openSUSE Packaging December 2012

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

45 participants
36 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging Guideline enforcement

by Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar

Dear Factory contributors and packagers, As openSUSE 12.2 is frozen and Factory is 'open to go wild' again, I would like to announce that the packaging guidelines have some extensions (not really new) that will be stricter enforced than they used to be. Currently a common rule to be 'ignored' or packagers are not aware is around the topics of: - .Changes entries - Patches First, the .changes entry (rpm changelog) surves two purposes: - News for the user - History tracking of packaging changes (often referenced in bugs to verify if a user has the latest packaging bugfixeS). A simple "Update to version x.y.z" is, as before, not accepted. There should be some buzz around the update for the user; some major reasons to the upgrade should be listed Changes on the package itself should be mentioned in a way that any other contributor to the same package can follow traces of why something is the way it is. Commonly, Added (build)dependencies are interesting to be seen, special hacks to make something work in a particular way [..]: Always consider that package maintenance is a distributed task and various contributors need to be able to step up at will. Patches: The rules about patches are listed at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Patches_guidelines . Most prominent is likely the mentioning of the patches life cycle, which forces you to mention additions and removals of patches in the changelog. As history shows, this can be helpful if a patch got removed, and later a regression is reported; finding out when a patch was removed can be crucial in reconstructing feature sets (including contacting the contributor that dropped it.. which is easily extracted from the .changes if listed) The main appeal is to the devel project maintainers / reviewers, to keep out for those rules, to live according to them, as it is frustrating for everybody if a package needs to be declined by the Factory Review team: - The dev prj maintainer is the one getting the 'decline' (as it was usually a forwarded request), which often leaves the 'fixing' to the devel project maintainers, where the 'originator' of the fix would have been willing to actually do that... And the Factory Review team also prefers to see complying submissions to having to reject SRs... reject is not fun for anybody! Looking forward to many more SRs to accept! Dominique / DimStar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] Package looking for volunteers: CodeAnalyst

by Cristian Morales Vega

As per https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=793541 it seems CodeAnalyst needs a new maintainer. Any volunteer? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

7 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] package looking for maintainer: the AT daemon

by Cristian Rodríguez

Hi: I will no longer maintain fix or otherwise care about the "at" daemon, starting now because I would rather devout my time testing and improving systemd.timer(5) So it is now up for grabs. that's all ;) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years

[opensuse-packaging] ldconfig - I'm frustrated

by Greg Freemyer

All, I sent the httrack package to security a couple weeks ago. It builds, but with a few rpmlint issues. I thought I would clean up the one about the shared library needing to be split out to its own package. I've tried to do that in home:gregfreemyer:branches:security > httrack The diff is: https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff?opackage=httrack&oproject=security… I've tried multiple ways to call ldconfig. But my build always fails with: [ 218s] libhttrack2.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin (Badness: 300) /usr/lib64/libhtsjava.so.2.0.46 [ 218s] libhttrack2.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin (Badness: 300) /usr/lib64/libhttrack.so.2.0.46 [ 218s] This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a [ 218s] call to ldconfig. The spec file currently has: === %post /sbin/ldconfig /usr/lib64 %postun /sbin/ldconfig /usr/lib64 === I've tried the basic versions as well. == %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig == %post /sbin/ldconfig %postun /sbin/ldconfig == Can anyone tell me what's going on? Thanks Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 3 months

[opensuse-packaging] Factory Status (2012/12/28)

