << "x = " << x << endl; return 0; } There is a bugzilla: <https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811546> There is still no official response. I'm posting here on behalf of the people at the forum, they are not subscribed to the mail lists. Don't ask me questions, ask them ;-) You can ask question to them in the forum - the login is the same as for bugzilla -. If you do not like web interface, you can access the forum via classical nntp (news) at nntp.opensuse.org. <https://forums.opensuse.org/faq.php?faq=novfor#faq_nntp> - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFkQXsACgkQtTMYHG2NR9W4BwCggp58pw/lSTCWwcaul9nb84ed seYAn2rcENYyzEXwU/FA4IZmdhDUwT8H =8aKi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 14

[opensuse-factory] File names conflict in $PATH
by Kyrill Detinov 09 Apr '13

09 Apr '13

Hello. We have two executable nfsiostat in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. % rpm -qf /usr/{bin,sbin}/nfsiostat sysstat-10.0.5-7.1.x86_64 nfs-client-1.2.7-4.1.x86_64 Is this normal? -- WBR Kyrill

2 2

[opensuse-factory] build power
by Jos Poortvliet 09 Apr '13

09 Apr '13

Hi all, In a couple of weeks we expect a new server rack, sponsored by SUSE, to arrive. It will bring enough build power to solve the long waiting many of you are experiencing. See http://news.opensuse.org/?p=15739 for details. In the mean time, cleaning up unused packages and projects in your home always helps us save some cycles! Our binary delivery server is also getting full and that, too, will need a solution. Cleaning up only gets us so far. Help finding a new server is welcome, Adrian can probably tell you what we need if you ask. Remember, this service depends on support from sponsors and we can use more help. Cheers, Jos

5 5

[opensuse-factory] new version of opensc
by Hans Witvliet 09 Apr '13

09 Apr '13

Hi all, I'm stuck with unsupported smartcards and i noticed that sometime ago the people from opensc-project already released a newer version, e.g. opensc-0.13, while the latest version for any suse-release is 0.12.2. Any chance of bumping it up in "obs/security:/chipcard/" ? Kind regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Re: New package: ooRexx
by Erico Mendonca 09 Apr '13

09 Apr '13

Could we get back to this request? I never got a definite answer on this one. Erico Mendonça Dedicated Support Engineer +55 (61) 9115-3256 +55 (61) 8594-9557 +55 (11) 3345-3900 Av. Nações Unidas, 12551 - Cj. 1308 São Paulo, SP - Brasil emendonca(a)suse.com >>> Erico Mendonca 20/12/12 22:28 >>> Package name: ooRexx License: CPL-1.0 URL: http://www.oorexx.org/ OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=ooRexx&project=home%3Aemend… Devel-Package: devel:languages:misc Description: Open Object Rexx is an object-oriented scripting language. The language is designed for both beginners and experienced Rexx programmers. It is easy to learn and use, and provides an excellent vehicle to enter the world of object-oriented programming without much effort. It extends the procedural way of Rexx programming with object-oriented features that allow you to gradually change your programming style as you learn more about objects. Some personal observations: Rexx has been in use since 1979, and transitioned through many different platforms, from the original mainframe implementation (where it still lives), to Amiga, OS/2, AIX, Windows and Linux. I've been using it daily in Linux servers for at least a decade, and OS/2 before that. This package is based on the latest stable release, and has been tweaked to avoid some of the pitfalls of the official RPMs, like fixed directories for classes, a reworked optimized SPEC and a working init script (the original seems to hang sometimes). This package has been thoroughly tested in the last few months and could be a nice addition. Erico Mendonça Dedicated Support Engineer +55 (61) 9115-3256 +55 (61) 8594-9557 +55 (11) 3345-3900 Av. Nações Unidas, 12551 - Cj. 1308 São Paulo, SP - Brasil emendonca(a)suse.com

3 4

[opensuse-factory] Net install: wrong repo naming, info or bug ?
by Daniele 07 Apr '13

07 Apr '13

Hi, there is something wrong in network installation, following: http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Network_installation under "Media free network installation" there is: wget --output-document=oS-12.1.vmlinuz.install http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.1/repo/oss/boot/$(arch)/loader… $(arch) should be auto-replaced by i586 or x86_64 Well, here becomes i686 but on the server is i386 ! So it' no clear to me if is a bug or what.. Daniele. P.S. I' ve replaced 12.1 with 12.3.. -- *** Linux user # 198661 ---_ ICQ 33500725 *** *** Home http://www.kailed.net *** *** Powered by openSUSE *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 21

