September 2012 - openSUSE Build Service

[opensuse-buildservice] [PATCH] [RFC][PATCH] osc build on remote --host
by Michal Vyskocil 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

The new argument for osc build --host will perform the build on a remote host. It is a shortcut for rsync -az -e ssh `pwd` user@hostname:/remote/dir ssh user@hostname "cd /remote/dir/package; osc build *build-args" iow it copy the current directory to the /remote/directory on hostname (if not specified, the ~/ is supplied) and then run the osc build on hostname. All build arguments are supplied to the remote osc build. There are known issues: * arguments like --oldpackages, --keep-pkgs, --prefer-pkgs does not work yet * using it with --rsync-dest and --rsync-src might be tricky and produce unexpected results * osc chroot should be extended to perform it on a remote machine * the OSC_ variables do not survive ssh (but we can introduce more sane switches for that purpose) * global arguments do not survive, but I doubt they are necessary * rsync can get more arguments * maybe other things I am waiting on a feedback Regards Michal Vyskocil --- osc/commandline.py | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/osc/commandline.py b/osc/commandline.py index b28e208..32ed197 100644 --- a/osc/commandline.py +++ b/osc/commandline.py @@ -5082,6 +5082,8 @@ Please submit there instead, or use --nodevelproject to force direct submission. help='take previous build from DIR (special values: _self, _link)') @cmdln.option('--shell', action='store_true', help=SUPPRESS_HELP) + @cmdln.option('--host', metavar='HOST', + help='perform the build on a remote server - user@server:~/remote/directory') def do_build(self, subcmd, opts, *args): """${cmd_name}: Build a package on your local machine @@ -5180,7 +5182,29 @@ Please submit there instead, or use --nodevelproject to force direct submission. raise oscerr.WrongOptions('--offline and --preload are mutually exclusive') print 'Building %s for %s/%s' % (args[2], args[0], args[1]) - return osc.build.main(self.get_api_url(), opts, args) + if not opts.host: + return osc.build.main(self.get_api_url(), opts, args) + else: + cwd = os.getcwdu() + basename = os.path.basename(cwd) + if not ':' in opts.host: + hostname = opts.host + hostpath = "~/" + else: + hostname, hostpath = opts.host.split(':', 1) + + rsync_cmd = ['rsync', '-az', '-e', 'ssh', cwd, "%s:%s" % (hostname, hostpath)] + print 'Run: %s' % " ".join(rsync_cmd) + subprocess.check_call(rsync_cmd) + + # we use all arguments behind build and drop --host 'HOST' + hostargs = sys.argv[sys.argv.index('build')+1:] + hostargs.pop(hostargs.index('--host')+1) + hostargs.pop(hostargs.index('--host')) + + ssh_cmd = ['ssh', hostname, '"cd %s/%s; osc build %s"' % (hostpath, basename, " ".join(hostargs))] + print 'Run: %s' % " ".join(ssh_cmd) + return subprocess.check_call(ssh_cmd) @cmdln.option('--local-package', action='store_true', -- 1.7.11.4

3 7

[opensuse-buildservice] openSUSE 11.4 ... do not disable repos on EOL?
by Marcus Meissner 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Hi, Given the large amounts of negative feedback we get when we disable the build repositories of just EOLed openSUSE distributions ... and as 11.4 is targeted to be a Evergreen target again... How about NOT removing the openSUSE 11.4 repositories this time? We could still remove the openSUSE 11.4 repos below home:* but perhaps not for the rest of the namespace. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 12

[opensuse-buildservice] [PATCH] make commit --noservice works for commitExtPackage
by Michal Vyskocil 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

--- osc/core.py | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/osc/core.py b/osc/core.py index 22c9f39..bb15b58 100644 --- a/osc/core.py +++ b/osc/core.py @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ class Project: elif pac in self.pacs_broken: print 'osc: \'%s\' package not found' % pac elif state == None: - self.commitExtPackage(pac, msg, todo, verbose=verbose) + self.commitExtPackage(pac, msg, todo, verbose=verbose, skip_local_service_run=skip_local_service_run) finally: self.write_packages() else: @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ class Project: delete_package(self.apiurl, self.name, pac) self.del_package_node(pac) - def commitExtPackage(self, pac, msg, files = [], verbose=False): + def commitExtPackage(self, pac, msg, files = [], verbose=False, skip_local_service_run=False): """commits a package from an external project""" if os_path_samefile(os.path.join(self.dir, pac), os.getcwd()): pac_path = '.' @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ class Project: template_args=({'name': pac, 'user': user}), apiurl=apiurl) p = Package(pac_path) p.todo = files - p.commit(msg=msg, verbose=verbose) + p.commit(msg=msg, verbose=verbose, skip_local_service_run=skip_local_service_run) def __str__(self): r = [] -- 1.7.11.4

