- openSUSE Factory

Duplicated proces
by Juan Erbes 27 Jan '06

27 Jan '06

I Fount in the top screen, some duplicate proces such as: mingetty kdm automount pdflush Other proces, is'nt duplicated, but I do'nt know what is: scsi_eh_0 scsi_eh_1 It seems as the network interface, with a scsi device. The screen of top is: Tasks: 85 total, 1 running, 83 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 1.3% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 95.0% id, 2.7% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si Mem: 516456k total, 392428k used, 124028k free, 41512k buffers Swap: 1036152k total, 120k used, 1036032k free, 167392k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 3115 root 15 0 99900 12m 4760 S 1.0 2.4 0:36.01 X 2130 root 16 0 1892 616 444 D 0.3 0.1 0:00.86 syslog-ng 2134 root 16 0 1656 564 372 S 0.3 0.1 0:00.36 klogd 4005 root 16 0 2172 1116 848 R 0.3 0.2 0:00.33 top 1 root 16 0 724 280 240 S 0.0 0.1 0:01.45 init 2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 events/0 5 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 khelper 6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread 8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kblockd/0 9 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid 121 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush 122 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.05 pdflush 124 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0 123 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 kswapd0 330 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod 377 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kpsmoused 746 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0 749 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0 750 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_1 806 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 reiserfs/0 910 root 11 -4 1760 548 348 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.43 udevd 1299 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd 1329 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 kgameportd 1367 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 shpchpd_event 2092 root 16 0 1516 508 436 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 acpid 2131 messageb 16 0 3420 1012 744 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.63 dbus-daemon 2170 root 17 0 1792 692 568 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.02 resmgrd 2201 root 16 0 4320 2884 1456 S 0.0 0.6 0:02.24 hald 2271 nobody 16 0 1560 424 340 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 portmap 2279 root 16 0 2756 1232 1092 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 NetworkManagerD 2297 root 21 0 1816 612 540 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 hald-addon-acpi 2301 root 16 0 11956 1900 1664 S 0.0 0.4 0:01.62 NetworkManager 2772 root 16 0 2316 1196 540 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 pcscd 2790 root 16 0 1796 704 580 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 cron 2939 root 25 0 4956 1212 880 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.13 sshd 2954 root 15 0 4580 1344 1060 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 smpppd 3036 root 16 0 1664 688 568 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 automount 3038 root 16 0 1660 668 556 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 automount 3054 root 15 0 1856 784 664 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 dhcdbd 3055 root 16 0 2112 1068 772 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 dhclient 3063 root 17 0 2812 792 668 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 kdm 3089 lp 16 0 6840 3080 1360 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.28 cupsd 3119 root 17 0 3556 1232 980 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.01 kdm 3121 root 18 0 1956 644 572 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.11 mingetty 3122 root 18 0 1956 628 556 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty Thanks

2 1

XFS?
by Glenn Holmer 26 Jan '06

26 Jan '06

I noticed that XFS was not an option when partitioning for 10.1 beta1. Is this something that will come later? -- ====================================================== Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) ====================================================== "Greater coherence cannot be achieved. Not even the Netherlanders have managed this." -Anton Webern ======================================================

2 4

Could'nt find boot.coldplug in beta1
by Juan Erbes 26 Jan '06

26 Jan '06

I have a problem that comes from the update from alpha 2 to 3, and the last weekend I upgraded to beta 1, and the problem continues. I opened the bug 144652, and I have no adecuate response. Other user has comment the same problem with alpha 3: http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-factory/2005-Nov/0009.html After the last upgrade to beta1, I try to reinstall preload, and I got: 1:Installing preload ###################################################################################### [100%] Output from preload-0.2-7@i586: insserv: Service boot.coldplug has to be enabled for service boot.preload insserv: exiting now! error: %post(preload-0.2-7.i586) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 I do'nt find boot.coldplug, in /etc/init.d In what package are the script boot.coldplug ? Thanks

2 2

qtcurve, a replacement for gtk_qt_engine
by jsiebert＠arcor.de 25 Jan '06

25 Jan '06

Hi there, I was looking around the last few days for a replacement for the (my opinion) crappy gtk_qt_engine. As far as I know this package is unmaintained at freedesktop.org and creates a lot of problems (like with eclipse, which I use permanently). Besides when using GTK-based apps under KDE with gtk_qt_engine, they look very [CENSORED] in many ways. I found the very promising project qtcurve (http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=5065) which provides a unified widget theme engine for QT, GTK2 and GTK1. There are binary packages for Suse at Guru's RPM page (http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/rpm-navigation.php?cat=/Themes/qtcurve) After some testing I think this is a very good replacement for gtk_qt_engine and I would like to vote for inclusion of this package into one of the next Suse/openSUSE releases. What do you think? Greetings Jens Siebert Machen Sie aus 14 Cent spielend bis zu 100 Euro! Die neue Gaming-Area von Arcor - über 50 Onlinespiele im Angebot. http://www.arcor.de/rd/emf-gaming-1

