- openSUSE Support

bugs@lists.opensuse.org dead?
by mh＠mike.franken.de 04 Jun '23

04 Jun '23

Hi, is bugs(a)lists.opensuse.org dead? The last mail I got from the bugs mailing list is "Message-ID: <bug-1210334-21960(a)http.bugzilla.opensuse.org/>" received on 12.04., 07:22. Thx and bye. Michael.

5 7

how to trust opensuse keys? new RSA 4096 bit keys, how to double check?
by cagsm 03 Jun '23

03 Jun '23

Support, how to trust opensuse keys? new RSA 4096 bit keys, how to double check? e.g. when test driving new dup for 15.5: > # sudo zypper -vvv --releasever=15.5 ref .... Checking whether to refresh metadata for Update repository of openSUSE Backports Retrieving: http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.5/backports/repodata/repomd.xml ........................................................................................................................[done (195 B/s)] Retrieving: http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.5/backports/repodata/repomd.xml… .....................................................................................................................[done (63 B/s)] Retrieving: http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.5/backports/repodata/repomd.xml… .....................................................................................................................[done (63 B/s)] Retrieving: http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.5/backports/repodata/repomd.xml ..................................................................................................................................[done] New repository or package signing key received: Repository: Update repository of openSUSE Backports Key Fingerprint: F044 C2C5 07A1 262B 538A AADD 8A49 EB03 25DB 7AE0 Key Name: openSUSE:Backports OBS Project <openSUSE:Backports@build.opensuse.org> Key Algorithm: RSA 4096 Key Created: Wed 10 May 2023 04:46:12 PM CEST Key Expires: Sun 09 May 2027 04:46:12 PM CEST Rpm Name: gpg-pubkey-25db7ae0-645bae34 Note: Signing data enables the recipient to verify that no modifications occurred after the data were signed. Accepting data with no, wrong or unknown signature can lead to a corrupted system and in extreme cases even to a system compromise. Note: A GPG pubkey is clearly identified by its fingerprint. Do not rely on the key's name. If you are not sure whether the presented key is authentic, ask the repository provider or check their web site. Many providers maintain a web page showing the fingerprints of the GPG keys they are using. Do you want to reject the key, trust temporarily, or trust always? [r/t/a/?] (r): -------------------------- I never understood how to actually test and lookup these keys and where to make sense of them and how to react in such cases questions of zypper or questions of yast software modules when adding additional repos and many more such situations. i used to understand that one needs to check via other means other channels and look for these keys fingerprints etc published on some official projects and companies websites and all. but this is all in such a messed up and not fully established state, at least thats what i make of it. all i find is like a corporate suse (not opensuse) sigining keys page for example. > <https://www.suse.com/support/security/keys/> this needs to become much better i say. maybe nobody of the userbase care these days everybody just clicks and downloads and executes :( please make this a wholesome and good experience and dont miseducate the userbase into just not understanding and knowing anything about security, trust chains etc anyone care to elaborate how to actually double check on opensuse binaries and repos and their security and all. it all boils down to keys, to the root source of authority of a project et al also are old keys signing the newer keys and building chains and successions and so on? ty

6 9

running different compiler than what's installed
by L A Walsh 03 Jun '23

03 Jun '23

I was wanting to run a different compiler than what's installed. I found the deps for gcc13 and downloaded them (deps): rpm -Uhv --test gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64.rpm warning: gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 29b700a4: NOKEY error: Failed dependencies: cpp13 = 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libasan8 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libatomic1 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.34)(64bit) is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.35)(64bit) is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.36)(64bit) is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libgcc_s1 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libgomp1 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libhwasan0 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libitm1 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 liblsan0 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libtsan2 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 libubsan1 >= 13.1.1+git7364-1.1 is needed by gcc13-13.1.1+git7364-1.1.x86_64 First I tried relocating the install path to my a devel dir '/home/devel/root' with rpm -relocate=/=/home/devel/root That didn't work as it said the package was not relocatable. Hmmm. Next I tried rpm2cpio and unpacking the cpio's under the root (using star). Set my LD_LIBRARY_PATH: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/devel/root/usr/lib64 for my test I just wanted to see gcc print its version. I set my PATH=/home/devel/root/usr/bin:$PATH When I tried running 'gcc --version', I got(get): /home/devel/root/usr/bin/gcc-13 --version gcc: symbol lookup error: /home/devel/root/usr/lib64/libc.so.6: undefined symbol: _dl_audit_symbind_alt, version GLIBC_PRIVATE ----- Any ideas as to why this didn't work? Thanks! -linda

5 13

binutils doesn't seem to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH
by L A Walsh 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23

in trying to use a different version of gcc/+libs/+binutils I have run into a problem -- namely that ld seems to use a hard coded path (or two): /home/devel/root/usr/bin> ldd ./ld ./ld: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by ./ld) linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffcc6340000) libbfd-2.40.0.20230412-4.so => not found libctf.so.0 => not found libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f724619b000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f7246c7a000) The 'ld' prog from binutils ignores LD_LIBRARY_PATH and points to the root to resolve libc, a few other libs that are not found and ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (hard-coded to /lib64 instead of using LD_LIBRARY_PATH Is this necessary?