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] Marketing Jur�dico | Newsletter Inrise Consultoria | Edi��o 27 | Ano 05
by Inrise RH 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Too much request for linked OBS ?
by JAFFREZIC Xavier 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

Hi community, I'm encountering some unaccurate behavior with my private OBS instance that may fall me into trouble with guys from the security team ... I'm running a OBS appliance 2.3 and for unknown reasons, this appliances can emit lot of http request to other OBS server it's linked to... For example I've be warned from the security team for about 16 000 000 requests for August (almost 6 per/second)... But I'm only linked to 2 other OBS (one is MeeGo) Is there any reason for this... Is there some inconsistency in my settings? Does this this behavior is normal (I hope it's not!!!) Regards -- Disclaimer ------------------------------------ Ce message ainsi que les eventuelles pieces jointes constituent une correspondance privee et confidentielle a l'attention exclusive du destinataire designe ci-dessus. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire du present message ou une personne susceptible de pouvoir le lui delivrer, il vous est signifie que toute divulgation, distribution ou copie de cette transmission est strictement interdite. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, nous vous remercions d'en informer l'expediteur par telephone ou de lui retourner le present message, puis d'effacer immediatement ce message de votre systeme. *** This e-mail and any attachments is a confidential correspondence intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by phone or by replying this message, and then delete this message from your system. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-buildservice] Deleted package
by openSUSE user 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

Hi. Recently package https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=ogre&project=home%3AopenSUS… was silently deleted. Why ? Best regards. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-buildservice] Factory:NonFree repository
by Kyrill Detinov 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

Hello. Factory:NonFree repository has not been published since 20-Jun-2012. http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/non-oss/suse/x86_64/ -- WBR Kyrill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-buildservice] Re: unity for openSUSE
by Adrian Schröter 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012, 13:24:15 schrieb Damian Ivanov: ... > Dear guys from OBS, dear Adrian: > I would ask you for a favor: > Could you please make it possible that we can add Fedora Updates and > Fedora Update-testing repo (if Fedora Rawhide would be supported too, > that would be brilliant) , we really need this (at the moment we use > some ugly hacks > having rpms from fedora updates in our source in OBS, which puts load > on your servers > and we can spend less time on the openSUSE port of unity) Since fedora updates are not static repos and our download on demand feature is not supporting non-static repositories atm, I do not want to add these repos, because I would need always manually to update it. If it is just one or two packages you need, I can once import them manually though. > Also please drop me a private message too (in case I am not on the > mailing list) when the OBS arch backend is arrived. It should be active already on build.opensuse.org. It is complete, but officially still experimental and not yet released :) > Xiao-Long Chen is also the maintainer of the successful port of unity > to arch (though he moved to Fedora as main distro) and we'd love to > just add the PKGBUILD > files to the packages in GNOME:Ayatana and these packages would > provide unity for SuSE, Fedora and Arch! Try it and tell ... > If someone wants to join us for a port of unity to other OBS supported > architectures feel free to contact us. > > Cheers, > Damian > -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH email: adrian(a)suse.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] Tumbleweed downgrades since 12.2 release
by Nico Kruber 14 Sep '12

14 Sep '12

Hi, I see, Tumbleweed has been adopted to be based on 12.2 images. However, some of the old packages (based on 12.1) have been newer than the current ones - mostly only in the release number, some also in the version, e.g. kernel (3.4.6 vs. 3.5.3) Both (but especially the latter) should not happen imho. Actually, I didn't see any other 'real' downgrades than the kernel but cannot verify that there is none. Could the kernel be upgraded back to 3.5.3 again? I'd create a sr for it but don't know which repo it comes from normally or whether it should be put into openSUSE:Tumbleweed:Testing first... Thank you Nico -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-buildservice] rebuild of openSUSE:Factory:ARM mpi-selector
by Joop Boonen 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Hi, Can package openSUSE:Factory:ARM mpi-selector please be rebuild as the currently build package depends on perl = 5.16.0 while this one doesn't exist anymore perl = 5.16.1 is the currently build version. Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS backup
by Lud Antonie 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Hello, We are using OBS already for some time but haven't made any backups yet. Is there a way to backup an OBS system, OBS mysql database and filesystems? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Lud -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 11

[opensuse-buildservice] request for devel:android project
by Tomas Cech 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

