openSUSE Packaging September 2019

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

21 participants
11 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Separating python modules into packages

by Axel Braun

Morning all, I need to separate one module from a build of a python package into a separate package. This is usually not a big act, e.g. in C-programs. Python packaging seems to be different from that What normally happens is that you have a file section with: %files [some more definitions] %{python_sitelib}/* Where the last command puts everything under /usr/lib/python3.x/.... Done. After having defined a new package in the spec file I wanted to separate the files: %files -n %{name}-orthanc %{python_sitelib}/health-orthanc* -> This results in a 'file not found error': [ 34s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gnuhealth-3.5-0.x86_64/health- orthanc* No surprise, as this is not the location for the module. So, I've defined a variable to keep the path: %define t_path $(ls -d /usr/lib/python3.* )/site-packages/trytond/modules that expands nicely e.g. in the Installation section: echo %{t_path} [ 29s] ++ ls -d /usr/lib/python3.6 [ 29s] + echo /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/trytond/modules [ 29s] /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/trytond/modules but in the files section: %files -n %{name}-orthanc %{t_path}/health-orthanc* [ 38s] Processing files: gnuhealth-orthanc-3.5-0.noarch [ 38s] error: File must begin with "/": $(ls [ 38s] error: File must begin with "/": -d [ 38s] error: File must begin with "/": )/site-packages/trytond/modules/ health-orthanc* At the moment I'm a bit stuck. Anyone with a better idea or an example? Thanks Axel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 7 months

[opensuse-packaging] Can some add OpenSubdiv-devel to Leap 15.1 and leap 15.2 ?

by J. Scheurich

Hi, When i click in https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/graphics/white_dune openSUSE_Leap_15.1 <https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/graphics/white_dune/openSUSE_Le…> <https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/graphics/.collapse-white_dune-openS…> x86_64unresolvable openSUSE_Leap_15.2 <https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/graphics/white_dune/openSUSE_Le…> <https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/graphics/.collapse-white_dune-openS…> x86_64unresolvable i get: Nothing provides OpenSubdiv-devel Can some add OpenSubdiv-devel please ? so long MUFTI <https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/graphics/.collapse-white_dune-openS…> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 7 months

[opensuse-packaging] Bug in -flto= flags combined with %limit_build -m

by Dave Plater

Hi, where do I report a bug in the macro that creates the value for -flto=n which is greater than the reduced number of threads created by %limit_build -m n causing link time crashes in gcc. Thanks Dave P -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 7 months

[opensuse-packaging] Problem packaging icon file

by Axel Braun

Hi, I'm currently building a python 3 program, that will create a desktop file entry. The samepackaging sequence as for the python 2.7 does - surprisingly - not work. What I do: # menu-entry desktop-file-install --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications % {name}.desktop %suse_update_desktop_file %{name} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps cp tryton/data/pixmaps/tryton/gnuhealth-icon.png %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/ pixmaps/gnuhealth.png That works *but* the rpm check moans about: gnuhealth-client.noarch: E: hardlink-across-partition (Badness: 10000) /usr/ lib/python3.6/site-packages/tryton/data/pixmaps/tryton/gnuhealth-icon.png / usr/share/pixmaps/gnuhealth.png [ 12s] Your package contains two files that are apparently hardlinked and that are [ 12s] likely on different partitions. Installation of such an RPM will fail due to [ 12s] RPM being unable to unpack the hardlink. do not hardlink across the first two [ 12s] levels of a path, e.g. between /srv/ftp and /srv/www or /etc and / usr. This is kinda strange - cp is not ln, no? Any ideas? Cheers Axel PS: <https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Application:ERP:Tryton:5.0/gnuhealt…> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] Status update /usr/etc move

by Thorsten Kukuk

Hi, If you haven't seen or heard much about the /usr/etc proposal, that's because we had to wait that the necessary basic changes were accepted in Factory. With today, we got two important packages released: - filesystem contains /usr/etc - rpmlint accepts /usr/etc We are still missing rpm-config-SUSE for the %_distconfdir define. I did also setup a wiki for best practices and the changes we make, please see: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_UsrEtc Improvements, corrections, better ideas, etc. are always welcome! And if you adjust your package, please document this in this list, too. So that users have one place to find out what we changed, where to find the configuration files today and what they need to modify. I created a home project with first adjusted packages, too: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:kukuk:etc All packages are tested on openSUSE MicroOS. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & MicroOS SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany Managing Director: Felix Imendoerffer (HRB 247165, AG München) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] /usr/share/licenses

by Peter Czanik

Hi, While trying to upgrade syslog-ng in Base:system I ran into a strange problem. It compiles fine even for the ancient SLES 12, but for SLES 12 SP2 and earlier package building fails with a strange error message: [ 139s] ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log [ 139s] ... running 04-check-filelist [ 139s] ... checking filelist [ 139s] syslog-ng-3.23.1-167.1.x86_64.rpm: directories not owned by a package: [ 139s] - /usr/share/licenses [ 139s] [ 139s] sheep83 failed "build syslog-ng.spec" at Tue Sep 3 15:40:47 UTC 2019. Not that I expect anybody still using SP2 and earlier, but still would love to see it all green. Is there a solution / workaround for this problem? For complete logs, check: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:czanik:branches:Base… Bye, CzP -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] Turning certain rpmlint errors into warnings

