- openSUSE Factory

AW: [opensuse-factory] AW: [SPAM] [opensuse-announce] SUSE Linux 10.1 Beta1 Released
by Prumbaum, Frank 24 Jan '06

24 Jan '06

>> Hi, >> >> while updating my 10.1a4 to 10.1b1 the installation >> procedure was very slowly reacting, my mouse pointer jumping >> every second. This startet right after X came up from installation >> cd. While starting boot cds of 10.0, 10.1a3 or a4 I never had this >> problem. >> >> Furthermore my font installation seems to be a bit messed up, every >> font package takes between 30 minutes and 2 hours to get installed. >> This is bit confusing cause I never installed s.th. by myself, my >> system has gone all the way through 10.0 -> 10.1a3 -> 10.1a4. Could >> this be an issue of the newly released Xorg? >> >> I'm now 30 hours into installation with 40 packages remaining... >> >> I can't imagine many who are patient enough waiting that long (Wouldn't >> it be possible to have a button 'ignore this package'?) >> >> Frank >> ------ >This sounds lika a very local problem to your conputer.. I've installed >beta1 on 4 separate boxes, i386 and x86_64 and all the installations >went as smooth as expected, no long delays anywhere. >One of the installations was in a VMware VM as well, and as I said, all >of them ran just fine during installation. >-- >Anders Norrbring >Norrbring Consulting Hi, well thanks, it seems I was a victim of Bug #143715 (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=143715) (Found in http://www.opensuse.org/Bugs:Most_Annoying_Bugs) Greetings Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aus Rechts- und Sicherheitsgruenden ist die in dieser E-Mail gegebene Information nicht rechtsverbindlich. Eine rechtsverbindliche Bestaetigung reichen wir Ihnen gerne auf Anforderung in schriftlicher Form nach. Beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der unautorisierten Nutzung, Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail nicht gestattet ist. Diese Nachricht ist ausschliesslich fuer den bezeichneten Adressaten oder dessen Vertreter bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen Vertreter sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit dem Absender der E-Mail in Verbindung zu setzen. ---------------------------- For legal and security reasons the information provided in this e-mail is not legally binding. Upon request we would be pleased to provide you with a legally binding confirmation in written form. Any form of unauthorised use, publication, reproduction, copying or disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted. This message is exclusively for the person addressed or their representative. If you are not the intended recipient of this message and its contents, please notify the sender immediately. ==============================================================================

1 0

ipw2100 firmware
by Glenn Holmer 24 Jan '06

24 Jan '06

I didn't see where to download the ipw2100 firmware, so as to be able to test wireless? -- ====================================================== Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) ====================================================== "Greater coherence cannot be achieved. Not even the Netherlanders have managed this." -Anton Webern ======================================================

3 3

AW: [SPAM] [opensuse-announce] SUSE Linux 10.1 Beta1 Released
by Prumbaum, Frank 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

Hi, while updating my 10.1a4 to 10.1b1 the installation procedure was very slowly reacting, my mouse pointer jumping every second. This startet right after X came up from installation cd. While starting boot cds of 10.0, 10.1a3 or a4 I never had this problem. Furthermore my font installation seems to be a bit messed up, every font package takes between 30 minutes and 2 hours to get installed. This is bit confusing cause I never installed s.th. by myself, my system has gone all the way through 10.0 -> 10.1a3 -> 10.1a4. Could this be an issue of the newly released Xorg? I'm now 30 hours into installation with 40 packages remaining... I can't imagine many who are patient enough waiting that long (Wouldn't it be possible to have a button 'ignore this package'?) Frank ------ > ______________________________________ > AXA Technology Services Germany GmbH > FRANK PRUMBAUM > ATTS-AP/MW (HOL 5.1.6) > Colonia-Allee 10-20; 51067 Köln > Tel.: +49 (0)221 - 148 - 2 44 32 > Fax: +49 (0)221 - 148 - 44 2 19 19 > E-Mail: Mailto:Frank.Prumbaum@axa-tech.com > _____________________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aus Rechts- und Sicherheitsgruenden ist die in dieser E-Mail gegebene Information nicht rechtsverbindlich. Eine rechtsverbindliche Bestaetigung reichen wir Ihnen gerne auf Anforderung in schriftlicher Form nach. Beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der unautorisierten Nutzung, Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail nicht gestattet ist. Diese Nachricht ist ausschliesslich fuer den bezeichneten Adressaten oder dessen Vertreter bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen Vertreter sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit dem Absender der E-Mail in Verbindung zu setzen. ---------------------------- For legal and security reasons the information provided in this e-mail is not legally binding. Upon request we would be pleased to provide you with a legally binding confirmation in written form. Any form of unauthorised use, publication, reproduction, copying or disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted. This message is exclusively for the person addressed or their representative. If you are not the intended recipient of this message and its contents, please notify the sender immediately. ==============================================================================

