June 2012 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] Failure when building KDE Live CD
by Larry Finger 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Coolo, The KDE Live CD also has differences between the installed and wanted lists as follows: + grep '<package ' /usr/share/openSUSE-kiwi/livecd-kde/config.xml + cut '-d"' -f2 + grep -v package-lists-openSUSE + cat /usr/share/suse/packages/kde_cd.x86_64.list + sort -u -o wanted.list wanted.list + rpm -r /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kiwi-image-livecd-kde-12.1/tmp -qa + sort -u + sed -e 's,-[^-]*-[^-]*$,,' + grep -v gpg-pubkey + diff -u wanted.list installed.list --- wanted.list 2012-06-07 21:24:11.767764971 +0000 +++ installed.list 2012-06-07 21:24:13.483726259 +0000 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ ConsoleKit-x11 DirectFB LibVNCServer +Mesa Mesa-demo-x Mesa-libEGL1 Mesa-libGL1 @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ a2ps aaa_base aaa_base-extras +accountsservice acl acpica acpid @@ -161,6 +163,9 @@ gdk-pixbuf-loader-libopenraw gdk-pixbuf-loader-rsvg gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders +gdm +gdm-branding-openSUSE +gdmflexiserver gegl-0_2 genisoimage gettext-runtime @@ -184,6 +189,8 @@ glibc-locale-32bit gnome-keyring gnome-keyring-pam +gnome-session-core +gnome-settings-daemon gnome-vfs2 gnome-vfs2-lang gnu-unifont-bitmap-fonts @@ -379,6 +386,7 @@ libXxf86misc1 libXxf86vm1 libaa1 +libaccountsservice0 libacl1 libadns1 libaio1 @@ -479,6 +487,7 @@ libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgdk_pixbuf-2_0-0 +libgdmsimplegreeter1 libgegl-0_2-0 libgeoclue0 libggz2 @@ -491,7 +500,9 @@ libgmodule-2_0-0 libgmp10 libgmpxx4 +libgnome-desktop-3-2 libgnome-keyring0 +libgnomekbd libgnutls28 libgobject-2_0-0 libgomp47 @@ -510,6 +521,7 @@ libgthread-2_0-0 libgtk-2_0-0 libgtk-3-0 +libgtop-2_0-7 libgudev-1_0-0 libhogweed2 libibus-1_0-0 @@ -529,6 +541,7 @@ libjbig2 libjpeg-turbo libjpeg62 +libjson-glib-1_0-0 libjson0 libkactivities6 libkate1 @@ -637,6 +650,7 @@ libppl9 libppl_c4 libprison0 +libprocps0 libproxy1 libproxy1-config-gnome3 libproxy1-config-kde4 @@ -737,6 +751,8 @@ libvorbis0 libvorbisenc2 libvorbisfile3 +libwacom-data +libwacom2 libwavpack1 libwbclient0 libwebkitgtk-1_0-0 @@ -760,6 +776,7 @@ libxine1-gnome-vfs libxine1-pulse libxkbfile1 +libxklavier16 libxml2-2 libxslt1 libxtables7 @@ -790,6 +807,7 @@ mc mdadm memtest86+ +metacity microcode_ctl mingetty mkcomposecache @@ -925,6 +943,7 @@ pm-utils-ndiswrapper polkit polkit-default-privs +polkit-gnome polkit-kde-agent-1 polkit-kde-kcmmodules-1 poppler-tools @@ -1027,6 +1046,11 @@ translation-update tunctl twm +typelib-1_0-Atk-1_0 +typelib-1_0-GdkPixbuf-2_0 +typelib-1_0-Gtk-3_0 +typelib-1_0-Pango-1_0 +typelib-1_0-Xkl-1_0 udev udisks ulimit @@ -1165,6 +1189,7 @@ xorg-x11-fonts-core xorg-x11-libX11-ccache xorg-x11-server +xorg-x11-server-extra xplsprinters xpr xprehashprinterlist @@ -1279,6 +1304,7 @@ zd1211-firmware zeitgeist zeitgeist-datahub +zenity zip zisofs-tools zlib error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tTWsor (%build) I have no idea on how to fix these problems upstream. Is there a way for me to patch package lists, etc. and not have them be overwritten from upstream? Thanks, Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-factory] Live CD build error
