- openSUSE GNOME

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Pidgin
by James Ogley 07 May '07

07 May '07

Can you keep replies on-list please? > what's the name of the pidgin package? i just made a quick search on > the webpin project website, and it returned no results, and did you > make it so it can automatically update gaim-unstable? It's called pidgin. Is there some latency on webpin perhaps? Haven't made it automatically update yet but I intend to once I'm satisfied it's relatively stable (seems to be so far). -- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

4 8

[opensuse-gnome] python-gtk
by James Ogley 07 May '07

07 May '07

I've added python-gtk packages to GNOME:Community. They're the standard packages but updated to 2.10.4. The reason being that gimp-unstable now needs this version for the python plugin. Once the version in Factory is updated, I'll disable the G:C Factory build. -- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-gnome] 2.19 Plan
by JP Rosevear 04 May '07

04 May '07

We need a plan to cover GNOME 2.19 now that its being released. Normally I would say move 2.18.1 to G:S and keep updating it there, but in this case we have the /opt/gnome -> /usr move to deal with, we'd break anyone on 10.2 and older for sure. Any thoughts on what to do? -JP -- JP Rosevear <jpr(a)novell.com> Novell, Inc. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

7 22

[opensuse-gnome] Pidgin
by James Ogley 02 May '07

02 May '07

Just an FYI for you all: I'll be uploading pidgin to GNOME:Community very soon, just beating the old gaim-unstable.spec to do what's required. I'm splitting it, as per the project's guidelines and nomenclature, into libpurple[-devel], pidgin[-devel] and finch[-devel]. I'm deviating from their default by not splitting all the libpurple plugins into separate subpackages though - that's overkill IMHO. Is it too late to get this into 10.3? -- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

Re: [opensuse-gnome] Gimmie
by James Ogley 02 May '07

02 May '07

Seriously, please reply on-list. > it actually adds a "gnome with gimmie" session option on gdm's ws, I know, that's my nasty hack - it doesn't support session management, autostart or anything useful. -- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] Gimmie
by James Ogley 01 May '07

01 May '07

I've transferred gimmie (and python-libgmail which it requires) to GNOME:Community this morning. I've not managed to test adding it to default.session so it contains a hacky script to start it with a basic GNOME session. Would default.session work for users with an existing GNOME session saved anyway? (I have tested replacing gnome-panel with gimmie in ~/.gnome2/session and that worked fairly nicely) -- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] [Fwd: Re: [opensuse-factory] GNOME?]
by James Ogley 28 Apr '07

28 Apr '07

-- James Ogley james(a)usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] SLAB menu enhancement
by Gabriel . 27 Apr '07

27 Apr '07

I was thinking that SLAB menu would be more useful by adding the possibility of customize it. Maybe letting the user change the groups of the application browser, or drag applications to other group, etc. Also theres no "Run command" anymore. What about adding a text box so you can run a command by typing on it. Nowadays this menu it's not really comfortable to use. Any chance? Regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] Re: [opensuse-factory] gnomebaker
by JP Rosevear 26 Apr '07

26 Apr '07

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:31 -0400, James Tremblay wrote: > Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, > would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to > carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple > md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible > speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a > default package. > I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not > to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to > KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's > why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt > an aditude of "is the Kitchen sink in Der, Eh " but when someone writes a > nice tool like GnomeBaker use it! I could really vent here but I won't out > of respect but............................................... Sounds pretty reasonable, file a bug and send us the number! We should upgrade to 0.6.1 while we're at it. -JP -- JP Rosevear <jpr(a)novell.com> Novell, Inc. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] removing meinproc calls from GNOME packages
by Stanislav Brabec 26 Apr '07

26 Apr '07

Hallo. After a longer research, it seems that calling meinproc in GNOME packages is no longer needed and that KDE can render GNOME documentation correctly even without it, because it has its own ghelp ioslave. Going to remove from all Factory GNOME packages. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec(a)suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1