by Johannes Segitz

Hello, the SUSE security team wants to change part of our process in a way that will affect (open)SUSE packagers. Several features in a package currently produce rpmlint errors that ask packagers to submit the package for a review by the security team. E.g.: - Adding a setuid binary - Changing polkit settings This is described here: https://en.opensuse.org/index.php?title=openSUSE:Package_security_guideline… The current approach (error by rpmlint) has the drawback that this also triggers in devel projects. So if you package something with a setuid binary but don't intend to make this package part of (open)SUSE you will still see the errors. You then either have to suppress them or we have to spend effort on reviewing something that's not in an official distribution. We want to change these errors into warnings without badness (first only in Factory, but in short order also for openSUSE:* and SUSE:* too). You will still see a warning that informs you that you need to go through a review if you want it in an official distribution. This is then enforced by adding reviews for the security team to each request made to an official distribution if these warnings are present. Once the changes have been reviewed and whitelisted the warnings will vanish. The upside for you is that you can already use/test your packages in the devel project without being blocked by build errors. We hope to make the process faster and easier for everyone involved. Nothing will change for you if: - you don't need special permissions in you package - you need special permissions and they were already checked by the security team If you see one of these warnings they describe what you need to do to get your submits through without an additional review being added to the submit. We have a constant flow of audit bugs, so please open you audit request as early as possible so that we don't introduce a delay in your request while we review the changes. If you have any questions please ask away (please CC me) or contact security(a)suse.de Thanks, Johannes for the SUSE security team -- GPG Key E7C81FA0 EE16 6BCE AD56 E034 BFB3 3ADD 7BF7 29D5 E7C8 1FA0 Subkey fingerprint: 250F 43F5 F7CE 6F1E 9C59 4F95 BC27 DD9D 2CC4 FD66 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer (HRB 247165, AG München)

2 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] 06-check-installtest

by Glenn Doig

Hello, Which lines in .spec causes the following and how is it fixed so it builds. Thanks Glenn Project: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/oracle-database-se… Spec: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:doiggl/oracle-database-se… Log: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:doiggl/oracle-databa… running 06-check-installtest [ 27s] ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent [ 27s] pre/postinstall/uninstall script of oracle-rdbms-server-11gR2-preinstall-1.0-34.1.x86_64.rpm modifies filelist! [ 27s] filelist diff: [ 27s] --- //.build_patchrpmcheck1 2019-09-03 06:57:42.616000000 +0000 [ 27s] +++ //.build_patchrpmcheck2 2019-09-03 06:57:42.644000000 +0000 [ 27s] @@ -24,3 +24,6 @@ [ 27s] +missing /etc/sysconfig/oracle-rdbms-server-11gR2-preinstall [ 27s] +missing /etc/sysconfig/oracle-rdbms-server-11gR2-preinstall/oracle-rdbms-server-11gR2-preinstall-verify [ 27s] +missing c /etc/sysconfig/oracle-rdbms-server-11gR2-preinstall/oracle-rdbms-server-11gR2-preinstall.param [ 27s] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] Proposal: Use /usr/libexec for libexec content

by Neal Gompa

Hello, I'd like to propose adding /usr/libexec to the openSUSE FHS and reverting the definition of %_libexecdir in rpm back to /usr/libexec so that libexec content is installed there. Currently, openSUSE overrides rpm to define %_libexecdir as /usr/lib, which leads to pollution of the /usr/lib directory with executable content as well as 64-bit content when there shouldn't be any. The /usr/libexec has been in use on RH/Fedora and Mageia systems in the Linux world, but has its origins in BSD and is still used today in BSDs and variants (like Mac OS X). The usage of /usr/libexec for libexec content has also been recognized by FHS with v3.0, released in 2015. In the Linux distribution landscape (that is, all major families, not just RPM ones), /usr/libexec is in use on Red Hat, Mandrake, Gentoo, and Slackware families. This is a breaking change, as it means that as packages are rebuilt, libexec content *should* migrate from /usr/lib to /usr/libexec. The major advantage of migrating the libexec content is that it will make openSUSE consistent with other major RPM-based Linux distributions, and ease efforts in supporting SUSE distributions along with Red Hat ones by removing the need for hacks and tweaks to support two different hierarchies. This simplifies the portability headaches in supporting both distribution families, and makes it easier for applications that were originally aimed for RHEL/CentOS to run on SLE/openSUSE Leap. This change would be done in three stages: 1. Make the change to the filesystem package to add /usr/libexec to the hierarchy. 2. Add /usr/libexec to allowed prefixes in rpmlint-checks and remove spec-cleaner rule that assumes /usr/lib == %_libexecdir. 3. Make the change to the rpm package to set %_libexecdir back to /usr/libexec. This one will cause a fair bit of work to fix packages that do the wrong thing one way or another with %_libexecdir. What do you all think? Best regards, Neal -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 8 months

[opensuse-packaging] #help wanted# 06-check-installtest filelist diff stopping build.

