openSUSE Build Service December 2018

buildservice@lists.opensuse.org

23 participants
17 discussions

[opensuse-buildservice] Public Key not available SLE_12_SP3 s390x

by Usman Haider

Hi, I am new and trying local build on s390x with SLE_12_SP3 using the following command sudo osc build but I get the public key not available for many packages. You can see the output by clicking the following link https://pastebin.com/YBQk3vGe I know that I can use --noverify option to bypass this and builds complete successfully when I use --noverify option but how can I fix this? What will happen if I don't fix it? -- Usman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 year, 5 months

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS Appliance - Unable to Update

by Khalil Graves

I am running OBS Appliance 2.8.2 on VMware ESX. When the appliance boots I get an error "Failed to start LSB: Finds the storage device to be used for OBS server and/or worker." I have included a dump of systemctl status obsstoagesetup.service below. I Just want to confirm if this is normal or should be addressed. I also attempted and update of a clone of my appliance via zypper but 2 GB root drive is not sufficient for upgrades. Update begins but end with "Error Code: Write Error". I checked root drive and it was up to 100% utilization from 93% prior to update. I decided to install latest version of OBS appliance over existing install. New appliance adopts my old setting but now I am getting and error on boot "Failed to start LSB: open build service source service server." In addition I am unable to build rpms in this current state. Not sure what to do next to get the cloned appliance to build a package. SYSTEMCTL status obsstoragesetup.service obsstoragesetup.service - LSB: Finds the storage device to be used for OBS server and/or worker Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/obsstoragesetup; bad; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2018-03-06 18:44:59 UTC; 16min ago Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) Process: 1365 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/obsstoragesetup start (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Mar 06 18:44:59 linux obsstoragesetup[1365]: OBS_SERVER_SIZE=38912 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux obsstoragesetup[1365]: TOTAL_SWAP_SIZE=1024 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux obsstoragesetup[1365]: FINAL_VG_SIZE = 12284 - 38912 - 25600 - 1024 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux obsstoragesetup[1365]: FINAL_VG_SIZE=-53252 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux obsstoragesetup[1365]: OBS_WORKER_ROOT_SIZE=-26626 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux obsstoragesetup[1365]: MIN_WORKER_ROOT_SIZE=4096 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux systemd[1]: obsstoragesetup.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1 Mar 06 18:44:59 linux systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Finds the storage device to be used for OBS server and/or worker. Mar 06 18:44:59 linux systemd[1]: obsstoragesetup.service: Unit entered failed state. Mar 06 18:44:59 linux systemd[1]: obsstoragesetup.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. SYSTEMCTL status obsservice.service obsservice.service - LSB: open build service source service server Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/obsservice; bad; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Fri 2018-03-09 11:59:39 UTC; 3min 34s ago Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) Process: 1761 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/obsservice start (code=exited, status=7) Mar 09 11:59:38 linux systemd[1]: Starting LSB: open build service source service server... Mar 09 11:59:39 linux startproc[1788]: startproc: exit status of parent of /usr/lib/obs/server/bs_service: 13 Mar 09 11:59:39 linux obsservice[1761]: Initializing obsservice..failed Mar 09 11:59:39 linux systemd[1]: obsservice.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=7 Mar 09 11:59:39 linux systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: open build service source service server. Mar 09 11:59:39 linux systemd[1]: obsservice.service: Unit entered failed state. Mar 09 11:59:39 linux systemd[1]: obsservice.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. '. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS + GitHub - deprecation of GitHub Services

by Linux Kamarada

Hello, guys! I searched how to integrate OBS with GitHub so that a git push would cause OBS to fetch the source code and build. I followed directions on these pages: https://openbuildservice.org/2013/11/22/source-update-via_token/ https://github.com/seccubus/obs_autobuild_test (CC their authors, thank you for the great material!) But when I opened GitHub's Integration & services to add the Obs service, I read this: "Note: [GitHub Services are being deprecated][1]. Please contact your integrator for more information on how to migrate or replace a service with [webhooks][2] or [GitHub Apps][3]." [1]: https://developer.github.com/changes/2018-04-25-github-services-deprecation/ [2]: https://developer.github.com/webhooks/ [3]: https://developer.github.com/apps/differences-between-apps/#about-github-ap… The news is from April 25, 2018. The first paragraph summarizes it: "GitHub plans on shutting down GitHub Services so we can shift focus to other areas of the API, such as strengthening GitHub Apps and GraphQL, and improving webhooks. The intention of GitHub Services was to allow third-party developers to submit code for integrating with their services, but this functionality has been superseded by GitHub Apps and webhooks. GitHub Services has not supported new features since April 25, 2016, and we plan to officially deprecate it on October 1st, 2018." Although I successfully integrated OBS with GitHub using a GitHub Service, is it already possible to do that same integration using GitHub Apps or webhooks? Thank you! Antonio The Linux Kamarada Project http://kamarada.github.io/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] build.opensuse.org's Debian:Next project URL is wrong

by Jan Engelhardt

The URLs in the Debian:Next meta are no longer valid. DoD therefore practically does not work since quite a while. The nearest OBS global project admin: please edit the URLs as per the following change: $ osc meta prj Debian:Next <repository name="update"> - <download arch="x86_64" url="http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/testing-updates/main" repotype="deb"> + <download arch="x86_64" url="http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/testing-update/main/" repotype="deb"> (including any other url= occurrences in the XML) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 4 months

