openSUSE Packaging December 2010

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

55 participants
46 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Right usage of libexecdir?

by Vincent Untz

Hey, Dominique and I are currently wondering what to do wrt libexecdir for evolution-data-server. Should we leave it unchanged (so files will be in /usr/lib) or should we change it to /usr/lib/evolution-data-server? If the latter, is there any reason this is not done automatically? Also, hrm, would rpmlint have ways to warn about packages that put binaries in libdir instead of libexecdir? (I can find a few of them here with a grep) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

9 years, 9 months

[opensuse-packaging] rpmlint-checks: adding new gnome/desktop-related checks

by Vincent Untz

Hi, I've been adding some macros to make life easier when packaging things for GNOME, or desktop applications in general. See [1] for some of those, and I guess I'll send a new mail later for the others -- I just need to figure out where some of them should live. Anyway. The thing is that those macros are all nice, but nobody will think about using them if they don't have rpmlint checks. So I wrote some checks. Can we add this to the rpmlint-checks git repo, and to our rpmlint package? Thanks, Vincent [1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2010-08/msg00059.html -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

10 years

[opensuse-packaging] OpenNebula

by Jaime Melis

Hello, I'm an OpenNebula [1] developer, and we would like to include OpenNebula in mainstream openSUSE. OpenNebula has already been accepted in Debian sid and in Ubuntu. Is there anyone interested in becoming the package maintainer for this project? We already have a working spec file so there's no need to start from scratch. The main challenge I see it that OpenNebula depends on xmlrpc-c libraries which aren't directly available on openSUSE. Nevertheless these packages are provided by the hamradio project [2], in particular packages: xmlrpc-c and libxmlrpc-c-devel. Regards, Jaime Melis [1] http://www.opennebula.org [2] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=hamradio -- Jaime Melis, Cloud Technology Engineer/Researcher DSA Research Group: web http://dsa-research.org and blog http://blog.dsa-research.org OpenNebula Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing: http://www.OpenNebula.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] Help with missing macro

by Robert Schweikert

Hi, I've linked rubygem-libxml-ruby and rubygem-nokogiri into Virtualization:Cloud from devel:languages:ruby:extensions. Both packages succeed in devel:languages:ruby:extensions for SLE11_SP1 and openSUSE 11.2 targets but fail in Virtualization:Cloud with the error: error: line 30: Unknown tag: %rubygems_requires Cannot figure out what's going on here. Help is much appreciated. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Software Engineer Consultant LINUX rschweikert(a)novell.com 781-464-8147 Novell Making IT Work As One -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] Help addressing rpmlint/post build errors and warnings

by Robert Schweikert

Hi, I need some help with clean up work. Getting the following error: opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a/cb26bdac5e1e80da5c43320fd8f1b3c7fdfc73 may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oned.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3 may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/eb68c7c477bb5149a4008296471456ab36cace may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/eb68c7c477bb5149a4008296471456ab36cace.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a/cb26bdac5e1e80da5c43320fd8f1b3c7fdfc73.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mm_sched.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage But the spec file contains the following: %files debuginfo %defattr(-,root,root,-) /usr/lib/debug/* Not sure what I am missing, help is appreciated. Project is Virtualization:Cloud, the package that is failing is the opennebula package. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Software Engineer Consultant LINUX rschweikert(a)novell.com 781-464-8147 Novell Making IT Work As One -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] changes in virtualbox package

by Michal Šebeň

Hi all, stable virtualbox 4.0.0 will be soon in Factory (I hope:) so here are few announces: if you will do update from Milestone2,3,4, 5 or from Factory you have to remove virtualbox-ose-qt package and install virtualbox-qt by hand (sorry I really don't know how to trigger update in this case for virtualbox-ose-qt without adding auxiliar subpackage) - update from 11.3 to 11.4 will work fine Also I want to announce few (I think major) changes in our virtualbox package(sr#56739,56738): 1, dropped OSE postfix for vbox's main package and all subpackages - since 4.0.0 Oracle team doesn't build PUEL version so ose postfix is not needed - this means : virtualbox-ose will be deleted from Factory and new virtualbox package will appear - devel repo will change from Virtualization:virtualbox-ose to Virtualization:virtualbox 2, renamed xorg-x11-driver-virtualbox-ose subpackage to virtualbox-guest-x11 - this package doesn't contain only x11 drivers but also tools for propper x11 guest integration (same name for this stuff use also debian) 3, update to first 4.0.0 stable release 4,added "Provides: virtualbox-gui" line for virtualbox-qt subpackage and "Recommends: virtualbox-gui" line for virtualbox package (this is related to vboxgtk package - I will also create sr for this package soon ) Also I want to apologize to people who wants to have VBoxGuestAdditions.iso in our virtualbox package, I decide to NOT include it to our package for now (again), I think linux and windows binaries grabbed from outside of buildservice is not standard way how we do packaging in bs - also as I said many times user could still download iso using the gui menu. suggestions, comments, tips are welcome ! bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] Cannot disable an rpmlint error message

by Ilya Chernykh

I cannot disable an rpmlint check. It says "no-return-in-nonvoid-function". I added an rpmlint file with content addFilter("no-return-in-nonvoid-function") but this does not help. Also tries different variants, icluding addFilter("*no-return-in-nonvoid-function*") and others. The package is https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=virtualbox-ose&project=home… Is it a bug in OBS? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] Undefined references at time of linking

by Ilya Chernykh

Hi! I've got "undefined reference" error when linking. I tried to add --no-as-needed option instead of --as-needed but this does not help. What else can I do? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] How to EULA in RPM package in OBS ?

by Pascal Bleser

How can I make a package include an EULA message in the OBS ? I checked the flash-player package in the non-free repository but it has no apparent magic in it. (and it's nowhere on the wiki either) cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser(a)opensuse.org> /\\ http://opensuse.org -- I took the green pill _\_v FOSDEM XI: 5 + 6 Feb 2011, http://fosdem.org

10 years, 1 month

[opensuse-packaging] virtualbox 4.0.0 BETA1

by Michal Šebeň

Hi all! I already push virtualbox-ose 4.0.0 BETA 1 to Virtualization repo : https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=virtualbox-ose&project=Virt… sr is always welcome :) see 4.0.0 BETA1 announcement : http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=36748 a lot of new features e.g. usb 1.1. support is now open source ... but I think, for our suse vbox package is a key feature "extension pack architecture" which means "No more OSE vs PUEL just VirtualBox (100% OSS) + optional PUEL extension pack", this means : in http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.0_BETA1/ you could find only OSE versions of rpm packages which should be the same like virtualbox-ose packages prepared in our buildservice (with one exception we don't use dkms - we prepare kernel modules directly in buildservice ) I see here duplicity work, what do you think ? bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 years, 1 month

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging December 2010