1 0

[support] installation initrds larger than subsequent
by Felix Miata 01 Jun '23

01 Jun '23

Long ago I noticed on Leap at least that the initial installed initrd is significantly larger than rebuilds or those for newer kernels. I'd like to know why, so I thought I could find (a) .conf file(s) on a boot from installation media. No such luck, NAICT. There are few small files in */usr/lib/dracut/dracut.conf.d/, but they don't really look like they're big enough, or contain the right kind of content, to be responsible: 113 multipath.conf 112 50-sg3_utils.conf 147 dm-parts.conf /etc/dracut.conf.d/ doesn't exist, and neither /etc/dracut.conf. multipath.conf only has comment and: install_items+=" /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/multipath.conf " dm-parts.conf only has comment and: install_items+=" /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/11-dm-parts.rules " 50-sg3_utils.conf only has comment and: install_items+=" /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/54-before-scsi-sg3_id.rules " How can I find out what is responsible for making them significantly bigger? -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

2 3

hibernating when lid closes
by Peter Münster 30 May '23

30 May '23

Hi, I have installed Leap 15.4 on a laptop with KDE-desktop. Unfortunately PowerDevil blocks the "handle-lid-switch", so the "HandleLidSwitch=hibernate" in /etc/systemd/logind.conf does not work. How could I get hibernation on the lid close event please? Is it possible somewhere, to configure PowerDevil to not block the event? TIA for any hints, -- Peter

6 10

Issue with CUPS and printer disappearing.
by Larry Len Rainey 29 May '23

29 May '23

1 0

15.4 - main update repostiry expired today - ?
by cagsm 29 May '23

29 May '23

Repository 'Main Update Repository' metadata expired since 2023-05-27 --------------------------- sudo zypper lu Loading repository data... Warning: Repository 'Main Update Repository' metadata expired since 2023-05-27 Warning: Repository metadata expired: Check if 'autorefresh' is turned on (zypper lr), otherwise manualy refresh the repository (zypper ref). If this does not solve the issue, it could be that you are using a broken mirror or the server has actually discontinued to support the repository. Reading installed packages... No updates found. ---------------------- zypper lr 1 Alias : repo-update Name : Main Update Repository URI : http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.4/oss Enabled : Yes GPG Check : (r ) Yes Priority : 99 (default priority) Autorefresh : On Keep Packages : Off Type : rpm-md GPG Key URI : Path Prefix : / Parent Service : Keywords : update Repo Info Path : /etc/zypp/repos.d/repo-update.repo MD Cache Path : /var/cache/zypp/raw/repo-update ---------------------------- everything is ref and online and live and date time correct what happen?

6 5

Video Intel awaking w wrong Brightness level
by Marco Calistri 28 May '23

28 May '23

Hello, I've been able to set a specific brightness intensity at evry boot, by using an /etc/init.d/after.local script, but anytime my system awakes from suspended mode, the brightness resets to a very high intensity. from dmesg I see: [ 3.128757] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Skipping intel_backlight registration [ 33.797331] ideapad_acpi VPC2004:00: Keyboard backlight control not available [28383.336476] video LNXVIDEO:00: Restoring backlight state How could I resolve this? Which file is used by Tumbleweed for an after suspend brightness adjustment? Thanks and regards, -- Marco Calistri Build: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20230213 Kernel: 6.1.10-1-default - XFCE: (4.18.1)

4 33

[opensuse-support] kernel vs. nouveau bug? report where?
by Felix Miata 24 May '23

24 May '23

I had the following bug report ready to submit, but I checked Fedora 38, and same problem there. Original Summary: absent both plymouth, and video= on linu lines, vtty[1-6] framebuffers produce vast raster right and bottom borders on the larger resolution of two displays To reproduce: 1-connect two unequal native resolution displays to a Tesla or Firmi GPU 2-don't have plymouth in use (I don't ever have it installed, so don't know whether it impacts) 3-don't include e.g. video=1440x900@60 directive on Grub's linu lines 4-boot TW 5-switch to a vtty, e.g. Ctrl-Alt-F3 Actual behavior: 1-Both displays utilize the resolution (same pixel grid) of the lower resolution display 2-Lower resolution display behaves as expected (light text on black background) 3-Higher resolution display uses same pixels as lower resolution display, with light text on black background, leaving right side and bottom raster instead of black Expected behavior: 1-Both displays utilize the resolution (same pixel grid) of the lower resolution display 2-Lower resolution display behaves as expected 3-Entire higher resolution display's background is black instead of portions in raster Workaround: add e.g. video=1440x900@60 to Grub's linu lines, which causes both displays to use the same nominal mode on the full display space. Typical other linu line options: noresume consoleblank=0 net.ifnames=0 ipv6.disable=1 preempt=full mitigations=none My Tesla has HDMI and DVI outputs, tested with 1920x1200 and 1680x1050 displays. My Fermi has dual DisplayPort, tested with 2560x1440 and 1680x1050 displays. Occurs with 6.3.2 and 6.2.12 kernel-default, *and* with 6.2.15 on Fedora 38. Does not occur with 6.1.12 kernel-default on NVidia, or with AMD Caicos (Terascale2) GPU, or with Intel Eaglelake GPU. Tested only on legacy booting (no UEFI support). Others might describe what I call "raster" as multicolored snow. Is there a Nouveau bug tracker to take this to, or does it need to goto bugzilla.kernel.org, or ??? Should I submit the report on BOO anyway? -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata

1 1

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

openSUSE Support