by Larry Finger 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Coolo, For a number of days, the Gnome Live CD failed to build with "nothing provides" messages. These were fixed when I checked today due to updates of the package lists. The Live CD still does not build because the wanted and installed lists differ. The console output is as follows: Jun-07 19:41:07 <1> : EXEC [rm -f /var/cache/kiwi/zypper/zypper.conf.29036 /var/cache/kiwi/zypper/zypp.conf.29036] + grep '<package ' /usr/share/openSUSE-kiwi/livecd-gnome/config.xml + cut '-d"' -f2 + grep -v package-lists-openSUSE + cat /usr/share/suse/packages/gnome_cd.x86_64.list + sort -u -o wanted.list wanted.list + rpm -r /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kiwi-image-livecd-gnome-12.1/tmp -qa + grep -v gpg-pubkey + sed -e 's,-[^-]*-[^-]*$,,' + sort -u + diff -u wanted.list installed.list --- wanted.list 2012-06-07 19:41:08.284350038 +0000 +++ installed.list 2012-06-07 19:41:10.628307308 +0000 @@ -770,6 +770,7 @@ libportaudio2 libppl9 libppl_c4 +libprocps0 libproxy1 libproxy1-config-gnome3 libproxy1-networkmanager error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gb1UQs (%build) Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] rpmbuild brp-compress not considering possible man locations/installation prefix
by dieter 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Hi, when I build private rpm files I use the prefix /usr/local to keep the files separate from the official rpms. This results that the man pages are put to /usr/local/share/man/* The MANPATH at my system points to /usr/local/man:/usr/local/share/man:/usr/share/man Some Opensuse versions ago rpmbuild started to fail with my *.spec files at the end when it checked for unpackaged files. The reason was roughly that the man files were not gzipped and did not match the created file list. As a workaround I inserted some lines in my spec files to perform the gzipping of the man pages. Now I had a deeper check and I think the problem is the file /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress which should do the compression, but it only searches the paths ./usr/man/man* ./usr/man/*/man* ./usr/info ./usr/share/man/man* ./usr/share/man/*/man* ./usr/share/info ./usr/kerberos/man ./usr/X11R6/man/man* ./usr/lib/perl5/man/man* ./usr/share/doc/*/man/man* ./usr/lib/*/man/man* without considering the chosen installation prefix. I made a small patch in brp-compress which only includes additionally the ./usr/local/man ./usr/local/share/man 44,45c44 < ./usr/share/doc/*/man/man* ./usr/lib/*/man/man* \ < ./usr/local/share/man/* ./usr/local/man/* --- > ./usr/share/doc/*/man/man* ./usr/lib/*/man/man* and with this the workaround in the spec files is no longer needed. Is it unsupported to build rpms with prefix different from /usr ? Or is it a bug in brp-compress? Dieter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] yast2-sshd, pam_ldap, and nss_ldap not on beta1 DVD
by Robert Klein 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Hi, is there a reason those packages aren't on the beta1 DVD? Any chance they'll appear again in RC or -RELEASE? Thanks a lot and best regards Robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-factory] tumbleweed: xfce4-appfinder package out of date results in broken alt-f2 shortcut
by Jörn Nettingsmeier 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

