April 2013 - openSUSE Build Service - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-buildservice] missing dependency for su in buildchroot
by Petr Cerny 16 Apr '13

16 Apr '13

Hi, recently I'm seeing build fails on local builds on a SLE11 SP2 host (osc versions 0.135 and 0.139). The problem seems to be libaudit.so.1 - a dependency of 'su' - which is missing from the early buildchroot environment - see the end of the attached log. Also of note is the missing 'grep' which is used in aaa_base's install scripts. As a side note, build runs without any errors on openSUSE:Factory host. processing specfile /dev/shm/pcerny/home:pcerny/cclive/cclive.spec ... running changelog2spec --target rpm --file /dev/shm/pcerny/home:pcerny/cclive/cclive.spec init_buildsystem --cachedir /var/cache/build --clean --rpmlist /tmp/rpmlist.jZoY6H /dev/shm/pcerny/home:pcerny/cclive/cclive.spec ... preinstalling aaa_base... preinstalling attr... preinstalling bash... preinstalling coreutils... preinstalling diffutils... preinstalling filesystem... preinstalling fillup... preinstalling glibc... preinstalling grep... warning: package grep does not exist preinstalling libbz2-1... preinstalling libgcc_s1... preinstalling m4... preinstalling libncurses5... preinstalling pam... preinstalling permissions... preinstalling libreadline6... preinstalling rpm... preinstalling sed... preinstalling tar... preinstalling libz1... preinstalling libselinux1... preinstalling liblzma5... preinstalling libcap2... preinstalling libacl1... preinstalling libattr1... preinstalling libpopt0... preinstalling libelf1... preinstalling liblua5_1... preinstalling libpcre1... running aaa_base preinstall script running aaa_base postinstall script Updating /etc/sysconfig/language... Updating /etc/sysconfig/backup... Updating /etc/sysconfig/boot... Updating /etc/sysconfig/clock... Updating /etc/sysconfig/proxy... Updating /etc/sysconfig/windowmanager... Updating /etc/sysconfig/cron... Updating /etc/sysconfig/news... Updating /etc/sysconfig/shutdown... .init_b_cache/scripts/aaa_base.post: line 152: grep: command not found .init_b_cache/scripts/aaa_base.post: line 159: grep: command not found Updating etc/passwd...unchanged .init_b_cache/scripts/aaa_base.post: line 197: grep: command not found .init_b_cache/scripts/aaa_base.post: line 198: grep: command not found Updating etc/group...unchanged .init_b_cache/scripts/aaa_base.post: line 197: grep: command not found .init_b_cache/scripts/aaa_base.post: line 198: grep: command not found Updating etc/shadow...new initializing rpm db... reordering...binary not found: ccw done removing nis flags from /dev/shm/pcerny/build-cclive/etc/nsswitch.conf... now finalizing build dir... /usr/sbin/Check is obsolete, don't call it! mount: none already mounted or /dev/shm/pcerny/build-cclive/proc busy su: error while loading shared libraries: libaudit.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Error: TOPDIR empty Thanks Kind regards Petr -- Petr Cerny Mozilla/OpenSSH maintainer for SUSE Linux -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] [RFC] osc3: port osc codebase to be compatible with Python3
by Michal Vyskocil 16 Apr '13

16 Apr '13

Hi all and Marcus, my hackweek project was to port osc to Python3. The goal has been achived, I've a series of around 20 patches changing the codebase of osc to be compatible with python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3. That means all test have passed in both three languages on the same codebase. However the M2Crypto does not have a python3 port. I've spent one day with a porting effort, but I've realized there is already some initial work done by RedHat guys at https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853 so I will need to compare mcepl's branch with my patchset first. For that reason I am reluctant to issue a pull request for a code, which was not (and can't properly be) tested in a real world. The downside is the code does not run on python 2.5 and olders. Speaking in a terms of a distributions, the following ones will become incompatible with the new code - Centos 5, Debian 5.0, RHEL 4, RHEL 5, SLE10. Not sure about Ubuntu 9 - it have 2.5 at least. However all targets are quite old and mostly without a general support available, therefor I'd say they can be turned off and we can agree that python 2.6 is the lowest supported Python version in current osc codebase. So should I made a pull request adding python3 support? BTW: patches are ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mvyskocil/osc3/, if you want to take a look before a pull request. They use some runtime quirks to stay compatible, but the biggest change is -print.patch, which is done by 2to3 as a mostly mechanical change. Regards Michal Vyskocil

3 5

[opensuse-buildservice] New build hardware & new images for ARM available now
by Jos Poortvliet 15 Apr '13