[opensuse-factory] I386
by gm1mqe＠aol.com 07 Apr '13

07 Apr '13

Out of interest will; a laptop with an 386 running at 20Mhz run linux? I still have an old one that I use for programming amateur radios and might try it if I get enough time while flying rockets !. Cheers, Andy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

10 11

[opensuse-factory] I386
by gm1mqe＠aol.com 06 Apr '13

06 Apr '13

Thanks for all the information. I have some very old Suse and Slackware so I will give it in a go. Thanks again, Andy Norrie GM1MQE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] after dup fro 12.2 to 12.3 grub menu still 12.2
by Daniele 05 Apr '13

05 Apr '13

Hi guys, I'm not a big fun of zypper dup but I did it ! New system is up and running but grub menu still show 12.2 instead of 12.3. Under Yast, boot loader options: Distributor and Default section -> openSUSE 12.2 Is a known issue ? worth a bugreport ? Better way to fix menu entry ? I never touched grub 2 configuration files... Daniele. -- *** Linux user # 198661 ---_ ICQ 33500725 *** *** Home http://www.kailed.net *** *** Powered by openSUSE *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 15

[opensuse-factory] Intentional breakage of feature? or Bug? SASH no longer StandAloneSHell
by Linda Walsh 05 Apr '13

05 Apr '13

I had a problem a few weeks ago where I was having libc problems booting off a rescue disk -- used to be I could usually boot from a rescue disk, mount root on /mnt, chroot /mnt, mount the rest, and look at startup scripts 1-by-1. Now that doesn't come close to working. But even when I got the paths set right (LDLLIBPATH) etc... BASH/DASH/SH/ were still having problems loading due to suse's adding OW's patches that make linked binaries incompat with standard libc/glibc I.e. -- instead of a dynamic load of OW, and giving reduced functionality, it was hardcoded in to prevent anything from working. Ok... so I thought -- AH Standalone shell... it doesn't depend on anything. SURPRISE -- it's now dynamically linked with a custom libc as well...so it wouldn't work either! Um... FAIL!!!! SASH is called SASH because it is supposed to be Stand-Alone and need no libs to link as well as having builtin basic commands: Manpage: DESCRIPTION The sash program is a stand-alone shell which is useful for recovering from certain types of system failures. In particular, it was created in order to cope with the problem of missing shared libraries or impor- tant executables. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Um...HELLO... breaking basic functionality? Had a bitch of a time recovering since xfsdump bumped it's version num to '3' to correct several kernel bugs. For some reason my xfsrestore's even from the disk kept saying '2'... Well it appears I couldn't run xfsrestore from any repair disk as they all had v2 of the libs (v3 appeared in mid Jan). But I couldn't link with the new versions on disk due to libc problems. Finally was able to rebuild xfs from git running on the repair disk and install xfsrestore onto the repair disk where the libc wasn't corrupted with a non-standard OW extension. But, that was an aside. Um...main beef .. NOT EVEN SASH?!?! statically linked? system recovery tools like xfsrestore likely should be too (as an afterthough/aside)... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 45

[opensuse-factory] mutliple displays bug
by Petr Danecek 05 Apr '13

05 Apr '13

Hello, I am experiencing a curious problem: My mouse pointer thinks that my screen is in some sense smaller. As a consequence the pointer cannot be used for copying text and it does not change from arrow-style pointer to the text-selection-style pointer in any application, be it gnome-terminal, evolution composer, or firefox. My primary screen is an external monitor and my laptop's screen is turned off. A workaround is to turn on both screens and turn the laptop's screen off again. After that, I can use the pointer normally until next reboot. Any help would be much appreciated. Best wishes, Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-factory] Multiple repos during installation?
by Andrey Borzenkov 05 Apr '13

05 Apr '13

Is it possible to use multiple repo (like primary and update) during installation? I do not see where I can add them in installer. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

