September 2011 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-factory] A package fails in Factory but builds well in devel project
by Ilya Chernykh 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

It seems, kde3-kmess fails in Factory. I think I know how to fix it, but to do so I have to reproduce the fail in KDE:KDE3. But it builds well there. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] libreoffice packages are going to be removed?
by Freigeist 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hello, I just tried a zypper dup on one of my Tumbleweed systems and got the following output from zypper: "The following packages are going to be REMOVED: libreoffice-components 3.3.1.2-1.2.3 libreoffice-filters 3.3.1.2-1.2.3 libreoffice-l10n-extras 3.3.1.2-1.2.3 libreoffice-libs-core 3.3.1.2-1.2.3 libreoffice-libs-extern 3.3.1.2-1.2.3 libreoffice-libs-gui 3.3.1.2-1.4.1 libreoffice-ure 3.3.1.2-1.2.3" Is this correct? I cannot imagine that the above packages should be removed. Thanks Andreas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-factory] No Beta 1 entry in Bugzilla Pulldown
by Larry Finger 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Now that a 'zypper up' on Factory shows the product to be "openSUSE 12.1 Beta 1", we need to be able to file bugs against it. Unfortunately the appropriate pull-down in the Bugzilla screen only goes to "Milestone 5". Thanks, Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

Re: [opensuse-java] Re: [opensuse-factory] Focusing on OpenJDK - Sun/Oracle JDK will not be in 12.1
by Andreas Jaeger 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

On Saturday, September 03, 2011 02:28:57 AM Manfred Riem wrote: > Hi all, > > I assume Oracle means it to read "the DLJ is no longer necessary for JDK 7 > and up. " > So I am a bit unsure why JDK6 won't be in 12.1? Even though JDK 7 is out it > is fairly > new and most if not all organizations will still be evaluating the JDK 7 > release during > the lifetime of 12.1? Ask Oracle why the revoked the DLJ for any future JDK6 version. We could ship the version we have today but cannot update if any security problems are found. Does it make sense to go to Open JDK7 for 12.1? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

6 7

Re: [opensuse-factory] Firefox is crash happy
by Sid Boyce 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

On 26/09/11 07:54, Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 22:28 +0100, Sid Boyce wrote: >> After a zypper dup a few days ago, MozillaFirefox-6.0.2-5.1.x86_64 >> crashes often. Clicking restart does nothing, so I wait a while and >> starts it up but clicking on a link will often cause it to crash on my 3 >> boxes. >> Crash reports sent upstream. >> I have yet to file a bug. >> Regards >> Sid. > As you run Factory, I'm wondering if you see the same as I did. > When started from terminal, do you see a glibc assert hp != hp2 > happening? > > If so: give the package glibc in Base:System a try: this resolved the > problem for me (and the crashy was not only Firefox, but generally any > application using tcp/ip stack.. I even saw it in osc :P > > Dominique > > The crashes were immediately after a reboot following zypper dup on factory and it's the same on all 3 x86_64 boxes. Initially it crashed every time so I removed ~/.mozilla and started it, later it crashed with very few plugins, session manager and tabbed browing. It comes up with only the following message. lancelot@slipstream:~/ftp/aug11/Transceiver> firefox& [1] 17730 lancelot@slipstream:~/ftp/aug11/Transceiver> *** nss-shared-helper: Shared database disabled (set NSS_USE_SHARED_DB to enable). Then came the crash when I clicked on a link. konsole message: (firefox-bin:17738): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type `TrackerSparqlConnection' (firefox-bin:17738): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (firefox-bin:17738): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed (firefox-bin:17738): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (firefox-bin:17738): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (firefox-bin:17738): Tracker-CRITICAL **: tracker_sparql_backend_load_plugins: assertion `self != NULL' failed Details from the Crash Report: Add-ons: langpack-en-GB@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-sv-SE@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-it@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-ca@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-es-AR@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-es-ES@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-es-CL@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-de@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-ru@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-zh-CN@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-da@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-pt-PT@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-ar@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-ko@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-nb-NO@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-fr@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-pt-BR@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-zh-TW@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-fi@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-cs@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-hu@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-pl@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-ja@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,langpack-nl@firefox.mozilla.org:6.0.2,trackerfox@bustany.org:0.12.1,susefox@opensuse.org:1.0.1,{1280606b-2510-4fe0-97ef-9b5a22eafe30}:0.7.6.1,{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}:1.3.9,{CE6E6E3B-84DD-4cac-9F63-8D2AE4F30A4B}:3.5,{0545b830-f0aa-4d7e-8820-50a4629a56fe}:6.0,{dc5d9a10-2736-11da-8cd6-0800200c9a66}:1.4.8,backupfox_959a5970_ada3_11e0_9f1c_0800200c9a66@mozillafirefoxextension:1.0.2,{972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}:6.0.2 BuildID: 2011090700 CrashTime: 1317036462 EMCheckCompatibility: true FramePoisonBase: 7ffffffff0dea000 FramePoisonSize: 4096 InstallTime: 1316777295 Notes: OpenGL: NVIDIA Corporation -- GeForce 8600 GT/PCI/SSE2 -- 3.3.0 NVIDIA 285.03 ProductName: Firefox ReleaseChannel: default SecondsSinceLastCrash: 30673 StartupTime: 1317036151 Theme: classic/1.0 Throttleable: 1 URL: http://www.hkinventory.com/public/EmailLog_Main.asp?rpID=618512&key=9fee005… Vendor: Mozilla Version: 6.0.2 This report also contains technical information about the state of the application when it crashed. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Licensed Private Pilot Emeritus IBM/Amdahl Mainframes and Sun/Fujitsu Servers Tech Support Senior Staff Specialist, Cricket Coach Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 6

