November 2011 - openSUSE Factory - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: [opensuse-factory] Ubuntu has similar themes for GTK2 and GTK3
by Richard Brown 19 Nov '11

19 Nov '11

However a word of note - the largest concern I think we'll have is ensuring the themes are actually maintained and maintainable - we don't want to end up in a situation where a theme today gets broken tomorrow with no one to fix it.. Also, GTK3 themes are great, but arguably we'll need gnome-shell themes to go along with them, which could be a trickier affair don't let my words of warning stop you though, please go ahead, I just wanted to highlight two issues that immediately sprang to mind >>> Jos Poortvliet 11/18/11 9:29 PM >>> On Friday, November 18, 2011 09:07:43 Ilya Chernykh wrote: > They ported the themes. What about openSUSE? I suggest to copy what they did, package it on OBS and submit it for inclusion in GNOME :D -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Re: Apper disaster - Can´t get my beloved 11.4 KpackageKit back
by Greg Freemyer 19 Nov '11

19 Nov '11

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:38 PM, jdd <jdd(a)dodin.org> wrote: > > Le 18/11/2011 23:28, James Knott a écrit : > >> BTW, w.r.t. some other comments there, I do have apper and packagekit >> installed and it still doesn't work. >> > > As far as I understand, apper was a last minute try to replace a buggy packagekit, but not mature enough. better use zypper or yast... > > jdd There are already 12.1 updates for the update stack! I just enabled online updates for the first time in 12.1. This is what I see (via zypper patch). ==== The following packages are going to be upgraded: libpackagekit-glib2-14 libpackagekit-qt14 libpackagekit-qt2-2 PackageKit PackageKit-browser-plugin PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin PackageKit-gtk3-module PackageKit-gtk-module ==== My understanding is that it's not apper that is buggy, but some of the opensuse libraries it depends on. I don't know if the above PackageKit updates will help or not. Then after you update the update stack, you should run zypper patch a second time and get a new flash-player. === sudo zypper patch Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Resolving package dependencies... The following NEW package is going to be installed: flash-player-kde4 The following NEW patches are going to be installed: openSUSE-2011-3 openSUSE-2011-4 openSUSE-2011-5 The following packages are going to be upgraded: flash-player gstreamer-0_10-fluendo-mp3 pullin-flash-player 3 packages to upgrade, 1 new. Overall download size: 5.2 MiB. After the operation, 14.6 MiB will be freed. Continue? [y/n/?] (y): === HTH Greg -- Greg Freemyer Head of EDD Tape Extraction and Processing team Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer CNN/TruTV Aired Forensic Imaging Demo - http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/23/how-computer-evidence-gets-retrie… The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-factory] Systemd RC2 12.1 slow start of job network
by Andreas Hoffmann 18 Nov '11

18 Nov '11

Dear List, I've discovered another problem with systemd in RC2 of 12.1. After booting the system, the login is available incredibly fast, but it take AGES (at least 4-5 minutes) until all the network-services (xvnc, ssh, smb, nmb) are up and running. When I'm calling systemctl list-jobs is shows about 15 jobs waiting and one job running (network.service). Then after 4-5 minutes the lists clears quite fast, within 20 seconds. After the jobs list cleared, all the required network services are up and running. After the job list cleared I ran systemctl list-units and there the network.service shows 2 times fail. I can start it then with systemctl start network.service and its fast. But even it shows fail fail it seems everything is working. (at least until now I didn't miss any functionality and the system behaves normally). Greetings, Andreas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 9

[opensuse-factory] openSUSE:Factory:NonFree repo is not complete
by Kyrill Detinov 18 Nov '11

18 Nov '11

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:51:44 +0400 Hello. opera-gtk and opera-kde4 aren't published. It seems, in 12.1 too. -- WBR, Kyrill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Why does 64-bit wine depend on packages in the 32-bit repository?
by Tim Edwards 18 Nov '11