hi *! first of all, thanks for providing tumbleweed - i have upgraded two of my machines, and it's been a very smooth ride so far. there seems to be a minor b0rkage in the xfce4 packages. pretty much everything is at 4.10.x now, except for xfce4-appfinder (which iiuc provides the command to deal with alt-f2 command launch requests, a feature which i like to use a lot). the outdated appgfinder (still at 4.8) cannot reasonably be installed in tumbleweed, since it would effectively downgrade all of xfce4 to 4.8. see here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tumbleweed/standard/x86… i guess the xfce4-appfinder package has just been omitted... if you require further feedback or testing, please cc: me, i'm not currently subscribed to the list. best, jörn -- Jörn Nettingsmeier Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487 Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio) Tonmeister VDT http://stackingdwarves.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 7

[opensuse-factory] Anyone dualbooting 12.1 and 12.2?
by Martin Schlander 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Has anyone tried installing 12.2 beta (using grub2) in dualboot with an existing 12.1 system (using legacy grub)? If yes, does it work right out of the box? Is it seamless? (like traditionally dualbooting multiple openSUSE versions all using legacy grub). Anything I should be aware of? I'd like to test 12.2 beta on my real hardware, by installing it on my test partition. But I'm scared of being left unable to boot my 12.1 production system. So I'd be happy to hear if others have good (or bad) experiences with similar setups. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 13

[opensuse-factory] CruiseControl: contrib repo
by Graham Anderson 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

I have let maintenence of the CruiseControl package slip. I don't think I packaged it well in any case because I wanted the tests to pass but had to patch out some of the network units so that it would build on OBS. I found it hard to pacakge the http based interface and additionally the spec file is very messy, my apologies for that but I'm not really an au fait java hacker. Having said that, I always found CruiseControl to be a very efficient, flexible and non opinionated CI tool; but sadly I find myself and my current clients migrating away from that world. To cut a long story short, I will not be spending any more time on the package and it already intermitently fails on i586. Unless anyone else has a use for CruiseControl and can bring the package up to date, it will likely fall out of our distro as contrib is phased out. If you use this package, please update your CruiseControl from the project release in future: http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/ Cheers the noo, Graham

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Re: More about the KDE Live CD
by Larry Finger 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

On 05/27/2012 02:11 AM, Basil Chupin wrote: > One cannot but ask, after all the years of being hassle-free, why the current > problems with building the Live CDs? I am not sure that the Live CDs have been hassle free! > The House of Cards called openSUSE about to collapse in the foreseeable future? For the Doom-and-Gloom crowd, the answer is "perhaps". As I see it, there have been many problems. Perhaps there is an overall shortage of people to do the required tasks, and something may have to be dropped. There were also problems with the backend storage system and the entire build system that happened at a critical time. The boot system of the Live CDs is different than the other products, and it is difficult to debug. After working with building my own Live CDs for 5 days, I have learned a lot, but I still can do little more than report the symptoms to Coolo. Fixing anything will require a lot more knowledge. The specific problem with the Live CDs was related to the change in /usr that is part of 12.2. I have no idea why no new ones have been built. Both Gnome and KDE versions build here just fine. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 7

[opensuse-factory] Broken profiling or aaa_base in Factory?
by Ilya Chernykh 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

Hi! Currently kdelibs3 fails in Factory because it cannot find libmcop.so.1 during build. But this file exists in the build system in directory /opt/kde3/lib/libmcop.so.1, this can be verified by the command "ls" before the "make". So is the library search path somehow broken in Factory? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

Re: [opensuse-factory] Xorg will not load with Opensuse 12.2 beta1
by "Stefan Brüns" 06 Jun '12

06 Jun '12

Am 06/06/12, schrieb Juan Erbes <jerbes(a)gmail.com>: > The last saturday I installed Opensuse 12.2 beta1 on my pc (Phenom 2 > X4 965 mobo Gigabye GM880-USB4, with 4 GB of memory and a ATI Radeon > HD 5670, the mobo has a ATI HD4250 graphical chip, disabled on the > bios), and is impossible to load Xord with KDE) > > I got the error: > > No screens found > > I tryed to use the propietary fglrx driver, but first it colud'nt > compile, and later after aplly 2 patches to the fglrx sources, it > compiled, but when I tryed to load the module I got an "undefined > symbol" error.. > > Later I tryed with the kernel 3.3 from the repo factory-tested, and I > tryed again with the fglrx driver wthout the parches, and it compiled > ok, but when I try to load Xorg, I got a segmentation error. > > Yesterday, I made a update of the system changing the repos to factory > and tryed again wth the open source driver radeon, and I got again the > same error of the begining: > > No screens found > > What's hsappened with Sax? > > I do'nt found it on the system. > > I mean the problem is that the radeon driver do'nt finds the phisical > address of the graphic card. > > How can I configure the phisical address of the graphic card for the > radeon driver? > > I attached the Xorg.0.log according to, you have not a single graphics card driver installed, not even vesa. Either you have deliberately broken dependencies, or there is a packaging error. You can check system consistency with "zypper verify". The gfx card drivers should be located in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers, with 12.1 these are part of xorg-x11-driver-video. Regards, Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0