2 1

RE: [opensuse-factory] ipw2100 firmware
by Robison, Jonathon (M.) 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

Ipw2100.sf.net --jmr -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Holmer [mailto:gholmer@ameritech.net] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:29 PM To: opensuse-factory(a)opensuse.org Subject: [opensuse-factory] ipw2100 firmware I didn't see where to download the ipw2100 firmware, so as to be able to test wireless? -- ====================================================== Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) ====================================================== "Greater coherence cannot be achieved. Not even the Netherlanders have managed this." -Anton Webern ======================================================

1 0

[Andreas Jaeger] [opensuse-announce] SUSE Linux 10.1 Beta1 Released
by Andreas Jaeger 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

FYI. Note: Most mirrors are not open yet, so download might take some time, Andreas Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

3 4

Re: [opensuse-announce] SUSE Linux 10.1 Beta1 Released
by Peter Czanik 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

Hello, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > * PPC only: The jsm serial driver is gone, its maintainers failed to > fix it. There is thus no way to boot on (old or new) PPC systems > with 8250 serial ports. > I don't know, if it's related to this change, but Pegasos PPC does not boot any more. It worked fine with factory boot.ppc.iso from Wednesday. Part of dmesg from a 10.0 kernel: "serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing disabled ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A " Booting failed just after the "Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing disabled". I tested SuSE 10.1 beta1 mini bood CD, the latest factory boot.ppc.iso and SLES 10 CD1 as well. Where should I report it? A "SuSE linux 10.1" and/or as a "SLES 10" bug? A picture of the faliure is available at http://peter.czanik.hu/kep/pegfail.jpg (5MB jpeg made with a digital camera). Bye, -- CzP http://peter.czanik.hu/

2 2

installing beta 1 with ATI fglrx driver
by Robert Schiele 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

Hi everybody, if you wanted to install the ATI proprietary fglrx driver on a 10.1 beta 1 system you will have the problem that some files from the fglrx package are linked to an expat library version that is no longer shipped with beta 1. If you still want to use the fglrx driver with beta 1 you can install the package http://pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~schiele/beta1/expat-compat-0-0.i586.… as a workaround. If you need the same package for a 64 bit system, drop me a note and I might consider to build one as well. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."

3 4

Apache not running.. 10.1 beta1
by Anders Norrbring 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

I've made a standard Apache installation with the example pages, and try to access it.. No luck, I get an empty page and this in the error_log [Sun Jan 22 16:09:12 2006] [notice] Apache/2.2.0 (Linux/SUSE) configured -- resuming normal operations [Sun Jan 22 16:09:25 2006] [notice] child pid 7440 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) This was WITH the PHP5 enabled. If I disable the php5 module, it shows the server root index.html page without problems. Ideas? -- Anders Norrbring Norrbring Consulting

