openSUSE Packaging April 2019

packaging@lists.opensuse.org

19 participants
13 discussions

[opensuse-packaging] Missing rubygem-rake dependency

by Larry Dewey

Hey everyone, I am trying to build libguestfs locally using osc, but am receiving the following error: buildinfo is broken... it says: unresolvable: nothing provides rubygem-rake I can fix the build by switching the rubygem-rake dependency to: ruby2.6-rubygem-rake-12_0 However, I know this package changes versions often, and I am not sure if there is a better way to handle this problem. Any insights on how to solve this would be greatly appreaciated! Thanks,-- Larry Dewey Software Engineer - Virtualization Specialist SUSE 1800 Novell Place (P)+1 801.861.7605 ldewey(a)suse.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 6 months

[opensuse-packaging] I need help with library naming conventions.

by Dave Plater

Hi, I have a package containing /usr/lib64/libcsound64.so.6.0 and: SONAME libcsound64.so.6.0 from what I can gather it's package should be called "libcsound64-6_0" but rpmlint doesn't like it. Do I have to put an underscore between the 6 and the 4? Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 years, 6 months

[opensuse-packaging] How to deal with plugin files (.so)?

by John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Hello! I am updating the bochs emulator package from the Emulators project as a small exercise. The emulator now ships with plugin files which rpmlint recognizes as development files and complains about them: [ 42s] bochs.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/bochs/plugins/libbx_acpi.so [ 42s] bochs.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/bochs/plugins/libbx_biosdev.so [ 42s] bochs.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/bochs/plugins/libbx_cmos.so (...) [ 42s] bochs.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/bochs/plugins/libbx_vga.so [ 42s] bochs.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/bochs/plugins/libbx_x.so [ 42s] A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is [ 42s] included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages. Can anyone tell me what the proper way of handling plugins in an RPM package is? Should I move these files into a separate -plugin package? Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:glaubitz:branches:Emulators/bo… N��r��y隊Z)z{.��ZrF��x>�{.n�+��Ǩ��r��i�m��0��ޙ��$j��0��Ǩ�

2 years, 6 months

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

openSUSE Packaging April 2019