Hi, I can't see any devel project for android OS related packages. Could we have one? I have one package I'd like to put there. Thanks, Tomas Cech Sleep_Walker

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] ARM noarch packages
by Joop Boonen 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

Dear all, I saw that a lot of noarch doc packages like for example lilypond-doc take extremely long to be build on arm. I wonder if it would be an option to disable these packages on arm and get them build on x86_64? This way the arm distro will be build faster. Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] "the Open Build Service team having upgraded the build farm with SSDs"?
by Greg Freemyer 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

All, In http://news.opensuse.org/2012/09/05/opensuse-12-2-green-means-go/ it says "the Open Build Service team having upgraded the build farm with SSDs and using preinstall images to rapidly setup build virtual machines." News to me, can we have an update? How many? Is performance improved? etc? Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 7

[opensuse-buildservice] project security:privacy missing repo openSUSE_12.2
by Adam Mizerski 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Will someone add openSUSE_12.2 repo to the security:privacy project? -- Adam "etamPL" Mizerski

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] openSUSE:Factory:ARM preinstallimage-base is constantly rebuild
by Joop Boonen 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Dear all, I saw package openSUSE:Factory:ARM preinstallimage-base is constantly rebuild. Can this please be checked out as it holds up a few new build of openSUSE:Factory:ARM. Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 5

[opensuse-buildservice] [PATCH] update default list of request states
by Dirk Müller 10 Sep '12

10 Sep '12

Hi, "declined" was some time ago changed to be considered an "open" request state. the default behavior of "osc rq list" is IMHO to show open requests (requests in state new or review), so I'm attaching a patch that adds "declined" as well. Tia, Dirk

3 2

[opensuse-buildservice] excluding files from build-compare
by Jon Nelson 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

I have a package that plops a timestamp into a file. Obviously, every time the package is rebuilt (due to a dependency change) this timestamp changes. I would like to exclude this file from the build-compare. How do I do that? -- Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 5

[opensuse-buildservice] local build problem ('su -c' in the build script)
by Marcin Wojdyr 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

While local build works for most of targets, I have problem with RHEL-5. When I do: $ osc build RHEL_5 x86_64 the build stops after message "now finalizing build dir...". Actually it waits for root password, but there is no prompt. I've added '-x' to the build script and could see that it's caused by 'su' in line 1963 in build. [ 6s] + BUILD_USER_ABUILD_USED=true [ 6s] + test spec = spec [ 6s] ++ chroot /run/media/wojdyr/b/osbuild-root su -c 'rpm --eval '\''%_topdir'\''' - abuild Somehow it's specific to RHEL5. Is there a workaround? In osc I use sudo as su-wrapper, so I don't need root password. Marcin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-buildservice] obs-worker cleanup chroot build environment / after build script
by Florian Kabus 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Hello, related to the "obs-worker - restarting services in chroot env at build time" mailing we still have some problems to get a more or less "clean" chroot build environment on a dedicated obs-worker machine. Therefore the question: Is there an (scripting) entry point to cleanup the obs-worker chroot build environment after _every_ build of a package even if the build has failed? In our case we have to kill some services like mysql or apache2 to ensure that they aren't running accidently after a (failed) build on the obs-worker. Your help is again very much appreciated. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-buildservice] Declined: not a valid devel prj
by Jan Engelhardt 04 Sep '12

04 Sep '12

---------- Forwarded message ---------- >State of submit-request #132461 was changed by factory-auto: > review -> declined > >Comment: > 'X11:RemoteDesktop:x2go' is not a valid devel project of > openSUSE:Factory - please pick one of the existent > >Source > project: X11:RemoteDesktop:x2go > package: nx-libs > revision: 8 >Target: > project: openSUSE:Factory > package: nx-libs Just how is X11:RemoteDesktop:x2go not a valid devel project for a to-be package? (Command was `osc sr openSUSE:Factory --no-cleanup` from within nx-libs checkout; using osc-0.134.50.git.1340786037-320.2.noarch on 12.1) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-buildservice] archlinux with ARM Architecture
by Florian Kellmer 03 Sep '12

03 Sep '12

Hi, Will it be possible to build ArchLinux for the ARM Architecture in the near future? At the moment one can add ARM to the repositories but it seems that there aren't any packages inside of it because even gcc is unresolvable. Best Regards Florian -- -- () ascii ribbon campaign | Florian Kellmer /\ - against HTML e-mail | http://www.asciiribbon.org | GPG ID: 0x6C6E3C0C --

2 1

Re: [opensuse-buildservice] openSUSE 12.2@ network
by Dmitriy Perlow 01 Sep '12

01 Sep '12

Thanks a lot! _______ Dmitriy Perlow / Sony Ericsson ---- Original message ---- From: Marcus Meissner done.

