September 2011 - openSUSE GNOME - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-gnome] openSUSE Weekly News 193 coming soon...
by Sascha Manns 15 Sep '11

15 Sep '11

Hello Mates, don't worry about this mail. I just would like to remind that our next openSUSE Weekly News 193 comes out at Saturday evening (UTC +2). Until Saturday 08:00:00 (CEST) +0200 UTC you can propose Articles, Links and all such stuff for integrating into the Weekly News. For people who don't want to write it in XML, you can use our Pad: http://os-news.ietherpad.com/2. I've planned to send this Mail each Wednesday to remind on the Weekly News. Have a lot of fun :-) -- Sincerely Yours Sascha Manns open-slx Community & Support Agent openSUSE Membership Comitee openSUSE Marketing Team Web: http://saigkill.homelinux.net German Community Portal: http://community.open-slx.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] Quick status update
by Vincent Untz 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hi all, Here's a very brief update of how things are :-) - GNOME 3.1.91 is in GNOME:Factory (except for gnome-user-docs, but that's a detail; and upstream tarballs that are late) - a lot of build issues that were in G:F/G:A are solved; but we still have a few of them in G:A (help welcome!). They're mostly related to missing libraries when linking. - I'm pushing G:A and G:F to Factory right now. The only things I'm not pushing are gdm and gnome-shell (as well as mutter) as I know of at least one blocker in gdm, and gnome-shell requires the new gdm (and might have issues too, according to a bug report and some comments on irc). I've decided to push now for several reasons: a) we've accumulated 2-3 weeks of changes, so it's time to push b) if we don't push now, it will be after the conference, which is really late c) I would have preferred to fix gdm & gnome-shell first, but I'm short in time before the conference, and I've been debugging this for too long already :/ This means we will have most of 3.1.91 in Factory soon, hopefully, and this should mostly work fine. Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-gnome] Banshee & Banshee Community Extensions
by Nelson Marques 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hi all, Banshee has it's development project now in GNOME:Apps, and 'coolo' has accepted 'banshee-community-extensions' in GNOME:Apps as well, which is awesome since now we can have both apps on GNOME:Apps and I will link them to Banshee:Unstable (which will become a costumer from GNOME:Apps/banshee). There will be a few more changes, but it will happen in the future once the next stable release is released. NM -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-gnome] Live/dvd software pattern
by Bjørn Lie 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

I just booted the M5 livecd of gnome, and to my suprise the full compiz stack including simple-ccsm was included? Should that be removed from that packagelist? Since it's not usable in Gnome now? I'm not advocating dropping them completely, but removing them from the default app list in the gnome patterns. //Bjørn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-gnome] Warning: gdm broken in GNOME:Factory
by Vincent Untz 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

Hi, The gdm update to 3.1.90 isn't perfect yet, so if you update gdm from GNOME:Factory, be aware that you will likely not be able to connect ;-) Fix coming soon. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-gnome] Gnome:Factory opensuse 11.3 buildtarget
by Bjørn Lie 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Can we pretty please remove 11.3 as a buildtarget from G:F? Every time i branch a package from GF I end up with that repo being enabled. I can of course work around it by keeping my gf branch alive between builds, but i tend to clean up my branches as often as possible. I highly doubt there are anyone left using 11.3 + Gnome:factory at present time. //Bjørn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

Re: [opensuse-gnome] GNOME Desktop: Why diversity on the "BLACK" tones
by Malcolm 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:31:57 -0300 Marco Calistri <marco.calistri(a)yahoo.com.br> wrote: > On Thu 01 Sep 2011 at 15:25:25 (-0300 UTC), Malcolm wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:02:34 -0300 > > Marco Calistri <marco.calistri(a)yahoo.com.br> wrote: > >> > >> And which differences we could expect among the above repository > >> and these ones below?: > >> > >> 1) > >> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/muzlocker/openSUSE_11.4/ > >> > >> 2) http://repos.opensuse-community.org/subpixel/openSUSE_11.4/ > >> > >> ??? > >> > >> Are the related packages in sync or they differ so they are leading > >> to a different desktop behaviour? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> > > Hi > > #2 is the same one ;) Muzlocker one contains Cario which doesn't > > need updating (and/or cause issues) or contain debug packages if > > they are needed.... > > > > So you suggest I switch to "official Subpixel" and abandon Muzlocker? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Marco Hi Would be my suggestion and ensure you switch the Cario back to the default repositories..... -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° (Linux Counter #276890) openSUSE 11.4 (x86_64) Kernel 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop up 2 days 2:12, 4 users, load average: 0.15, 0.20, 0.18 GPU GeForce 8600 GTS Silent - Driver Version: 280.13 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

2 3

[opensuse-gnome] GNOME Desktop: Why diversity on the "BLACK" tones
by Marco Calistri 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

Hi, I Noticed in the past and currently that GNOME is generally representing a "less dark" BLACK than KDE, when showing black text on the screen. Tonite I noticed other little detail: under GNOME 3.0.2 Desktop, Evolution is showing a TXT composed email as light-black/gray tone, while an HTML composed email appears with a better, brilliant, darker black. Wonder why this happens and if exists a way to set a "super dark" black, independently of the type of the desktop environment/application. Please see the attached pictures, to better understand what I mean: Evolution under GNOME 3.0.2 HTML Rendering: http://www.flickr.com/photos/amdturion/6074882873/sizes/l/in/photostream/ Evolution under GNOME 3.0.2 TXT Rendering: http://www.flickr.com/photos/amdturion/6074882749/sizes/l/in/photostream/ Cheers, -- Marco Calistri (amdturion) opensuse 11.4 Celadon - Linux 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop x86_64 AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology MK-36 - GeForce Go 6150 Gnome 3.0.2 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help(a)opensuse.org

4 12