openSUSE Packaging June 2012

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

47 participants
29 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] To %make_install or to %makeinstall (spec-cleaner)

by Joop Boonen

Hi all, I have been using spec cleaner for while. What I notice it that it uses macro %make_install instead of %makeinstall. Both macros are OK for openSUSE but the first one breaks the build for SLE. <quote> + %make_install /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.59594: line 45: fg: no job control </quote> I wonder if this should be fixed, in either spec-cleaner (use%makeinstall in stead of %make_install) or in the buildserver (add macro %make_install for SLE)? Regards, Joop. See also: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712171 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] OCaml help please

by Robert Schweikert

Probably have mostly the same people on the obs list and the packaging list, but never the less I will try my luck here as well. I have a couple of requests/questions in "cleaning up" OCaml related packages and a problem. 1.) Since we have top level devel:languages:ocaml project can we please move everything that is ocaml related and maintained devel:languages:misc into the ocaml project? 2.) Do we have anyone that is really interested in OCaml or do we just have what we have because other projects/packages depend on the few packages we do have? in d:l:ocaml the ocaml package is a link to the package in Factory. The devel project for factory is d:l:misc. Because of local mods in d:l:ocaml the link is busted due to merge conflicts. This breaks other packages in d:l:ocaml. I have no idea how to fix this as every time I try to touch any of these packages to get something fixed I get a stupid: buildinfo is broken... it says: type of message. This is of course complete crap as it prevents a person trying to fix something from fixing it. In addition to the gripes above I have a problem that I am stuck on and could also use some help with. I am trying to build ocamlnet which depends on pcre. The build process failes with this error: ocamlfind ocamlc -g -I ../../src/netstring -package "unix" -custom -o ocamlrpcgen -package unix,netstring \ rpc_generator.cma main.cmo -linkpkg /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lpcre_stubs collect2: ld returned 1 exit status File "_none_", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: Error while building custom runtime system make[1]: *** [ocamlrpcgen] Error 2 Knowing nothing about OCaml build and link processes I can only infer things. Obviously the process calls ld to link a binary and passes -lpcre_stubs, this would require the presence of libpcre_stubs.so somewhere in the default search directories of ld. However, the package ocaml-pcre does not provide this, it provides a dllpcre_stubs.so file in a none-standard location (%{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs). Should ocaml-pcre create and provide a link %{_libdir}/libpcre_stubs.so to {_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs/dllpcre_stubs.so, or maybe a link in %{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs and then a -L argument on the link line? Or is there some trick that ocamlfind is supposed to play for me? Help is as always appreciated. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei(a)suse.com rschweik(a)ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] build error on Apache version 2.4.1

by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au

Hello I get a build error on Apache. The failure is as follows: . . checking whether to enable mod_lbmethod_bybusyness... shared checking whether to enable mod_lbmethod_heartbeat... shared checking which MPM to use by default... itk configure: error: MPM itk is not supported on this platform. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.U21N0a (%build) The Spec file https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=apache2.spec&package=apac… Build Log https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=apache2&proje… Project https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=apache2&project=home%3Adoig… Sources http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 Question: What to I alter in the spec file so Apache can finish compiling ? Thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging/branching/build help

by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au

Hello, This package builds ok in this location[1]. When I branch the package to [2] the package shows 'unresolvable' How can I get the branched package to build. Thanks Glenn [1]builds ok package smart of project system:packagemanager https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=system%3Apack… https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=smart&project… [2]branched location - unresolvable https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=smart&project=home%3Adoiggl -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] Interactive Package Review

by Andreas Jaeger

osc 0.135 comes with a nice feature: Interactive Package review. I've described it a bit at my blog: http://jaegerandi.blogspot.de/ Happy reviewing of packages! Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] gnome-maintainers group now maintainer of several packages

