April 2012 - openSUSE Build Service - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-buildservice] Re: [opensuse-arm] ARM gcc47 build issue (strange "gcc/build" behaviour)
by Joop Boonen 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

On Sat, April 21, 2012 11:45 am, Joop Boonen wrote: > Hi all, > > An ARM build issue exists. > > I see: > /emul/x86_64-for-arm/lib64:/emul/x86_64-for-arm/usr/lib64 > > Is still gcc 4.6.3. > > Form the config.log of for instance binutils I see it tries to compile > against gcc4.6.3 > > <quote> > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.6.3 (SUSE Linux) > configure:4018: $? = 0 > configure:4007: gcc -V >&5 > gcc: error: unrecognized option '-V' > gcc: fatal error: no input files > compilation terminated. > </quote> > > instead of 4.7. Which is installed correctly in: > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Apr 20 18:30 armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 21 11:10 ./build-root/usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.7 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Apr 21 11:08 ./build-root/usr/lib64/gcc -> > ../lib/gcc > > These are gcc 4.6.3 binaries. > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Apr 21 11:08 > ./build-root/emul/x86_64-for-arm/usr/lib/gcc -> ../lib64/gcc > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 322K Apr 20 10:29 > ./build-root/emul/x86_64-for-arm/usr/bin/gcc > >>From package: > qemu-accel-arm ( qemu-accel-arm-0.2-8.5.x86_64.rpm ) > > Package: > openSUSE:Factory:ARM qemu-accel > cant be rebuild due to: > openSUSE:Factory:ARM cross-armv7l-binutils for x86_64 ( qemu_accel ) > > Will enabling this build resolve this issue? > I don't see a spec file for: cross-armv7l-binutils only cross-arm-binutils > > I've just build this package locally without a problem: > osc build --alternative-project=openSUSE:Factory:ARM qemu_accel x86_64 > cross-arm-binutils.spec > I did more checks, via the specfile of binutils. I something quite strange. /usr/bin/gcc shows gcc 4.6.3 while /usr/bin/gcc-4.7 where /usr/bin/gcc links to shows version 4.7. ++ which gcc + ls -al /usr/bin/gcc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Apr 21 09:58 /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.7 + ls -alH /usr/bin/gcc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 396888 Apr 20 16:36 /usr/bin/gcc + ls -al /usr/bin/gcc-4.7 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 396888 Apr 20 16:36 /usr/bin/gcc-4.7 + /usr/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc Target: armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.6 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-plugin --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-linker-build-id --with-sysroot=/ --enable-linux-futex --disable-nls --target=armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb --with-abi=aapcs-linux --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --disable-sjlj-exceptions --build=x86_64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.3 (SUSE Linux) + /usr/bin/gcc-4.7 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc-4.7 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi/4.7/lto-wrapper Target: armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.7 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-libitm --disable-plugin --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-linker-build-id --program-suffix=-4.7 --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --with-arch=armv7-a --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb --with-abi=aapcs-linux --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --disable-sjlj-exceptions --build=armv7l-suse-linux-gnueabi Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20120413 [gcc-4_7-branch revision 186417] (SUSE Linux) So it might not be related to qemu-accel, but something else. > > Regards, > > Joop. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org > To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner(a)opensuse.org > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Error: Package obs-service-format-spec-file is required for this operation
by Marguerite Su 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Hi, I first osc co a package from OBS server, then when I try osc service localrun format-spec-file, it tells me the message above. But of course I have that package from Tools repository, the same version as other obs & osc package. so what happened to that package 0.4.1-97.1? anyone in the same situation? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-buildservice] Fedora:16 prjconf missing libmount in VMinstall?
by Daniel Gollub 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Hi, any chance that (openSUSE.org:)Fedora:16 prjconf is missing libmount in VMinstall? ---8<-- [...] 2nd stage started in virtual machine machine type: i686 mount: error while loading shared libraries: libmount.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory mount: error while loading shared libraries: libmount.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory swapon on /dev/vdb swapon: /dev/vdb: found swap signature: version 1, page-size 4, same byte order swapon: /dev/vdb: pagesize=4096, swapsize=2097152000, devsize=2097152000 mount: error while loading shared libraries: libmount.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory mount: error while loading shared libraries: libmount.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory logging output to //.build.log... processing specfile /.build-srcdir/cmus.spec ... [...] --->8--- It seems to not harm for KVM workers - I currently root causing an issue with Xen workers which looks like this: ---8<--- [...] Mounting root /dev/hda1 mount -o ro,defaults -t ext3 /dev/hda1 /root 2nd stage started in virtual machine machine type: x86_64 switching personality to 8... 2nd stage started in virtual machine machine type: i686 mount: error while loading shared libraries: libmount.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory mount: error while loading shared libraries: libmount.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory swapon on /dev/hda2 swapon: /dev/hda2: found swap signature: version 1, page-size 4, same byte order swapon: /dev/hda2: pagesize=4096, swapsize=1073741824, devsize=1073741824 Error: BUILD_ROOT=/ not writeable, try --clean. chown: changing ownership of `/': Read-only file system [ 4.871716] SysRq : Power Off [ 6.379040] Power down. [...] --->8--- I guess Xen workers relies on that to work in the build script: if test "$VM_TYPE" != 'lxc'; then mount -n -o remount,noatime,rw / fi Which is not the case if libmount is missing ... in Fedora:16 Best Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Gollub Linux Consultant & Developer Tel.: +49-160 47 73 970 Mail: gollub(a)b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] how to chnage amount of make jobs in a prefered way?
by Joop Boonen 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Hi All, Package poco has een enormous memory footprint while building. When building on x86_64 OBS workers the build even fails. The build is OK locally for me, due to more internal memory. The make flag is like this "make %{?_smp_mflags}" which is the preferred make for the spec file. What is the preferred way to reduce the make jobs so this package get build? Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS server maintance?
by Marguerite Su 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi, is there an OBS server maintance executing? after 8:00 PM GMT+8, OBS can't open or refresh. (I lost some work, but just a little bit) the ping is okay, traceroute shows a suse.de server does not response, website is bad gateway, local osc vc will use username@localhost, when saving, it will tell you can't find your username. are you people maintaining server or updating hardware? if so, please pre-post a short notification here, it won't take you much time. OBS is international, this will make us in your night timezone less worried. (because today China National Great Firewall is also upgrading, we were afraid OBS is blocked in our area.) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

