December 2010 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] Right usage of libexecdir?
by Vincent Untz 25 May '11

25 May '11

Hey, Dominique and I are currently wondering what to do wrt libexecdir for evolution-data-server. Should we leave it unchanged (so files will be in /usr/lib) or should we change it to /usr/lib/evolution-data-server? If the latter, is there any reason this is not done automatically? Also, hrm, would rpmlint have ways to warn about packages that put binaries in libdir instead of libexecdir? (I can find a few of them here with a grep) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

6 9

[opensuse-packaging] rpmlint-checks: adding new gnome/desktop-related checks
by Vincent Untz 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

Hi, I've been adding some macros to make life easier when packaging things for GNOME, or desktop applications in general. See [1] for some of those, and I guess I'll send a new mail later for the others -- I just need to figure out where some of them should live. Anyway. The thing is that those macros are all nice, but nobody will think about using them if they don't have rpmlint checks. So I wrote some checks. Can we add this to the rpmlint-checks git repo, and to our rpmlint package? Thanks, Vincent [1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2010-08/msg00059.html -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

3 19

[opensuse-packaging] OpenNebula
by Jaime Melis 27 Jan '11

27 Jan '11

Hello, I'm an OpenNebula [1] developer, and we would like to include OpenNebula in mainstream openSUSE. OpenNebula has already been accepted in Debian sid and in Ubuntu. Is there anyone interested in becoming the package maintainer for this project? We already have a working spec file so there's no need to start from scratch. The main challenge I see it that OpenNebula depends on xmlrpc-c libraries which aren't directly available on openSUSE. Nevertheless these packages are provided by the hamradio project [2], in particular packages: xmlrpc-c and libxmlrpc-c-devel. Regards, Jaime Melis [1] http://www.opennebula.org [2] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=hamradio -- Jaime Melis, Cloud Technology Engineer/Researcher DSA Research Group: web http://dsa-research.org and blog http://blog.dsa-research.org OpenNebula Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing: http://www.OpenNebula.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 8

[opensuse-packaging] Help with missing macro
by Robert Schweikert 01 Jan '11

01 Jan '11

Hi, I've linked rubygem-libxml-ruby and rubygem-nokogiri into Virtualization:Cloud from devel:languages:ruby:extensions. Both packages succeed in devel:languages:ruby:extensions for SLE11_SP1 and openSUSE 11.2 targets but fail in Virtualization:Cloud with the error: error: line 30: Unknown tag: %rubygems_requires Cannot figure out what's going on here. Help is much appreciated. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Software Engineer Consultant LINUX rschweikert(a)novell.com 781-464-8147 Novell Making IT Work As One -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Help addressing rpmlint/post build errors and warnings
by Robert Schweikert 31 Dec '10

31 Dec '10

Hi, I need some help with clean up work. Getting the following error: opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a/cb26bdac5e1e80da5c43320fd8f1b3c7fdfc73 may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oned.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3 may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/eb68c7c477bb5149a4008296471456ab36cace may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/eb68c7c477bb5149a4008296471456ab36cace.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/2a/cb26bdac5e1e80da5c43320fd8f1b3c7fdfc73.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage opennebula.x86_64: E: suse-filelist-forbidden-debuginfo (Badness: 10000) /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/mm_sched.debug may only be packaged in the -debuginfo subpackage But the spec file contains the following: %files debuginfo %defattr(-,root,root,-) /usr/lib/debug/* Not sure what I am missing, help is appreciated. Project is Virtualization:Cloud, the package that is failing is the opennebula package. Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Software Engineer Consultant LINUX rschweikert(a)novell.com 781-464-8147 Novell Making IT Work As One -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 2

[opensuse-packaging] changes in virtualbox package
by Michal Šebeň 31 Dec '10

31 Dec '10

Hi all, stable virtualbox 4.0.0 will be soon in Factory (I hope:) so here are few announces: if you will do update from Milestone2,3,4, 5 or from Factory you have to remove virtualbox-ose-qt package and install virtualbox-qt by hand (sorry I really don't know how to trigger update in this case for virtualbox-ose-qt without adding auxiliar subpackage) - update from 11.3 to 11.4 will work fine Also I want to announce few (I think major) changes in our virtualbox package(sr#56739,56738): 1, dropped OSE postfix for vbox's main package and all subpackages - since 4.0.0 Oracle team doesn't build PUEL version so ose postfix is not needed - this means : virtualbox-ose will be deleted from Factory and new virtualbox package will appear - devel repo will change from Virtualization:virtualbox-ose to Virtualization:virtualbox 2, renamed xorg-x11-driver-virtualbox-ose subpackage to virtualbox-guest-x11 - this package doesn't contain only x11 drivers but also tools for propper x11 guest integration (same name for this stuff use also debian) 3, update to first 4.0.0 stable release 4,added "Provides: virtualbox-gui" line for virtualbox-qt subpackage and "Recommends: virtualbox-gui" line for virtualbox package (this is related to vboxgtk package - I will also create sr for this package soon ) Also I want to apologize to people who wants to have VBoxGuestAdditions.iso in our virtualbox package, I decide to NOT include it to our package for now (again), I think linux and windows binaries grabbed from outside of buildservice is not standard way how we do packaging in bs - also as I said many times user could still download iso using the gui menu. suggestions, comments, tips are welcome ! bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 8

[opensuse-packaging] Cannot disable an rpmlint error message
by Ilya Chernykh 31 Dec '10

31 Dec '10

I cannot disable an rpmlint check. It says "no-return-in-nonvoid-function". I added an rpmlint file with content addFilter("no-return-in-nonvoid-function") but this does not help. Also tries different variants, icluding addFilter("*no-return-in-nonvoid-function*") and others. The package is https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=virtualbox-ose&project=home… Is it a bug in OBS? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

10 17

[opensuse-packaging] Undefined references at time of linking
by Ilya Chernykh 30 Dec '10

30 Dec '10

Hi! I've got "undefined reference" error when linking. I tried to add --no-as-needed option instead of --as-needed but this does not help. What else can I do? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

4 9

[opensuse-packaging] How to EULA in RPM package in OBS ?
by Pascal Bleser 29 Dec '10

29 Dec '10

How can I make a package include an EULA message in the OBS ? I checked the flash-player package in the non-free repository but it has no apparent magic in it. (and it's nowhere on the wiki either) cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser(a)opensuse.org> /\\ http://opensuse.org -- I took the green pill _\_v FOSDEM XI: 5 + 6 Feb 2011, http://fosdem.org

5 8

[opensuse-packaging] virtualbox 4.0.0 BETA1
by Michal Šebeň 28 Dec '10

28 Dec '10

Hi all! I already push virtualbox-ose 4.0.0 BETA 1 to Virtualization repo : https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=virtualbox-ose&project=Virt… sr is always welcome :) see 4.0.0 BETA1 announcement : http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=36748 a lot of new features e.g. usb 1.1. support is now open source ... but I think, for our suse vbox package is a key feature "extension pack architecture" which means "No more OSE vs PUEL just VirtualBox (100% OSS) + optional PUEL extension pack", this means : in http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.0_BETA1/ you could find only OSE versions of rpm packages which should be the same like virtualbox-ose packages prepared in our buildservice (with one exception we don't use dkms - we prepare kernel modules directly in buildservice ) I see here duplicity work, what do you think ? bye -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

3 4