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Build loop with Arch backend
by Florian Kellmer 01 Sep '12

01 Sep '12

Hey @ all, I noticed that there is a problem with building hsolink. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=hsolink&project=home%3Afloy… Everytime when the build process was succesfully the build is started again. Could someone please take a look to determine where the problem is? I tied to build it for Arch_Core_standard x86_64. greets florian -- -- () ascii ribbon campaign | Florian Kellmer /\ - against HTML e-mail | http://www.asciiribbon.org | GPG ID: 0x6C6E3C0C --

4 4

[opensuse-buildservice] MI AMIGO FEDERICO
by Ernesto Muyshondt 01 Sep '12

01 Sep '12

Mi amigo Federico Hernández es una persona “Objetiva” aunque tiene serias dificultades para contemplar su propio discurso ante el espejo, es “Imparcial” aunque milita en un partido que siempre ha manejado un criterio de “conveniencia política”, es “Honrado” aunque tiene reparos por más de $1,000,000.00 USD, en CONCULTURA, cuenta con una “Integridad” envidiable a pesar de desaparecer varios vehículos de la misma institución. Federico sí que es “Inteligente” ya que él se encargó de destapar la “Cloaca” en CONCULTURA y ahora trata de tapar la de la cámara de comercio. Que gran amigo es Federico, “Humilde”. A Federico no solo lo queremos, sino también lo amamos por su honestidad, por ejemplo cuando se llevó a cabo la reunión en un reconocido bar de la Zona Rosa en San Salvador y entre otros visitantes llegó él, con su guardaespaldas y motorista, a lo largo del espacio de tiempo que se mantuvo en la reunión y en un deliberado momento de “narcicismo, egolatría y vanidad”, reclamaba una respuesta a la interrogante de quien era el integrante de la promoción de bachilleres que más alto había llegado y tenido éxito devengando el mayor sueldo, nadie le contestaba dado que era evidente que quería escuchar su nombre pues entre otras cosas había sido diputado suplente, Presidente de CONCULTURA y le escribió los discursos a Paco Flores. No satisfecho con esto, más bien molesto ante la negativa a escuchar lo que quería oír, se levantó de la mesa y se fue. Pero el punto negativo no es ese, el problema es que se fue sin pagar, dejando a los comensales con la cuenta de sus 3 botellas de vino y 2 platos de bocas (un Sashimi y unos calamares). Ah, que Federico, aún recuerdo cuando salía en el programa “Tierra de Infancia”… como era de simpático…, quisiera saber cuándo fue que comenzó a escribir y brindar a sus adeptos líneas terminadas mezcladas con ambigüedades, así como también opiniones desacertadas acerca de contenidos ideológicos que al parecer no pudo comprender en algún curso de periodismo que posiblemente le dieron en alguna universidad privada. Por favor…a los que juzgan a mi amigo les voy a pedir que no se confundan ya que él es libre de opinar, a pesar que la neutralidad y la ponderación de las que presume son engañosas. Ah… que Federico, sus “sobrias y elegantes opiniones” tienen mucho de lavado de cara. No quiero pensar que es oportunista cuando muestra indignación por los desmanes hermenéuticos de la situación que se vive en El Salvador, al mismo tiempo que calla frente a la oscura intervención del partido ARENA, al que pertenece desde su juventud. Me conmueven los comentarios que hacen contra mi amigo, el sobrino del ex campeón de tenis de mesa; como cuando una poeta de nuestro país me decía que el consuelo que ella tenía cuando Federico estaba al frente de CONCULTURA era que "nadie puede ser peor que él" y otro amigo agregó que no puede existir corrupción, estupidez y partidarismo más grande que el de Federico Hernández. Como amigo del gran Federico Hernández Aguilar, les pido por favor que las aguas negras de la vida de Federico hay que dejarlas correr. Lo importante es retomar la luz que ha caído sobre la cloaca de su vida para así ver con objetividad todo lo malo que ya pasó y olvidar los robos y demás corrupción que hubo en su gestión como Presidente de CONCULTURA. Fede, no importa lo que digan, todavía es tiempo de cambiar, todavía es tiempo de que te veas en el espejo e integres todos los fragmentos de tu vida, no sólo aquellos que te convienen. No olvides que tú formas parte de la trama y ese es el drama de tus ideas que aun siendo disfrazadas de oportunas no dejan de ser oportunistas. Tu amigo, Fernando B. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0