by Cristian Morales Vega

This time I didn't report the new problems. Simply we are in Christmas and people is less active. But just in case somebody feels like fixing something, here is the list. In any case the list is too long, We have six build failures because sblim-sfcb removed its /etc/init.d/sfcb file to use only Systemd and those packages restart the service in the scriplets. Then there are also a few C# failures. And the classic failures from the kernel update. Name Devel Project Bug report Status - selinux-policy security:SELinux bnc#789160 Fails for 136 days: error(s) encountered while parsing configuration (Request 145734 to openSUSE:Factory) - hawk network:ha-clustering:Factory bnc#789165 Fails for 95 days: cannot load such file -- gettext/tools/rgettext (rails 2 vs rails 3?) (Request 146273 to openSUSE:Factory) - psi network bnc#789178 Fails for 85 days: error: 'OtrlMessageAppOps' has no member named 'notify' (Different changes in devel project (since 15 days)) - gnome-do-plugins GNOME:Apps bnc#789193 Fails for 85 days: Type `FlickrNet.FoundUser' does not contain a definition for `Username' - qutim KDE:Distro:Factory bnc#789195 Fails for 85 days: libotr update - f-spot GNOME:Apps bnc#789196 Fails for 85 days: The type or namespace name `Licenses' could not be found - pcsc-asedriveiiie-usb security:chipcard bnc#793542 Fails for 52 days: /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/*.rules not found - ksymoops Base:System bnc#793544 Fails for 47 days: #error config.h must be included before this header - excalibur Java:packages bnc#793551 Fails for 47 days: error: method checkPackage in class Component cannot be applied - postgresql server:database:postgresql bnc#793553 Fails for 45 days: timezone package needed for timezone (Different changes in devel project (since 3 months)) - libzypp-bindings zypp:Head bnc#793554 Fails for 45 days: test suite fails - webyast-base YaST:Web bnc#793558 Fails for 40 days: No such file or directory - /var/lib/polkit-1/ (Request 146369 to openSUSE:Factory) - libimobiledevice mobile:synchronization:FACTORY bnc#796133 Fails for 25 days: Overriding final methods is not allowed - compiz X11:Compiz bnc#789161 Fails for 19 days: kwin 4.10 - mono-tools Mono:Factory Fails for 18 days: error CS1061: Type `Mono.Cecil.Cil.ExceptionHandler' does not contain a definition for `FilterEnd' (Different sources in devel project (since about 1 month)) - nant Mono:Factory Fails for 18 days: missing framework mono - gnome-do GNOME:Apps Fails for 18 days: error CS0012: The type `Do.Platform.Linux.IConfigurable' is defined in an assembly - gbrainy GNOME:Apps Fails for 18 days: error CS1729: The type `Mono.CSharp.Report' does not contain a constructor - docky GNOME:Apps Fails for 18 days: Assuming assembly reference `Mono.Cairo - libvirt-cim Virtualization Fails for 18 days: /etc/init.d/sfcb: No such file or directory (Systemd port) - sblim-cmpi-ssh_service_profile systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 18 days: /etc/init.d/sfcb: No such file or directory (Systemd port) - sblim-cmpi-power_supply_profile systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 18 days: /etc/init.d/sfcb: No such file or directory (Systemd port) - sblim-cmpi-fan_profile systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 18 days: /etc/init.d/sfcb: No such file or directory (Systemd port) - sblim-cmpi-ethport_profile systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 18 days: /etc/init.d/sfcb: No such file or directory (Systemd port) - sblim-cmpi-boot_control_profile systemsmanagement:wbem Fails for 18 days: /etc/init.d/sfcb: No such file or directory (Systemd port) - smuxi GNOME:Apps Fails for 18 days: error CS0305: Using the generic type `System.Action<T>' requires `1' type argument(s) (New upstream version 0.8.10.12100 available) - perl-Sys-Virt Virtualization Fails for 17 days: libvirt >= 1.0.0 is required - atspiuiasource Mono:Factory Fails for 17 days: Warning as Error: Assuming assembly reference `WindowsBase - uiadbus Mono:Factory Fails for 17 days: Warning as Error: Assuming assembly reference `WindowsBase - uiaatkbridge Mono:Factory Fails for 17 days: Warning as Error: Assuming assembly reference `WindowsBase - uiautomationwinforms Mono:Factory Fails for 17 days: Warning as Error: Assuming assembly reference `WindowsBase - xerces-j2-bootstrap openSUSE:Factory Fails for 13 days: the typical java one - python-nose devel:languages:python Fails for 10 days: assert 'test_timeout' in log - haveged security Fails for 10 days: failing test suite (Request 146266 to openSUSE:Factory) - ImageMagick graphics Fails for 10 days: failing test suite - calibre Documentation:Tools Fails for 9 days: /etc/bash_completion.d/calibre not found (Different changes in devel project (since 3 days)) - bundle-lang-gnome-extras openSUSE:Factory Fails for 9 days: dia graphs are missing - libwebkit3 openSUSE:Factory Fails for 9 days: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: - _product:openSUSE-ftp-livetree-gnome-i586 Fails for 9 days: outdated lists - _product:openSUSE-ftp-livetree-gnome-x86_64 Fails for 9 days: outdated lists - kernel-vanilla openSUSE:Factory Fails for 8 days: worker ran out of disc space (Request 146394 to openSUSE:Factory) - gstreamer-0_10-plugins-bad multimedia:libs Fails for 8 days: error: expected ')' before '__attribute__' - iscsitarget hardware Fails for 8 days: Kernel 3.7 - hdjmod hardware Fails for 8 days: Kernel 3.7 (Request 146314 to openSUSE:Factory) - ndiswrapper hardware Fails for 8 days: Kernel 3.7 - virtualbox Virtualization Fails for 8 days: Kernel 3.7 - xtables-addons security:netfilter Fails for 8 days: Kernel 3.7 (Request 146265 to openSUSE:Factory) - coreutils-testsuite openSUSE:Factory Fails for 8 days: broken spec - cogl GNOME:Factory Fails for 8 days: compiling docu fails (libxml?) - ibus M17N Fails for 8 days: compiling docu fails (libxml?) - installation-images system:install:head Fails for 7 days: no such package: libnl-* - libdlm network:ha-clustering:Factory Fails for 7 days: Unknown build failure - gdome2 GNOME:Apps Fails for 7 days: Unknown build failure - yast2-installation YaST:Head Fails for 7 days: Unknown build failure -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 5 months