[opensuse-factory] isdn + asterisk
by Hans Witvliet 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hi all, It looks like i'm caught in a transition gap: With my very old box, i use misdn + asterisk1.2. Now, i want to move to another box, and heard that asterisk18 doesnot work wel with misdn1, while misdn2 is still work-in-progress. On the asterisk-list, somebody quoted: "And since Dahdi supports the important BRI card based on HFC-8S/4S colonge chip and via http://code.google.com/p/zaphfc/ also the cheap HFC-S cards. No reason anymore to use mISDN." But as far as i can see, this code is not on the OBS, not even in somebodies home directory. Could it be somewhere included? Like ../repo/network:/telephony:/asterisk/openSUSE_11.4/ or ../repo/home:/vitsoft:/asterisk-dahdi/openSUSE_11.4/ afaicr, ISDN with HFC-S was quite popular in (atleast) DE and NL. Hans -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Features making it into 12.1 for blog
by Roger Luedecke 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

I wanted to start off my openSUSE blog with the latest release. I'll rehash the ones I have heard. Emphasis on KDE since I NEVER use Gnome. AppArmor notifier (aanotify?) systemD Grub2 Plymouth? Kernel 3.1? CDEmu with menu extensions for mounting ISO etc. I know there were others, but I have forgotten them. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

16 17

[opensuse-factory] Missing LibreOffice package
by Larry Finger 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

When I use 'zypper up' on Factory, I get a long list of LibreOffice components that are listed as not being updated. When I used YaST to determine why, it says "nothing provides libreoffice-icon-themes = 3.4.2.6 needed by libreoffice-3.4.2.6-1.1.x86_64". I have not tested on i686 to see if this only affects 64-bit systems. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-factory] Is Artistic license permitted in Factory?
by Ilya Chernykh 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

Recently I had two packages rejected from Factory (including an important part of KDE3) because they include parts licensed under Artistic license. But it seems that Factory includes packages, licensed under Artistic, for example, https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=artistic-license.txt&pack… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

4 6

[opensuse-factory] Legal problem in package sim
by Ilya Chernykh 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

When trying to rename package sim to kde3-sim I facted the following legal problem: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719081 === The spec file of kde3-sim and most of the licenses in the package state that the package is licensed under the GPL-2.0+. However, a single file (with header): sim/qjpegio.cpp is licensed under an old version of QT license. It offers a choice of either (1) a commercial license, (2) QPL or (3) GPL-2.0 ("only"). As we must choose choice (3) this will mean that a resulting derived work of qjpegio.cpp and the other GPL-2.0+ files in the package will need to be licensed under the GPL-2.0 "only". Thus, the spec file license should read (with comment): # the GPL-2.0 license of qjpegio.cpp may cause the entire package to be licensed # under GPL-2.0 License: GPL-2.0 There is, however, a second problem. The file plugins/yahoo/sha.c is licensed under the MPL-1.1. That license is incompatible with the GPL-2.0. So we need to determine: (1) if that file is actually used at all (2) if it is used, is it compiled/linked with GPL licensed code (3) if it is (and a derived work may have been created) upstream will need to be contacted to resolve this (4) Failing (3), it may be possible to substitute the MPL sha.c code with a functionally equivalent GPL compatible version === For now I removed the Yahoo plugin entirely. But what other possible solutions, given the package sim is already in Factory? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org

7 9