6 10

[opensuse-buildservice] about prj name "SLE_11" vs "SLE_11_SP1" vs "SLE_11_SP2"
by Christian 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi @all can we please stop with this "SLE_11_SP?" naming and stick on "SLE_11" And the webui should not provide 3 prjs for SLES 11, just one "SLE_11" configure with "SUSE:SLE-11:SP1" (at a miniumum) This naming changes will break "_aggregate" packages. why at a miniumum SP1 ? - GA is not suppoerted anymore - any build on SP1 should run on SP2 without any problems. and what to do when SP3 is out ? then use at a minimum SP2. -- Christian ---------------------------------------------------- - Please do not 'CC' me on list mails. Just reply to the list :) ---------------------------------------------------- Der ultimative shop für Sportbekleidung und Zubehör http://www.sc24.de ---------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 5

[opensuse-buildservice] Base:System blocked for days
by Claudio Freire 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hey guys. I have this[0] branch where I'm trying to fix python3-rpm and submit it to Base:System, but after a recent (really trivial) change I made a couple of days ago, it became blocked, and didn't unblock. Base:System for Factory is now fully built (albeit glibc is failed, not sure why), but the branch is still blocked. I smell foul. Any ideas how to unblock it? (or if it's the glibc thing?) [0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?project=home%3Aklaussfreire%3Abr… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 4

[opensuse-buildservice] how to clear a false unresolvable
by brian＠aljex.com 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

