On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 09:31 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
> On Fri Jan 25, 2008 02:34PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > Banshee
> > - Development has been a good testbed for technologies, some of them needed to be written for Banshee
> > - Now all ipods except for iPhone and touch, should work
> > - 6 months ago, a partial rewrite was started, now much faster than the old one, better searching, Xesam compliance, new album/artist browser, playback queue/track mixer
> > - Looking for good solution for codecs installation
> >
> > Factory testing
> > - 2.21.5 update started, still some parts broken, but fixing it
> > - Work around page really needed for helping people in testing
> > AI: hpj and sreeves to post factory work arounds
> >
> > Lived in project
> > - http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Projects/Lived_in_Project
> > - Will try to get good ideas/patches from other distros/OS, volunteers welcome
> >
> > Patch upstreaming
> > - Next Monday/Tuesday will be patch review day, to tag all our patches, and upstream/remove as appropriate
> >
> > 10.3 updates
> > - No negative comments so far on the set of updates
> > - Metacity added
> > AI: jpr, sreeves to push 10.3 update
> >
>
> What version of Banshee will work with recent iPods? I have a
> recent-generation iPod nano that is not recognized with my current
> version of Banshee on 10.3:
>
> helix-banshee-plugins-default-0.13.1-89
> helix-banshee-0.13.1-89
> helix-banshee-engine-helix-0.13.1-89
> helix-banshee-plugins-extra-0.13.1-89
> helix-banshee-engine-gst-0.13.1-89
Banshee 0.13.2
--
Kevin "Yo" Dupuy | Public Mail <kevin(a)kevinsword.com>
Hope for America: Ron Paul for President. www.RonPaul2008.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
Banshee
- Development has been a good testbed for technologies, some of them needed to be written for Banshee
- Now all ipods except for iPhone and touch, should work
- 6 months ago, a partial rewrite was started, now much faster than the old one, better searching, Xesam compliance, new album/artist browser, playback queue/track mixer
- Looking for good solution for codecs installation
Factory testing
- 2.21.5 update started, still some parts broken, but fixing it
- Work around page really needed for helping people in testing
AI: hpj and sreeves to post factory work arounds
Lived in project
- http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Projects/Lived_in_Project
- Will try to get good ideas/patches from other distros/OS, volunteers welcome
Patch upstreaming
- Next Monday/Tuesday will be patch review day, to tag all our patches, and upstream/remove as appropriate
10.3 updates
- No negative comments so far on the set of updates
- Metacity added
AI: jpr, sreeves to push 10.3 update
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo(a)novell.com>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
For those of you who have assigned action items, please go to
http://www.rememberthemilk.com/home/opensuse.gnome/1884064/#section.tasks
and update your task status. Please do this before the meeting begins
tomorrow.
Thanks!
--
---Bryen---
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
Michael Foerster wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > I am just working on packaging changes of gstreamer for OpenSuSE 11.0.
> > Best Regards / S pozdravem,
>
> So, it's possible to install gstreamer (basic-necessities) without
> requieries to samba-libs/client or usb-media-player-libs?
No, there are no changes in splitting of plugins.
OpenSUSE uses an upstream way of splitting (with exception of
plugins-good-extra). It might be possible to split each package to more
subpackages at cost of some extra dependencies in applications.
For example OpenEmbedded creates one package per each module.
Such change would be a bit risky and independent on the current change.
. Now you are sure, that with just four packages you can play most open
formats. In such case, for each new format you would need to install
extra package.
> I'd like that. Things like that kind of connectivity belongs to the
> player-software, not to the audio-framework.
Please let me know, which dependencies seems superfluous to you exactly.
> So far the 'new' packaging works better for me than the OSS-10.3 version.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Question: What kind of 'plugins' are there already? the seen nameing in
> Factory isn't nice: look at 'gstreamer' for 'Factory' in webpin or
> <http://packages.opensuse-community.org/index.jsp?searchTerm=gstreamer&distr…>
> just what is in
> gstreamer010-plugins-good / gstreamer010-plugins-bad / gstreamer010-plugins-ugly
> for all the seen text is 'GStreamer Streaming-Media Framework Plug-Ins'
> wouldn't make gstreamer010-plugins-codec-mpeg,
> gstreamer010-plugins-codec-flac, gstreamer010-plugins-jack, etc make more
> sense?
> I'm asking, NOT demanding. But maybe it would be easier to select what
> plugins you as user (not with insde knowlege) need to get the job done.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 09:57 +0000, Darragh Ó Héiligh wrote:
> Are you sure?
Sure I'm sure...!
> The last time I participated in that meeting a lot of the people from
> the US very justifyably complained about the time of the morning they
> were awake at. Is there a particular reason that 12PM doesn't suit?
> Personally, it's absolutely fine for me. I'll be in work either way.
Well, the rest of the meetings take place at my 4am in the mornings. Can
I justifiably complain about that? What is so bad with trying to get the
world outside of US and Europe involved by changing the time, once a
month, to suit us better?
>
> P.S, sorry for the top posting.
Cheers,
Magnus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
As many of you know, the first openSUSE GNOME Team Meeting of each
month is held at a different time to make it easier for those in Asia,
Australia, India, etc. to participate. During one of our previous
meetings, the question was asked whether we're really getting the most
participation by doing this. There's an open task
(http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Tasks) for those living in these areas
to discuss the alternatives. If you've got input/suggestions, please
reply to this thread in the mailing list.
Thanks!
Boyd
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
I noticed on the GNOME Desktop Policy page
(http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Desktop_Policy) and noticed that under
GDM, Face Browser was marked as off. Could adding a face browser to GDM
in 11.0 as default be an idea? I think that would be a good idea, since
it tends to be more intuitive for most users than just a white box ;).
--
Kevin "Yo" Dupuy | Public Email: <kevin(a)kevinsword.com>
Happy New Year from Yo.media!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi
As discussed in the last meeting, people seemed to agree on having some
joint effort for reducing the amount of patches (see
http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Projects/PatchUpstreaming)
So, what do people think about having one or two days for joint patch
upstreaming. Basically, this would be a 'get our packages and
tag/clean/upstream the patches in there', to kick off the patch
upstreaming project.
Since this is not a real meeting that needs people's attention to IRC
all the time, I was thinking we could have next week, like Monday and
Tuesday (Jan 28th and 29th) for this.
Any comments?
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo(a)novell.com>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org
I am just working on packaging changes of gstreamer for OpenSuSE 11.0.
The packaging scheme could be applied for the backports as well, because
it should include all required provides/obsoletes.
Old names in Requires/BuildRequires could still be used, because new
packages use split-provides, but using of new names is preferred.
OBS gstreamer-0.8 could follow the same conventions and then they can
live together on one system.
Files inside will remain the same, but packaging will strictly follow
library packaging conventions:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223286
gstreamer-0_10: Only core modules. Requires new enough
libgstreamer-0_10-0.
gstreamer-0_10-utils: Contains versioned binaries.
gstreamer-utils: Contains unversioned wrappers. Does not depend on any
concrete gstreamer version, but requires gstreamer-utils_versioned
virtual symbol.
libgstreamer-0_10-0: Shared libraries.
gstreamer-0_10-devel: Devel package.
gstreamer-0_10-doc: Devel documentation.
Plugins packages will follow this naming scheme as well.
Please report any problems to me.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org