openSUSE Build Service March 2012

buildservice@lists.opensuse.org

72 participants
73 discussions

[opensuse-buildservice] Getting old _service:*.spec file in a _link

by Cristian Morales Vega

See https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=lightspark&project=home%3A… The _service:format_spec_file:lightspark.spec file uses CMAKE_SKIP_RPATH instead of the CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH from the original .spec file. It's from an old revision and I have no idea why it appeared there when I added the "<topadd>%define _with_ffmpeg 1</topadd>" line to the _link file. If you check the date you can see the _service file is older than the original .spec file!! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] wine-devel-32bit in home:RedDwarf not available to x86_64 build

by Cristian Morales Vega

Marcus was kind enough to add a wine-devel-32bit subpackage that is now available in Factory. Because of this now my lmms x86-64 build has VST support. To support it also in 12.1 I linked the wine package from the devel project to my home repo. I even added the "ExportFilter: ^wine.*\.i586.rpm$ . x86_64" line to my prjconf, even if I guess it is inherited from the openSUSE:12.1 prjconf. But home:RedDwarf/lmms in openSUSE_12.1/x86_64 is still in the unresolvable state because it can't find wine-devel-32bit. So... what I'm doing wrong? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] building 32bit in Fedora16 x86_64

by Olaf Hering

How can a package in Fedora 16 x86_64 build 32bit binaries? In the various SuSE repos it can be done with BuildRequires: glibc-devel-32bit. I tried BuildRequires: glibc-devel.i686, but that does not seem to work. Installing the i686 variants of glibc, glibc-devel and nss-softokn-freebl manually into a local x86_64 build chroot and using osc build --no-init fixes the compile errors for me. The project where I would like to use this feature is home:olh:testing-xen-unstable Olaf -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] master now requires rails 3.2 and other gems

by Stephan Kulow

Hi, Just a little warning - I merged my rails 3.2 port into master, creating some problems aside that you should be aware of if you want to play with master: - hidden projects are visible for generic cases, most routes use check_access? though, which still works. - api has no more user/group/role management web page. Of course you can still create users using the console - exception_notifier is patched out right now - we require specific versions of all gems now. All versions needed will be in openSUSE:Tools:Unstable - but you're free to use them from rubyforge if you prefer. But bundle will make sure you have them in the same version. - we require mysql2 driver instead of mysql as OBS 2.3 - this is also the rails recommended driver and it has much better performance. You need to adapt your config/database.yml - your environment.rb will need to be patched For the later I also changed the way these development.$HOMENAME.rb files work. In the past they were a full copy of development.rb, which required to add all defaults there too. Now you can overwrite all config options or CONFIG elements in a development.$HOMENAME.rb file, but you can just leave it all out. For reference, my file looks like this: > CONFIG['source_host'] = "localhost" > CONFIG['source_port'] = 5352 > > OBSApi::Application.configure do > config.cache_store = :memory_store > end The webui is still rails 2.3, but this will change soonish, fortunately rails-3_2 and rails-2_3 are co-installable. But you need to be aware that "rails" will most likely be 2.3, so you use rails-3_2 for stuff. Ah, btw: rails 3 no longer has a ./script/console or a ./script/server. This is all done by rails-3_2 now, so use e.g. "rails-3_2 server -e test" Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] bugzilla or OBS for pushing patches upstream

by Darin Perusich

Hello All, I'm curious to know if there's a preferred method for pushing features/patches to packages upstream in the distribution. I created a feature/bug request in bugzilla to which the response was basically "patches are welcome". So I patched and tested this feature to the app and posted the patches to the bugzilla ticket and nothing, no response or followups. That's fine, i know people are busy and my request may not be of much importance to others, but I do feel this feature is valuable and it's availability will be a dependency on another packaging modification request I plan on creating. At this point would I be better served by branching the package in OBS, applying my patches, and creating an SR or just wait for the things to work there way through bugzilla? While I'd like to see this pushed out to all supported distro releases I realize this may not be an option, but with the 12.2 RC around the corner I'd be happy with it making that release. Thanks! -- Later, Darin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] Disk size limit in the BS virtual host