I've got some packages falsely claiming to be unresolvable for some build targets, just some arches in some targets. I know they are resolvable and buildable because they already built, and the same packages still build fine for the same targets just in other subprojects. Specifically, in home:aljex I have build targets suse 10.0 and 10.1 aming others. In OS 10.1 x86_64 (just x86_64, i586 is fine) package jbigkit is claiming to be unresolvable because "nothing provides m4 1.4.4 required by autoconf". m4-1.4.4 is available since that's the native version of m4 for os 10.1, and, the i586 arch built, and, they both built a few days ago, and, they both build right now for the same target in home:aljex:branches:graphics/jbigkit What caused this problem is I briefly had newer versions of autoconf, automake and m4 in the same hopme:aljex repo and that unsurprisingly screwed a lot of things up. I removed or disabled those at least for the older targets and most packages are back to normal. But for whatever reason just these two things are stuck. just 10.0 i586 and 10.1 x86_64. How can I force the build service to re-resolve, or at least tell me more about why it's failing? It's saying nothing provides m4 1.4.4 but that's not true. So I need to know why it thinks that. The problem autoconf/automake/m4 packages are no longer in the download repos and I even disabled the publish and use for build flags for them for those targets "just because". I don't know what else I can clean up or fix. How can I debug this further to find out what's _really_ wrong? Thanks -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-buildservice] bug in file method of build controller
by Robert Schiele 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, I ran into a bug in the file action of the build controller in the OBS API. Whenever the backend has a file that is exactly of size 8192*n+1 and the last byte is 0x30 = '0' the API cannot deliver the complete file through the path build/:project/:repository/:arch/:package/:filename but delivers only the full 8192 chunks without the final byte. Some debugging demonstrated the the backend itself does still deliver the file correctly but the API does cut off the last byte. I am not a deep Ruby expert but my interpretation of this behavior is that apparently some part of the code incorrectly interprets a chunk consisting of a single 0x30 = '0' as an empty chunk and thus concludes that the file reading has completed. Especially since it does not seem to happen when the last byte is different from 0x30. You can reproduce that by just placing a file there of the above style (for instance with "echo -n 0 > foobar.rpm" for the most simple case of n=0) and then try to retrieve it through the API. Robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-buildservice] RHEL5 and CENTOS5 upgrade to 5.6?
by Johannes Weberhofer 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hello! I try to package some packages for RHEL5 and CentOS5, which requires PHP 5.3; Is it already possible/planned that those repositories are updated to the 5.6 versions, which support those newer packages? Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Weberhofer Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Reworking the software search, part II
by Thomas Schmidt 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, thanks for your feedback regarding our mockups for the software search. We implemented a working prototype which now also contains a search form. Please check the new search at: http://software.opensuse.org/search/find and see an example app page here: http://software.opensuse.org/package/kopete Please let me know what you think of the current state. Greetings -- Thomas Schmidt (tom [at] opensuse.org) openSUSE Boosters Team "Don't Panic", Douglas Adams (11.03.1952 - 11.05.2001) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

16 56

[opensuse-buildservice] change of e-mail address
by Michael Behrisch 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, maybe this question was asked before but Google could not find a solution. Is it possible to change the e-mail-address associated with my obs account? And if so, how? Regards, Michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 5

[opensuse-buildservice] inconsistent behavior on architecture, repository, and project deletion
by Robert Schiele 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, I observed the following behavior which seems inconsistent to me but maybe there is a reason behind that that I currently don't see: - When deleting all architecture from a repository, the corresponding /srv/obs/build/$PRJ/$REPO/$ARCH directory is not wiped, nor is /src/obs/repos/$PRJ/$REPO/*. - When deleting a repository from a project, the corresponding directories are neither deleted in those places. - When deleting the whole project, the corresponding directories _do_ get deleted (which is what I would have expected in all three cases). Is there a reason that in the first two cases the directories don't get removed or is this a bug? In case of a bug: Is my assumption correct that it would be safe for me to delete the mentioned directories with a script on the backend or might I introduce some inconsistencies that way? Robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 10

[opensuse-buildservice] about the new web software search
by Ruediger Meier 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, IMO the new search webinterface is quiet useless now. You have to do too many clicks just to find out which exactly versions of a package are available and what particular project it comes from. In fact it even seems to find much less packages than available on OBS. It's not clear on first view how to browse directly into the source project page where the search hit belongs too. Also IMO confusiong that project names are shown somehow "human readble" instead of just using the well known (and copy/pasteble) strings like "openSUSE:11.4:Update". Another thing, why you always hide the "show distribution" menu after submitting the search button? This is very annoying. Moreover I generally hate these kind of java script pages where the page back button never does what you would expect... Is the old web search still available somewhere? cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

11 19

[opensuse-buildservice] Upgrading private OBS to 2.2.99*
by 686f6c6d 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, when attempting to upgrade to the current version of OBS, the webui keeps displaying the "Link to remote instance" setup page although the OBS instance was private before. It seems there is no documented way to skip/disable that nag page. 1.) How do I get rid of that page without linking to a remote instance? 2.) Do I have to re-run section 4.2 of README.SETUP again after upgrading? 3.) Will doing 2.) negatively affect any distributions/repos/projects already configured? 4.) Please also document the correct solution in README.UPDATERS and/or README.SETUP or whereever it is appropriate. -- Kind regards 686f6c6d / Christopher 'm4z' Holm -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-buildservice] how to create a debian watch file for tarballs hosted on the OBS.
by Paul Elliott 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

