openSUSE Build Service April 2023

buildservice@lists.opensuse.org

17 participants
12 discussions

Ubuntu 22.04 build order issue when building in OBS
by Dirk Stöcker 05 May '23

05 May '23

Hello, when I try to use Ubuntu 22.04 I always get [ 11s] [234/305] installing libssl-dev-3.0.2-0ubuntu1 [ 11s] [235/305] installing fontconfig-config-2.13.1-4.2ubuntu5 [ 11s] [236/305] installing libdebuginfod-common-0.186-1build1 [ 11s] /usr/bin/ucf: 352: getopt: not found [ 11s] dpkg: error processing package libdebuginfod-common (--install): [ 11s] installed libdebuginfod-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127 [ 11s] Errors were encountered while processing: [ 11s] libdebuginfod-common It seems there is an installation conflict that getopt is required before util-linux is installed. Could this please be fixed? Also it seems Ubuntu 21.04 universe should be refreshed. I tries to download e.g. http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/ubuntu/pool/universe/t/texlive-lang/texli… but this file doesn't exist on this server. P.S. I build with osc locally. Freedom in Peace -- https://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

4 6

ARM aarch64 items not published.
by Roger Oberholtzer 02 May '23

02 May '23

I have a couple projects that are building for OpenSUSE_Factory_ARM. They build for aarch64 and armv71. The builds succeed. But only the armv71 get published. In the OBS web gui Build Results, there is a lock symbol next to the aarch4 build results, while the armv71 has a green vehicle. I cannot see that I have configured anything different between these two architectures. So I have no idea why they are being treated differently. For example, this simple package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:rogeroberholtzer/libpixtend Any pointers are welcome. -- Roger Oberholtzer

2 3

export NO_BRP_CHECK_RPATH=true does not work
by Carsten Ziepke 23 Apr '23

23 Apr '23

Hello, using "export NO_BRP_CHECK_RPATH=true" does not work as expected. .. [ 27s] + export NO_BRP_CHECK_RPATH=true [ 27s] + NO_BRP_CHECK_RPATH=true .. [ 30s] nfs2se.i586: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath (Badness: 10000) /usr/bin/nfs2se (RUNPATH: $ORIGIN) [ 30s] The binary or shared library defines `RPATH' (or `RUNPATH') that points to a [ 30s] non-system library path. https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Kieltux:branches:gam… Is this a rpmlint problem or a problem with obs? Thank you. Carsten

2 2

Add Fedora Linux 38 to openSUSE Build Service?
by Wong Hoi Sing Edison 20 Apr '23

20 Apr '23

Hi Everyone, Fedora 38 is now released on 2023-04-18: * https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-38/ * https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-all-tasks.html * https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/38/Server/x86_… Can we start getting it added to OBS now? Thanks in advance! Regards, Edison Wong

2 2

Do not publish source packages, publish only binary packages
by Dilawar Singh 19 Apr '23

19 Apr '23

Hi, I am running a private instance of open build service. All is working really well. Is there a setting or a workaround that removes the source package from the repository (public facing)? best, Dilawar

3 5

How to register a user with osc api?
by liuxueping.snow＠bytedance.com 14 Apr '23

14 Apr '23

OS:openSUSE Leap 15.2 obs server:2.10.20 How to register a user with osc api? "osc api -X POST /person?cmd=register" does not work

2 1

Building RT-Kernel Module packages for Leap 15.4
by Florian Pose 13 Apr '23

13 Apr '23

Hello, I maintain the science:EtherLab project [1] and we are building packages containing kernel-modules for the EtherCAT master project [2] based on the distribution kernels (using %{kernel_module_package_buildreqs}, %{flavors_to_build} and friends). We have a problem with the openSUSE Leap 15.4 repository: The module ethercat-kmp-rt is built correctly, but for kernel 5.3.18 (the version from the main repo). On a freshly installed Leap 15.4 system there is a repository called "Update repository with updates from SUSE Linux Enterprise 15" [3], that comes with a newer kernel-rt (5.14.21), so if users update the system, they get a newer RT kernel, but no updated EtherCAT modules for the installed kernel. Which repository do I have to add to the OBS project? I tried - SUSE:SLE-15:Update/pool-leap-15.4 - SUSE:SLE-15:Update/standard without luck. Where do I find this information for future distributions? [1] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/science:EtherLab [2] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/science:EtherLab/ethercat [3] http://download.opensuse.org/update/leap/15.4/sle

3 8

Mingw buiilds now failing
by Roger Oberholtzer 11 Apr '23

11 Apr '23

I build a couple of Mingw packages on OBS. I now get build failures in most of them. The error is generally like this: [ 49s] Processing files: mingw64-tktable-debug-2.10-2.1.noarch [ 49s] error: Could not open %files file /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/mingw64-debugfiles.list: No such file or directory I looked at a couple Mingw packages that are not failing, and I see that they seem to no longer use: %{_mingw64_debug_package} So I thought I would remove those. But it seems to make no difference. Here is a sample project that no longer builds on OBS: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:rogeroberholtzer:mingw64/mingw… Anyone have a clue what might be happening? -- Roger Oberholtzer

2 3

CentOS 8 Stream builds unresolvable
by Martin Tůma 10 Apr '23

10 Apr '23

Hi, For some time, CentOS 8 Stream builds are unresolvable because of the following error: unresolvable: nothing provides gcc = 8.5.0-18.el8 needed by gcc-c++, (got version 8.5.0-15.el8), nothing provides libgomp = 8.5.0-15.el8 needed by gcc, (got version 8.5.0-18.el8) Can someone please have a look at it? I doubt that it is a Centos problem and they have broken gcc packages in the distro for weeks... Thanks M.

1 0

Re: Heads-up: Removal of python38-* packages
by Ben Greiner 07 Apr '23

07 Apr '23

Hi, Am 04.04.23 um 13:05 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger: > Dear Tumbleweed users and hackers, > > > openSUSE:Factory has just been reconfigured to no longer consider > python38 when using the python single_spec macros (as most python-* > packages do); those packages will be cleaned up as part of snapshot > 0404. This change has not propagated to the devel projects yet. Look at all the unresolvables in devel:languages:python* https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Factory/prjconf has ExpandFlags: macroserial:20230404 so there must be a regression in the build service - Ben

1 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Build Service April 2023