openSUSE GNOME February 2009

gnome@lists.opensuse.org

17 participants
27 discussions

[opensuse-gnome] Overview of rpmlint warnings in G:F
by Vincent Untz 28 Feb '09

28 Feb '09

Hey, Thanks to Magnus, and after some quick coding, we have back some page that we lost a few months ago (when we completely moved to the build service): http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py This gives an overview of all the rpmlint warnings in G:F. Some should be pretty trivial to fix: http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?type=non-utf8-spec-file http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?type=files-attr-not-set http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?type=non-break-space http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?type=untranslated-desktop… http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?type=deprecated-use-of-%r… http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?type=no-%build-section etc. It's also possible to view those warnings per package. http://tmp.vuntz.net/opensuse-packages/rpmlint.py?srcpackage=anjuta etc. So if people are wondering what can be done... here's another good opportunity ;-) Note that it might make sense to look at this page when updating a package to a new version, to try to fix a few more warnings. (the page itself is obviously not perfect: it should be possible to have the details for each warning -- it's possible since it's in the database, it just needs some more line) Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] GNOME:UNSTABLE
by Magnus Boman 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Hello people, I'd like to delete all package from GNOME:UNSTABLE to avoid people using old, stale, broken stuff. G:U, as explained [1] is only going to be used once Factory is frozen prior to the next openSUSE release. If you have any packages in there that you need, can you please copy them somewhere else. I plan on removing all packages in a weeks time. Also, as a side note, GNOME:Factory:Next have now been removed and people should be using GNOME:Factory instead. Thanks, Magnus [1] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Repositories -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 4

[opensuse-gnome] Fwd: Re: [opensuse-factory] gconftool-2 makes factory update slow
by Vincent Untz 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hey there, Some relevant information for people using G:F. If you're seeing some weird stuff about gconf in the next few days, ping me. Vincent ----- Forwarded message from Vincent Untz <vuntz(a)opensuse.org> ----- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:24:54 +0100 From: Vincent Untz <vuntz(a)opensuse.org> To: opensuse-factory(a)opensuse.org, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks(a)novell.com> Subject: Re: [opensuse-factory] gconftool-2 makes factory update slow Mail-Followup-To: opensuse-factory(a)opensuse.org, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks(a)novell.com> Hi, Le jeudi 26 février 2009, à 02:35 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le lundi 23 février 2009, à 22:01 +0100, Markus Koßmann a écrit : > > Just updating factory I noticed that many gnome applications need a lot of > > time for running several instances of /usr/bin/gconftool-2 with --makefile- > > install-rule or --makefile-uninstall-rule arguments. in their install script. > > Compiz installation comsumed over 5 minutes for doing that > > Is this expected ? > > This is certainly not expected. I think it's because of this change in > gconf2: > > Use "merged" for schema-install-source, for better performance. After some discussion with Michael, and thanks to his input, I made some changes to the gconf2 package which should solve the issue in most cases: + we call gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule only once per package using gconf now, instead of multiple times. This should improve things significantly for some packages. (we still have to call gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule too) + if the schema file hasn't changed between the old and the new package, we just skip this test. And since schema files don't change that often, this is a huge win. I just put the updated gconf2 package in GNOME:Factory, so it'd be great to have people test GNOME:Factory to make sure it doesn't break anything. I'm a bit hesitant to directly push it to openSUSE:Factory since it can break stuff badly if I made a small mistake ;-) But we'll push it at some point. Note that to really experience the improvement, you'll need to update to GNOME packages compiled with this new gconf. And then, on the following updates, it will be much faster. (the first update is still somewhat slow because the package you currently have has the old %preun script which is not optimal) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help(a)opensuse.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] Fwd: commit libproxy for openSUSE:Factory
by Dominique Leuenberger 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

> +Mon Feb 23 13:57:01 CET 2009 - vuntz(a)novell.com > + > +- Revert the use of %{libproxy_shnum}: there are places where the > + macro cannot be used (%files, eg), and we want don't want to mix > + libproxy0 and libproxy%{libproxy_shnum} -- too likely to forget > + to update one of the two instances. What do you mean it can't be used in the %files section? I have been packaging this lib for more than half a year with this and apparently everything goes well? I even use this technique very often in %files %{_libdir}/%{name}.so.%{shnum} as it allows to 'detect' immediately that the version is wrong, based on a wrong file blob. Under what specific case does it not work in %files ? Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] openSUSE-GNOME Hack Days Schedule!
by Bryen 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