[opensuse-packaging] Common LIsp packaging

by Alex Naumov

Hello everyone, as you know, we're recently formed a team that will take care of the packaging guidelines and introduced a small process to change them: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_guidelines_change_process I would like to start discussion about Common Lisp and create Lisp packaging related rules. The first version of it you can find there: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Lisp (please discuss here before edit something in wiki) I don't know how many Lisp developers we have, but I invite everybody to find and create most interesting, correct and optimal packaging rules for openSUSE distribution. Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 5 months

[opensuse-packaging] removal help -line: %suse_update_config.

by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au

Hello How is the following error fixed: Thanks Glenn Part of log shown below. Full Log see [1] Here is the spec file[2] Question: What can replace this section ? %{?suse_update_config:%{suse_update_config -f}} aclocal --force libtoolize --force autoconf --force autoheader --force automake -afc CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wall -Wno-unused" \ ./configure \ --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --libdir=%{_libdir} \ --bindir=%{_bindir} \ --includedir=%{_includedir} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} make %{?jobs:-j%jobs} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wall -Wno-unused" entire log see [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=x86_64&package=reise… . . [ 58s] + exec rpmbuild -ba --define '_srcdefattr (-,root,root)' --nosignature --define '_build_create_debug 1' --define 'disturl obs://build.opensuse.org/home:doiggl/openSUSE_12.2/cdaef9d019b97ec53d83b9f7…' /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs.spec [ 58s] Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XZ0ADg [ 58s] + umask 022 [ 58s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 58s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 58s] + rm -rf reiser4progs-1.0.7 [ 58s] + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-1.0.7.tar.bz2 [ 58s] + /bin/tar -xf - [ 59s] + STATUS=0 [ 59s] + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' [ 59s] + cd reiser4progs-1.0.7 [ 59s] + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . [ 59s] + echo 'Patch #1 (fsck-dont-allocate-unalloc-extents.patch):' [ 59s] Patch #1 (fsck-dont-allocate-unalloc-extents.patch): [ 59s] + /usr/bin/cat /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/fsck-dont-allocate-unalloc-extents.patch [ 59s] + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0 [ 59s] + echo 'Patch #2 (reiser4progs-fsck-handle-unprepped-cluster.patch):' [ 59s] Patch #2 (reiser4progs-fsck-handle-unprepped-cluster.patch): [ 59s] + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0 [ 59s] + /usr/bin/cat /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/reiser4progs-fsck-handle-unprepped-cluster.patch [ 59s] + exit 0 [ 59s] Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9M0EQf [ 59s] + umask 022 [ 59s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 59s] + /usr/bin/rm -rf /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reiser4progs-1.0.7-5.1.x86_64 [ 59s] ++ dirname /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reiser4progs-1.0.7-5.1.x86_64 [ 59s] + /usr/bin/mkdir -p /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT [ 59s] + /usr/bin/mkdir /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reiser4progs-1.0.7-5.1.x86_64 [ 59s] + cd reiser4progs-1.0.7 [ 59s] + echo 'WARNING: REMOVE %suse_update_config. If your sources are really' [ 59s] WARNING: REMOVE %suse_update_config. If your sources are really [ 59s] + echo 'too old to cover current architectures, prefer autoreconf --force --install' [ 59s] too old to cover current architectures, prefer autoreconf --force --install [ 59s] + autoreconf --force --install [ 59s] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9M0EQf: line 33: autoreconf: command not found [ 59s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9M0EQf (%build) [ 59s] [ 59s] [ 59s] RPM build errors: [ 59s] Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9M0EQf (%build) [ 61s] /.build/build: line 313: 239 Killed background_monitor_process / &>/dev/null [ 63s] [ 49.794059] SysRq : Power Off [ 63s] [ 49.819442] Power down. [2]https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?expand=1&file=reiser4progs.s… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 5 months