2 3

VMware-workstation-5.5.1 and SUSE 10.1 B1
by James PEARSON 25 Jan '06

25 Jan '06

Hello all I tried (unsucessfully) to compile the vmmon modules using both with VMware-workstation-5.5.1-19175.i386.rpm and vmware-any-any-update94 using linux 2.6.15-git12-6-default SUSE kernel It errors out. I was wondering if anyone else has been to install VMware-workstation-5.5 on SUSE 10.1 B1? I haven't had much time to research the problem but I did post extracts of the error messages over at the vmware community. Here is the url http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=30803&tstart=0 James

3 3

fetchmail 6.3.1
by Aschwin Marsman 25 Jan '06

25 Jan '06

Hi, Fetchmail 6.3.1 was released a couple of days ago. I haven't seen a security update for SUSE 10.0 yet and havent found a new src rpm on: http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-sourc… so I can build it myself easily. Any plans? Otherwise I will get the src. Have a pleasent year end, Aschwin Marsman -- aschwin(a)marsman.org http://www.marsman.org

2 4

More gtk-sharp packaging changes.
by Wade Berrier 24 Jan '06

24 Jan '06

More sub packages have been split out. This should have been done the first go around, but better now than later. The following packages have been added: art-sharp2 gnome-vfs-sharp2 gtkhtml-sharp2 rsvg-sharp2 And for gtk-sharp 1.0.10: art-sharp gda-sharp gnomedb-sharp gtkhtml-sharp rsvg-sharp If you're using gtk-sharp-complete or gtk-sharp2-complete in neededforbuild, you won't need any changes (thanks Rudi!). Wade

1 0

gtk-qt-engine removed in 10.1?
by jsiebert＠arcor.de 24 Jan '06

24 Jan '06

Hi there! I looked at some screenshots of Suse 10.1b1 at shots.osdir.com and noticed a new option in the KDE control-center in one of the screenshots (http://shots.osdir.com/slideshows/slideshow.php?release=565&slide=15) which covers font and style settings of GTK apps in KDE. Is this related to gtk-qt-engine or is this replaced by another GTK/KDE theme engine in 10.1? Greetings Jens Siebert Machen Sie aus 14 Cent spielend bis zu 100 Euro! Die neue Gaming-Area von Arcor - über 50 Onlinespiele im Angebot. http://www.arcor.de/rd/emf-gaming-1

5 6

Factory and bugzilla
by Anders Norrbring 24 Jan '06

24 Jan '06

Hiya all... I see quite some entries in bugzilla about "resolved" and "commited", but I haven't seen any updates in the factory distribution directories yet. What's the "normal" lead-time from commited fix until it's available for download? Or, are the fixes not posted for public download? -- Anders Norrbring Norrbring Consulting

5 11

AW: [opensuse-factory] AW: [SPAM] [opensuse-announce] SUSE Linux 10.1 Beta1 Released
by Prumbaum, Frank 24 Jan '06

24 Jan '06

>> Hi, >> >> while updating my 10.1a4 to 10.1b1 the installation >> procedure was very slowly reacting, my mouse pointer jumping >> every second. This startet right after X came up from installation >> cd. While starting boot cds of 10.0, 10.1a3 or a4 I never had this >> problem. >> >> Furthermore my font installation seems to be a bit messed up, every >> font package takes between 30 minutes and 2 hours to get installed. >> This is bit confusing cause I never installed s.th. by myself, my >> system has gone all the way through 10.0 -> 10.1a3 -> 10.1a4. Could >> this be an issue of the newly released Xorg? >> >> I'm now 30 hours into installation with 40 packages remaining... >> >> I can't imagine many who are patient enough waiting that long (Wouldn't >> it be possible to have a button 'ignore this package'?) >> >> Frank >> ------ >This sounds lika a very local problem to your conputer.. I've installed >beta1 on 4 separate boxes, i386 and x86_64 and all the installations >went as smooth as expected, no long delays anywhere. >One of the installations was in a VMware VM as well, and as I said, all >of them ran just fine during installation. >-- >Anders Norrbring >Norrbring Consulting Hi, well thanks, it seems I was a victim of Bug #143715 (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=143715) (Found in http://www.opensuse.org/Bugs:Most_Annoying_Bugs) Greetings Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aus Rechts- und Sicherheitsgruenden ist die in dieser E-Mail gegebene Information nicht rechtsverbindlich. Eine rechtsverbindliche Bestaetigung reichen wir Ihnen gerne auf Anforderung in schriftlicher Form nach. Beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der unautorisierten Nutzung, Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail nicht gestattet ist. Diese Nachricht ist ausschliesslich fuer den bezeichneten Adressaten oder dessen Vertreter bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen Vertreter sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit dem Absender der E-Mail in Verbindung zu setzen. ---------------------------- For legal and security reasons the information provided in this e-mail is not legally binding. Upon request we would be pleased to provide you with a legally binding confirmation in written form. Any form of unauthorised use, publication, reproduction, copying or disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted. This message is exclusively for the person addressed or their representative. If you are not the intended recipient of this message and its contents, please notify the sender immediately. ==============================================================================

1 0