13 30

[opensuse-factory] New Package: videolan's VLC
by Raymond Wooninck 04 Apr '13

04 Apr '13

Hi List, One of the goals for openSUSE 13.1 is to drop the old gstreamer version 0.10. At this moment this would cause quite some issues for KDE as that the phonon- backend for gstreamer only works with this older version. Attempts are currently on the way to port this phonon backend to gstreamer 1.0, but we seem to be still far away from a working version. In order to make sure that KDE is more independent from Gstreamer, I would like to start working on the preparation for the second phonon backend, which is based on VLC. I am aware that VLC comes with all kind of bad plugins to support the bad bad codecs, but it seems that we are able to build VLC with only support for the opensource codecs. This would enable us to build a similar package as with Xine, where the bare necessity was build on OBS and the full package could be downloaded from packman. For VLC this would be the same, however users would have a choice of downloading it from Packman or to install it from the videolan repo (maintained by DimStar). Based on the the legal acceptance of the ffmpeg sources in Chromium, I believe we can make this happen. VLC in Factory would also mean that we could build more packages that depends on the VLC library. I see the following steps to be done: 1) Decide on the best location for the VLC package (multimedia:libs) ? 2) Submit the VLC package to Factory for legal review. 3) Adjust the VLC package in such a way that it can be used directly on packman (building the same source, etc) 4) Check with Dominique if we could achieve the same for the videolan repository Steps 3 and 4 should enable us to have only one location where to maintain the package and have it build in two or three places. I would appreciate if people could let me know what the best place for this package would be. Thanks Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 11

[opensuse-factory] pro-tips
by Jos Poortvliet 04 Apr '13

04 Apr '13

Heya, A while ago we published an article about 'openSUSE for non-geekos' with tips for those transitioning from other distro's to Green: https://news.opensuse.org/2013/03/22/opensuse-for-new-geekos/ Again, thanks to all who contributed to it and spread it around! This was a rather popular article but some people commented to me that current users are left out a bit. So, how about doing an article with some 'pro' geeko tips? I'd need tips for that, however. Anyone having ideas can dump them in this piratepad: http://piratepad.net/opensuse-for-ubuntu-refugees Thanks, Jos

2 1

[opensuse-factory] 'su' seems to ignore "-p" (preserve environment)... in factory...
by Linda Walsh 03 Apr '13

03 Apr '13

Plays havoc with my remoteX stuff... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 44

[opensuse-factory] Conflicting packages / dbus services
by Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a. Dimstar 02 Apr '13

02 Apr '13

Hi all, Coolo (rightly) declined a package submissions of mine against openSUSE:Factory, where a conflict between two packages was identified but not marked as such in the meta data. The reasoning is clear.. now we're looking for the best solution (please, only people that have implementation recipes speak up.. we don't want to organise full workflows and change the distribution). Issue: ====== Two packages involved: * apper * gnome-packagekit Both provide the file /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.freedesktop.PackageKit.service and implement the PackageKit dbus service (they are the respective frontends for KDE and GNOME). Now, already visible, correctly, they conflict on file level. The last thing I am planning to do is Conflicts: apper in gnome-packagekit (even though this would solve the issue at hand... but it's not the 'right' thing per se and does not scale). Proposed solution: ================== Packages have to provide their dbus service in the metadata, in the form Provides: dbusservice(org.freedesktop.PackageKit) And generally, all those provides should be also specified as Conflicts: otherproviders(dbusservice(org.freedesktop.PackageKit)) Now, obviously, this would best be done automagically (not targetting 'one' case, but actually all possible usecases. Suggestions? Ideas? Better solutions? The Provides: part is rather simple to implement using rpm find/prov hooks.. can this be done to also add Conflicts the same way? Followup issue: =============== Now, whereas this is rather simple to solve on a technical / packaging level (somebody might have better Ideas for above), this leave the problem that a machine with KDE AND GNOME installed would end up with only one provider of org.freedesktop.PackageKit (which is not different to what is now, just that it's clear on the pkg metadata). What are the expectations around this? Similar issues: =============== The same problem is also observed between Empathy and KDE Telepathy (ktp). Looking forward for your inputs! Dominique (in the name of the KDE and GNOME teams, I'd say) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 3

[opensuse-factory] 'which' missing from 'base build root'
by Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger 02 Apr '13