How to create a watch file for a tarball found on the OBS (Open Build Service). First find the Sources package page for the package that uses your tarball. If you do not already know this, perhaps you can search for it here: https://build.opensuse.org/search Once you have found the page for your package, you can click on "Sources". In my example, my package is libreoffice-converter, so I find this page: https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libreoffice-converter&proj… You should find links for the various sources that go to make up the source rpm. And this should include the tarball. If you look at the source for that web page, it will include a link that looks like this: <a href="https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice… converter-3.3.tar.bz2?rev=2dffadb97b188c6bc4c0037f1d4c446d&"> The \?rev=BLAH stuff needs to be thrown away. So you create a watch file that looks like this: >version=3 > >opts=filenamemangle=s/\?rev=.*// \ >https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libreoffice-converter&proj… \ >https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice… The first line: >opts=filenamemangle=s/\?rev=.*// \ Says we are going to throw away the ?rev= stuff. The second line is the package source page that we found: >https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=libreoffice-converter&proj… \ The third line is the link target: >https://api.opensuse.org:443/public/source/LibreOffice:Unstable/libreoffice… The version part 3.3, has been written as (\d\.\d) so uscan can abstract the version numbers. And it includes the part that will be thrown away "\?rev=.*". Thanks to David Paleino for helping me with this. -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelliott(a)BlackPatchPanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] Trouble on first install of a OBS-Worker 2.2.994-1.3
by Jeremias Bosch 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hello all, I have trouble on installing a obs worker with version 2.2.994-1.3.noarch I run the following setup: OBS-Server (192.168.122.173) OBS-Worker (192.168.122.8) Both are KVM on the same host and each installed with this documentation: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_private_installation Both are also in the same (virtual) network and have access to internet and can ping each other by IP. I used this for install the server: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tools/images/obs-server… And this for the worker: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/Tools/images/obs-worker… I'm able to access the OBS-Server Webui as I would expect it. I installed the worker regarding: #Installing_the_obs-worker_software The worker boots up and complains that it failes to fetch initial code on http://localhost:5252 (when i manual change in /etc/rc.d/obsworker localhost to obs server ip the fetch of the initial code works 'done') I can login as root. Now I tried to configure the worker and got stuck here: #Configuring_the_OBS_instance_names There is no /usr/lib/obs/server/BSConfig.pm on my worker. I'm also missing /etc/sysconfig/obs-worker (which is mentioned in other documentations.) there is only obs-server slptool findsrvs obs.source_server slptool findsrvs obs.repo_server give me nothing (no output). Can anyone point me in the correct direction? Thanks, Jeremias -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] small bug in repository selection by new software.opensuse.org
by Frederic Crozat 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, I noticed this weekend the regexp used to select repository for 1-click url can be incorrect, when you want an "unsupported" repository : on http://software.opensuse.org/package/calibre do the following: - choose "other version" - choose "openSUSE 12.1" - choose "unsupported packages" - accept the warning - check the urls created for the "Documentation:Tools" line (also valid for KDE:Extra) instead of referencing to openSUSE:12.1 repository, the various links are preferring KDE_Release_48_openSUSE_12.1 instead. I guess the regexp used to choose the repository should favor openSUSE_12.1 and only use another repository if openSUSE_12.1 isn't available in the project. Otherwise, the website is great ! -- Frederic Crozat <fcrozat(a)suse.com> SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-buildservice] Software Search for 12.1 on the 11.4/Factory Download Page?
by Martin Seidler 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hello all, as here on this list the new software search is discussed I would like to ask if the search boxes on the download pages could set up as default to be searching for packages for the according versions (and not all as default for 12.1). In my amateurish view I hope that only a small change of code (of the selected version?) would be necessary for this. Nowadays the source code is for example http://software.opensuse.org/developer/en > [...] >  Show distribution:  > <select id="baseproject" name="baseproject"><option value="openSUSE:Factory">openSUSE Factory</option> > <option value="openSUSE:12.1" selected="selected">openSUSE 12.1</option> > <option value="openSUSE:11.4">openSUSE 11.4</option> > [...] and as well http://software.opensuse.org/114/en > [...] > <option value="openSUSE:12.1" selected="selected">openSUSE 12.1</option> > <option value="openSUSE:11.4">openSUSE 11.4</option> > [...] Regards Martin -- openSUSE profile: https://users.opensuse.org/show/pistazienfresser Martin Seidler KIRCHSTR. 11, 65843 SULZBACH (TAUNUS) FON (priv.): +49 6196 40 20 283 Ø FON (comm.): +49 6196 59 236 23 Ø FAX: +49 6196 59 236 24 Ø -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 5