[opensuse-packaging] New Package Request 146437 up-imapproxy

by Ralf Lang

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just filed an SR for "up-imapproxy" against server:mail. This is an updated and enhanced version of the specfile as original created by upstream and modified by Peer Heinlein of Heinlein Support. I'd like to have the server there to gradually improve the packaging up to distribution quality and submit it. I'm open to instead mentor newcomer maintainers on this package if they want to try. Some of the additions to the startup script (which should become a systemd file at some point) should go upstream if possible. But not before 2013 ;) rlang@rl-desktop:~/obs/home:ralflangb1:branches:home:pheinlein/up-imapproxy> osc sr server:mail up-imapproxy Warning: failed to fetch meta data for 'server:mail' package 'up-imapproxy' (new package?) created request id 146437 - -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer Tel.: +49-170-6381563 Mail: lang(a)b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDbQJgACgkQCs1dsHJ/X7APQACg144jaB4y+r0hXGejqWFrty4v ozgAnRefZ7dF9X+Jw4vv6xvo+PyFE2YT =0LcO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 5 months

[opensuse-packaging] Submitting a maintenance request - fix in devel package

by Robert Munteanu

Hi, I'd like to submit a trivial mr to fix bnc #780243 [1]. I've looked at the maintenance docs from [2] but I am missing a step. I've branched the package and have my own 12.2_Update repo, but the fixes are in the devel:languages:python repo. Do I just manually sync the sources between the devel repo and my update repo or is there another way? Thanks, Robert [1]: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=780243 [2]: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_maintenance -- Sent from my (old) computer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 5 months

[opensuse-packaging] RFC: Guidelines change - change of guidelines change process

by Michal Vyskocil

Hi all, during compilation of the changes in packaging wiki, I have found one unclear thing, which resulted in the removal of Category:Packaging_documentation from two pages. But the fault belongs to us, because we did not make clear the following Category:Packaging_documentation is the **official** one and should be added only as a result of the review here on a list. The current phrasing """ Each page should have a [[Category:Packaging documentation]] """ is confusing. I dislike the naming of the category as well. At the moment we have two mostly overlapped packaging categories. Category:Packaging documentation with 34 pages http://en.opensuse.org/Category:Packaging_documentation Category:Packaging with 38 http://en.opensuse.org/Category:Packaging The Category documentation is intended to be the official and reviewed one, but I consider the naming extremly confusing. For that reason, I propose following 1. Create Category:Packaging_guidelines - this makes the purpose of the category clear 2. Document this category is the **official** one - on Category description page, either on guidelines change page 3. Put things, are reviewed to the category I'm afraid only Lua guidelines can be moved, atm 4. Request the addition of things from _documentation to _guidelines this will be long-term process, because for a sanity of us, only few pages should be reviewed on this ML 5. Once finished, drop the _documentation category BTW: I'm volunteer for the category moving process, but it will be better if it can be requested by interested people. Waiting on your feedback Michal Vyskocil

8 years, 5 months

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging December 2012