openSUSE GNOME July 2007

gnome@lists.opensuse.org

10 participants
11 discussions

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Evolution + Exchange 2007

by Veerapuram Varadhan

On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 21:24 +1000, John wrote: > Hi, > Wondering if there is an "easy" solution to connecting to an Exchange > 2007 server from Evolution (or anything else...), on Suse10.2? > The default packages don't support Exchange 2007, and I have been having > issues trying to install the latest source for Evolution + Exchange > connector, but not even sure if this is supposed to support 2007?? We are working on adding Exchange 2007 support to connector and we estimate the initial support - fetching mails and appointments - to be completed by mid of august. Let us know if you are interested to try any custom packages, if provided, with a patch to support exchange 2007. Thanks, V. Varadhan -- Veerapuram Varadhan <vvaradhan(a)novell.com> Novell, Inc. Software for the Open Enterprise™ http://www.novell.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 9 months

[opensuse-gnome] Evolution + Exchange 2007

by John

Hi, Wondering if there is an "easy" solution to connecting to an Exchange 2007 server from Evolution (or anything else...), on Suse10.2? The default packages don't support Exchange 2007, and I have been having issues trying to install the latest source for Evolution + Exchange connector, but not even sure if this is supposed to support 2007?? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 9 months

[opensuse-gnome] Re: proposed shared library GNOME package

by Stanislav Brabec

Stephan Kulow píše v Út 17. 07. 2007 v 15:30 +0200: > Am Dienstag 17 Juli 2007 schrieb Stanislav Brabec: > > > It sounds inconvenient if package called libgtop can be installed > > without libgtop library. > > > > I can also change its name to libgtop-common or so. > Then there is no libgtop package at all? Yes, then there would be libgtop-common (translations, license), libgtop-2_0-7 (shared library), libgtop-devel (devel) and libgtop-doc (docs), and libgtop src.rpm. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] Re: proposed shared library GNOME package

by Stanislav Brabec

Stephan Kulow píše v Út 17. 07. 2007 v 15:17 +0200: > Am Dienstag 17 Juli 2007 schrieb Stanislav Brabec: > > libgtop requires libgtop-2_0-7 (so anybody installing libgtop will also > > get real library), and libgtop-2_0-7 requires libgtop not older than > Why would anyone install libgtop as it? > I see 3 use cases: > - requires - will require libgtop-2_0_7, which will drag in libgtop > - upgrades - are done by requires, see above. Perhaps add a Provides > - install -devel - see above > > So I would rather drop that extra requires. It sounds inconvenient if package called libgtop can be installed without libgtop library. I can also change its name to libgtop-common or so. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] Re: proposed shared library GNOME package

by Stanislav Brabec

Stephan Kulow píše v Út 17. 07. 2007 v 13:46 +0200: > Am Dienstag 17 Juli 2007 schrieb Stanislav Brabec: > > Hallo. > > > > I spent some time thinking about a fix of libgtop and libwnck shared > > library. Here is the result. > > > > Thinking about packaging of library, which often change soname, but does > > not change translation domain, I guess that we have to create both > > libgtop and libgtop-2_0-7 - first one will contain translations, second > > one library itself. If we will not do it, we will get a file conflict or > > missing translations. > > > > I guess that the cyclic dependency is OK here. Otherwise you may install > > translations without library thinking, that you installed library. > > > Looks sane to me. Where do you see the cycle? libgtop requires libgtop-2_0-7 (so anybody installing libgtop will also get real library), and libgtop-2_0-7 requires libgtop not older than library version (so anybody will get a translation package, allowing to use version not corresponding with exact version of the library). -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] proposed shared library GNOME package