[opensuse-buildservice] X11:xfce priority
by Guido Berhoerster 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, can I get some higher priority for the X11:xfce project? Currently it seems to take awfully long[*] to do a complete rebuild with long periods of packages remaining in scheduled and blocked state and makes development rather painful. The whole project is rather lightweight, locally I can do a full rebuild of all packages of a build target and arch in under 30 minutes. [*] I cannot access the actual statistics, https://build.opensuse.org/project/rebuild_time?arch=i586&project=X11%3Axfc… leads to an error. -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Rebuild trigger request for openSUSE:Factory:ARM gdk-pixbuf
by Joop Boonen 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi all, Can the package openSUSE:Factory:ARM gdk-pixbuf please be rebuild, as this package isn't up to date any more. package libtiff-devel where this package depends on has been rebuild. Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] [PATCH] [build] Map Debian ARM arches to OBS
by Hector Oron 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Debian ARM arches: - Debian 'armel', which defaults to ARMv4t (soft) maps to armv[4567]l - Debian 'armhf', which defaults to ARMv7 (hard-float) maps to armv7hl Note Ubuntu 'armel' deprecated after 'precise' release, defaults to ARMv7 (softfp). So Ubuntu 'armel' should really map armv7l, but its out of scope for this patch. Signed-off-by: Hector Oron <hector.oron(a)collabora.co.uk> --- Build/Deb.pm | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Build/Deb.pm b/Build/Deb.pm index b6c7cc6..3878fd4 100644 --- a/Build/Deb.pm +++ b/Build/Deb.pm @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ sub parse { $arch = 'i386' if $arch =~ /^i[456]86$/; $arch = 'powerpc' if $arch eq 'ppc'; $arch = 'amd64' if $arch eq 'x86_64'; + $arch = 'armel' if $arch =~ /^armv[4567]l$/; + $arch = 'armhf' if $arch eq 'armv7hl'; if (ref($fn) eq 'ARRAY') { @control = @$fn; -- 1.7.9.1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 7

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS 2.3 corrections
by Joop Boonen 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hi all, I found some errors in de configurations of the OBS 2.3 server. I've attached the corrected files and the patches. It's related to: Documentation: /usr/share/doc/packages/obs-api/README.SETUP Apache vhosts configuration: /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/obs.conf I've added the api port 81 connection as a quick fix and as the internal doesn't really need to be encrypted. Should I create a bug report for this? Regards, Joop.

