openSUSE Build Service May 2021

buildservice@lists.opensuse.org

20 participants
15 discussions

by Avindra G

I've been having trouble getting deno to build since v1.9.0 (April 13th, 2021) on x86_64. Tried various _constraints values, but the job is failing with the same error: [ 3311s] LLVM ERROR: IO failure on output stream: No space left on device [ 3311s] /.build/build-vm: line 460: echo: write error: No space left on device [ 3312s] error: could not compile `deno` [ 3312s] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:javascript/deno#com… Can anyone advise? Thanks, avindra goolcharan

5 months, 2 weeks

Leap 15.3 as DoD repo gives "The repository setup is broken, build or publish not possible"

by Till Dörges

Hello all, since the release of 15.3 is near I'd like to test it on our internal OBS (2.10). I created a new project with a download on demand repository like this --- snip --- <project name="openSUSE.org:Leap:15.3"> <title>openSUSE Leap 15.3 OSS (DoD)</title> <description>dod</description> <person userid="x" role="maintainer"/> <repository name="standard"> <download arch="x86_64" url="http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.3/repo/oss/" repotype="rpmmd"/> <arch>x86_64</arch> </repository> </project> --- snap --- I also copied the project configuration from api.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Leap:15.3. But when I try to use my new repo all I get in the webgui is a red warning sign and the message The repository setup is broken, build or publish not possible Looking into /srv/obs/log/dodup.log only gives me --- snip --- obs:/srv/obs/log # grep 15.3 dodup.log 2021-05-10 00:37:34: [1622] checking openSUSE.org:Leap:15.3/standard/x86_64... updating metadata for rpmmd repo at http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.3/repo/oss/ 2021-05-10 00:44:34: [1622] checking PRESENSE/openSUSE_Leap_15.3/x86_64... updating metadata for rpmmd repo at http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.3/repo/oss/ 2021-05-10 00:49:57: [1622] checking openSUSE.org:Leap:15.3/standard/x86_64... updating metadata for rpmmd repo at http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.3/repo/oss/ --- snap --- The same worked perfectly for openSUSE Leap 15.*2*. Has anything changed or how do I proceed to pinpoint the error? Thanks and regards -- Till -- Dipl.-Inform. Till Dörges doerges(a)pre-sense.de PRESENSE Technologies GmbH Nagelsweg 41, D-20097 HH Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors AG Hamburg, HRB 107844 Till Dörges, Jürgen Sander USt-IdNr.: DE263765024

7 months, 3 weeks

BEWARE: OBS may allow source change after review

by Ludwig Nussel

Hi, tl;dr if you rely on package reviews for your development process in OBS make sure requests have a revision. Only osc shows the information you are looking for. Turns out submit request in OBS do not necessarily refer to a specific revision in the originating package. Means the sources can change after a review passed. Unfortunately changing the sources does not reset reviews and reviews do not record the revision they were done for. That obviously defeats the purpose of source reviews. Accepting a request without revision may therefore lead to accepting something different from what was reviewed (resp staged). AFAIK this feature has been in OBS since the very beginning, it's just well hidden as the official interfaces osc and the webui do add a revision when creating requests. There is no way to turn that off either. Also tools such as bots that use osc as python module automatically generate submit request with revision. This is not because the server enforces it but because the client code does it. So anyone who wants to fool reviewers just has to use a custom client. According to the OBS team this hidden behavior is actually considered a feature. The security team doesn't treat it as security issue as it's kind of documented¹, even though osc doesn't behave in the documented way. There are plans to add a special attribute to disallow unversioned requests per project². IMHO a global setting to require revisions by default with the option for exceptions would have been more sensible. Anyway, apparently the fix needs some time to ripe still. Meanwhile the factory-auto bot was enhanced to decline unversioned requests to Factory (thanks Fabian). If you are using reviews in eg your devel project or run your own OBS you need to create your own bot or watch out manually. The webui does not seem to display any revision at all, so not helpful. In osc it looks like this: Request: #12345 submit: foo:bar/baz@42 -> blah Absence of the @number means no revision. cu Ludwig [1] https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.request_an… [2] https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/pull/10992 -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)

7 months, 3 weeks

Continuous integration with OBS and GitHub/GitLab

by Dany Marcoux

Hey everyone, we've been hard at work on extending the integration between OBS and GitHub/GitLab. We're looking forward to hear from you on the subject. Have a look at our latest blog post for details: https://openbuildservice.org/2021/05/31/scm-integration/ Best regards Dany from the Build Solutions team -- Dany Marcoux <dmarcoux(a)suse.de> Full Stack Web Developer - Open Build Service SUSE Linux GmbH Maxfeldstrasse 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

7 months, 4 weeks

Implementing a new APT publisher

by Arnaud Ferraris

Hi, We currently use OBS for building and publishing APT packages for the Apertis project[1] (a Debian derivative distribution). At the moment we use downstream patches for the publisher (src/backend/bs_publish) in order to use reprepro instead of dpkg-scanpackages/dpkg-scansources. As we're considering implementing a new APT publisher based on aptly[2], we'd like to do so in a way that can be upstreamed to OBS so it can benefit the whole community. This obviously raises several questions as to how we should proceed, so I'm sending this email as a call for advice/comments/suggestions. We're considering the following: - this new publisher would be implemented in addition to the existing dpkg-scan* based one and be selectable through global configuration options. - using aptly opens up possibilities, but it isn't always as straightforward as a few system() call; we would therefore need to either ship a helper tool or add a new BSPublisher submodule (the latter is the preferred option atm) - aptly can also be used through a REST API, which implies some asynchronous processing would be preferrable. Is there currently a way to handle async processing in OBS, or would that require another helper tool/module, if possible at all? We're only at the planning and design stage for now, so we would be very interested in your opinion and comments regarding the above. Thanks, Arnaud [1] https://apertis.org [2] https://aptly.info

7 months, 4 weeks

Project Maintainer can't edit Attributes

by Christian

Hi, just sadly noticed that a Project Maintainer can't edit his projects Attributes. The Maintainer User is not an OBS admin. Seems only an OBS admin is able to edit Project Attributes Is this a Feature or a BUG ? -- Christian ------------------------------------------------------------ https://join.worldcommunitygrid.org?recruiterId=177038 ------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.sc24.de - Sportbekleidung ------------------------------------------------------------

8 months

Missing choice

by Martin Koegler

An setting is missing for Fedora_Rawhide: have choice for libusb-1.0.so.0()(64bit) needed by libgusb: libusb1 libusbxh have choice for libusb-1.0.so.0 needed by libgusb: libusb1 libusbx Regards, Martin

8 months, 1 week

emerging low code app development platforms

by Rosy

there is an increase in usage of low code platforms by many startups, medium-sized and in every business. low code platforms are trending now because even with zero coding knowledge people can develop apps. it saves time and money. For more info click below: https://www.wavemaker.com/low-code-app-development-platform/ to learn more about mobile app development platforms click below https://www.wavemaker.com/mobile-app-development-platform/

8 months, 2 weeks

emerging low code app development platforms

by Rosy

8 months, 2 weeks

low code

by Rosy

nowadays <a href="https://www.wavemaker.com/low-code-app-development-platform/">low code platforms</a> are becoming prominent,and time saving for the business. even with minimal coding knowledge people can create apps. so many businesses are opting for it.

8 months, 2 weeks

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Build Service May 2021