Hey guys, i know you are all working hard already. But, might I ask if someone
could help put a joomla package together for the edu-cd?
some called "illusio" i believe has one that with a little dumbing down might
just be easy enough for teachers to install. no offense to any teachers here,
most of my colleges are science or math teachers first , IT geeks second. ;)
already to busy to learn anything more than where is that 2k3 disk.
--
James Tremblay
Director of Technology
Newmarket School District
Newmarket NH 03857
"let's make a difference"
http://en.opensuse.org/education
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi guy's,
I build a package with java 1.5.0, but rather want to build packages with
dependency on jdk6 / java 1.6.0 .
Which package should I use? There are several peoples project.
Where can i find the officical shipped java 1.6.0 version and how can i make
it available for my project.
Thanks for help.
Denny
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
goffice contains a shared library as well as shared files (glade files
for UI elements exposed by the library) and plugins. Its install dirs
use a versioned dir system so it is parallel installable.
Questions:
1) As per exception #3 in the shlib policy the glade files could go in
libgoffice-0_6-6 or in goffice-0_6. If the latter, I assume
libgoffice-0_6-6 needs to explicity require goffice-0_6
2) Do plugins go in goffice-0_6-plugins or libgoffice-0_6-plugins?
3) Could the plugins be "Recommend"ed by libgoffice-0_6-6?
Perhaps we should add an example with parallel installable versioning?
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr(a)novell.com>
Novell, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hey everyone,
I was wondering who is maintaining the Mythtv packages for gnome's software
tools. I understand that the packages are UI independent but I have questions
about the install process i.e. there didn't seem to be a "root" mythtv
package like there is in search tool \ webpin. Any way thanks for the
packages. P.S. is anyone interested in discussing a "homeserver" \ "Media
center" build pattern?
--
James Tremblay
Director of Technology
Newmarket School District
Newmarket NH 03857
"let's make a difference"
http://en.opensuse.org/education
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi there,
i was wondering if someone build openjdk / jre packages successfully already?
As they should have the 64bit java web plug-ins included, it would be nice to
have them available ... also fro development of course.
I've seen quite some activity on ubuntu / fedora.
cheers,
denny
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
We will include -Wstrict-prototypes in RPM_OPT_FLAGS via enabling
it for -Wall soon, which will warn about non-prototypes like
void foo();
which cause problems if foo is called before its definition is reached
and arguments with default argument promotions applied do not match
the argument types. For example
void foo();
{ .. foo(1.0); .. }
void foo(float x)
{
...
}
will call foo with a double argument.
Note that
void foo();
is not a valid prototype for a function with zero arguments in C, but
void foo(void);
is. The above case will probably cause a lot of extra warnings.
Thanks,
Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi.
I wonder if there is some black magix involved to build Virtualobx on
x86_64. To my understanding it needs bin86 or dev86 to build but those
packages don't exist as x86_64 packages. So how should this be handle
in the build service?
And what does this lines in the spec file do:
# WARNING: This is not a comment, but the real command to repack souce:
#%(sh %{_sourcedir}/%{name}-patch-source VirtualBox-%{version}_OSE.tar.bz2)
It triggers an error for me.
Warm Regards,
Claes Backstrom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hello List,
i believe i have an error/bug in my repository.
Situation:
i install new rpms in my repository-folder RPMS/i586 and update repo-data
i use ftp to connect to the rpms. on first requests all is fine.
sometimes i have to change some minimal things in spec or source.
so i compile the rpm without increasing the realease and put it again in
correct folder and update also again repo-data.
now i get an error at retrieving this rpm files.
Total download size: 26 M
Downloading Packages:
ftp://user:pass@server/package.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: [Errno ftp error]
Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Trying other mirror.
Error Downloading Packages:
package: failure: package from server: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
all my tries to avoid this were not succesful. i removed this rpm an created
repo-date without it. but error occurs again if i create the repo with this
package
dont know what to do...
ftp is correct, other files on same machine work. cant find software-error
etc.
??
Thanks Andre
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Please update the icewm package to version 1.2.35. Changes since 1.2.32:
1.2.35: 2008-01-05
- Application tray bug fixes
- Add encoding/language to about dialog
1.2.34: 2007-12-27
- fix gmplayer switching to fullscreen
- popup dialog focus fixes
- fix screen change with xrandr 1.2
1.2.33: 2007-11-04
- build fixes (Bert Wesarg)
- fix FocusOnRaise
- tray fixes
- fix taskbar popup in fullscreen mode
Thanks for Michal who will probably do this :-}
--
Krzysztof Kotlenga <piernik$gmail,com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
I have an rpm to maintain.
Because it used to have some files that were owned by more than one
package, I changed it so that the files would be installed under a
second hierarchy, and copied to the original hierarchy via %post.
However, now I'm finding that I can repeatably:
1) Install 3.1.0.0 of the rpm
2) -Uvh 3.1.0.3 of the rpm
3) The files under the original hierarchy disappear. The files under
the secondary hierarchy become present. My %post that copies files from
the secondary hierarchy to the original hierarchy doesn't seem to be
getting run
4) -ivh 3.1.0.3 of the rpm
5) The files under the original hierarchy become present. It seems that
my %post is getting run
It seems like %post is only happening on -ivh, not on -Uvh, even though
the maximum rpm book says that -Uvh is basically just a -e and -ivh.
Has anyone seen anything like this before? Is there a fix?
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