by Petr Mladek

Hi, please, what is the disk size limit of the virtual hosts in the Build Service? LibreOffice-3.4 build failed with the following error message: --- cut --- Using BUILD_ROOT=/var/cache/obs/worker/root_10/.mount Using BUILD_ARCH=x86_64:i686:i586:i486:i386 Doing kvm build in /var/cache/obs/worker/root_10/root build30 started "build libreoffice.spec" at Thu Mar 29 16:08:18 UTC 2012. Building libreoffice for project 'LibreOffice:Unstable' repository 'openSUSE_12.1' arch 'x86_64' srcmd5 '8d3c3d8ce83f060f391c6862dc285cf1' [...] Unable to write payload to /home/abuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libreoffice-debuginfo-3.5.2.2-102.1.x86_64.rpm: [51477.804792] SysRq : Power Off [51479.576116] Power down. --- cut --- It succeeded on 11.2-i586. I guess that it is because the binaries and debuginfo packages a smaller there. Thus I think that I need to be very close to the disk size limit. I am going to remove debuginfo as temporary solution. I will also check if anything crazy happens during build, e.g. too detailed logs. I wonder what limit I need to reach ;-) Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] exim build for RHEL 6 target missing xorg-x11-server-sdk

by Lars Müller

Hi, exim used to build for RedHat_RHEL-6 in the past. Now we get by calling: server:mail/exim> osc build RedHat_RHEL-6 x86_64 exim.spec ... buildinfo is broken... it says: unresolvable: nothing provides xorg-x11-server-sdk The same üackage sources used to built in the past. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] The "download package" page hasn't data anymore

by cedric.vincent＠st.com

Hello OBS developers, The "download" page for my packages hasn't data anymore, even when I explicitly enable the publish flag for all repositories. Please could you help me to understand what I did wrong? Example: http://software.opensuse.org/download/package?project=home:cedric-vincent&p… https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=PRoot&project=home%3Acedric… Thanks in advance, Cédric. PS: Congratulation and many thanks for this great build framework! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] Re: [PATCH] - do_update: rewrote code path for expanding/unexpanding a wc

by Michael Schroeder

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:45:34PM +0200, OBS osc wrote: > From: Marcus Huewe <suse-tux(a)gmx.de> > > The way for determining the revision was completely "wrong". > [...] > - rev = show_upstream_xsrcmd5(p.apiurl, p.prjname, p.name, revision=p.rev, linkrev='base') > - p.mark_frozen() > - else: > - p.update(rev, opts.server_side_source_service_files, opts.limit_size) > - rev = p.linkinfo.xsrcmd5 > + rev = p.latest_rev(expand=True) > print 'Expanding to rev', rev > elif opts.unexpand_link and p.islink() and p.isexpanded(): > - p.update(rev, opts.server_side_source_service_files, opts.limit_size) > - # XXX: calling update again is redundant (see below) > - rev = p.rev > + rev = show_upstream_rev(p.apiurl, p.prjname, p.name, meta=p.meta) > print 'Unexpanding to rev', rev That can't work if you didn't check out the latest version, but some older rev. Really, you can check out an expanded link (by supplying the xsrcmd5) and then it should be possible to switch to the unexpanded view. That's what the linkrev's lsrcmd5 is for. If you're not using it you're doing somethink wrong ;) Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder mls(a)suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

[opensuse-buildservice] Re: [PATCH] - do not verify signatures during build, the inner system is anyway not trustable and osc checks it already (bnc#433206)

by Michael Schroeder

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:41:14AM +0200, OBS build wrote: > From: Adrian Schröter <adrian(a)suse.de> > > --- > build | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/build b/build > index 6b6a526..a6d4223 100755 > --- a/build > +++ b/build > @@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ for SPECFILE in "${SPECFILES[@]}" ; do > test -z "$BUILD_RPM_BUILD_STAGE" && BUILD_RPM_BUILD_STAGE=-ba > > # XXX: move _srcdefattr to macro file? > - rpmbopts=("$BUILD_RPM_BUILD_STAGE" "--define" "_srcdefattr (-,root,root)") > + rpmbopts=("$BUILD_RPM_BUILD_STAGE" "--nosignature" "--define" "_srcdefattr (-,root,root)") > if [ -n "$ABUILD_TARGET" ]; then > rpmbopts[${#rpmbopts[@]}]="--target=$ABUILD_TARGET" > fi Hmm, I think older rpm versions (SLES9?) don't support --nosignature. I might be mistaken, though. M. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 9 months

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Build Service March 2012