openSUSE Packaging August 2014

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

29 participants
19 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Where's xulrunner?
by marguerite 02 Nov '14

02 Nov '14

Hi, listmates, I found that there's no more xulrunner-devel package inside openSUSE:Factory. but it's still releasing: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/latest/source/ So what happened to it? (I need it to build gpac package in Packman, which is a dependency for x264) Greetings Margueirte

4 11

[opensuse-packaging] spec-cleaner bug?
by jcsl 29 Aug '14

29 Aug '14

Hi. After I applied spec-cleaner it removed a version check %if 0%{?suse_version} >= 1140 but it left the corresponding %endif. It is a but, Isn't it? Greetings. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Multiple packages from a tarball: single spec or multiple spec files?
by Takashi Iwai 28 Aug '14

28 Aug '14

Hi, currently alsa-tools-gui.rpm contains various programs using different toolkits, gtk2, gtk3, and fltk. I'm thinking of splitting this big one into individual packages for each program. The question is whether they should be built from a single spec file as of now, or they should be built from the own spec files. A merit of the latter would be that each spec can reduce the dependency; one spec file has only one BuildRequires for a toolkit. OTOH, it means that there will need multiple build instances, of course. Are such multiple spec files good or bad for build service in general? FWIW, it'll be split to 7 packages. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] A trick on the WebUI I just learned
by Greg Freemyer 27 Aug '14

27 Aug '14

All, I've been using OBS for a couple years. I maintain numerous packages and in one case I have about 50 packages that form a dependency tree (no cycles, just a tree). One of the frustrations I've had not having an easy way to know if the top packages "Requires:" statements are met without actually installing it. I find that hard because on my development PC I may have the dependencies installed but that doesn't mean they are in OBS for other users. I just realized I can tell at least some extent by looking at the WebUI. In particular my last "mistake" related to plaso which I submitted to factory without having all the dependencies in factory first. I just created a dedicated sub-project in my home project for plaso (python-plaso). The plaso package is at: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:gregfreemyer:libyal-plaso/pyth… If I click on openSUSE_Factory in the build results area I can see the factory RPMs for plaso. I already knew that: https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/home:gregfreemyer:libyal-plaso/… If I then click on one of the noarch RPMs, I can see the provides and requires columns. I even knew that. https://build.opensuse.org/package/binary/home:gregfreemyer:libyal-plaso/py… What I didn't know is that if I do the same thing in the devel project (security this time), then the requires columns that have a blank in the "provided by" column mean factory can't provide the required package: https://build.opensuse.org/package/binary/security/python-plaso?arch=x86_64… I submitted all 6 of the missing dependencies to factory a few hours ago, so if there are no blanks in the provided by column you know my SRs got accepted! Hope that helps someone. Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Expect trouble about util-linux split
by Stephan Kulow 25 Aug '14

25 Aug '14

Hi, The util-linux package underwent a major split (including a version update) and I expect a day or two to pass before the situation settled especially as the build service will get a lot of load. This can result in suprising failures about "missing binaries" or unresolvable. Bear with me and just trigger rebuilds of such failures. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Please readd texi2html and texi2roff
by Dr. Werner Fink 25 Aug '14

25 Aug '14

Hi Dmitry. could you *please* readd the tools texi2html and texi2roff back to the texinfo package? Those tools are preconditioned for serval packages. Werner -- Dr. Werner Fink -- Software Engineer Consultant SuSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, Nuernberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) phone: +49-911-740-53-0, fax: +49-911-3206727, www.opensuse.org ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] BuildRequires: /usr/bin/something allowed?
by Kyrill Detinov 21 Aug '14

21 Aug '14

Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:39:33 +0400 Hello. I need a clarification: does rpm allow "BuildRequires: /usr/bin/something" in a spec? -- WBR Kyrill

3 5

[opensuse-packaging] python related rpmlint complaint
by Greg Freemyer 20 Aug '14

20 Aug '14

All, I had a package (python-dfVFS) that rpmlint is complaining about. I can get the error to go away via these 2 lines in the %files section of the specfile. %defattr(755,root,root) %{python_sitelib}/dfvfs I'm told 755 is likely wrong for anything in python_sitelib. My rpmlint errors without the 755 statement are similar to: [ 29s] python-dfVFS.noarch: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dfvfs/vfs/tar_file_system_test.py 0644L /usr/bin/python [ 29s] python-dfVFS.noarch: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dfvfs/file_io/fake_file_io_test.py 0644L /usr/bin/python [ 29s] python-dfVFS.noarch: W: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dfvfs/helpers/source_scanner_test.py 0644L /usr/bin/python The files seem to start with: #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- . . . There are hundreds of the files. Should I run a sed script to trash "#!/usr/bin/python" in all the files. There are over 150 of them. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 4

[opensuse-packaging] Is gtkspellmm-3.0 available?
by jcsl 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi. Trying to build gImageReader and need gtkspellmm-3.0 (-devel, I suppose). Does anybody know if it is available for openSUSE? Package search page is broken now. Greetings. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 1

[opensuse-packaging] PENAWARAN SOUVENIR PERUSAHAAN TANPA BRAND
by Marketing 10 17 Aug '14

17 Aug '14

Dear customer Kami menerima pesanan gift perusahaan untuk product tertentu seperti: 1.travel adapter, (min 100pcs) 2.usb flashdisk, (min 100pcs) 3.payung (berbagai macam ukuran / min 300pcs) 4.Kemeja promosi (min 100pcs) 5.Kaos krah / oblong (min 500pcs) 6.Mouse promosi (min 500pcs) 7.power bank (min 200pcs) 8.PEN (MIN 500PCS HARGA MULAI RP.5.000) semua product kami tanpa merek, dan dapat di printing / sablon sesuai permintaan anda untuk mendapatkan penawaran harga yang baik, silakan hubungi kami kembali hubungi kami untuk info lebih lengkap locanojakarta(a)yahoo.com PHONE: 0812 90 59 1689 http://locanousb.blogspot.com/ -- Thanks for your email. I'm out of the office now I'll reply to you as soon as I return. BEST REGARDS http://locanousb.blogspot.com/

1 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging August 2014