openSUSE Build Service December 2007

buildservice@lists.opensuse.org

59 participants
60 discussions

by aledr

Sorry, let me clarify... I'm using a local build service on my own server, and that is the repo I want. I think that I should create a vhost for that. 2007/12/18, Andrea <andreafl(a)libero.it>: > The only repo now avaible is that one: > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/Admin/openSUSE_10.2/ > > the suse 10.3 one will be avaible only when the first rpm will be built > succesfully, address will be > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/Admin/openSUSE_10.3/ > > aledr ha scritto: > > Good day! > > > > Where should I point the URLs to access the repositories > > (/srv/obs/build/home\:Admin/openSUSE_10.3/[i586,x86_64])? > > It shows api.opensuse.org and download.opensuse.org instead my server address... > > > Thanks! -- [ ]'s Aledr - Alexandre "OpenSource Solutions for SmallBusiness Problems" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] Repos URLs

by aledr

Good day! Where should I point the URLs to access the repositories (/srv/obs/build/home\:Admin/openSUSE_10.3/[i586,x86_64])? It shows api.opensuse.org and download.opensuse.org instead my server address... -- [ ]'s Aledr - Alexandre "OpenSource Solutions for SmallBusiness Problems" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] OO-dep prob in 11.0

by M9.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, 'zypper dup' brings: 2 problemen: Probleem: No valid solution found with just resolvables which suitalbe best suitable for your system. Probleem: Dit zou OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch ongeldig maken. Probleem: No valid solution found with just resolvables which suitalbe best suitable for your system. With this run only resolvables with the best fit have been regarded. Het overwegen van alle mogelijke oplosbaren neemt enige tijd in beslag maar kan een bruikbaar resultaat opleveren. Oplossing 1: Voer een oplosbaarheidsdraai uit met ALLE mogelijkheden. Alle oplosbaren met geschikte architectuur worden overwogen. Choose the number, (s)kip, (r)etry or (c)ancel> 1 Oplossing 1 wordt toegepast Probleem: Dit zou OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch ongeldig maken. er is niet voldaan aan de vereisten voor OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch === OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch === OpenOffice_org-2.3.1-2.i586[openSUSE-FACTORY_11.0_1] levert OpenOffice_org == 2.3.1-2, maar een andere versie van pakket is al geïnstalleerd. OpenOffice_org-2.3.1-3.x86_64 levert OpenOffice_org == 2.3.1-3, maar is aangemerkt voor deïnstallatie. Aan de vereiste OpenOffice_org == 2.3.1 voor OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch kan niet worden voldaan OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch zal opnieuw worden geëvalueerd voor installatie door language:nl-.noarch (nl == ) Oplossing 1: OpenOffice_org-nl verwijderen OpenOffice_org-nl-2.3.1-2.noarch verwijderen Choose the number, (s)kip, (r)etry or (c)ancel> - -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.24-rc4-git6-2-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: monkey9@tribal-sfn2 Systeem: openSUSE 11.0 (x86_64) Alpha0 KDE: 3.5.8 "release 24" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHZ4msX5/X5X6LpDgRAgOaAJ97OFdRlPeR/CbfEpX3MfxhC3ykwwCeIpix T4Q7+M5j5iZZ7yHuKDz2Gp0= =Cn2L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] links from games:libs to openSUSE:Factory

by Dominique Leuenberger

Hello, I've seen that many libraries from games:libs are actually links to the equivalent of openSUSE:Factory. As this helps us always having the latest of the lib available in games:libs, it also imposes a big risk of instability on older products. So for the moment, SDL_ttf for example does not build for older Distros (SUSE 10.0 for example) because of missing BuildRequires. Of course they can all be adjusted in the Project-Config of SUSE:10.0. But is this what we want? Do we want to offer games:* in a 'stable and tested' way or do we want to offer whatever bleeding edge we get in Factory? I'm actually in favour of the stable part. The ones that want factory, will likely go for installing factory. Comments are highly appreciated. Dominique -- Sorry for the annoying disclaimer. TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 77 offices in 60 countries and over 2,500 professionals (2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] Expansion error on Fedora 7 and 8

