Hey,
Dominique and I are currently wondering what to do wrt libexecdir for
evolution-data-server. Should we leave it unchanged (so files will be in
/usr/lib) or should we change it to /usr/lib/evolution-data-server?
If the latter, is there any reason this is not done automatically?
Also, hrm, would rpmlint have ways to warn about packages that put
binaries in libdir instead of libexecdir? (I can find a few of them here
with a grep)
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
I've been adding some macros to make life easier when packaging things
for GNOME, or desktop applications in general. See [1] for some of
those, and I guess I'll send a new mail later for the others -- I just
need to figure out where some of them should live.
Anyway. The thing is that those macros are all nice, but nobody will
think about using them if they don't have rpmlint checks. So I wrote
some checks.
Can we add this to the rpmlint-checks git repo, and to our rpmlint
package?
Thanks,
Vincent
[1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2010-08/msg00059.html
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
Hello,
I'm an OpenNebula [1] developer, and we would like to include
OpenNebula in mainstream openSUSE. OpenNebula has already been
accepted in Debian sid and in Ubuntu.
Is there anyone interested in becoming the package maintainer for this
project? We already have a working spec file so there's no need to
start from scratch. The main challenge I see it that OpenNebula
depends on xmlrpc-c libraries which aren't directly available on
openSUSE. Nevertheless these packages are provided by the hamradio
project [2], in particular packages: xmlrpc-c and libxmlrpc-c-devel.
Regards,
Jaime Melis
[1] http://www.opennebula.org
[2] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=hamradio
--
Jaime Melis, Cloud Technology Engineer/Researcher
DSA Research Group: web http://dsa-research.org and blog
http://blog.dsa-research.org
OpenNebula Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing: http://www.OpenNebula.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
I've linked rubygem-libxml-ruby and rubygem-nokogiri into
Virtualization:Cloud from devel:languages:ruby:extensions.
Both packages succeed in devel:languages:ruby:extensions for SLE11_SP1
and openSUSE 11.2 targets but fail in Virtualization:Cloud with the error:
error: line 30: Unknown tag: %rubygems_requires
Cannot figure out what's going on here. Help is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert
--
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
Software Engineer Consultant LINUX
rschweikert(a)novell.com
781-464-8147
Novell
Making IT Work As One
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
I need some help with clean up work.
Getting the following error:
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a/cb26bdac5e1e80da5c43320fd8f1b3c7fdfc73 may
only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/usr may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oned.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo
subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a may only be packaged in the -debuginfo
subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3 may only be packaged in the -debuginfo
subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/eb68c7c477bb5149a4008296471456ab36cace may
only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/eb68c7c477bb5149a4008296471456ab36cace.debug
may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a/cb26bdac5e1e80da5c43320fd8f1b3c7fdfc73.debug
may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage
opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000)
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mm_sched.debug may only be packaged in the
-debuginfo subpackage
But the spec file contains the following:
%files debuginfo
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
/usr/lib/debug/*
Not sure what I am missing, help is appreciated.
Project is Virtualization:Cloud, the package that is failing is the
opennebula package.
Thanks,
Robert
--
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
Software Engineer Consultant LINUX
rschweikert(a)novell.com
781-464-8147
Novell
Making IT Work As One
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi all,
stable virtualbox 4.0.0 will be soon in Factory (I hope:) so here are
few announces:
if you will do update from Milestone2,3,4, 5 or from Factory you have
to remove virtualbox-ose-qt package and install virtualbox-qt by hand
(sorry I really don't know how to trigger update in this case for
virtualbox-ose-qt without adding auxiliar subpackage) - update from
11.3 to 11.4 will work fine
Also I want to announce few (I think major) changes in our virtualbox
package(sr#56739,56738):
1, dropped OSE postfix for vbox's main package and all subpackages
- since 4.0.0 Oracle team doesn't build PUEL version so ose postfix is
not needed
- this means : virtualbox-ose will be deleted from Factory and new
virtualbox package will appear
- devel repo will change from Virtualization:virtualbox-ose to
Virtualization:virtualbox
2, renamed xorg-x11-driver-virtualbox-ose subpackage to virtualbox-guest-x11
- this package doesn't contain only x11 drivers but also tools for
propper x11 guest integration (same name for this stuff use also
debian)
3, update to first 4.0.0 stable release
4,added "Provides: virtualbox-gui" line for virtualbox-qt subpackage
and "Recommends: virtualbox-gui" line for virtualbox package (this is
related to vboxgtk package - I will also create sr for this package
soon )
Also I want to apologize to people who wants to have
VBoxGuestAdditions.iso in our virtualbox package, I decide to NOT
include it to our package for now (again), I think linux and windows
binaries grabbed from outside of buildservice is not standard way how
we do packaging in bs - also as I said many times user could still
download iso using the gui menu.
suggestions, comments, tips are welcome !
bye
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
I cannot disable an rpmlint check. It says "no-return-in-nonvoid-function". I
added an rpmlint file with content
addFilter("no-return-in-nonvoid-function")
but this does not help. Also tries different variants, icluding
addFilter("*no-return-in-nonvoid-function*")
and others.
The package is
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=virtualbox-ose&project=home…
Is it a bug in OBS?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi! I've got "undefined reference" error when linking. I tried to
add --no-as-needed option instead of --as-needed but this does not help. What
else can I do?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org
How can I make a package include an EULA message in the OBS ?
I checked the flash-player package in the non-free repository but it has
no apparent magic in it.
(and it's nowhere on the wiki either)
cheers
--
-o) Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser(a)opensuse.org>
/\\ http://opensuse.org -- I took the green pill
_\_v FOSDEM XI: 5 + 6 Feb 2011, http://fosdem.org
Hi all!
I already push virtualbox-ose 4.0.0 BETA 1 to Virtualization repo :
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=virtualbox-ose&project=Virt…
sr is always welcome :)
see 4.0.0 BETA1 announcement :
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=36748
a lot of new features e.g. usb 1.1. support is now open source ...
but I think, for our suse vbox package is a key feature "extension
pack architecture" which means "No more OSE vs PUEL just VirtualBox
(100% OSS) + optional PUEL extension pack", this means : in
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.0_BETA1/ you could find
only OSE versions of rpm packages which should be the same like
virtualbox-ose packages prepared in our buildservice (with one
exception we don't use dkms - we prepare kernel modules directly in
buildservice )
I see here duplicity work, what do you think ?
bye
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org