3 3

[opensuse-buildservice] To fetch latest <pkg>.rpm during build from build repository
by Rahul Emmatty 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hi, Is there a way to get latest <pkg>.rpm during build from build repository ? I would like to get the latest rpm available of a certain package build in OBS and bundle the same in another package. The Buildrequires section in the spec file will fetch the rpm & installs. But the installed rpms are not available anywhere in the chroot. Please do let me know If there are any solution to the above mentioned scenario. Thanks, Rahul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] OBS: Endless loop for openSUSE:Factory?
by Tobias Burnus 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hi, I have the feeling that there is an endless loop on the OBS for openSUSE:Factory. "gcc46" is continuously rebuild (together with projects like cracklib). Looking at the output, cf. below, I have the feeling the changes are either due to encoded build time or due to different orders because of "make -j <n>". At least the following change is expected: |-GFORTRAN module version '6' created from omp_lib.f90 on Fri Apr 13 16:12:52 2012 +GFORTRAN module version '6' created from omp_lib.f90 on Fri Apr 13 18:14:16 2012| (If you think that encoding the date is a bad idea: In GCC 4.7, .mod files do no longer have a date line in the file.) The others look similar, but with binaries, it is a bit difficult to see. Tobias |compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.src.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gcc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.src.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/cpp46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/cpp46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/cc1 differs in ELF sections --- /tmp/tmp.1joyMAvu6p 2012-04-13 18:52:15.984000065 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.hT4BBaokk7 2012-04-13 18:52:22.976000065 +0000 @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ 8048178 00000000 02000000 06000000 10000000 ................ Contents of section .note.gnu.build-id: 8048188 04000000 14000000 03000000 474e5500 ............GNU. - 8048198 97e0c8f6 6936fa72 f91611cf 9765b006 ....i6.r.....e.. - 80481a8 f9abed67 ...g + 8048198 33a57013 6dee0238 ed34fce9 94dbc72c 3.p.m..8.4....., + 80481a8 b2978df9 .... Contents of section .hash: 80481ac 07010000 61010000 00000000 7b000000 ....a.......{... 80481bc 00000000 54000000 3f000000 00000000 ....T...?....... @@ -446266,8 +446266,8 @@ 8717390 58140d08 090d0d08 090d0d08 28140d08 X...........(... 87173a0 10140d08 f8130d08 40140d08 69783836 ........@...ix86 87173b0 5f746172 6765745f 6d616372 6f735f69 _target_macros_i - 87173c0 6e746572 6e616c00 b43729fc ded2b993 nternal..7)..... - 87173d0 9788a3b0 4d930a29 00000000 00000000 ....M..)........ + 87173c0 6e746572 6e616c00 38634d1d 2503eae5 nternal.8cM.%... + 87173d0 a3380a49 e9e9bf39 00000000 00000000 .8.I...9........ 87173e0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 87173f0 00000000 070f1f3f 7f081020 4080070f .......?... @... 8717400 1f3f0810 20400000 00000000 00000000 .?.. @.......... @@ -598587,4 +598587,4 @@ Contents of section .comment.SUSE.OPTs: 0000 4f737057 67004f73 70574700 OspWg.OspWG. Contents of section .gnu_debuglink: - 0000 6363312e 64656275 67000000 e1a8f5e6 cc1.debug....... + 0000 6363312e 64656275 67000000 d61d0cd6 cc1.debug....... compare /.build.oldpackages/cpp46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/cpp46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm --- /tmp/tmp.MZk2o34MsE 2012-04-13 18:52:25.136000064 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.Su8o47mozd 2012-04-13 18:52:25.160000064 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -debuginfo(build-id) 32776 97e0c8f66936fa72f91611cf9765b006f9abed67 +debuginfo(build-id) 32776 33a570136dee0238ed34fce994dbc72cb2978df9 debuginfo(build-id) 32776 a052888fdc61a43be34b2378b7f81cee94bbd55a cpp46-debuginfo 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ cpp46-debuginfo(x86-32) 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ RPM meta information is different compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-ada-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-ada-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/adalib/g-expect.ali differs ( ASCII text) --- old//usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/adalib/g-expect.ali 2012-04-13 16:20:06.000000000 +0000 +++ new//usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/adalib/g-expect.ali 2012-04-13 18:24:42.000000000 +0000 @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ D s-exctab.ads 20110314140253 66e51330 D s-finimp.ads 20110314140254 46853fe8 D s-finroo.ads 20110314140252 dbb860c9 -D s-oscons.ads 20120413161834 0552ddc8 +D s-oscons.ads 20120413182304 0552ddc8 D s-os_lib.ads 20110314140254 e0681e2d D s-parame.ads 20110314140252 9c5d83fa D s-regpat.ads 20110314140252 825a9b7f compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-ada-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-ada-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-c++-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-c++-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/cc1plus differs in ELF sections --- /tmp/tmp.ZNoly2oUk5 2012-04-13 18:53:45.500000065 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.xnlJsqTdFn 2012-04-13 18:53:51.368000065 +0000 @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ 8048178 00000000 02000000 06000000 10000000 ................ Contents of section .note.gnu.build-id: 8048188 04000000 14000000 03000000 474e5500 ............GNU. - 8048198 01002392 6d8131ae 359695bf 4f777be5 ..#.m.1.5...Ow{. - 80481a8 efeda853 ...S + 8048198 62ec3a82 537450c7 84c93eac 3c406ff9 b.:.StP...>.<@o. + 80481a8 bf05c686 .... Contents of section .hash: 80481ac 07010000 61010000 00000000 7b000000 ....a.......{... 