by Jordi Mas

Hello, I'm trying to build gbrainy package[1] on Fedora 7 and Fedora 8 (it builds correctly on OpenSuse). I get the following error: "nothing provides glade-sharp2, nothing provides gnome-sharp2" It looks like the substitutes for these packages should be added for Fedora 7 and Fedora 8. Any suggestion on how to fix this? Thanks, [1] http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jordimas/ -- Jordi Mas i Hernàndez, HomePage http://www.softcatala.org/~jmas/ Bloc personal http://www.softcatala.org/~jmas/bloc/ Planeta Softcatalà: http://www.softcatala.org/planet/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] patterns for speciffic build targets

by Michal Marek

Hi, Following http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service_Tutorial#Create_Patterns , I'm trying to create some patterns (`osc meta -e mattern') for the server:php project. My goal is to - create a pattern, say PHP5, that installs php5 packages from the correstonding "base distro" repository, eg. when on 10.2, it would install from download.o.o/repositories/server:/php/openSUSE_10.2/ - create a pattern Apache2_and_PHP5, that installs php5 packages built against the Apache project, that is install from software.o.o/repositories/server:/php/server_apache_openSUSE_10.2/ _and_ from software.o.o/repositories/Apache/openSUSE_10.2/ - likewise for the server:database builds and the not yet present server:database + Apache combined builds My problem is that I don't know how to restrict a pattern to just some build targets. I created an Apache2_and_PHP5 pattern, but the resulting Apache2_and_PHP5.ymp files of course show up everywhere. I'd like to have different patterns with different descriptions for different build combinations. thanks, Michal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] expansion error

by Martin Trautmann

Hi, the tips and tricks page recommends to report expansion errors to this email address. I am trying to compile project "home:trautm" for Feodora 8 and get the following expansion error: have choice for text-www-browser needed by docbook-utils: lynx elinks w3m I don't need a text-www-browser, so I don't care which one is chosen. kind regards, Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] packages not published in 10.3 repo

by CyberOrg

Hi The packages built yesterday in home:cyberorg have not appeared in : http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cyberorg/openSUSE_10.3/ They have appeared properly in SUSE_Factory repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cyberorg/SUSE_Factory/ Publish is enabled, can anyone have a look what happened there? Thanks -J --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] Unable to build kernel modules

by Jon Nelson

I've recently run into a problem. I updated my specfile for an updated version of the upstream module. The only changes I made were to the version info, and I scheduled a rebuild, which appeared to work. However, only the src rpm got built. Eventually, I tracked it down to %flavors_to_build is now, somehow, empty. I am using the opensuse 10.3 updated repo. I do depend on kernel-source (which provides the appropriate rpm smarts): BuildRequires: kernel-source procps module-init-tools and I am including the appropriate macro: %suse_kernel_module_package kdump um In %build I have this: echo "Building Flavors: %flavors_to_build" and in the build log I see: + echo 'Building Flavors: ' Building Flavors: The kernel-source package being installed by the build service is: installing kernel-source-2.6.22.13-0.3 which is the same that I have at home. The same specfile (via rpmbuild -ba ...) works fine at home. Can anybody tell me what's going on? -- Jon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

[opensuse-buildservice] Suggested package updates

by Krzysztof Kotlenga

Hi. Suggested package updates: Name Current New Repos ---------------------------------------------------------- python-qt4 4.3 4.3.3 standard, devel:languages:python python-sip 4.7 4.7.3 standard, devel:languages:python eric 4.0.1 4.0.3 standard gajim 0.11.1 0.11.4 server:messaging gpsd 2.34 2.35 Application:Geo lyx 1.5.1 1.5.2 standard, KDE:Backports ntfsprogs 1.13 2.0.0 standard, filesystems BTW: Which mailing list is best for reporting outdated packages? Where can I know why some packages are in more than one repo? Why standard repo is so poor and I have to use gazillion of BS repos? -- Krzysztof Kotlenga <piernik$gmail,com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help(a)opensuse.org

13 years, 1 month

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openSUSE Build Service December 2007