15 Apr '13

Hi all, The openSUSE ARM team would like to let you all know that there are 12 new ARMv7 images, including Calxeda Highbank, Raspberry Pi, Beagle-, Panda- and Arndale boards and more available for download. Moreover, thanks to collaboration with Samsung we've deployed Arndale boards with Exyos 5 dualcore CPU's to speed up packaging on the Open Build Service! Find more details in the article on news.opensuse.org: https://news.opensuse.org/?p=15779 Get the goodies on the ARM portal: http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM Have a lot of fun, The ARM Team

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] Re: [obs submit-request 163623] devel:libraries:c_c++/hxtools: accepted by dirkmueller
by Jan Engelhardt 12 Apr '13

12 Apr '13

On Thursday 2013-04-11 14:59, dmueller(a)suse.com wrote: > >State of submit-request #163623 was changed by dirkmueller: > > new -> accepted > >Comment: > ok To accept this is not acceptable for at least two reasons: - there is a package maintainer defined, and you gave him a measly 74 minutes to respond. - the patch has no description or author info whatsoever http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines#Type_2:_Comple… There is practically no information as to what it fixes, or why, other than what could be guessed from the filename or the project it came from. Robert Schweikert once proposed/brought up [http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2012-10/msg00282.html ] that we have too many maintainers on particular levels. Implicit inheritance of users is also an issue unresolved to date. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-buildservice] build power
by Jos Poortvliet 12 Apr '13

12 Apr '13

Hi all, In a couple of weeks we expect a new server rack, sponsored by SUSE, to arrive. It will bring enough build power to solve the long waiting many of you are experiencing. See http://news.opensuse.org/?p=15739 for details. In the mean time, cleaning up unused packages and projects in your home always helps us save some cycles! Our binary delivery server is also getting full and that, too, will need a solution. Cleaning up only gets us so far. Help finding a new server is welcome, Adrian can probably tell you what we need if you ask. Remember, this service depends on support from sponsors and we can use more help. Cheers, Jos

9 9

RE: [opensuse-buildservice] latest stable 2.3.8 binary location?
by Rick Liu 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

> > Before 2.4 is ready to release, > > I'm trying to find the location for obs-worker-2.3.8 RPM binaries, > > but it seems obs2.3.8 doesn't exist in any of opensuse 12.x version. > [Rick Liu] > Forgot to put the location I searched. > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tools/openSUSE_x > xx > [Rick Liu] Now, I just found a 2.3.8 versions for openSUSE_12.1 under: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tools:/2.3/ Is there openSUSE_12.2 and openSUSE_12.3 version (besides obs-worker, also for obs-server, obs-api, etc.)? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

RE: [opensuse-buildservice] latest stable 2.3.8 binary location?
by Rick Liu 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

> Before 2.4 is ready to release, > I'm trying to find the location for obs-worker-2.3.8 RPM binaries, > but it seems obs2.3.8 doesn't exist in any of opensuse 12.x version. [Rick Liu] Forgot to put the location I searched. http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tools/openSUSE_xxx -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

RE: [opensuse-buildservice] latest stable 2.3.8 binary location?
by Rick Liu 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Hi, Before 2.4 is ready to release, I'm trying to find the location for obs-worker-2.3.8 RPM binaries, but it seems obs2.3.8 doesn't exist in any of opensuse 12.x version. Thanks, Rick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Packaging UHD firmware binaries (source available under GPL)
by Joschi Brauchle 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Hi all, I wanted to ask if it is OK to package precompiled binary firmware images (for USRP devices and so on), who's source code is available under GPL? I don't want to go into the hassle of cross-compiling the firmware as that would require an immense amount of work to get that right... The firmware I'm talking about is available here: https://github.com/EttusResearch/UHD-Mirror/tree/release_003_005_001/firmwa… So I guess that should be ok? Best regards, J Brauchle

5 7

[opensuse-buildservice] Debian unstable repository
by Gianluca 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Dear all, as happens for OpenSuse where there is the Factory repository for the upcoming latest packages that will be present into the next release... ... is it possible to have also a repository for the Debian "unstable" in order to create packages for the upcoming Debian releases ?? I need the "unstable" repository of Debian because I've just realized that a lot of Debian users tend to use the "unstable" version :-S That's strange to me... maybe this impression arise from the fact the majority of people that will use my packages use Debian "unstable" :-S In any case, I think that it is worth to add to the build service also the "unstable" repository of Debian, isn'it ?? Cheers, Gianluca. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 3