80481bc 00000000 54000000 3f000000 00000000 ....T...?....... @@ -490048,8 +490048,8 @@ 87c23e0 58711608 58711608 096a1608 096a1608 Xq..Xq...j...j.. 87c23f0 28711608 10711608 f8701608 40711608 (q...q...p..@q.. 87c2400 69783836 5f746172 6765745f 6d616372 ix86_target_macr - 87c2410 6f735f69 6e746572 6e616c00 d0bb83d9 os_internal..... - 87c2420 70a5000a 5892efee 4f6fcb47 00000000 p...X...Oo.G.... + 87c2410 6f735f69 6e746572 6e616c00 5a8ae6cf os_internal.Z... + 87c2420 03d1e23b 4e6967eb 1481435d 00000000 ...;Nig...C].... 87c2430 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 87c2440 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 87c2450 00000000 070f1f3f 7f081020 4080070f .......?... @... @@ -647518,4 +647518,4 @@ 0000 4f737057 67004f73 70574700 OspWg.OspWG. Contents of section .gnu_debuglink: 0000 63633170 6c75732e 64656275 67000000 cc1plus.debug... - 0010 0250a3b5 .P.. + 0010 f110d60f .... compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-c++-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-c++-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm --- /tmp/tmp.luK3xwPUVF 2012-04-13 18:53:54.348000065 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.SQAcOi0MOh 2012-04-13 18:53:54.368000065 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -debuginfo(build-id) 32776 010023926d8131ae359695bf4f777be5efeda853 +debuginfo(build-id) 32776 62ec3a82537450c784c93eac3c406ff9bf05c686 debuginfo(build-id) 32776 cfca7426b5d4ea82427f28af37a89a700835d0e2 gcc46-c++-debuginfo 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ gcc46-c++-debuginfo(x86-32) 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ RPM meta information is different compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-debugsource-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-debugsource-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/src/debug/gcc-4.6.3-20120301/obj-i586-suse-linux/gcc/cc1-checksum.c differs ( C source, ASCII text) --- old//usr/src/debug/gcc-4.6.3-20120301/obj-i586-suse-linux/gcc/cc1-checksum.c 2012-04-13 16:11:23.000000000 +0000 +++ new//usr/src/debug/gcc-4.6.3-20120301/obj-i586-suse-linux/gcc/cc1-checksum.c 2012-04-13 18:11:15.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ #include "config.h" #include "system.h" -EXPORTED_CONST unsigned char executable_checksum[16] = { 0xb4, 0x37, 0x29, 0xfc, 0xde, 0xd2, 0xb9, 0x93, 0x97, 0x88, 0xa3, 0xb0, 0x4d, 0x93, 0x0a, 0x29 }; +EXPORTED_CONST unsigned char executable_checksum[16] = { 0x38, 0x63, 0x4d, 0x1d, 0x25, 0x03, 0xea, 0xe5, 0xa3, 0x38, 0x0a, 0x49, 0xe9, 0xe9, 0xbf, 0x39 }; compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-fortran-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-fortran-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/finclude/omp_lib.mod differs ( ASCII text) --- old//usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/finclude/omp_lib.mod 2012-04-13 16:23:35.000000000 +0000 +++ new//usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/finclude/omp_lib.mod 2012-04-13 18:30:36.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -GFORTRAN module version '6' created from omp_lib.f90 on Fri Apr 13 16:12:52 2012 +GFORTRAN module version '6' created from omp_lib.f90 on Fri Apr 13 18:14:16 2012 MD5:1dfd69109579ad16abda48732bae1e67 -- If you edit this, you'll get what you deserve. (() () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-fortran-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-fortran-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-info-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.noarch.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gcc46-info-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.noarch.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-locale-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-locale-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-obj-c++-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-obj-c++-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/cc1objplus differs in ELF sections --- /tmp/tmp.0oCXSMEjKT 2012-04-13 18:55:13.572000066 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.lfyT5wDpeH 2012-04-13 18:55:19.476000065 +0000 @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ 8048178 00000000 02000000 06000000 10000000 ................ Contents of section .note.gnu.build-id: 8048188 04000000 14000000 03000000 474e5500 ............GNU. - 8048198 cc852e62 d9b1e21d 3303c713 0d69d843 ...b....3....i.C - 80481a8 f2355e07 .5^. + 8048198 9f576b9c 97c40cd2 31416234 a591e037 .Wk.....1Ab4...7 + 80481a8 637620f7 cv . Contents of section .hash: 80481ac 07010000 61010000 00000000 7b000000 ....a.......{... 80481bc 00000000 54000000 3f000000 00000000 ....T...?....... @@ -499878,8 +499878,8 @@ 87e8a40 f89b1808 f89b1808 a9941808 a9941808 ................ 87e8a50 c89b1808 b09b1808 989b1808 e09b1808 ................ 87e8a60 69783836 5f746172 6765745f 6d616372 ix86_target_macr - 87e8a70 6f735f69 6e746572 6e616c00 d00eccf6 os_internal..... - 87e8a80 fb913dc2 56886caa 6020cc6a 00000000 ..=.V.l.` .j.... + 87e8a70 6f735f69 6e746572 6e616c00 d1a06da7 os_internal...m. + 87e8a80 c94e8727 6ee145bd 82610dc6 00000000 .N.'n.E..a...... 87e8a90 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 87e8aa0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 87e8ab0 00000000 070f1f3f 7f081020 4080070f .......?... @... @@ -658561,4 +658561,4 @@ 0000 4f737057 67004f73 70574700 OspWg.OspWG. Contents of section .gnu_debuglink: 0000 6363316f 626a706c 75732e64 65627567 cc1objplus.debug - 0010 00000000 f3fb85a3 ........ + 0010 00000000 eb48bdf4 .....H.. compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-obj-c++-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-obj-c++-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm --- /tmp/tmp.v13hzAR4Z0 2012-04-13 18:55:20.868000064 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.wmJdFaoRJr 2012-04-13 18:55:20.900000064 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -debuginfo(build-id) 32776 cc852e62d9b1e21d3303c7130d69d843f2355e07 +debuginfo(build-id) 32776 9f576b9c97c40cd231416234a591e037637620f7 gcc46-obj-c++-debuginfo 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ gcc46-obj-c++-debuginfo(x86-32) 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ RPM meta information is different compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-objc-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-objc-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.6/cc1obj differs in ELF sections --- /tmp/tmp.4oaoYQFxzC 2012-04-13 18:56:13.920000065 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.PMQDMZXIJf 2012-04-13 18:56:18.984000066 +0000 @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ 8048178 00000000 02000000 06000000 10000000 ................ Contents of section .note.gnu.build-id: 8048188 04000000 14000000 03000000 474e5500 ............GNU. - 8048198 bd53b87c 7a9846e7 472d405e 5114f0b8 .S.|z.F.G-@^Q... - 80481a8 77a3c9dd w... + 8048198 003e2939 e5a8b6d9 4433ff7d 7a121e7c .>)9....D3.}z..| + 80481a8 95730359 .s.Y Contents of section .hash: 80481ac 07010000 61010000 00000000 7b000000 ....a.......{... 80481bc 00000000 54000000 3f000000 00000000 ....T...?....... @@ -455865,7 +455865,7 @@ 873cb70 392a0f08 58310f08 40310f08 28310f08 9*..X1..@1..(1.. 873cb80 70310f08 69783836 5f746172 6765745f p1..ix86_target_ 873cb90 6d616372 6f735f69 6e746572 6e616c00 macros_internal. - 873cba0 2f5c40d3 c388ba70 b3fe7944 a865f27a /\@....p..yD.e.z + 873cba0 2d08fbf6 256671d7 f613c645 a10a924f -...%fq....E...O 873cbb0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 873cbc0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................ 873cbd0 00000000 070f1f3f 7f081020 4080070f .......?... @... @@ -609391,4 +609391,4 @@ 0000 4f737057 67004f73 70574700 OspWg.OspWG. Contents of section .gnu_debuglink: 0000 6363316f 626a2e64 65627567 00000000 cc1obj.debug.... - 0010 2da55113 -.Q. + 0010 edb820e1 .. . compare /.build.oldpackages/gcc46-objc-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gcc46-objc-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm --- /tmp/tmp.ndVBNIYink 2012-04-13 18:56:20.428000065 +0000 +++ /tmp/tmp.AvenOFNYyF 2012-04-13 18:56:20.460000065 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -debuginfo(build-id) 32776 bd53b87c7a9846e7472d405e5114f0b877a3c9dd +debuginfo(build-id) 32776 003e2939e5a8b6d94433ff7d7a121e7c95730359 gcc46-objc-debuginfo 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ gcc46-objc-debuginfo(x86-32) 8 4.6.3_20120301-@RELEASE@ RPM meta information is different compare /.build.oldpackages/libada46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libada46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libada46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libada46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libgcc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libgcc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libgcc46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libgcc46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libgfortran46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libgfortran46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libgfortran46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libgfortran46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libgomp46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libgomp46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libgomp46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libgomp46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libobjc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libobjc46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libobjc46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libobjc46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libquadmath46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libquadmath46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libquadmath46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libquadmath46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libstdc++46-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libstdc++46-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libstdc++46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libstdc++46-debuginfo-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libstdc++46-devel-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.i586.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/libstdc++46-devel-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.i586.rpm compare /.build.oldpackages/libstdc++46-doc-4.6.3_20120301-3.5.noarch.rpm /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/libstdc++46-doc-4.6.3_20120301-3.6.noarch.rpm comparing /.build.oldpackages/rpmlint.log and /home/abuild/rpmbuild/OTHER/rpmlint.log rpmlint.log files differ: --- /.build.oldpackages/rpmlint.log 2012-04-13 17:28:29.000000000 +0000 +++ /home/abuild/rpmbuild/OTHER/rpmlint.log 2012-04-13 18:51:05.064000065 +0000 @@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ libraries. It must not be called a lib-package then. Give it a more sensible name. +libgomp46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libgomp1 +libstdc++46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libstdc++6 libgfortran46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libgfortran3 -libquadmath46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libquadmath0 libobjc46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libobjc3 libgcc46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libgcc_s1 -libstdc++46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libstdc++6 -libgomp46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libgomp1 +libquadmath46.i586: W: shlib-legacy-policy-name-error libquadmath0 Your shared library package is not named after its SONAME, but it has been added to the list of legacy exceptions. Please do not rename the package until SONAME changes, but if you have to rename it for another reason, make sure you @@ -74,14 +74,14 @@| -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3