[opensuse-buildservice] back-home x86_64 is dead

by munix9

Hi, back-home x86_64 is dead. https://build.opensuse.org/monitor Happy holidays. Paolo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 4 months

[opensuse-buildservice] creating a "backup" of a project with "osc release" possible?

by Stefan Seyfried

Hi all, First, what do I want to achieve? The VDR project (https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/vdr) will get a version update to version 2.4 in the near future (hopefully ;-) In the past (when updating from 1.6.x to 2.0...) I created a vdr:legacy project where I just copied all sources before updating. I'd like to do something similar now, this time "vdr:2.2", but I'd rather not copy the sources over and build everything again. Instead I was wondering if nifty tricks with "osc release" could be used to achieve what I want. My idea was to temporarily set a release target for vdr (and vdr:plugins) to vdr:2.2, release everything and then remove the release target again. Will this work as I intend it to? Or will the binaries vanish once I remove the release target from the vdr repo? (I doubt it, but who knows ;-) Have fun, seife -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 4 months

[opensuse-buildservice] "release management chapter in the OBS book"

by Stefan Seyfried

Good morning. Quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ seife@vbox-seife:~> osc help release release: Release sources and binaries This command is used to transfer sources and binaries without rebuilding them. It requires defined release targets set to trigger="manual". Please refer the release management chapter in the OBS book for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I'm desperately seeking for the "OBS book" which contains a "release management chapter". Can anyone help me find it? Have fun, seife -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 4 months

[opensuse-buildservice] "State needs recalculations" forever, on a release project

by Julio González Gil

I am trying to release packages from: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:Cent… to: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Stable:Cent… With: $ osc release systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:CentOS6-Uyuni-Client-Tools <status code="invoked"> <summary>Job invoked</summary> </status> But for some reason only one package (cobbler) was released. I can't see any errors, but no other packages are released, and the status of the repositories is "State needs recalculations, former state was: No build possible atm, waiting for jobs in other repositories" The strange thing is CentOS7 worked fine when I released packages from: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:Cent… to https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Stable:Cent… With: $ osc release systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:CentOS7-Uyuni-Client-Tools <status code="invoked"> <summary>Job invoked</summary> </status> It is hard to me to believe that this is a config problem, as meta and project are almost the same at origin and destination (only exception being that at Master:CentOS6-Uyuni-Client- Tools there is an extra patch project to systemsmanagement:Uyuni:Master:Temp). Any idea of what is going on? -- Julio González Gil <jgonzalez(a)suse.com> Release Engineer SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nürnberg Tel: +49-911-74053-0; Fax: +49-911-7417755; https://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

2 years, 4 months

[opensuse-buildservice] Doc/experiences about migrations from _product to 000product (old to new format for product definition)

by Julio González Gil

I reviewed so far: - https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_Concept_Product_Definition is outdated (it still refers to _product) - https://speakerdeck.com/openbuildservice/open-build-service-project-workshop (linked at https://openbuildservice.org/help/ is outdated as well) - Nothing at this list https://lists.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi? query=000product&advanced.x=0&advanced.y=0&list=opensuse-buildservice I also had a look at the differences between _product for Leap 42.3 and 000product for Leap 15.0 and the only BIG difference I can see so far is that, for 000product, there are .kiwi files. But what puzzles me is that the image definition is still at the .product file. Has anyone here experience with migration from _product to 000product and things we should keep in mind? :-) And one extra question: is the migration mandatory, keeping in mind that our product will be based on SLE15 (SUSE Manager) or openSUSE 15 (Uyuni)? -- Julio González Gil <jgonzalez(a)suse.com> Release Engineer SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nürnberg Tel: +49-911-74053-0; Fax: +49-911-7417755; https://www.suse.com/ SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

2 years, 4 months

[opensuse-buildservice] What are the steps required for setting up partitions in the backend?

by Srinidhi B

Hello Everyone, I couldn't find any resource so far on how to setup partitions on the backend. There is a reference about partitions on the OBS Architecture page [1] in the reference guide, but no instructions on how to go about setting things up. While searching the archives of this list, I came across one thread where Adrian suggested [2] what is explained in BSConfig.pm. I want to split backends for "existing" projects (let's say, home:). From what I understand from reading code, only "newer" content will be pushed / moved to the partitioned servers. My questions are: - What contents should I be moving to the new partitioned server? (e.g., partitioning home: projects) * /srv/obs/build/home:* * /srv/obs/repos/home:/* - Do I need move any other data? - Do I need to stop all backend services on the main server before moving this data? I'm assuming yes, but wanted a confirmation. - Do I need to run or check something else after moving the data over to partitioned server(s)? Regards, Srinidhi. [1] https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-reference-guide/cha.obs.archi… [2] https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2016-07/msg00041.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 4 months

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Build Service December 2018