18 Nov '11

As I understand it in oss and factory packages in the 64-bit repository should not depend on packages in the 32-bit repo. This is why we have a huge number (926 in 12.1 oss) of *-32bit packages in oss/factory under x86_64. But wine depends on 'wine-32bit' which is only provided by a wine-32bit package in the i586 repository. Is this a bug or have I misunderstood something? > rpm -qp --requires oss/suse/x86_64/wine-1.3.30-2.1.2.x86_64.rpm ... wine-32bit = 1.3.30 rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.6-1 > rpm -qp --provides oss/suse/x86_64/wine-1.3.30-2.1.2.x86_64.rpm ... wine = 1.3.30-2.1.2 wine(x86-64) = 1.3.30-2.1.2 > rpm -qp --provides http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/12.1/repo/oss/suse/i586/wine-32bi… ... wine-32bit = 1.3.30-2.1.2 wine-32bit(x86-32) = 1.3.30-2.1.2 Tim -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-factory] 12.1 IPv6 addressing issue
by Lew Wolfgang 18 Nov '11

18 Nov '11

Hi Folks, I installed RC2 last week on a desktop just for the fun of it. There were a few glitches during the install process but overall it went well. But I'm having an issue with IPv6 addressing. The install is on a large network that runs both IPv4 and IPv6. Something like 96% of the six-thousand or so hosts are fully IPv6 enabled. openSuSE has always worked well enough in this environment. But 12.1 RC2 kicks off an infrastructure warning that the host is running a "private" address. The network has a policy that prohibits private addresses and so this new install will be blocked soon. Ifconfig shows that none of the inet6 address have the lower half of the MAC address as is usual. Did the policy regarding IPv6 private addressing change in 12.1? If so, how can we return to the old policy? I'll include obfuscated ifconfig outputs below. Thanks, Lew Wolfgang Not working 12.1 RC2: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:xx:E8:08:00:43 inet addr:xxx.yy.77.50 Bcast:xxx.yy.79.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: xxxx:yyy:zz:76:224:e8ff:fe08:43/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::xxx:e8ff:fe08:43/64 Scope:Link inet6 addr: xxxx:yyy:zz:76:54d2:36fb:2fd5:56b6/64 Scope:Global A working 11.4 system shows: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 70:xx:BC:46:7B:A9 inet addr:xxx.yy.10.73 Bcast:xxx.yy.15.255 Mask:255.255.248.0 inet6 addr: xxxx:yyy:zz:8:7271:bcff:fe46:7ba9/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::xxxx:bcff:fe46:7ba9/64 Scope:Link -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 88

[opensuse-factory] Zypper and dependent repos.
by Greg Freemyer 18 Nov '11

18 Nov '11

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Greg KH <gregkh(a)suse.de> wrote: >> So why does the main 12.1 repo not simply feed the TW repo? > > That is exactly what it does, to build it against, not to actually > provide it for users to sync against, that is now how Tumbleweed has > ever worked. I don't think zypper has the ability to automatically pull in dependent repositories. I don't think it should be used often, but for the normal updates repo, tumbleweed, a maybe a couple others it would be great if zypper allowed a single repo to be added which in turn caused the underlying repo to be searched. Thus if a user has the tumbleweed repo, there could be config data that tells zypper that it should also consider the opensuse_current repo to be part of it. That way Greg KH could also control how the updates repo gets handled, etc. Anyway, I'm not a zypper internals expert, so I'm just asking if this would be feasible. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-factory] Testers for new procmail wanted
by Dr. Werner Fink 18 Nov '11

18 Nov '11

Hi, just finished a procmail which includes some fixes from Debian as well as my own fixes together with a IPv6 patch. Now the question rises: how stable this new procmail is. Therefore testers are welcome. The download repostories are found at http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/mail/ Werner -- "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-factory] New kernel flavor -netbook
by Roger Luedecke 17 Nov '11

17 Nov '11

Looks like people from the ArchLinux team have been working on this. I personally would love a kernel optimized for my netbook, and for the clients I have who use them. Their code and all that jazz is available here. http://code.google.com/p/kernel-netbook/ -- If God is dead, who will save the Queen? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 16

[opensuse-factory] subpixel hinting and freetype
by Ilya Chernykh 17 Nov '11

17 Nov '11

People say subpixel hinting is not enebled in Freetype build options in 12.1. Why? Is there a reason? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2