by Glenn Doig

Hello, Can spec be adjusted so build completes, tried 2 sets of fixes , different errors see lines marked '>> ## problem ??' builds [1] and [2] Thanks Cheers --Glenn ## Package: name: oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall urls: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:doiggl/oracle-database-server-… https://build.opensuse.org/build/home:doiggl/openSUSE_Leap_42.3/x86_64/orac… ############################### #build [2] latest build re-try: ############################### [ 24s] + umask 022 [ 24s] + cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD [ 24s] + cd oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0 [ 24s] + /usr/bin/rm -rf /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-12.1.x86_64 [ 24s] + exit 0 [ 24s] ... checking for files with abuild user/group [ 24s] ... running 00-check-install-rpms [ 24s] ... installing all built rpms [ 24s] Preparing packages... [ 24s] oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-debugsource-1.0-12.1.noarch [ 24s] oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-12.1.noarch [ 25s] oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-firstboot: unknown service [ 25s] warning: %posttrans(oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-12.1.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 [ 25s] ... running 01-check-debuginfo [ 25s] ... testing for empty debuginfo packages [ 25s] ! [ 25s] ! //.build.packages/RPMS/noarch/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-debugsource-1.0-12.1.noarch.rpm: empty debuginfo/debugsource package, deleting [ 25s] ! [ 25s] ... running 02-check-gcc-output [ 25s] ... testing for serious compiler warnings [ 25s] (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) [ 25s] (using //.build.log) [ 25s] ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log [ 25s] ... running 04-check-filelist [ 25s] ... checking filelist [ 25s] ... running 05-check-invalid-requires [ 25s] ... running 06-check-installtest >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] find: './proc/946': No such file or directory >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] ./.build_patchrpmcheck_scr >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] ./.build_patchrpmcheck1 >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] pre/postinstall/uninstall script of oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-12.1.noarch.rpm modifies >> ## problem ?? filelist! >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] filelist diff: >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] --- //.build_patchrpmcheck1 2019-08-29 01:37:19.136000000 +0000 >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] +++ //.build_patchrpmcheck2 2019-08-29 01:37:19.432000000 +0000 >> ## problem ?? [ 25s] @@ -24,3 +24,5 @@ [ 25s] +SM5....T. /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-verify [ 25s] +SM5....T. c /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.param [ 25s] [ 25s] sheep81 failed "build oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.spec" at Thu Aug 29 01:37:19 UTC 2019. [ 25s] [ 29s] ## ######################### #build [1] 1st build try: ######################### . . . # [ 44s] + exit 0 [ 44s] ... checking for files with abuild user/group [ 44s] ... running 00-check-install-rpms [ 44s] ... installing all built rpms [ 44s] Preparing packages... [ 44s] oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-debugsource-1.0-9.1.noarch [ 45s] oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-9.1.noarch [ 46s] oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-firstboot: unknown service [ 46s] warning: %posttrans(oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-9.1.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 [ 46s] ... running 01-check-debuginfo [ 46s] ... testing for empty debuginfo packages [ 46s] ! [ 46s] ! //.build.packages/RPMS/noarch/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-debugsource-1.0-9.1.noarch.rpm: empty debuginfo/debugsource package, deleting [ 46s] ! [ 46s] ... running 02-check-gcc-output [ 46s] ... testing for serious compiler warnings [ 46s] (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) [ 46s] (using //.build.log) [ 46s] ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log [ 46s] ... running 04-check-filelist [ 46s] ... checking filelist [ 46s] ... running 05-check-invalid-requires [ 46s] ... running 06-check-installtest [ 46s] ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent [ 46s] mount: none is already mounted or /proc busy [ 46s] none is already mounted on /dev/pts [ 46s] none is already mounted on /dev/shm [ 47s] pre/postinstall/uninstall script of oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-1.0-9.1.noarch.rpm modifies filelist! [ 47s] filelist diff: [ 47s] --- //.build_patchrpmcheck1 2019-08-28 16:55:44.366281978 +0000 [ 47s] +++ //.build_patchrpmcheck2 2019-08-28 16:55:44.406281976 +0000 [ 47s] @@ -24,3 +24,5 @@ [ 47s] +SM5....T. /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-verify [ 47s] +SM5....T. c /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.param [ 47s] [ 47s] cloud121 failed "build oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.spec" at Wed Aug 28 16:55:44 UTC 2019. [ 47s] [ 47s] ### VM INTERACTION START ### [ 50s] [ 35.405189] sysrq: SysRq : Power Off [ 50s] [ 35.415012] reboot: Power down [ 54s] ### VM INTERACTION END ### [ 54s] [ 54s] cloud121 failed "build oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.spec" at Wed Aug 28 16:55:52 UTC 2019. [ 54s] # +missing /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall +missing /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-verify +missing c /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.param ############################################################## fix[1] added into oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.spec and retried build see build [2] above. ############################################################## %postun #added in following 3 lines /usr/bin/mkdir /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall /usr/bin/touch /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall-verify /usr/bin/touch /etc/sysconfig/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall/oracle-database-server-12cR2-preinstall.param # -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 8 months

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging September 2019