by Stanislav Brabec

Hallo. I spent some time thinking about a fix of libgtop and libwnck shared library. Here is the result. Thinking about packaging of library, which often change soname, but does not change translation domain, I guess that we have to create both libgtop and libgtop-2_0-7 - first one will contain translations, second one library itself. If we will not do it, we will get a file conflict or missing translations. I guess that the cyclic dependency is OK here. Otherwise you may install translations without library thinking, that you installed library. Note that also devel renaming following pkgconfig epoch might be useful for some packages, but in general, I would be glad to avoid it and rename packages to its "canonical" form as mich as possible. Name: libgtop BuildRequires: gdbm-devel glib2-devel gtk-doc intltool licenses popt-devel xorg-x11-devel License: GPL v2 or later Group: Development/Libraries/GNOME Version: 2.19.4 %define shlib_name 2_0-7 Release: 0 Summary: LibGTop Library Source: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/libgtop/2.19/%{name}-%{version… Patch: libgtop-resident-field-fix.patch Requires: %{name}-%{shlib_name} licenses BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build %description A library that fetches information about the running system, such as CPU and memory usage and active processes. On Linux systems, this information is taken directly from the /proc file system. On other systems, a server is used to read information from /dev/kmem. Authors: -------- Martin Baulig (martin(a)home-of-linux.org) Drazen Kacar (dave(a)srce.hr) %package %{shlib_name} Summary: LibGTop Library Group: Development/Libraries/GNOME # Require translation package (%{name}) not older than the library: Requires: %{name} >= %{version} %description %{shlib_name} This package contains all necessary include files and libraries needed to develop applications that require these. Authors: -------- Martin Baulig (martin(a)home-of-linux.org) Drazen Kacar (dave(a)srce.hr) %package devel Summary: Include Files and Libraries mandatory for Development. Group: Development/Libraries/GNOME Requires: %{name} = %{version} glib2-devel gdbm-devel xorg-x11-devel PreReq: %install_info_prereq %description devel This package contains all necessary include files and libraries needed to develop applications that require these. Authors: -------- Martin Baulig (martin(a)home-of-linux.org) Drazen Kacar (dave(a)srce.hr) %package doc Summary: LibGTop Library Group: Development/Libraries/GNOME Requires: %{name} = %{version} %description doc A library that fetches information about the running system, such as CPU and memory usage and active processes. On Linux systems, this information is taken directly from the /proc file system. On other systems, a server is used to read information from /dev/kmem. Authors: -------- Martin Baulig (martin(a)home-of-linux.org) Drazen Kacar (dave(a)srce.hr) %prep %setup -q %patch # rpmlint note: libgtop has a separate translation for both Bengali and Bengali India %build autoreconf -f -i %configure\ --disable-static make %{?jobs:-j%jobs} %install %makeinstall %find_lang %{name}-2.0 LIBNAME="$(echo $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}-*.so.? | sed 's/.*\///;s/\.so\./-/;s/\./_/')" if test "$LIBNAME" != "%{name}-%{shlib_name}" ; then echo "Library version does not match package name. It should be $LIBNAME." exit 1 fi for FILE in COPYING copyright.txt ; do MD5SUM=$(md5sum $FILE | sed 's/ .*//') if test -f /usr/share/doc/licenses/md5/$MD5SUM ; then ln -sf /usr/share/doc/licenses/md5/$MD5SUM $FILE fi done %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post %{shlib_name} -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun %{shlib_name} -p /sbin/ldconfig %post doc %install_info --info-dir=%{_datadir}/info %{_datadir}/info/%{name}2.info.gz %postun doc %install_info_delete --info-dir=%{_datadir}/info %{_datadir}/info/%{name}2.info.gz %files -f %{name}-2.0.lang %defattr(-, root, root) # TODO is empty %doc AUTHORS COPYING NEWS README copyright.txt %files %{shlib_name} %defattr(-, root, root) %{_libdir}/*.so.* %files devel %defattr(-, root, root) %{_includedir}/libgtop-2.0 %{_libdir}/*.so %{_libdir}/*.*a %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %files doc %defattr(-, root, root) %dir %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/libgtop %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/libgtop/* %doc %{_infodir}/*.info* -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] GNOME 2.18 and GNOME:STABLE x GNOME:UNSTABLE

by Stanislav Brabec

Hallo. Now Factory started to move to GNOME 2.19. What do you propose from these possibilities: - Move GNOME 2.18 in /usr to GNOME:STABLE. - Keep GNOME:STABLE as is and continue updating of GNOME:UNSTABLE. - Branch GNOME:2.18. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] disk burning and labeling

by James Tremblay

hello all, I was wondering if when the team adds GnomeBaker to the default could it also add a little program called Glabels > http://glabels.sourceforge.net/ It has a nice rating at GnomeFiles > http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/gLabels and it includes a very nice little CD label maker. -- James Tremblay Director of Technology Newmarket School District Newmarket,NH http://en.opensuse.org/Education "let's make a difference" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] New GConf2 RPM macros for older products in GNOME:Community

by James Ogley

As the subject says, I've added a package that adds the new RPM macros that Stanislav has created for 10.3+ to GNOME:Community. This provides the same macros for 10.2 and older. Simply add this to your spec file and you can use roughly the same spec file across the versions: %if %suse_version <= 1020 BuildRequires gconf2-rpm-macros %endif If you include this within the %if statement then the spec file will normally be exactly the same throughout with no more %suse_version checks required %define _prefix /opt/gnome %define _sysconfdir /etc%_prefix Of course, there will be some exceptions to that but not many :) -- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

[opensuse-gnome] heads up: 2.19.4 in factory

by Michael Wolf

Yo I've started updating GNOME in Factory to 2.19.4. All of the platform packages have been submitted, and should show up within a day or two. Other packages, with enhanced levels of awesomeness, are on the way and should start to show up a day or two after the platform packages. Enjoy, and don't hesitate to report any problems you find. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

14 years, 10 months

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

openSUSE GNOME July 2007