openSUSE Packaging April 2012

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

44 participants
35 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Submit request to "Publishing" repository

by Kyrill Detinov

Hello. Please, anyone, review/accept/decline sr#109334. It was requested 5 weeks ago. I'd like to submit the package to Factory then. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/109334 -- WBR Kyrill -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 12 months

[opensuse-packaging] library question

by Joop Boonen

Hi all, What is the preferred library rpm build name? When if have package foo. I know the library itself shoould be libfoo{soname}-*-rpm Should the the devel package be libfoo-devel-*.rpm or foo-devel-*.rpm I assume the osc package name should be foo? In case the package name is libfoo I assume the devel package should be libfoo-devel-*.rpm should be Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 12 months

[opensuse-packaging] how to chnage amount of make jobs in a prefered way?

by Joop Boonen

Hi All, Package poco has een enormous memory footprint while building. When building on x86_64 OBS workers the build even fails. The build is OK locally for me, due to more internal memory. The make flag is like this "make %{?_smp_mflags}" which is the preferred make for the spec file. What is the preferred way to reduce the make jobs so this package get build? Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 12 months

[opensuse-packaging] Missing Boost License

by Joop Boonen

Hi all, I've be editing package poco under Boost License: http://www.boost.org/users/license.html I see it's missing on the openSUSE license file: http://license.opensuse.org/ I wonder what the correct license for the spec file would be? Boost-1 as according to the old mapping engine? Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

8 years, 12 months

[opensuse-packaging] Package php5-pear-phpunit blocked for 24 hours

by Robert Munteanu

Hi, To enable submission to factory [1] for php5-pear-phpunit I needed to temporarily enable x86_64 building and publishing for the server:php:applications repository. I have done that and for 24 hours the package is in 'blocked' state for both architectures [2] with the blocking packages being the ones from its own repo. One of them , php5-pear-phpunit-DbUnit, has remained in a 'scheduled' state [3]. I suspect this is true for the other dependencies. Is there anything I need to do or just to wait for this to sort itself out? Thanks, Robert [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/114327 [2]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=php5-pear-phpunit&project=s… [3]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=php5-pear-phpunit-DbUnit&pr… -- Sent from my (old) computer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years

[opensuse-packaging] [reminder] openSUSE 12.2 Milestone 4 is next week

by openSUSE Roadmap Reminder

Hello all, openSUSE 12.2 Milestone 4 will be released next week, on Thursday 26 April 2012. Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday. For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see: http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap Thanks, -- openSUSE Roadmap Reminder -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years

[opensuse-packaging] registration of several UIDs and GIDs for OpenStack

by Christian Berendt

Hello. In our packages for OpenStack we create several users and groups for running the specific services. rpmlint now gives us an warning and I want to remove the message without using rpmlintrc. [...] A file in this package is owned by an unregistered user id. Please contact opensuse-packaging(a)opensuse.org to register the user. Is it possible to register the following users and groups? (We always create a user keystone with a group keystone for example.) keystone glance nova swift quantum melange Bye, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Solution Architect Tel.: +49-171-5542175 Mail: berendt(a)b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years

[opensuse-packaging] SR declined for Factory - package is disabled or does not build

by Robert Munteanu

Hi, SR #114327 [1] was declined since the package does not build against factory. However, the Factory state is 'blocked', not 'failed'. What should I do in this case - poke someone or just wait for the package to unblock by itself? Thanks, Robert [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/114327 -- Sent from my (old) computer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years

Re: [opensuse-packaging] [reminder] openSUSE 12.2 Milestone 4 is next week

by Dominique Leuenberger a.k.a DimStar

Quoting Stephan Kulow <coolo(a)suse.de>: > On 18.04.2012 12:00, openSUSE Roadmap Reminder wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> openSUSE 12.2 Milestone 4 will be released next week, on >> Thursday 26 April 2012. >> >> Please submit your packages before Friday afternoon (UTC time) to make >> sure they will get included in this release. Leaf packages submitted >> during the week-end might also get accepted on Monday. >> >> For a quick overview of the openSUSE Roadmap, please see: >> http://en.opensuse.org/Roadmap >> > I suggest we use it for a gcc47 field test. I like this idea... (obviously?) for this to be as successful as possible, though, we have to ask all package maintainers that received gcc 4.7 patches in their packages to have those fixes forwarded to Factory. For most parts I think this is fine; Likely there are some more fallouts... which we keep on chasing (or in rare exceptional cases, try to work around). I think the biggest short-coming I have seen in the 'gcc 4.7' transition 'project' was a 'compare two projects build states and list the differences' (in human english: show me all packages that failed in the gcc 4.7 staging area that did work in the non-staging area... with an average of 100 packages failing already with gcc 4.7, this would have helped several times to not look at those packages (but well, we ended up fixing some packages of that category too :) ) Best regards, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years

[opensuse-packaging] Tumbleweed x86_64 can't find installed automoc4 and libqt4.

by Marguerite Su

Hi, all, project here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=hotot&project=home%3AMargue… it was okay just a few days ago, and I don't know why it fails. in buildlog OBS has libqt4-devel and automoc4 installed, but cmake keeps telling me there's no such package. and the same spec builds successfully on i586. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

9 years

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging April 2012