June 2011 - openSUSE Build Service - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-buildservice] Licenses
by Pavol Rusnak 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Hi! I just saw the following OBS request from Ciaran: >> Correct syntax from http://spdx.org/licenses/ >> -License: BSD >> +License: BSD-3-Clause I noticed that there was licensing crossdistro summit at LinuxTag. Does that mean that all distributions agreed to use abbreviations from the mentioned document in their packages? (I recon we were using BSD3c for this particular license, also we use GPLv2+ while the document mentions GPL-2.0+). If yes, then it is really cool and you should do a blogpost about the results of the summit (which you should do anyway I guess ;-)). Also there should be a tool that fixes spec file entries in OBS automagically and we'll put the same replacement magic in our spec-cleaner ... Thanks for the clarification! -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o openSUSE Boosters Team Lihovarska 1060/12 PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9 prusnak[at]opensuse.org Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

4 3

[opensuse-buildservice] [gsoc] osc code cleanup - summary of week 2
by Marcus Hüwe 06 Jun '11

06 Jun '11

Hi, here's a small summary of the 2nd (coding) week. This week I spent most of my time with working on an OO-style class for doing http requests: * it's possible to switch the http(s) implementation without touching any library code * supports response validation (if a schema was specified for the request) Currently I'm still working on the "remote models": * decided to use lxml.objectify [1]: - goal is to encapsulate the xml logic solely into the object itself - example workflow: prj = RemoteProject('some_name') prj.title = 'dummy' prj.description = 'foo bar' repo = prj.add_repository(name='openSUSE_Factory') repo.add_path(project='openSUSE:Factory', repository='standard') repo.add_arch('i586') # change arch to x86_64 repo.arch[0] = 'x86_64' repo.save() Minor stuff: * decided to use the "logging" module: this way we can easily add "debug" and "info" etc. messages and it's up to the "client" which messages it wants to display (I'm not talking about the messages which are displayed when "osc up" is called or something like that) Marcus [1] http://lxml.de/objectify.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-buildservice] python fails on obs
by peer 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

Hi, Looks like my previous message got rejected by the mailman... My python packages fails. They are just backports from Debian and so builds fine on Debian an Ubuntu, but they fail at OBS :( Because pretty some packages rely on python, I end up in a dependency hell for my project. Comments, support would be welcome. ~P https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=python-… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-buildservice] Random build failures
by Guido Berhoerster 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

Hello, I'm getting seemingly random build failures because of error: Couldn't exec /usr/lib/rpm/mimetypes.prov: No such file or directory Manually triggering a rebuild mostly results in a successful build. -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-buildservice] Re: [PATCH] - add 'requestbugownership' command for setting the bugowner via request
by Sascha Peilicke 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

Just as a side note, this is not the first example, but one of those commits that made a total rewrite necessary. By quality, the last ones by Ludwig and Vincent aren't any better either. Ideally, fixing sth. shouldn't be only about adding lines but about re-factoring lines. Otherwise the next commiter might be tempted to add his personal 'osc scratchmyback' command w/o communication too. @suse-tux: For the osc rewrite, I strongly urge you to enforce peer-reviews for commits. Or even better, don't let anyone commit directly but let them file merge requests, which can be reviewed and commented appropriatly. Otherwise the new osc will end up exactly like the current one, as an unmaintainable pile of crap code. We also should think about adapting a similar policy for OBS code, but I fear this would break quite some odd habbits... On Wednesday 01 June 2011 09:28:33 OBS osc wrote: > From: Adrian Schröter <adrian(a)suse.de> > > --- > NEWS | 1 + > osc/commandline.py | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > index f9bb6a6..3002937 100644 > --- a/NEWS > +++ b/NEWS > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > 0.132 > - rdelete and undelete command requesting now a comment > + - add 'requestbugownership' command for setting the bugowner via request > # > # Features which requires OBS 2.3 > # > diff --git a/osc/commandline.py b/osc/commandline.py > index 2090d7b..04c091f 100644 > --- a/osc/commandline.py > +++ b/osc/commandline.py > @@ -1533,18 +1533,23 @@ Please submit there instead, or use > --nodevelproject to force direct submission. > > @cmdln.option('-m', '--message', metavar='TEXT', > help='specify message TEXT') > - @cmdln.option('-r', '--role', metavar='role', default='maintainer', > + @cmdln.option('-r', '--role', metavar='role', > help='specify user role (default: maintainer)') > + @cmdln.alias("reqbugownership") > + @cmdln.alias("requestbugownership") > @cmdln.alias("reqmaintainership") > @cmdln.alias("reqms") > + @cmdln.alias("reqbs") > def do_requestmaintainership(self, subcmd, opts, *args): > - """${cmd_name}: requests to add user as maintainer > + """${cmd_name}: requests to add user as maintainer or bugowner > > usage: > osc requestmaintainership # for > current user in checked out package osc requestmaintainership USER > # for specified user in checked out package osc > requestmaintainership PROJECT PACKAGE # for current user osc > requestmaintainership PROJECT PACKAGE USER # request for specified > user + > + osc requestbugownership ... # accepts > same parameters but uses bugowner role > > ${cmd_option_list} > """ > @@ -1570,14 +1575,23 @@ Please submit there instead, or use > --nodevelproject to force direct submission. else: > raise oscerr.WrongArgs('Wrong number of arguments.') > > - if not opts.role in ('maintainer', 'bugowner'): > + role = 'maintainer' > + if subcmd in ( 'reqbugownership', 'requestbugownership', 'reqbs' > ): + role = 'bugowner' > + if opts.role: > + role = opts.role > + if not role in ('maintainer', 'bugowner'): > raise oscerr.WrongOptions('invalid \'--role\': either specify > \'maintainer\' or \'bugowner\'') if not opts.message: > opts.message = edit_message() > > r = Request() > - r.add_action('add_role', tgt_project=project, tgt_package=package, > - person_name=user, person_role=opts.role) > + if role == 'bugowner': > + r.add_action('set_bugowner', tgt_project=project, > tgt_package=package, + person_name=user) > + else: > + r.add_action('add_role', tgt_project=project, > tgt_package=package, + person_name=user, person_role=role) > r.description = cgi.escape(opts.message or '') > r.create(apiurl) > print r.reqid -- With kind regards, Sascha Peilicke SUSE Linux Products GmbH - GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany - HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

3 4