by Vincent Untz

Hi, The GNOME team is slowly moving towards workflows centered around the gnome-maintainers group in OBS. This group is made of people we trust to be able to properly deal with GNOME-related packages. One step I made today is to add gnome-maintainers with the maintainer role to the metadata of various packages, to enable any of the GNOME maintainers to accept changes for those packages. So don't be surprised about the change :-) In addition, I also added gnome-maintainers with the reviewer role for packages that, as far as I know, are 100% maintained by the GNOME team. This matches the workflow used by the team where we prefer to have a second pair of eyes review the changes before accepting sr. I specifically didn't do this changes for packages that are also updated by other people. Packages were gnome-maintainers was added as just maintainer: Base:System/polkit X11:common:Factory/poppler X11:common:Factory/poppler-data multimedia:libs/gnonlin multimedia:libs/gst-rtsp multimedia:libs/gstreamer multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10 multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-doc multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-bad multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-base multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-gl multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-good multimedia:libs/gstreamer-0_10-plugins-ugly multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-bad multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-base multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-good multimedia:libs/gstreamer-plugins-ugly multimedia:libs/orc Packages were gnome-maintainers was added as maintainer and reviewer: Base:System/udisks Base:System/udisks2 Base:System/upower M17N:fonts/cantarell-fonts X11:common:Factory/devilspie X11:common:Factory/libgxps X11:common:Factory/libspectre X11:common:Factory/media-player-info X11:common:Factory/shared-color-profiles X11:common:Factory/shared-color-targets YaST:Head/yast2-control-center-gnome devel:languages:python/python-cairo devel:languages:python/python-gnome devel:languages:python/python-gnome-extras devel:languages:python/python-gobject devel:languages:python/python-gobject2 devel:languages:python/python-goocanvas devel:languages:python/python-gstreamer-0_10 devel:languages:python/python-gtk devel:languages:python/python-gtkglext devel:languages:python/python-gtksourceview devel:languages:python/python-notify devel:languages:python/python-orbit devel:languages:python/python-webkitgtk devel:languages:python/python3-cairo hardware/libgusb (there might be a few more packages where we do a similar change, once we realized they were not on our initial list ;-)) Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] Anyone interested in sawfish?

by Vincent Untz

Hi, Is there anyone interested in maintaining packages for the sawfish window manager? (http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page) We have packages in Contrib for it (sawfish + librep and rep-gtk, that are dependencies). Ideally, we'd move them to Factory, via X11:windowmanagers. But I'm not sure anyone in the GNOME team would be able to correctly maintain it (given that we wouldn't use it), and the fact that it'll be in X11:windowmanagers won't help for the GNOME team. So if someone wants to keep sawfish, please raise your hand. Otherwise, we'll just drop it, I guess. Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] [reminder] openSUSE 12.2 Goldmaster is next week

by openSUSE Roadmap Reminder

Hello all, openSUSE 12.2 Goldmaster will be released next week, on Friday 06 July 2012. Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday. For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see: http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap Thanks, -- openSUSE Roadmap Reminder -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] Speed up packging with parallel gzip, xz, bzip2, lzma

by Petr Mladek

Hi, today someone pointed out that packing RPMS might take longer time than a real build, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-June/034161.html https://plus.google.com/101094190333184858950/posts/D9x87DkdceD We could get a significant speedup by parallel versions of compression tools: http://www.zlib.net/pigz/ http://compression.ca/pbzip2/ http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/pxz/ I probably wont have time to play with it anytime soon. Anyway, I wanted to share it here. Maybe, someone else might be interested. Hackweek is getting close, ... Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

[opensuse-packaging] Fallen into a Java rat hole and need some help

by Robert Schweikert

Hi, Working on dependencies to build CloudStack. One of the packages needs ws-commons-util which already exists in network:/cluster:/xtreemos. ws-commons-util requires java-javadoc and some package fulfills this requirement as it builds just fine on openSUSE. However, on SLE nothing provides java-javadoc and the build fails. How can I figure out what package provides java-javadoc On my openSUSE 12.1 system -> rpm -qf /usr/bin/javadoc file /usr/bin/javadoc is not owned by any package OBS search for java-javadoc turns up nothing either. I took a look at the spec file for openjdk to no avail. I am out of ideas of places to look and could use some help. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX Tech Lead rjschwei(a)suse.com rschweik(a)ca.ibm.com 781-464-8147 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 10 months

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging June 2012