The openSUSE-GNOME Team is proud to announce its Hack Day Series for the next two months. These events are designed to get the community involved in the various processes that make everything hum so wonderfully. These events will be held bi-weekly on Thursdays, coinciding with our regular weekly team meetings. They are all day events with a scheduled coordinator monitoring the channel throughout the day. All hack days will occur in the #opensuse-gnome channel on the Freenode Network. We welcome everyone to join us. And don't be intimidated if you don't think you know how to do certain tasks. There will be experts around to guide you. Below is our schedule: (Please note that topics of each hack day may change as we get closer. For updated information, subscribe to news.opensuse.org's calendar.) 26-February-2009 Wiki Hack Day Cleaning up all -GNOME related pages on the openSUSE Wiki site. This includes updating old pages, removing or adding pages, rearranging, etc. I will be chairing this day. 12-March-2009 Spec File Day Cleaning up our packages and ensuring consistency of our packages across the board. 26-March-2009 GNOME:Stable Day Upgrade all packages in GNOME:Stable repository to the latest stable 2.24 version. 09-April-2009 (To be determined) 23-April-2009 Patch from Upstream Day By this date, GNOME 2.26.1 should be released and we'll update packages in GNOME:Factory/Backports. Looking forward to seeing you all there! -- Bryen Yunashko openSUSE Board Member openSUSE-GNOME Team Member GNOME-A11y Team Member -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] GNOME:Community python / python-gtk packages
by Dominique Leuenberger 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Good afternoon, I was just busy updating comix to the latest version in G:C and ran into an issue (works up to openSUSE 11.1, so I submitted the package, even though it does not work on Factory for the moment). the problem in short: comix BuildRequires: python-gtk and python-gtk apparently Requires python < 2.6, which is not available. Is this a known problem? In a regular factory build we have python-gtk and apparently it does not require python < 2.6.. Looking forward for some fixes there :) Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 3

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Calling all teams
by Christopher Hobbs 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 18:55 -0600, Bryen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 10:41 +1100, Magnus Boman wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just had a look at our wiki page [1] and lots of stuff was really > > outdated. We had "Report a bug" pointing to 10.3 etc. I think we really > > need to have virtual teams that take responsible for the different > > parts, such as wiki, packaging, testing, bug reporting etc. > > > > We currently do have a page for Team [2] and Directory [3] > > > > On the Directory [3] page, we list the following topics; > > > > * Accessibility > > * Bug Tracking > > * Packaging > > * Meetings > > * Helping Hands > > * GNOME Repositories > > > > I think we need a wiki specific topic as well, and would like each and > > everyone of you to add yourself to the topics of interest and where you > > can help. We should then try to go through these topics once a month > > (either during the normal meeting or as a separate meeting) to make sure > > that we keep this up to date. > > As I see it, people adding themselfs to the wiki topic would have a huge > > task on their hand, checking pages to make sure they are current. It's > > also a great way to contribute if you don't have coding skills etc. > > > > Opinions? > > > > Cheers, > > Magnus > > > > [1] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME > > [2] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Team > > [3] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Directory > > > > Well, besides spelling "themselfs" when it should be "themselves", I > think its a great idea. But reality is, it's always a challenge. > Dividing up the work is a good approach if we all agree that we'll each > consistently update our tasked pages. > > Bigger challenge still is to clean up the wiki overall. Reorganize > pages as needed, remove pages as needed, etc. > > Perhaps we need to have a Wiki Hack Day soon to do this. > -- > Bryen Yunashko > openSUSE Board Member > I wouldn't know anything about this wiki cleanup... Maybe yet another wiki meeting is in order and we can identify what exactly needs polishing? -- Christopher M. Hobbs, chobbs(a)siloamsprings.com Network Administrator, City of Siloam Springs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-gnome] Next GNOME Meeting - 2009 February 19, 2200 UTC
by Bryen 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

It's time for our next openSUSE-GNOME Meeting in the IRC Channel #opensuse-gnome on the Freenode network. This will be held at 22:00 UTC on Thursday, February 18. In this meeting, we will discuss Magnus's email discussing wiki cleanup and possibly organizing a Wiki Hack Day. We'll also discuss other hack fests as appropriate and needed, including bug squashing, etc. We look forward to see you there! -- Bryen Yunashko openSUSE Board Member GNOME-A11y Team Member -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] OpenSUSE branding other distributions?!
by smurfd 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

Hi, i was wondering where i could find specificly the icon theme used for the latest openSUSE GNOME release?! Is it Gilouche icon theme or Industrial, its called, im not sure?!. is it part of the gnome-icon-theme or does the opensuse have a separate icon package for that? Preferably if a svn/cvs repository.. im not using opensuse as a distribution you see, but i like the artwork :) best regards /Nicklas / smurfd ps please CC me if you reply -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-gnome] Calling all teams
by Magnus Boman 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Hello, I just had a look at our wiki page [1] and lots of stuff was really outdated. We had "Report a bug" pointing to 10.3 etc. I think we really need to have virtual teams that take responsible for the different parts, such as wiki, packaging, testing, bug reporting etc. We currently do have a page for Team [2] and Directory [3] On the Directory [3] page, we list the following topics; * Accessibility * Bug Tracking * Packaging * Meetings * Helping Hands * GNOME Repositories I think we need a wiki specific topic as well, and would like each and everyone of you to add yourself to the topics of interest and where you can help. We should then try to go through these topics once a month (either during the normal meeting or as a separate meeting) to make sure that we keep this up to date. As I see it, people adding themselfs to the wiki topic would have a huge task on their hand, checking pages to make sure they are current. It's also a great way to contribute if you don't have coding skills etc. Opinions? Cheers, Magnus [1] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME [2] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Team [3] http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/Directory -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

3 2

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

openSUSE GNOME February 2009