02 Apr '13

Hi all, What a nice surprise I had to see this morning: some 'old' package (last touched > 12 months ago) suddenly fails to build.. Builderror? -bash: which: command not found yes, right: which was split out into a sep. package. No consideration or pre-announcement was done (or I missed it). And to make the whole story fun: BuildRequires: which => unresolvable: nothing provides which great stuff! I think everybody would appreciate if such fundamental changes, if not handled transparently, would be communicated upfront. As a wrapup: the 'submit' came in with: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/161218 The submitter added as submit text: "Please wait for which, adjtimex, time to go in first since those packages have been split from util-linux." * Are we (packagers) now supposed to add BuildRequires: which to whatever uses it (I don't object it.. but where does it stop?) * When can we expect 'which' to actually appear in Factory, so that builds are possible again? Best regards, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 20

[opensuse-factory] Change in util-linux breaks packaging of many packages
by Johannes Weberhofer 02 Apr '13

02 Apr '13

Hello! In util-linux I see the following change in factory: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Sun Mar 17 20:39:47 UTC 2013 - jengelh(a)inai.de - Split "which", "time" and "adjtimex" off util-linux This modification breaks many packages, e.g. most PHP packages as the build process depends on "which", that is no longer in the util-linux package. Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Weberhofer Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-factory] Proposal for new Bugzilla category
by Robert Schweikert 02 Apr '13

02 Apr '13

Hi developers, Yes, as a rare occasion a mail from the board on the factory list. The board has been approached about consideration of a new Accessibility (a11y) category in Bugzilla. While this is a technical issue, this specific technical issue carries with it a large community component and thus after discussion during the last board call we felt it was appropriate to approach the developer community with the proposal outlined below. We have weight both pros and cons for adding a new category in Bugzilla. The summary of the board discussion is available in the meeting minutes of the board call from 2013-03-25 (https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_meeting#Meeting_2013-03-25). Proposal: Add an Accessibility category to Bugzilla Accessibility bugs should be treated as major bugs, even issues that may appear small or minor to non handicapped users may have a profound effect on users that depend on a11y technology. It is preferable that accessibility fixes get released as updates in the current distribution. We do not have a dedicated team to address a11y bugs, thus the regular development teams and package maintainers are responsible for fixing a11y issues, just as they are today. However, these bugs will likely have a higher priority assignment than they have today. ========= The board is in favor of having an accessibility category in Bugzilla. However, ultimately this is a decision that rests with the development community. If there is no clear consensus within the developer community the board would appreciate if the release team could reach a conclusion and post a decision to the list. The developer community and release team may of course consider alternate proposals or work flows to address this expressed need. We would very much appreciate if you would consider this request and discuss the issue. Thank you, Your openSUSE Board -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 12

Re: [opensuse-factory] Multiple repos during installation?
by Andrey Borzenkov 02 Apr '13

02 Apr '13

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Hans Witvliet <suse(a)a-domani.nl> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Boltz <opensuse(a)cboltz.de> > To: opensuse-factory(a)opensuse.org > Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] Multiple repos during installation? > Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:03:29 +0200 > > Hello, > > Am Sonntag, 31. März 2013 schrieb Andrey Borzenkov: > > Is it possible to use multiple repo (like primary and update) during > > installation? I do not see where I can add them in installer. > > I didn't use the installer since a long time (thanks to zypper dup ;-) > but in the good old times[tm] [1] there was an option to add repos > (maybe it's called "Add-On"?) in one of the early steps of the > installation. > > IMHO it makes sense to add the update repo as early as possible - you'll > already get fixes for package installation (%post scripts etc.) and for > the second stage of the installation. > > I never had any problems with adding the update repo that early (but as > I said: thanks to zypper dup, I don't run the installer too often ;-) > > > -----Original Message----- > > Indeed, the older the release is, the more sense it makes. > I always include the "update"-repo when doing an install. > You avoid installing packages that will be replaced during a concequent > update. > So for factory it doesn't makes sense, but even for 12.3 it saves (some) > time... > Good. So everyone agrees it is useful. Could someone finally explain, *how* it can be used during installation? :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-factory] failed to build packes in factory
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 01 Apr '13

01 Apr '13

Hello Some questions: 1. Do the packages listed in openSUSE:Factory > Status Monitor [1] need to be fixed before opensuse 13.0 milestones or cd/dvd installs are made available ?. Looks like alot failed/unresolvable. 2. Any way of listing packages in factory which failed to build with osc command ?. 3. Any way of listing the last 10 log lines of each of the failed packages with osc command ?. -- Glenn [1] openSUSE Build Service > Projects > openSUSE:Factory > Status Monitor https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?blocked=0&building=0&dispatching… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2