1 0

Beta1-mini.iso not working
by Rauch Christian 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, i downloaded 10.1 Beta1 today and tried to install using a 10.0 Installation Server and using SUSE-10.1-CD-OSS-i386-Beta1-mini.iso for install. I triplechecked this iso, so md5sum is correct, and it gets burned correct(K3B Checks succeeds), but i can not boot with this CD. Can anyone tell me, whats wrong? Is this one not to be used for, what the old boot.iso (e.g. in 10.0 inst-source/boot) was for? Or is there something wrong with my system or the iso? btw. size of this iso comes quite small to me, only 37 mb instead of 64 mb for 10.0. Regards, Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD04R+ayhvFxrDZlkRAtKFAJ9sjDQrvzwcEfi98YPmLULbUmD1mwCcCFnW hiavSAxlhTKplHjZt8L+HQo= =sMKe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

Apt and SUSE 10.1 Beta 1
by James PEARSON 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

Hello all Has anyone installed and used "apt" on the SUSE beta 10.1? I installed the same two apt and apt-lib rpm packages that I am using on SUSE 10.0: apt-0.5.15cnc7-6 apt-libs-0.5.15cnc7-6 I used the "sources.list" from http://ftp4.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/SuSE/10.1-i386/examples/sources.list… When I ran "apt-get update" I got the following error message: apt-get: error while loading shared libraries: librpm-4.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Running Apt update... apt-get: error while loading shared libraries: librpm-4.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Checked to what the differences between rpm and librpm were on SUSE 10.0 et SUSE 10.1 BETA1. The results below show the version changes... # SUSE 10.1 BETA 1 rpm-4.4.2-9 # SUSE 10.0 rpm-4.1.1-222 # SUSE 10.1 BETA 1 ls -l /usr/lib/librpm* linux:/data/Install/Apts # ls -l /usr/lib/librpm* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 363460 Jan 15 18:30 /usr/lib/librpm-4.4.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 156980 Jan 15 18:30 /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.4.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 989460 Jan 15 18:30 /usr/lib/librpmdb-4.4.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 415100 Jan 15 18:30 /usr/lib/librpmio-4.4.so # SUSE 10.0 ls -l /usr/lib/librpm* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 320240 2005-09-09 17:10 /usr/lib/librpm-4.1.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 156572 2005-09-09 17:10 /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.1.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1028772 2005-09-09 17:10 /usr/lib/librpmdb-4.1.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 314868 2005-09-09 17:10 /usr/lib/librpmio-4.1.so # I tried the following just to see what would happen ln -s /usr/lib/librpm-4.4.so /usr/lib/librpm-4.1.so ln -s /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.4.so /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.1.so ln -s /usr/lib/librpmdb-4.4.so /usr/lib/librpmdb-4.1.so ln -s /usr/lib/librpmio-4.4.so /usr/lib/librpmio-4.1.so Results running apt-get update # apt-get update Get:1 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386 release [1366B] Fetched 1366B in 0s (2043B/s) Get:1 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/rpmkeys pkglist [5801B] Get:2 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/rpmkeys release [133B] Get:3 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/base pkglist [5935kB] Get:4 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/base release [130B] Get:5 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/extra pkglist [128kB] Get:6 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/extra release [131B] Get:7 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/security pkglist [14B] Get:8 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/security release [135B] Get:9 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/rpmkeys srclist [14B] Get:10 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/base srclist [721kB] Get:11 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/extra srclist [16.5kB] Get:12 ftp://ftp4.gwdg.de SuSE/10.1-i386/security srclist [14B] Fetched 6807kB in 17s (380kB/s) Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Good but not good enough as there are still have a few important problems to solve before I apt will work as shown below... apt-get dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get --fix-broken install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: apt: Depends: librpm-4.1.so but it is not installable Depends: librpmdb-4.1.so but it is not installable Depends: librpmio-4.1.so but it is not installable apt-libs: Depends: librpm-4.1.so but it is not installable Depends: librpmdb-4.1.so but it is not installable Depends: librpmio-4.1.so but it One last thing... I noticed that the the SUSE 10.1 BETA CDs contain version "apt-libs-0.5.15cnc7-9" (I installed "cnc7-6") but there is no "apt" package. I know that smart is the way of the future but I still like using the two of them. All comments welcome James

4 4