Hi All,
Can anyone review
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=udev-browse&project=home%3A….
Also, where should I submit this package for further factory submission?
--
Regards
Manu Gupta
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
only very recently brp-desktop was fixed to allow desktop files
that refer to standard icons from the XDG Icon Naming Spec rather
than providing their own icons (see
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571819) and this
continues to be a problem causing fatal errors when building
packages for 12.1 and 11.4. I'm wondering how to deal with this,
I can think of several options:
* make a copy from some icon theme and provide it in hicolor (not
really viable since this can easily lead to conflicts with other
packages)
* make a copy from some icon theme and rename it to some invented
name and edit the desktop file (not nice either, diverges from
upstream and prevents theming)
* disable brp-check-suse (big hammer, probably with side effects)
Any suggestions?
--
Guido Berhoerster
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi all,
I have a build issue for SLES11 SP2.
I get:
have choice for mod_php_any needed by cacti: apache2-mod_php5
apache2-mod_php53, have choice for php-mysql needed by cacti: php5-mysql
php53-mysql, have choice for php-snmp needed by cacti: php5-snmp
php53-snmp
How can this be handled.
Basically any of there is OK.
Regards,
Joop.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
On Tuesday 10 Apr 2012 14:52:10 you wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 06:31 PM, Graham Anderson wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > I'm going to tweak a couple of locations for the third party go packages.
> > One issue I ran into while developing a package but also having it
> > installed via repos was that the go tool will build using
> > packages/sources it finds in $GOROOT in preference to anything in
> > $GOPATH.
> >
> > I will move the install location of the third party packages outside of
> > the
> > $GOROOT/pkg location and into $GOROOT/vendor, I'll update the profile env
> > vars to add the vendor dir as the last location in $GOPATH.
> >
> > $GOPATH would then look something like this:
> > GOPATH=$HOME/go:$GOROOT/vendor
> >
> > This allows anyone on hacking on a new library version in their GOPATH to
> > build using that in preference to the system installed version without the
> > inconvenience of having to manually pass paths to the compiler.
>
> Sounds like it'S worth discussing with upstream. Let's give it a try.
Sure, I wanted to ask about the Go tool anyway. Some of the behaviour was
finalised quite late on and because it's not in the spec I wanted to know if
the current behaviour with regards to $GOROOT being prioritised over $GOPATH
was going to be guaranteed going forward.
I rather suspect we will have to move the install location for third party
libs anyway. According to the plans for Go 1.1 in the last comment of this
issue:
http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=2775
>
> > package changes
> > ---------------
> >
> > I added go-mimemagic and removed go-gomagic (not updated since 7 months).
> >
> > go-socket.io doesn't seem to be developed anymore. I've fixed the current
> > version but it's only life support for anyone who was using that because
> > it
> > only works with socket.io 0.7.x, socket.io is now on 0.9+
> >
> > I added go-gtk3, gobject instrospection based bindings. needs some patches
> > there's newers methods than older suse versions have and deprecated
> > methods
> > for factory. There's actually a third gtk bindings package that offers
> > generated bindings for both gtk2 and gtk3, I guess I'll try to package
> > that
> > too and people can evaluate which one has the completed features they
> > want.
> >
> > I added go-falcore http library, some test failures on certain suse
> > versions, will investigate at some point soon since I'm using that
> > library myself.
> Cool. I wonder whether we should move Go packaging discussions to
> opensuse-packaging in the future, I know of at least two more guys that
> would be interested.
Sounds like a plan...
Go-OpenGL might need looked at. There was some talk this week on the go-nuts
list of difficulties using this since Go 1. I didn't follow the thread too
closely but the reporters might not have realised use of Go-OpenGL needs to
used with runtime.GOMAXPROCS(1) or the goroutine that invokes the GLContext
needs to be locked to the OS thread.
We should probably review and assertain the state of development of current DB
drivers as well. There are CGO wrappers for C implmentations and native
drivers. In general the CGO drivers seem to be the older ones (but not
necessarily the ones with most features or the most mature). The native SQL
drivers now finnaly seem to be coalescing round the database/sql and
database/sql/driver std library API. There are also a bunch of different NoSQL
drivers to evaluate.
There are competing drivers for MySQL, Postgres, Sqlite3, Oracle, Redis,
MongoDB, CouchDB, Kyoto Cabinet and Riak. I doubt I'll be able to evaluate
even half of these but I'm pretty sure some of the competing implementations
are bit-rotting already.
This is one area where we could certainly use an extra pair of hands ;)
Cheers the noo,
Graham
Hello,
I plan to package a small logging library (
http://algernon.github.com/libumberlog/ ). Is there a skeleton spec file
I could use to get started? Or any suggestions, which existing library
should I take as an example? At http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Packaging
I found many useful tips, but no sample I could use to get started...
Bye,
CzP
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hello, trying to address the bug reported here:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751747#c,
I ended up with a doubt.
The mentioned file is packaged in the -devel, %{_libdir}/*.settings,
together with the following binaries.
%{_bindir}/h5c++
%{_bindir}/h5cc
%{_bindir}/h5fc
Should I moved all of those, including the libhdf5.settings to the
default package?
Thanks, Filipe.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
--
=============================================
Jeremiah C. Foster エレミア フォスター
Open Source Technologist
Pelagicore AB
Ekelundsgatan 4, 6tr, SE-411 18 Gothenburg, Sweden
Mobile: +46 (0)730 93 0506
E-Mail: jeremiah.foster(a)pelagicore.com
=============================================
=== NOTE ===
The information contained in this E-mail message is
intended only for use of the individual or entity
named above. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.
=============
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi, can someone help me on how to deal with these kind of errors. I
have no idea why these files are being created and/or "globed":
error: File not found by glob:
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/netcdf-4.2-16.1.i386/usr/lib/libnetcdf_c++.so.*
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/22/b526386242b07fa9b9e50869a2b460116c0a13
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/22/b526386242b07fa9b9e50869a2b460116c0a13.debug
The full log is here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log?arch=i586&package=netcdf&…
Thanks, Filipe.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
(Apologies is this is off-topic, it was the closest mailing list I
could find for this topic)
I've started a basic build[0] for the mod_pagespeed apache module [1]
. Right now it's just a thin wrapper around the google build process
[2] which uses external libraries from its own tree rather than the
ones available on the system.
I'm going to look for ways of using the system libraries but my
knowledge of building C/C++ applications is limited, so anyone
interested is more than welcome in lending a hand :-)
Robert
[0]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=apache2-mod_pagespeed&proje…
[1]: https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/mod
[2]: http://code.google.com/p/modpagespeed/wiki/HowToBuild
--
Sent from my (old) computer
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org
Hi guys,
I am a 12.1 user. Yesterday I was trying to compile some scientific codes
(in fortran) with the option "-static". The compiler complained as it cannot
find the libbz2. I checked the installed lib and found both the libbz2-1 and
libbz2-devel are installed. But none of them includes the static lib I need.
The repositories I use includes
openSUSE-12.1-Non-Oss
openSUSE-12.1-Oss
openSUSE-12.1-Source
Updates for openSUSE 12.1 12.1-1.4
opensuse-education-i586
Both of them are from the http://download.opensuse.org domain.
Currently I walk around the problem by deleting the "-static" option in the
Makefile. The code runs fine. But I still wandering where I can find the
static lib? Or the only way is compiling from source code by myself?
Good luck
Y. Zhang
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org